Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review

It is anticipated that the decarbonisation of the entire energy system will require the introduction of large shares of variable renewable electricity generation into the power system. Long term integrated energy systems models are useful in improving our understanding of decarbonisation but they st...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017-09, Vol.76, p.839-856
Hauptverfasser: Collins, Seán, Deane, John Paul, Poncelet, Kris, Panos, Evangelos, Pietzcker, Robert C, Delarue, Erik, Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 856
container_issue
container_start_page 839
container_title Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews
container_volume 76
creator Collins, Seán
Deane, John Paul
Poncelet, Kris
Panos, Evangelos
Pietzcker, Robert C
Delarue, Erik
Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig
description It is anticipated that the decarbonisation of the entire energy system will require the introduction of large shares of variable renewable electricity generation into the power system. Long term integrated energy systems models are useful in improving our understanding of decarbonisation but they struggle to take account of short term variations in the power system associated with increased variable renewable energy penetration. This can oversimplify the ability of power systems to accommodate variable renewables and result in mistaken signals regarding the levels of flexibility required in power systems. Capturing power system impacts of variability within integrated energy system models is challenging due to temporal and technical simplifying assumptions needed to make such models computationally manageable. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by reviewing prominent methodologies that have been applied to address this challenge and the advantages & limitations of each. The methods include soft linking between integrated energy systems models and power systems models and improving the temporal and technical representation of power systems within integrated energy systems models. Each methodology covered approaches the integration of short term variations and assesses the flexibility of the system differently. The strengths, limitations, and applicability of these different methodologies are analysed. This review allows users of integrated energy systems models to select a methodology (or combination of methodologies) to suit their needs. In addition, the analysis identifies remaining gaps and shortcomings.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_579187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_579187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5791873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjr1Ow0AQhK8gUn7fYTsKFMnni2MnXYRA0Ke3TvbaPjjfWrcbh7x9AoKeNDPSzDfSPKiZNtvNOjGpnqo580eS6KzIzUzxexBsoxUXWuCOooBg7GG00d1CCgzUgHQIA50xAl9YsAcXhL7lZ4o1YMDYXv7anmr0vIcD9Cgd1eSpdZX1EHF0eF6qSWM94-rXF-rx9eX4_Lb-PHk8jRjKmgdbYalTs8m2ebErs3ynb3_vIZ_-R5byJeYKXt5bNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Collins, Seán ; Deane, John Paul ; Poncelet, Kris ; Panos, Evangelos ; Pietzcker, Robert C ; Delarue, Erik ; Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig</creator><creatorcontrib>Collins, Seán ; Deane, John Paul ; Poncelet, Kris ; Panos, Evangelos ; Pietzcker, Robert C ; Delarue, Erik ; Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig</creatorcontrib><description>It is anticipated that the decarbonisation of the entire energy system will require the introduction of large shares of variable renewable electricity generation into the power system. Long term integrated energy systems models are useful in improving our understanding of decarbonisation but they struggle to take account of short term variations in the power system associated with increased variable renewable energy penetration. This can oversimplify the ability of power systems to accommodate variable renewables and result in mistaken signals regarding the levels of flexibility required in power systems. Capturing power system impacts of variability within integrated energy system models is challenging due to temporal and technical simplifying assumptions needed to make such models computationally manageable. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by reviewing prominent methodologies that have been applied to address this challenge and the advantages &amp; limitations of each. The methods include soft linking between integrated energy systems models and power systems models and improving the temporal and technical representation of power systems within integrated energy systems models. Each methodology covered approaches the integration of short term variations and assesses the flexibility of the system differently. The strengths, limitations, and applicability of these different methodologies are analysed. This review allows users of integrated energy systems models to select a methodology (or combination of methodologies) to suit their needs. In addition, the analysis identifies remaining gaps and shortcomings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-0321</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Science</publisher><ispartof>Renewable &amp; Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017-09, Vol.76, p.839-856</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27860</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Collins, Seán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deane, John Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poncelet, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panos, Evangelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietzcker, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delarue, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review</title><title>Renewable &amp; Sustainable Energy Reviews</title><description>It is anticipated that the decarbonisation of the entire energy system will require the introduction of large shares of variable renewable electricity generation into the power system. Long term integrated energy systems models are useful in improving our understanding of decarbonisation but they struggle to take account of short term variations in the power system associated with increased variable renewable energy penetration. This can oversimplify the ability of power systems to accommodate variable renewables and result in mistaken signals regarding the levels of flexibility required in power systems. Capturing power system impacts of variability within integrated energy system models is challenging due to temporal and technical simplifying assumptions needed to make such models computationally manageable. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by reviewing prominent methodologies that have been applied to address this challenge and the advantages &amp; limitations of each. The methods include soft linking between integrated energy systems models and power systems models and improving the temporal and technical representation of power systems within integrated energy systems models. Each methodology covered approaches the integration of short term variations and assesses the flexibility of the system differently. The strengths, limitations, and applicability of these different methodologies are analysed. This review allows users of integrated energy systems models to select a methodology (or combination of methodologies) to suit their needs. In addition, the analysis identifies remaining gaps and shortcomings.</description><issn>1364-0321</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVjr1Ow0AQhK8gUn7fYTsKFMnni2MnXYRA0Ke3TvbaPjjfWrcbh7x9AoKeNDPSzDfSPKiZNtvNOjGpnqo580eS6KzIzUzxexBsoxUXWuCOooBg7GG00d1CCgzUgHQIA50xAl9YsAcXhL7lZ4o1YMDYXv7anmr0vIcD9Cgd1eSpdZX1EHF0eF6qSWM94-rXF-rx9eX4_Lb-PHk8jRjKmgdbYalTs8m2ebErs3ynb3_vIZ_-R5byJeYKXt5bNw</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Collins, Seán</creator><creator>Deane, John Paul</creator><creator>Poncelet, Kris</creator><creator>Panos, Evangelos</creator><creator>Pietzcker, Robert C</creator><creator>Delarue, Erik</creator><creator>Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig</creator><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review</title><author>Collins, Seán ; Deane, John Paul ; Poncelet, Kris ; Panos, Evangelos ; Pietzcker, Robert C ; Delarue, Erik ; Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5791873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Collins, Seán</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deane, John Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poncelet, Kris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panos, Evangelos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pietzcker, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delarue, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Renewable &amp; Sustainable Energy Reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Collins, Seán</au><au>Deane, John Paul</au><au>Poncelet, Kris</au><au>Panos, Evangelos</au><au>Pietzcker, Robert C</au><au>Delarue, Erik</au><au>Ó Gallachóir, Brian Pádraig</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review</atitle><jtitle>Renewable &amp; Sustainable Energy Reviews</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>76</volume><spage>839</spage><epage>856</epage><pages>839-856</pages><issn>1364-0321</issn><abstract>It is anticipated that the decarbonisation of the entire energy system will require the introduction of large shares of variable renewable electricity generation into the power system. Long term integrated energy systems models are useful in improving our understanding of decarbonisation but they struggle to take account of short term variations in the power system associated with increased variable renewable energy penetration. This can oversimplify the ability of power systems to accommodate variable renewables and result in mistaken signals regarding the levels of flexibility required in power systems. Capturing power system impacts of variability within integrated energy system models is challenging due to temporal and technical simplifying assumptions needed to make such models computationally manageable. This paper addresses a gap in the literature by reviewing prominent methodologies that have been applied to address this challenge and the advantages &amp; limitations of each. The methods include soft linking between integrated energy systems models and power systems models and improving the temporal and technical representation of power systems within integrated energy systems models. Each methodology covered approaches the integration of short term variations and assesses the flexibility of the system differently. The strengths, limitations, and applicability of these different methodologies are analysed. This review allows users of integrated energy systems models to select a methodology (or combination of methodologies) to suit their needs. In addition, the analysis identifies remaining gaps and shortcomings.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Science</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-0321
ispartof Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017-09, Vol.76, p.839-856
issn 1364-0321
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_579187
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
title Integrating short term variations of the power system into integrated energy system models: A methodological review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A38%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20short%20term%20variations%20of%20the%20power%20system%20into%20integrated%20energy%20system%20models:%20A%20methodological%20review&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20&%20Sustainable%20Energy%20Reviews&rft.au=Collins,%20Se%C3%A1n&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=76&rft.spage=839&rft.epage=856&rft.pages=839-856&rft.issn=1364-0321&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_579187%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true