Ergometer-cycling with strict versus minimal contact supervision among the oldest adults: A cluster-randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and short- and long-term effects of two 10-wk structured ergometer-cycling programs among elderly in assisted-living residences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eight assisted-living residences (N=95; age=81.2±5.9years) were randomly assigned to one of three...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS 2017-05, Vol.70, p.112-122
Hauptverfasser: Van Roie, Evelien, Martien, Sofie, Hurkmans, Emalie, Pelssers, Johan, Seghers, Jan, Boen, Filip, Delecluse, Christophe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue
container_start_page 112
container_title ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
container_volume 70
creator Van Roie, Evelien
Martien, Sofie
Hurkmans, Emalie
Pelssers, Johan
Seghers, Jan
Boen, Filip
Delecluse, Christophe
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and short- and long-term effects of two 10-wk structured ergometer-cycling programs among elderly in assisted-living residences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eight assisted-living residences (N=95; age=81.2±5.9years) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 1) ergometer-cycling with strict coach-supervision (STRICT, N=3; n=35); 2) ergometer-cycling with autonomy-supportive minimal contact coach-supervision (AUT; N=3; n=36); or 3) control condition (CON; N=2, n=24). INTERVENTION: Three-weekly progressive ergometer-cycling sessions for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, physical activity (PA), muscular strength, functional performance and quality of life (baseline, post-intervention (10weeks) and 6-month follow-up). RESULTS: 83 participants were analyzed post-intervention, 75 at follow-up. Adherence was higher in STRICT than AUT during the intervention (p=0.001), but not during follow-up. Compared with CON, both programs showed positive short- and long-term effects on moderate-intensity PA (p=0.034). With regard to strength, functional performance and well-being, no time-by-group interaction effects were found. When comparing high-adherers (adherence≥80%) to low-adherers, a greater increase in functional performance and in well-being and a trend towards a lower decrease in strength were found in the short-term (p=0.047, p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_567916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_567916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5679163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVTctOwzAQ9AEkyuMf9sYBRXKakJLeqqqID-AeWfbSGtZ25V2HcuLXMYgPgMvMaDSPM7XQ7bBq-rHvLtQl86vWutfLYaE-d3mfAgrmxn5Y8nEP714OwJK9FZgxc2EIPvpgCGyKYqrN5Yh59uxTBBNSLckBIZFDFjCukPAaNmCp8PdyNtGl4Bndz0JORFXWB0PX6vzFEOPNL1-p28fd8_apeSuEZcY4OT4ai1O77Pr7YfUwThXHduj-k7z7W3KSk3RfoslgCA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ergometer-cycling with strict versus minimal contact supervision among the oldest adults: A cluster-randomised controlled trial</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Van Roie, Evelien ; Martien, Sofie ; Hurkmans, Emalie ; Pelssers, Johan ; Seghers, Jan ; Boen, Filip ; Delecluse, Christophe</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Roie, Evelien ; Martien, Sofie ; Hurkmans, Emalie ; Pelssers, Johan ; Seghers, Jan ; Boen, Filip ; Delecluse, Christophe</creatorcontrib><description>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and short- and long-term effects of two 10-wk structured ergometer-cycling programs among elderly in assisted-living residences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eight assisted-living residences (N=95; age=81.2±5.9years) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 1) ergometer-cycling with strict coach-supervision (STRICT, N=3; n=35); 2) ergometer-cycling with autonomy-supportive minimal contact coach-supervision (AUT; N=3; n=36); or 3) control condition (CON; N=2, n=24). INTERVENTION: Three-weekly progressive ergometer-cycling sessions for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, physical activity (PA), muscular strength, functional performance and quality of life (baseline, post-intervention (10weeks) and 6-month follow-up). RESULTS: 83 participants were analyzed post-intervention, 75 at follow-up. Adherence was higher in STRICT than AUT during the intervention (p=0.001), but not during follow-up. Compared with CON, both programs showed positive short- and long-term effects on moderate-intensity PA (p=0.034). With regard to strength, functional performance and well-being, no time-by-group interaction effects were found. When comparing high-adherers (adherence≥80%) to low-adherers, a greater increase in functional performance and in well-being and a trend towards a lower decrease in strength were found in the short-term (p=0.047, p&lt;0.001 and p=0.054, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both interventions were feasible and equally effective to increase long-term engagement in PA, irrespective of the type of supervision. When adherence is high, positive effects on strength, performance and well-being can be expected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4943</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD</publisher><ispartof>ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2017-05, Vol.70, p.112-122</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27851</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Roie, Evelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martien, Sofie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurkmans, Emalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelssers, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seghers, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boen, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delecluse, Christophe</creatorcontrib><title>Ergometer-cycling with strict versus minimal contact supervision among the oldest adults: A cluster-randomised controlled trial</title><title>ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS</title><description>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and short- and long-term effects of two 10-wk structured ergometer-cycling programs among elderly in assisted-living residences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eight assisted-living residences (N=95; age=81.2±5.9years) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 1) ergometer-cycling with strict coach-supervision (STRICT, N=3; n=35); 2) ergometer-cycling with autonomy-supportive minimal contact coach-supervision (AUT; N=3; n=36); or 3) control condition (CON; N=2, n=24). INTERVENTION: Three-weekly progressive ergometer-cycling sessions for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, physical activity (PA), muscular strength, functional performance and quality of life (baseline, post-intervention (10weeks) and 6-month follow-up). RESULTS: 83 participants were analyzed post-intervention, 75 at follow-up. Adherence was higher in STRICT than AUT during the intervention (p=0.001), but not during follow-up. Compared with CON, both programs showed positive short- and long-term effects on moderate-intensity PA (p=0.034). With regard to strength, functional performance and well-being, no time-by-group interaction effects were found. When comparing high-adherers (adherence≥80%) to low-adherers, a greater increase in functional performance and in well-being and a trend towards a lower decrease in strength were found in the short-term (p=0.047, p&lt;0.001 and p=0.054, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both interventions were feasible and equally effective to increase long-term engagement in PA, irrespective of the type of supervision. When adherence is high, positive effects on strength, performance and well-being can be expected.</description><issn>0167-4943</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqVTctOwzAQ9AEkyuMf9sYBRXKakJLeqqqID-AeWfbSGtZ25V2HcuLXMYgPgMvMaDSPM7XQ7bBq-rHvLtQl86vWutfLYaE-d3mfAgrmxn5Y8nEP714OwJK9FZgxc2EIPvpgCGyKYqrN5Yh59uxTBBNSLckBIZFDFjCukPAaNmCp8PdyNtGl4Bndz0JORFXWB0PX6vzFEOPNL1-p28fd8_apeSuEZcY4OT4ai1O77Pr7YfUwThXHduj-k7z7W3KSk3RfoslgCA</recordid><startdate>20170501</startdate><enddate>20170501</enddate><creator>Van Roie, Evelien</creator><creator>Martien, Sofie</creator><creator>Hurkmans, Emalie</creator><creator>Pelssers, Johan</creator><creator>Seghers, Jan</creator><creator>Boen, Filip</creator><creator>Delecluse, Christophe</creator><general>ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170501</creationdate><title>Ergometer-cycling with strict versus minimal contact supervision among the oldest adults: A cluster-randomised controlled trial</title><author>Van Roie, Evelien ; Martien, Sofie ; Hurkmans, Emalie ; Pelssers, Johan ; Seghers, Jan ; Boen, Filip ; Delecluse, Christophe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5679163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Roie, Evelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martien, Sofie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurkmans, Emalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelssers, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seghers, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boen, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delecluse, Christophe</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Roie, Evelien</au><au>Martien, Sofie</au><au>Hurkmans, Emalie</au><au>Pelssers, Johan</au><au>Seghers, Jan</au><au>Boen, Filip</au><au>Delecluse, Christophe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ergometer-cycling with strict versus minimal contact supervision among the oldest adults: A cluster-randomised controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS</jtitle><date>2017-05-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>70</volume><spage>112</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>112-122</pages><issn>0167-4943</issn><abstract>OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and short- and long-term effects of two 10-wk structured ergometer-cycling programs among elderly in assisted-living residences. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Eight assisted-living residences (N=95; age=81.2±5.9years) were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: 1) ergometer-cycling with strict coach-supervision (STRICT, N=3; n=35); 2) ergometer-cycling with autonomy-supportive minimal contact coach-supervision (AUT; N=3; n=36); or 3) control condition (CON; N=2, n=24). INTERVENTION: Three-weekly progressive ergometer-cycling sessions for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility, physical activity (PA), muscular strength, functional performance and quality of life (baseline, post-intervention (10weeks) and 6-month follow-up). RESULTS: 83 participants were analyzed post-intervention, 75 at follow-up. Adherence was higher in STRICT than AUT during the intervention (p=0.001), but not during follow-up. Compared with CON, both programs showed positive short- and long-term effects on moderate-intensity PA (p=0.034). With regard to strength, functional performance and well-being, no time-by-group interaction effects were found. When comparing high-adherers (adherence≥80%) to low-adherers, a greater increase in functional performance and in well-being and a trend towards a lower decrease in strength were found in the short-term (p=0.047, p&lt;0.001 and p=0.054, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both interventions were feasible and equally effective to increase long-term engagement in PA, irrespective of the type of supervision. When adherence is high, positive effects on strength, performance and well-being can be expected.</abstract><pub>ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4943
ispartof ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2017-05, Vol.70, p.112-122
issn 0167-4943
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_567916
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
title Ergometer-cycling with strict versus minimal contact supervision among the oldest adults: A cluster-randomised controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T17%3A46%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ergometer-cycling%20with%20strict%20versus%20minimal%20contact%20supervision%20among%20the%20oldest%20adults:%20A%20cluster-randomised%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=ARCHIVES%20OF%20GERONTOLOGY%20AND%20GERIATRICS&rft.au=Van%20Roie,%20Evelien&rft.date=2017-05-01&rft.volume=70&rft.spage=112&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=112-122&rft.issn=0167-4943&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_567916%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true