A principled approach to defining actual causation

In this paper we present a new proposal for defining actual causation, i.e., the problem of deciding if one event caused another. We do so within the popular counterfactual tradition initiated by Lewis, which is characterised by attributing a fundamental role to counterfactual dependence. Unlike the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Synthese: an International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 2016, Vol.195 (2), p.835-862
Hauptverfasser: Beckers, Sander, Vennekens, Joost
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 862
container_issue 2
container_start_page 835
container_title Synthese: an International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science
container_volume 195
creator Beckers, Sander
Vennekens, Joost
description In this paper we present a new proposal for defining actual causation, i.e., the problem of deciding if one event caused another. We do so within the popular counterfactual tradition initiated by Lewis, which is characterised by attributing a fundamental role to counterfactual dependence. Unlike the currently prominent definitions, our approach proceeds from the ground up: we start from basic principles, and construct a definition of causation that satisfies them. We define the concepts of counterfactual dependence and production, and put forward principles such that dependence is an unnecessary but sufficient condition for causation, whereas production is an insufficient but necessary condition. The resulting definition of causation is a suitable compromise between dependence and production. Every principle is introduced by means of a paradigmatic example of causation. We illustrate some of the benefits of our approach with two examples that have spelled trouble for other accounts. We make all of this formally precise using structural equations, which we extend with a timing over all events.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_555278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_555278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5552783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzDEOwiAYQGEGTazVO7A5mCZQSqGjMRoP4E7-AFWUUFLAeHwXD9DpLV_eClWEsKERkosN2qb0IoTSviMVak84zi5oF701GGKcJ9BPnCds7OiCCw8MOhfwWENJkN0Udmg9gk92_2-NDtfL_Xxr3sXb8rFBmRRBW0Vb1vFeyEFxzlshWY2Oy6TK38yWf3-kcEH3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A principled approach to defining actual causation</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Beckers, Sander ; Vennekens, Joost</creator><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Sander ; Vennekens, Joost</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we present a new proposal for defining actual causation, i.e., the problem of deciding if one event caused another. We do so within the popular counterfactual tradition initiated by Lewis, which is characterised by attributing a fundamental role to counterfactual dependence. Unlike the currently prominent definitions, our approach proceeds from the ground up: we start from basic principles, and construct a definition of causation that satisfies them. We define the concepts of counterfactual dependence and production, and put forward principles such that dependence is an unnecessary but sufficient condition for causation, whereas production is an insufficient but necessary condition. The resulting definition of causation is a suitable compromise between dependence and production. Every principle is introduced by means of a paradigmatic example of causation. We illustrate some of the benefits of our approach with two examples that have spelled trouble for other accounts. We make all of this formally precise using structural equations, which we extend with a timing over all events.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer</publisher><ispartof>Synthese: an International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 2016, Vol.195 (2), p.835-862</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,4024,27860</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Sander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vennekens, Joost</creatorcontrib><title>A principled approach to defining actual causation</title><title>Synthese: an International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science</title><description>In this paper we present a new proposal for defining actual causation, i.e., the problem of deciding if one event caused another. We do so within the popular counterfactual tradition initiated by Lewis, which is characterised by attributing a fundamental role to counterfactual dependence. Unlike the currently prominent definitions, our approach proceeds from the ground up: we start from basic principles, and construct a definition of causation that satisfies them. We define the concepts of counterfactual dependence and production, and put forward principles such that dependence is an unnecessary but sufficient condition for causation, whereas production is an insufficient but necessary condition. The resulting definition of causation is a suitable compromise between dependence and production. Every principle is introduced by means of a paradigmatic example of causation. We illustrate some of the benefits of our approach with two examples that have spelled trouble for other accounts. We make all of this formally precise using structural equations, which we extend with a timing over all events.</description><issn>0039-7857</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzDEOwiAYQGEGTazVO7A5mCZQSqGjMRoP4E7-AFWUUFLAeHwXD9DpLV_eClWEsKERkosN2qb0IoTSviMVak84zi5oF701GGKcJ9BPnCds7OiCCw8MOhfwWENJkN0Udmg9gk92_2-NDtfL_Xxr3sXb8rFBmRRBW0Vb1vFeyEFxzlshWY2Oy6TK38yWf3-kcEH3</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Beckers, Sander</creator><creator>Vennekens, Joost</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>A principled approach to defining actual causation</title><author>Beckers, Sander ; Vennekens, Joost</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5552783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beckers, Sander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vennekens, Joost</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Synthese: an International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beckers, Sander</au><au>Vennekens, Joost</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A principled approach to defining actual causation</atitle><jtitle>Synthese: an International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science</jtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>835</spage><epage>862</epage><pages>835-862</pages><issn>0039-7857</issn><abstract>In this paper we present a new proposal for defining actual causation, i.e., the problem of deciding if one event caused another. We do so within the popular counterfactual tradition initiated by Lewis, which is characterised by attributing a fundamental role to counterfactual dependence. Unlike the currently prominent definitions, our approach proceeds from the ground up: we start from basic principles, and construct a definition of causation that satisfies them. We define the concepts of counterfactual dependence and production, and put forward principles such that dependence is an unnecessary but sufficient condition for causation, whereas production is an insufficient but necessary condition. The resulting definition of causation is a suitable compromise between dependence and production. Every principle is introduced by means of a paradigmatic example of causation. We illustrate some of the benefits of our approach with two examples that have spelled trouble for other accounts. We make all of this formally precise using structural equations, which we extend with a timing over all events.</abstract><pub>Springer</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-7857
ispartof Synthese: an International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, 2016, Vol.195 (2), p.835-862
issn 0039-7857
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_555278
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); SpringerLink Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
title A principled approach to defining actual causation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A50%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20principled%20approach%20to%20defining%20actual%20causation&rft.jtitle=Synthese:%20an%20International%20Journal%20for%20Epistemology,%20Methodology%20and%20Philosophy%20of%20Science&rft.au=Beckers,%20Sander&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=835&rft.epage=862&rft.pages=835-862&rft.issn=0039-7857&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_555278%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true