Third Reich Cinema and Film Theory

© 2016 IAMHIST & Taylor & Francis. In the Third Reich, theoretical discourse was rarely presented out of genuine epistemological interest. It was rather linked to national objectives in the service of National Socialism. The same can be said about the realm of film: theoretical engagement wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television Radio and Television, 2016-06, Vol.36 (2), p.190-213
Hauptverfasser: Hochscherf, Tobias, Vande Winkel, Roel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 213
container_issue 2
container_start_page 190
container_title Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television
container_volume 36
creator Hochscherf, Tobias
Vande Winkel, Roel
description © 2016 IAMHIST & Taylor & Francis. In the Third Reich, theoretical discourse was rarely presented out of genuine epistemological interest. It was rather linked to national objectives in the service of National Socialism. The same can be said about the realm of film: theoretical engagement with cinema (at the time often referred to as film 'dramaturgy') was situated at the crossroads of art, technology, ideology and economy. This article investigates how it was especially the duality between profit and propaganda that informed film theory and criticism during the Nazi years in Germany. In so doing, it goes beyond the role of Goebbels and his Propaganda Ministry by drawing attention to a new generation of authors who fundamentally shaped discourses on film. Our investigation in particular concentrates on the writings by Hans Traub, Gunter Groll, Bruno Rehlinger, Fritz Hippler, Peter von Werder, Leonhard Fürst, Wolfgang Liebeneiner, Frank Maraun and Hans Weidemann. It was not only through monographs or articles in high-profile trade journals that they played a significant role, but also by way of their ability to occupy key positions within the German film industry. They were able to firmly position themselves between theory and practice by maintaining professional networks that warrant closer scrutiny. Our article demonstrates that their call for an 'applied theory' - that is a theoretical apparatus that could be developed into codes of practice able to help reducing the risk of film projects to fail - was inherently problematic. Theorising as an intellectual process was ultimately limited within the confines of a totalitarian state. The article shows to what extent film theory in Nazi Germany semantically reconfigured existing theoretical ideas that can be traced back to Weimar Germany and to theorists of Jewish origin such as Béla Balázs in line with the ideological and commercial imperatives of those in power.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven_FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_536084</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_536084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5360843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDQx1rU0szDlYOAqLs4yAAJjA0tOBqWQjMyiFIWg1MzkDAXnzLzU3ESFxLwUBbfMnFyFkIzU_KJKHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoO7mGuLsoZtdmpNaWpaaF59SXJCYnBpvaGRsYmpmbmEZb2psZmBhYszNoE2cyviSihJj4s0FAFVMOvo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Third Reich Cinema and Film Theory</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><creator>Hochscherf, Tobias ; Vande Winkel, Roel</creator><creatorcontrib>Hochscherf, Tobias ; Vande Winkel, Roel</creatorcontrib><description>© 2016 IAMHIST &amp; Taylor &amp; Francis. In the Third Reich, theoretical discourse was rarely presented out of genuine epistemological interest. It was rather linked to national objectives in the service of National Socialism. The same can be said about the realm of film: theoretical engagement with cinema (at the time often referred to as film 'dramaturgy') was situated at the crossroads of art, technology, ideology and economy. This article investigates how it was especially the duality between profit and propaganda that informed film theory and criticism during the Nazi years in Germany. In so doing, it goes beyond the role of Goebbels and his Propaganda Ministry by drawing attention to a new generation of authors who fundamentally shaped discourses on film. Our investigation in particular concentrates on the writings by Hans Traub, Gunter Groll, Bruno Rehlinger, Fritz Hippler, Peter von Werder, Leonhard Fürst, Wolfgang Liebeneiner, Frank Maraun and Hans Weidemann. It was not only through monographs or articles in high-profile trade journals that they played a significant role, but also by way of their ability to occupy key positions within the German film industry. They were able to firmly position themselves between theory and practice by maintaining professional networks that warrant closer scrutiny. Our article demonstrates that their call for an 'applied theory' - that is a theoretical apparatus that could be developed into codes of practice able to help reducing the risk of film projects to fail - was inherently problematic. Theorising as an intellectual process was ultimately limited within the confines of a totalitarian state. The article shows to what extent film theory in Nazi Germany semantically reconfigured existing theoretical ideas that can be traced back to Weimar Germany and to theorists of Jewish origin such as Béla Balázs in line with the ideological and commercial imperatives of those in power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-9685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Carfax Publishing Co</publisher><ispartof>Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 2016-06, Vol.36 (2), p.190-213</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,776,27837</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/536084$$EView_record_in_KU_Leuven_Association$$FView_record_in_$$GKU_Leuven_Association</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hochscherf, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vande Winkel, Roel</creatorcontrib><title>Third Reich Cinema and Film Theory</title><title>Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television</title><description>© 2016 IAMHIST &amp; Taylor &amp; Francis. In the Third Reich, theoretical discourse was rarely presented out of genuine epistemological interest. It was rather linked to national objectives in the service of National Socialism. The same can be said about the realm of film: theoretical engagement with cinema (at the time often referred to as film 'dramaturgy') was situated at the crossroads of art, technology, ideology and economy. This article investigates how it was especially the duality between profit and propaganda that informed film theory and criticism during the Nazi years in Germany. In so doing, it goes beyond the role of Goebbels and his Propaganda Ministry by drawing attention to a new generation of authors who fundamentally shaped discourses on film. Our investigation in particular concentrates on the writings by Hans Traub, Gunter Groll, Bruno Rehlinger, Fritz Hippler, Peter von Werder, Leonhard Fürst, Wolfgang Liebeneiner, Frank Maraun and Hans Weidemann. It was not only through monographs or articles in high-profile trade journals that they played a significant role, but also by way of their ability to occupy key positions within the German film industry. They were able to firmly position themselves between theory and practice by maintaining professional networks that warrant closer scrutiny. Our article demonstrates that their call for an 'applied theory' - that is a theoretical apparatus that could be developed into codes of practice able to help reducing the risk of film projects to fail - was inherently problematic. Theorising as an intellectual process was ultimately limited within the confines of a totalitarian state. The article shows to what extent film theory in Nazi Germany semantically reconfigured existing theoretical ideas that can be traced back to Weimar Germany and to theorists of Jewish origin such as Béla Balázs in line with the ideological and commercial imperatives of those in power.</description><issn>0143-9685</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDQx1rU0szDlYOAqLs4yAAJjA0tOBqWQjMyiFIWg1MzkDAXnzLzU3ESFxLwUBbfMnFyFkIzU_KJKHgbWtMSc4lReKM3NoO7mGuLsoZtdmpNaWpaaF59SXJCYnBpvaGRsYmpmbmEZb2psZmBhYszNoE2cyviSihJj4s0FAFVMOvo</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Hochscherf, Tobias</creator><creator>Vande Winkel, Roel</creator><general>Carfax Publishing Co</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Third Reich Cinema and Film Theory</title><author>Hochscherf, Tobias ; Vande Winkel, Roel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5360843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hochscherf, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vande Winkel, Roel</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hochscherf, Tobias</au><au>Vande Winkel, Roel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Third Reich Cinema and Film Theory</atitle><jtitle>Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television</jtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>190</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>190-213</pages><issn>0143-9685</issn><abstract>© 2016 IAMHIST &amp; Taylor &amp; Francis. In the Third Reich, theoretical discourse was rarely presented out of genuine epistemological interest. It was rather linked to national objectives in the service of National Socialism. The same can be said about the realm of film: theoretical engagement with cinema (at the time often referred to as film 'dramaturgy') was situated at the crossroads of art, technology, ideology and economy. This article investigates how it was especially the duality between profit and propaganda that informed film theory and criticism during the Nazi years in Germany. In so doing, it goes beyond the role of Goebbels and his Propaganda Ministry by drawing attention to a new generation of authors who fundamentally shaped discourses on film. Our investigation in particular concentrates on the writings by Hans Traub, Gunter Groll, Bruno Rehlinger, Fritz Hippler, Peter von Werder, Leonhard Fürst, Wolfgang Liebeneiner, Frank Maraun and Hans Weidemann. It was not only through monographs or articles in high-profile trade journals that they played a significant role, but also by way of their ability to occupy key positions within the German film industry. They were able to firmly position themselves between theory and practice by maintaining professional networks that warrant closer scrutiny. Our article demonstrates that their call for an 'applied theory' - that is a theoretical apparatus that could be developed into codes of practice able to help reducing the risk of film projects to fail - was inherently problematic. Theorising as an intellectual process was ultimately limited within the confines of a totalitarian state. The article shows to what extent film theory in Nazi Germany semantically reconfigured existing theoretical ideas that can be traced back to Weimar Germany and to theorists of Jewish origin such as Béla Balázs in line with the ideological and commercial imperatives of those in power.</abstract><pub>Carfax Publishing Co</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0143-9685
ispartof Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 2016-06, Vol.36 (2), p.190-213
issn 0143-9685
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_536084
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association)
title Third Reich Cinema and Film Theory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T05%3A34%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven_FZOIL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Third%20Reich%20Cinema%20and%20Film%20Theory&rft.jtitle=Historical%20Journal%20of%20Film,%20Radio%20and%20Television&rft.au=Hochscherf,%20Tobias&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=190&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=190-213&rft.issn=0143-9685&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven_FZOIL%3E123456789_536084%3C/kuleuven_FZOIL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true