Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity

The radiation risk in mammography is traditionally evaluated using the average glandular dose. This quantity for the average breast has proven to be useful for population statistics and to compare exposure techniques and systems. However it is not indicating the individual radiation risk based on th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2015-07, Vol.165 (1), p.342-5
Hauptverfasser: Geeraert, N, Klausz, R, Muller, S, Bloch, I, Bosmans, Hilde
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5
container_issue 1
container_start_page 342
container_title Radiation Protection Dosimetry
container_volume 165
creator Geeraert, N
Klausz, R
Muller, S
Bloch, I
Bosmans, Hilde
description The radiation risk in mammography is traditionally evaluated using the average glandular dose. This quantity for the average breast has proven to be useful for population statistics and to compare exposure techniques and systems. However it is not indicating the individual radiation risk based on the individual glandular amount and distribution. Simulations of exposures were performed for six appropriate virtual phantoms with varying glandular amount and distribution. The individualised average glandular dose (iAGD), i.e. the individual glandular absorbed energy divided by the mass of the gland, and the glandular imparted energy (GIE), i.e. the glandular absorbed energy, were computed. Both quantities were evaluated for their capability to take into account the glandular amount and distribution. As expected, the results have demonstrated that iAGD reflects only the distribution, while GIE reflects both the glandular amount and distribution. Therefore GIE is a good candidate for individual radiation risk assessment.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_528526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_528526</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5285263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzEsOgjAUheEONPG5hztzYEiwFEWnRuMCnJMbuWK1tNgHyu5F4gIcnZzkyz9g43glRJQJHo_YxLl7HPPNNhVj9jg0qAJ6aTSYK9C7Ni5YAqmhwqoypcX61u5AyUr6nrmvw4YslgSlQl0EhRYK4wi6A7U1XQNVz0DTC54BtZe-nbHhFZWj-W-nbHE8nPen6BEUhYZ0XrgaL5SveCLS9Sbb5inPUr5Opmz5n8z92yf_dz_ogVeh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Geeraert, N ; Klausz, R ; Muller, S ; Bloch, I ; Bosmans, Hilde</creator><creatorcontrib>Geeraert, N ; Klausz, R ; Muller, S ; Bloch, I ; Bosmans, Hilde</creatorcontrib><description>The radiation risk in mammography is traditionally evaluated using the average glandular dose. This quantity for the average breast has proven to be useful for population statistics and to compare exposure techniques and systems. However it is not indicating the individual radiation risk based on the individual glandular amount and distribution. Simulations of exposures were performed for six appropriate virtual phantoms with varying glandular amount and distribution. The individualised average glandular dose (iAGD), i.e. the individual glandular absorbed energy divided by the mass of the gland, and the glandular imparted energy (GIE), i.e. the glandular absorbed energy, were computed. Both quantities were evaluated for their capability to take into account the glandular amount and distribution. As expected, the results have demonstrated that iAGD reflects only the distribution, while GIE reflects both the glandular amount and distribution. Therefore GIE is a good candidate for individual radiation risk assessment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nuclear Technology Pub</publisher><ispartof>Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2015-07, Vol.165 (1), p.342-5</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,27860</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Geeraert, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klausz, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloch, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosmans, Hilde</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity</title><title>Radiation Protection Dosimetry</title><description>The radiation risk in mammography is traditionally evaluated using the average glandular dose. This quantity for the average breast has proven to be useful for population statistics and to compare exposure techniques and systems. However it is not indicating the individual radiation risk based on the individual glandular amount and distribution. Simulations of exposures were performed for six appropriate virtual phantoms with varying glandular amount and distribution. The individualised average glandular dose (iAGD), i.e. the individual glandular absorbed energy divided by the mass of the gland, and the glandular imparted energy (GIE), i.e. the glandular absorbed energy, were computed. Both quantities were evaluated for their capability to take into account the glandular amount and distribution. As expected, the results have demonstrated that iAGD reflects only the distribution, while GIE reflects both the glandular amount and distribution. Therefore GIE is a good candidate for individual radiation risk assessment.</description><issn>0144-8420</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzEsOgjAUheEONPG5hztzYEiwFEWnRuMCnJMbuWK1tNgHyu5F4gIcnZzkyz9g43glRJQJHo_YxLl7HPPNNhVj9jg0qAJ6aTSYK9C7Ni5YAqmhwqoypcX61u5AyUr6nrmvw4YslgSlQl0EhRYK4wi6A7U1XQNVz0DTC54BtZe-nbHhFZWj-W-nbHE8nPen6BEUhYZ0XrgaL5SveCLS9Sbb5inPUr5Opmz5n8z92yf_dz_ogVeh</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Geeraert, N</creator><creator>Klausz, R</creator><creator>Muller, S</creator><creator>Bloch, I</creator><creator>Bosmans, Hilde</creator><general>Nuclear Technology Pub</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity</title><author>Geeraert, N ; Klausz, R ; Muller, S ; Bloch, I ; Bosmans, Hilde</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5285263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Geeraert, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klausz, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bloch, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosmans, Hilde</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Radiation Protection Dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Geeraert, N</au><au>Klausz, R</au><au>Muller, S</au><au>Bloch, I</au><au>Bosmans, Hilde</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity</atitle><jtitle>Radiation Protection Dosimetry</jtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>342</spage><epage>5</epage><pages>342-5</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><abstract>The radiation risk in mammography is traditionally evaluated using the average glandular dose. This quantity for the average breast has proven to be useful for population statistics and to compare exposure techniques and systems. However it is not indicating the individual radiation risk based on the individual glandular amount and distribution. Simulations of exposures were performed for six appropriate virtual phantoms with varying glandular amount and distribution. The individualised average glandular dose (iAGD), i.e. the individual glandular absorbed energy divided by the mass of the gland, and the glandular imparted energy (GIE), i.e. the glandular absorbed energy, were computed. Both quantities were evaluated for their capability to take into account the glandular amount and distribution. As expected, the results have demonstrated that iAGD reflects only the distribution, while GIE reflects both the glandular amount and distribution. Therefore GIE is a good candidate for individual radiation risk assessment.</abstract><pub>Nuclear Technology Pub</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2015-07, Vol.165 (1), p.342-5
issn 0144-8420
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_528526
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T20%3A10%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20exposure%20in%20mammography:%20limitations%20of%20average%20glandular%20dose%20and%20proposal%20of%20a%20new%20quantity&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20Protection%20Dosimetry&rft.au=Geeraert,%20N&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=5&rft.pages=342-5&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_528526%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true