Stance as participant structure: A Jakobsonian approach to the pragmatics and semantics of evidentiality
Jakobson (1957) bases the analysis of mood on a three-part structure that crucially involves two participant variables. Although the definition of evidentiality in Jakobson (1957) differs in some fundamental ways, it also allows for the explication of a participant structure inherent in evidential m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Belgian Journal of Linguistics 2015, Vol.29, p.193-216 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 216 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 193 |
container_title | Belgian Journal of Linguistics |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Spronck, Stef |
description | Jakobson (1957) bases the analysis of mood on a three-part structure that crucially involves two participant variables. Although the definition of evidentiality in Jakobson (1957) differs in some fundamental ways, it also allows for the explication of a participant structure inherent in evidential meanings. In this paper I argue that by exploring the interaction between these participant structures in multiple-perspective constructions and in reported speech, the framework proposed in Jakobson (1957) enables us to systematically examine phenomena that are typically assumed to arise in evidential expressions as pragmatic effects, particularly 'commitment effets' and evidential interpretations of modals. I propose that this approach presents us with a principled account of stance meanings (Du Bois 2007), more particularly, of the semantic and pragmatic interaction between modal and evidential meanings, based on their semantic structure. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven_FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_524484</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_524484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5244843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjEGKwkAQRXuhoKPeoXYuBiExHRPdyaDIbJ19qOmUpjV2N10VcW5vhDmAq8-D_95AjZOi0Is81elIfTBfkiQr1mUyVs1R0BkCZAgYxRob0AmwxM5IF2kDW_jGq_9l7yw6wBCiR9OAeJCGIEQ837D3GNDVwHTr9Rf5E9Dd1tQTtlb-pmp4wpZp9r8TNd_vfr4Oi2vXUncnV9Uc0FCVLjOdr4pyXeVLrUudTdTne89KHpK9330CmB1WdQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stance as participant structure: A Jakobsonian approach to the pragmatics and semantics of evidentiality</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><creator>Spronck, Stef</creator><contributor>Arrese, J.I.M ; Cornillie, B</contributor><creatorcontrib>Spronck, Stef ; Arrese, J.I.M ; Cornillie, B</creatorcontrib><description>Jakobson (1957) bases the analysis of mood on a three-part structure that crucially involves two participant variables. Although the definition of evidentiality in Jakobson (1957) differs in some fundamental ways, it also allows for the explication of a participant structure inherent in evidential meanings. In this paper I argue that by exploring the interaction between these participant structures in multiple-perspective constructions and in reported speech, the framework proposed in Jakobson (1957) enables us to systematically examine phenomena that are typically assumed to arise in evidential expressions as pragmatic effects, particularly 'commitment effets' and evidential interpretations of modals. I propose that this approach presents us with a principled account of stance meanings (Du Bois 2007), more particularly, of the semantic and pragmatic interaction between modal and evidential meanings, based on their semantic structure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0774-5141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles</publisher><ispartof>Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 2015, Vol.29, p.193-216</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,780,27860</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/524484$$EView_record_in_KU_Leuven_Association$$FView_record_in_$$GKU_Leuven_Association</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Arrese, J.I.M</contributor><contributor>Cornillie, B</contributor><creatorcontrib>Spronck, Stef</creatorcontrib><title>Stance as participant structure: A Jakobsonian approach to the pragmatics and semantics of evidentiality</title><title>Belgian Journal of Linguistics</title><description>Jakobson (1957) bases the analysis of mood on a three-part structure that crucially involves two participant variables. Although the definition of evidentiality in Jakobson (1957) differs in some fundamental ways, it also allows for the explication of a participant structure inherent in evidential meanings. In this paper I argue that by exploring the interaction between these participant structures in multiple-perspective constructions and in reported speech, the framework proposed in Jakobson (1957) enables us to systematically examine phenomena that are typically assumed to arise in evidential expressions as pragmatic effects, particularly 'commitment effets' and evidential interpretations of modals. I propose that this approach presents us with a principled account of stance meanings (Du Bois 2007), more particularly, of the semantic and pragmatic interaction between modal and evidential meanings, based on their semantic structure.</description><issn>0774-5141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjEGKwkAQRXuhoKPeoXYuBiExHRPdyaDIbJ19qOmUpjV2N10VcW5vhDmAq8-D_95AjZOi0Is81elIfTBfkiQr1mUyVs1R0BkCZAgYxRob0AmwxM5IF2kDW_jGq_9l7yw6wBCiR9OAeJCGIEQ837D3GNDVwHTr9Rf5E9Dd1tQTtlb-pmp4wpZp9r8TNd_vfr4Oi2vXUncnV9Uc0FCVLjOdr4pyXeVLrUudTdTne89KHpK9330CmB1WdQ</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Spronck, Stef</creator><general>Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Stance as participant structure: A Jakobsonian approach to the pragmatics and semantics of evidentiality</title><author>Spronck, Stef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5244843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spronck, Stef</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Belgian Journal of Linguistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spronck, Stef</au><au>Arrese, J.I.M</au><au>Cornillie, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stance as participant structure: A Jakobsonian approach to the pragmatics and semantics of evidentiality</atitle><jtitle>Belgian Journal of Linguistics</jtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><spage>193</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>193-216</pages><issn>0774-5141</issn><abstract>Jakobson (1957) bases the analysis of mood on a three-part structure that crucially involves two participant variables. Although the definition of evidentiality in Jakobson (1957) differs in some fundamental ways, it also allows for the explication of a participant structure inherent in evidential meanings. In this paper I argue that by exploring the interaction between these participant structures in multiple-perspective constructions and in reported speech, the framework proposed in Jakobson (1957) enables us to systematically examine phenomena that are typically assumed to arise in evidential expressions as pragmatic effects, particularly 'commitment effets' and evidential interpretations of modals. I propose that this approach presents us with a principled account of stance meanings (Du Bois 2007), more particularly, of the semantic and pragmatic interaction between modal and evidential meanings, based on their semantic structure.</abstract><pub>Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0774-5141 |
ispartof | Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 2015, Vol.29, p.193-216 |
issn | 0774-5141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_524484 |
source | Lirias (KU Leuven Association) |
title | Stance as participant structure: A Jakobsonian approach to the pragmatics and semantics of evidentiality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T11%3A45%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven_FZOIL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stance%20as%20participant%20structure:%20A%20Jakobsonian%20approach%20to%20the%20pragmatics%20and%20semantics%20of%20evidentiality&rft.jtitle=Belgian%20Journal%20of%20Linguistics&rft.au=Spronck,%20Stef&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=29&rft.spage=193&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=193-216&rft.issn=0774-5141&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven_FZOIL%3E123456789_524484%3C/kuleuven_FZOIL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |