Category change in the English gerund: tangled web or fine-tuned constructional network?

© 2018 John Benjamins Publishing Company. This study considers the diachronic categorial shift from nominal (NG) to verbal gerunds (VG) in Middle English in terms of Langacker's functional account of noun phrases and clauses as 'deictic expressions'. The analysis shows that the Middle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Fonteyn, Lauren, Heyvaert, Liesbet
Format: Buchkapitel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 177
container_issue
container_start_page 149
container_title
container_volume
creator Fonteyn, Lauren
Heyvaert, Liesbet
description © 2018 John Benjamins Publishing Company. This study considers the diachronic categorial shift from nominal (NG) to verbal gerunds (VG) in Middle English in terms of Langacker's functional account of noun phrases and clauses as 'deictic expressions'. The analysis shows that the Middle English gerund was essentially formally nominal but functionally hybrid, thus exhibiting 'form-function friction'. This friction furthered a split in the gerundive system between a verbal component associated with clausal deixis, alongside a nominal component, which specialized in nominal deixis; but this split is not absolute. The constructionist idea of language as a network of (inter) paradigmatically connected constructions helps to explain why the verbal gerund seems to simultaneously drift away from and again partake in the deictic behaviour of the nominal category.
format Book Chapter
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven_FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_508423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_508423</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5084233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjkFuwjAQRS2VSkWQO8yuCxTJiWMSd9MFouIALNhFJhmSFGtc2WNob98sOACrL_339fRfRGbqxsiyLqWsCrMQy0LXKtemOr2JLMZvKWVhdLM1ailOO8s4-PAH3WhpQJgIeETY0-CmOMKAIVH_ATxDhz3c8Qw-wGUizDnR3HSeIofU8eTJOiDkuw_Xz7V4vVgXMXvkSrx_7Y-7Q35NDtMNqe3jj-2wLUpV6e38uNWyqUqlVmLz3LLlX1bPe_8B7cdTfg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Category change in the English gerund: tangled web or fine-tuned constructional network?</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><creator>Fonteyn, Lauren ; Heyvaert, Liesbet</creator><contributor>Norde, Muriel ; Vanderbauwhede, Gudrun ; Van Goethem, Kristel ; Coussé, Evie</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fonteyn, Lauren ; Heyvaert, Liesbet ; Norde, Muriel ; Vanderbauwhede, Gudrun ; Van Goethem, Kristel ; Coussé, Evie</creatorcontrib><description>© 2018 John Benjamins Publishing Company. This study considers the diachronic categorial shift from nominal (NG) to verbal gerunds (VG) in Middle English in terms of Langacker's functional account of noun phrases and clauses as 'deictic expressions'. The analysis shows that the Middle English gerund was essentially formally nominal but functionally hybrid, thus exhibiting 'form-function friction'. This friction furthered a split in the gerundive system between a verbal component associated with clausal deixis, alongside a nominal component, which specialized in nominal deixis; but this split is not absolute. The constructionist idea of language as a network of (inter) paradigmatically connected constructions helps to explain why the verbal gerund seems to simultaneously drift away from and again partake in the deictic behaviour of the nominal category.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-594X</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9789027200419</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9027200416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>John Benjamins</publisher><ispartof>vol:20, 2018, p.149-177</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,779,780,27860</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/508423$$EView_record_in_KU_Leuven_Association$$FView_record_in_$$GKU_Leuven_Association</linktorsrc></links><search><contributor>Norde, Muriel</contributor><contributor>Vanderbauwhede, Gudrun</contributor><contributor>Van Goethem, Kristel</contributor><contributor>Coussé, Evie</contributor><creatorcontrib>Fonteyn, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyvaert, Liesbet</creatorcontrib><title>Category change in the English gerund: tangled web or fine-tuned constructional network?</title><title>vol:20</title><description>© 2018 John Benjamins Publishing Company. This study considers the diachronic categorial shift from nominal (NG) to verbal gerunds (VG) in Middle English in terms of Langacker's functional account of noun phrases and clauses as 'deictic expressions'. The analysis shows that the Middle English gerund was essentially formally nominal but functionally hybrid, thus exhibiting 'form-function friction'. This friction furthered a split in the gerundive system between a verbal component associated with clausal deixis, alongside a nominal component, which specialized in nominal deixis; but this split is not absolute. The constructionist idea of language as a network of (inter) paradigmatically connected constructions helps to explain why the verbal gerund seems to simultaneously drift away from and again partake in the deictic behaviour of the nominal category.</description><issn>1573-594X</issn><isbn>9789027200419</isbn><isbn>9027200416</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjkFuwjAQRS2VSkWQO8yuCxTJiWMSd9MFouIALNhFJhmSFGtc2WNob98sOACrL_339fRfRGbqxsiyLqWsCrMQy0LXKtemOr2JLMZvKWVhdLM1ailOO8s4-PAH3WhpQJgIeETY0-CmOMKAIVH_ATxDhz3c8Qw-wGUizDnR3HSeIofU8eTJOiDkuw_Xz7V4vVgXMXvkSrx_7Y-7Q35NDtMNqe3jj-2wLUpV6e38uNWyqUqlVmLz3LLlX1bPe_8B7cdTfg</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Fonteyn, Lauren</creator><creator>Heyvaert, Liesbet</creator><general>John Benjamins</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Category change in the English gerund: tangled web or fine-tuned constructional network?</title><author>Fonteyn, Lauren ; Heyvaert, Liesbet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_5084233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fonteyn, Lauren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyvaert, Liesbet</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fonteyn, Lauren</au><au>Heyvaert, Liesbet</au><au>Norde, Muriel</au><au>Vanderbauwhede, Gudrun</au><au>Van Goethem, Kristel</au><au>Coussé, Evie</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Category change in the English gerund: tangled web or fine-tuned constructional network?</atitle><btitle>vol:20</btitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><spage>149</spage><epage>177</epage><pages>149-177</pages><issn>1573-594X</issn><isbn>9789027200419</isbn><isbn>9027200416</isbn><abstract>© 2018 John Benjamins Publishing Company. This study considers the diachronic categorial shift from nominal (NG) to verbal gerunds (VG) in Middle English in terms of Langacker's functional account of noun phrases and clauses as 'deictic expressions'. The analysis shows that the Middle English gerund was essentially formally nominal but functionally hybrid, thus exhibiting 'form-function friction'. This friction furthered a split in the gerundive system between a verbal component associated with clausal deixis, alongside a nominal component, which specialized in nominal deixis; but this split is not absolute. The constructionist idea of language as a network of (inter) paradigmatically connected constructions helps to explain why the verbal gerund seems to simultaneously drift away from and again partake in the deictic behaviour of the nominal category.</abstract><pub>John Benjamins</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1573-594X
ispartof vol:20, 2018, p.149-177
issn 1573-594X
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_508423
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association)
title Category change in the English gerund: tangled web or fine-tuned constructional network?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A44%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven_FZOIL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Category%20change%20in%20the%20English%20gerund:%20tangled%20web%20or%20fine-tuned%20constructional%20network?&rft.btitle=vol:20&rft.au=Fonteyn,%20Lauren&rft.date=2018&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=177&rft.pages=149-177&rft.issn=1573-594X&rft.isbn=9789027200419&rft.isbn_list=9027200416&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven_FZOIL%3E123456789_508423%3C/kuleuven_FZOIL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true