A single session of 1mA anodal tDCS-supported motor training does not improve motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of atDCS on motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previously, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) has been shown to improve motor performance in healthy subjects and neurodegenerative populations. However, the effect of atDCS on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 2014-01, Vol.2 (32), p.293-300
Hauptverfasser: Meesen, Raf, Thijs, Herbert, Leenus, Daphnie, Cuypers, Koen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 300
container_issue 32
container_start_page 293
container_title Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience
container_volume 2
creator Meesen, Raf
Thijs, Herbert
Leenus, Daphnie
Cuypers, Koen
description PURPOSE: To assess the effects of atDCS on motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previously, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) has been shown to improve motor performance in healthy subjects and neurodegenerative populations. However, the effect of atDCS on motor performance is not examined in MS. METHODS: In the current study, a sham controlled double-blind crossover design was used to evaluate the effect of 20 minutes of 1 mA atDCS or sham tDCS (stDCS) on a unimanual motor sequence-training task, consisting of sequential finger presses on a computer keyboard with the most impaired hand. Patients received stimulation (atDCS or stDCS) during motor training. tDCS was applied over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the most impaired hand. Motor performance was assessed immediately before, during and 30 minutes after stimulation. RESULTS: Although we need to be careful with the interpretation of the data due to lack of power, our results showed no significant effect of atDCS on motor performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that atDCS-supported motor training was not able to improve motor performance more than sham-supported motor training. Possibly, the effects of atDCS are mediated by specific MS-related characteristics. Furthermore, increasing atDCS intensity and offering multiple stimulation sessions might be necessary to optimize motor performance resulting from atDCS-supported motor training.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven_FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_423289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_423289</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_4232893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjb1OAzEQhF0QiRB4h-0o0EmOLz93ZRRA9KQ_WXd7xGDvWt69QM-LE6Q8QIrRFPPNzI2Z29a5amNdc2vuRD6ttduz5uZ3BxLoIyIIigQm4BGWaQeeePAR9Hn_XsmUMxfFARIrF9DiA51bMDAKECuElAuf8JJnLCOX5KlHCATZa0BSge-gR0hT1JD_D_uIhSXIvZmNPgo-XHxhHl9fDvu36muKOJ2QukGy77Fbunq13mybtlu52jVtvTBP15Gd_mh9_e4fLVVgYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A single session of 1mA anodal tDCS-supported motor training does not improve motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><creator>Meesen, Raf ; Thijs, Herbert ; Leenus, Daphnie ; Cuypers, Koen</creator><creatorcontrib>Meesen, Raf ; Thijs, Herbert ; Leenus, Daphnie ; Cuypers, Koen</creatorcontrib><description>PURPOSE: To assess the effects of atDCS on motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previously, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) has been shown to improve motor performance in healthy subjects and neurodegenerative populations. However, the effect of atDCS on motor performance is not examined in MS. METHODS: In the current study, a sham controlled double-blind crossover design was used to evaluate the effect of 20 minutes of 1 mA atDCS or sham tDCS (stDCS) on a unimanual motor sequence-training task, consisting of sequential finger presses on a computer keyboard with the most impaired hand. Patients received stimulation (atDCS or stDCS) during motor training. tDCS was applied over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the most impaired hand. Motor performance was assessed immediately before, during and 30 minutes after stimulation. RESULTS: Although we need to be careful with the interpretation of the data due to lack of power, our results showed no significant effect of atDCS on motor performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that atDCS-supported motor training was not able to improve motor performance more than sham-supported motor training. Possibly, the effects of atDCS are mediated by specific MS-related characteristics. Furthermore, increasing atDCS intensity and offering multiple stimulation sessions might be necessary to optimize motor performance resulting from atDCS-supported motor training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-6028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Science Publishers BV</publisher><ispartof>Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 2014-01, Vol.2 (32), p.293-300</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,776,27839</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://lirias.kuleuven.be/handle/123456789/423289$$EView_record_in_KU_Leuven_Association$$FView_record_in_$$GKU_Leuven_Association$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meesen, Raf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijs, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leenus, Daphnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuypers, Koen</creatorcontrib><title>A single session of 1mA anodal tDCS-supported motor training does not improve motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis</title><title>Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience</title><description>PURPOSE: To assess the effects of atDCS on motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previously, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) has been shown to improve motor performance in healthy subjects and neurodegenerative populations. However, the effect of atDCS on motor performance is not examined in MS. METHODS: In the current study, a sham controlled double-blind crossover design was used to evaluate the effect of 20 minutes of 1 mA atDCS or sham tDCS (stDCS) on a unimanual motor sequence-training task, consisting of sequential finger presses on a computer keyboard with the most impaired hand. Patients received stimulation (atDCS or stDCS) during motor training. tDCS was applied over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the most impaired hand. Motor performance was assessed immediately before, during and 30 minutes after stimulation. RESULTS: Although we need to be careful with the interpretation of the data due to lack of power, our results showed no significant effect of atDCS on motor performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that atDCS-supported motor training was not able to improve motor performance more than sham-supported motor training. Possibly, the effects of atDCS are mediated by specific MS-related characteristics. Furthermore, increasing atDCS intensity and offering multiple stimulation sessions might be necessary to optimize motor performance resulting from atDCS-supported motor training.</description><issn>0922-6028</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjb1OAzEQhF0QiRB4h-0o0EmOLz93ZRRA9KQ_WXd7xGDvWt69QM-LE6Q8QIrRFPPNzI2Z29a5amNdc2vuRD6ttduz5uZ3BxLoIyIIigQm4BGWaQeeePAR9Hn_XsmUMxfFARIrF9DiA51bMDAKECuElAuf8JJnLCOX5KlHCATZa0BSge-gR0hT1JD_D_uIhSXIvZmNPgo-XHxhHl9fDvu36muKOJ2QukGy77Fbunq13mybtlu52jVtvTBP15Gd_mh9_e4fLVVgYw</recordid><startdate>201401</startdate><enddate>201401</enddate><creator>Meesen, Raf</creator><creator>Thijs, Herbert</creator><creator>Leenus, Daphnie</creator><creator>Cuypers, Koen</creator><general>Elsevier Science Publishers BV</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201401</creationdate><title>A single session of 1mA anodal tDCS-supported motor training does not improve motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis</title><author>Meesen, Raf ; Thijs, Herbert ; Leenus, Daphnie ; Cuypers, Koen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_4232893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meesen, Raf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thijs, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leenus, Daphnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuypers, Koen</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meesen, Raf</au><au>Thijs, Herbert</au><au>Leenus, Daphnie</au><au>Cuypers, Koen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A single session of 1mA anodal tDCS-supported motor training does not improve motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis</atitle><jtitle>Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience</jtitle><date>2014-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>293-300</pages><issn>0922-6028</issn><abstract>PURPOSE: To assess the effects of atDCS on motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Previously, anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS) has been shown to improve motor performance in healthy subjects and neurodegenerative populations. However, the effect of atDCS on motor performance is not examined in MS. METHODS: In the current study, a sham controlled double-blind crossover design was used to evaluate the effect of 20 minutes of 1 mA atDCS or sham tDCS (stDCS) on a unimanual motor sequence-training task, consisting of sequential finger presses on a computer keyboard with the most impaired hand. Patients received stimulation (atDCS or stDCS) during motor training. tDCS was applied over the primary motor cortex contralateral to the most impaired hand. Motor performance was assessed immediately before, during and 30 minutes after stimulation. RESULTS: Although we need to be careful with the interpretation of the data due to lack of power, our results showed no significant effect of atDCS on motor performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that atDCS-supported motor training was not able to improve motor performance more than sham-supported motor training. Possibly, the effects of atDCS are mediated by specific MS-related characteristics. Furthermore, increasing atDCS intensity and offering multiple stimulation sessions might be necessary to optimize motor performance resulting from atDCS-supported motor training.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Science Publishers BV</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0922-6028
ispartof Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 2014-01, Vol.2 (32), p.293-300
issn 0922-6028
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_423289
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association)
title A single session of 1mA anodal tDCS-supported motor training does not improve motor performance in patients with multiple sclerosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T15%3A18%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven_FZOIL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20single%20session%20of%201mA%20anodal%20tDCS-supported%20motor%20training%20does%20not%20improve%20motor%20performance%20in%20patients%20with%20multiple%20sclerosis&rft.jtitle=Restorative%20Neurology%20and%20Neuroscience&rft.au=Meesen,%20Raf&rft.date=2014-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=293-300&rft.issn=0922-6028&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven_FZOIL%3E123456789_423289%3C/kuleuven_FZOIL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true