Donation after Uncontrolled Cardiac Death (uDCD): A Review of the Debate from a European Perspective

Presumed consent alone will not solve the organ shortage, but it will create an ethical and legal context that supports organ donation, respects individuals who object to organ donation, relieves families from the burden of decision making, and can save lives.

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of law medicine & ethics 2008, Vol.36 (4), p.752-759
Hauptverfasser: Borry, Pascal, van Reusel, Walter, Roels, Leo, Schotsmans, Paul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 759
container_issue 4
container_start_page 752
container_title Journal of law medicine & ethics
container_volume 36
creator Borry, Pascal
van Reusel, Walter
Roels, Leo
Schotsmans, Paul
description Presumed consent alone will not solve the organ shortage, but it will create an ethical and legal context that supports organ donation, respects individuals who object to organ donation, relieves families from the burden of decision making, and can save lives.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kuleuven</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_210842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>123456789_210842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_2108423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjrsOgkAQRbfQRHz8w3RqjMkuID46AxpLY7QmIwwRxV2yO6Cfr4UfYHWLc3JyO8JTchnMlZKLnug7d5dSKj-IPJEnRiOXRgMWTBYuOjOarakqyiFGm5eYQULIN5g0SZxMN7CFE7UlvcAUwDf60isyQWHNExB2jTU1oYYjWVdTxmVLQ9EtsHI0-u1AjPe7c3yYP5qKmpZ0mrsaM0q_n8JFtFytU1_JVegHAzH7z0z5zcH_3Q8inFJR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Donation after Uncontrolled Cardiac Death (uDCD): A Review of the Debate from a European Perspective</title><source>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Borry, Pascal ; van Reusel, Walter ; Roels, Leo ; Schotsmans, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Borry, Pascal ; van Reusel, Walter ; Roels, Leo ; Schotsmans, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Presumed consent alone will not solve the organ shortage, but it will create an ethical and legal context that supports organ donation, respects individuals who object to organ donation, relieves families from the burden of decision making, and can save lives.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1073-1105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell publishing</publisher><ispartof>Journal of law medicine &amp; ethics, 2008, Vol.36 (4), p.752-759</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,780,784,4024,27860</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borry, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Reusel, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roels, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schotsmans, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Donation after Uncontrolled Cardiac Death (uDCD): A Review of the Debate from a European Perspective</title><title>Journal of law medicine &amp; ethics</title><description>Presumed consent alone will not solve the organ shortage, but it will create an ethical and legal context that supports organ donation, respects individuals who object to organ donation, relieves families from the burden of decision making, and can save lives.</description><issn>1073-1105</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>FZOIL</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjrsOgkAQRbfQRHz8w3RqjMkuID46AxpLY7QmIwwRxV2yO6Cfr4UfYHWLc3JyO8JTchnMlZKLnug7d5dSKj-IPJEnRiOXRgMWTBYuOjOarakqyiFGm5eYQULIN5g0SZxMN7CFE7UlvcAUwDf60isyQWHNExB2jTU1oYYjWVdTxmVLQ9EtsHI0-u1AjPe7c3yYP5qKmpZ0mrsaM0q_n8JFtFytU1_JVegHAzH7z0z5zcH_3Q8inFJR</recordid><startdate>2008</startdate><enddate>2008</enddate><creator>Borry, Pascal</creator><creator>van Reusel, Walter</creator><creator>Roels, Leo</creator><creator>Schotsmans, Paul</creator><general>Blackwell publishing</general><scope>FZOIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2008</creationdate><title>Donation after Uncontrolled Cardiac Death (uDCD): A Review of the Debate from a European Perspective</title><author>Borry, Pascal ; van Reusel, Walter ; Roels, Leo ; Schotsmans, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kuleuven_dspace_123456789_2108423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borry, Pascal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Reusel, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roels, Leo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schotsmans, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Lirias (KU Leuven Association)</collection><jtitle>Journal of law medicine &amp; ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borry, Pascal</au><au>van Reusel, Walter</au><au>Roels, Leo</au><au>Schotsmans, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Donation after Uncontrolled Cardiac Death (uDCD): A Review of the Debate from a European Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Journal of law medicine &amp; ethics</jtitle><date>2008</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>752</spage><epage>759</epage><pages>752-759</pages><issn>1073-1105</issn><abstract>Presumed consent alone will not solve the organ shortage, but it will create an ethical and legal context that supports organ donation, respects individuals who object to organ donation, relieves families from the burden of decision making, and can save lives.</abstract><pub>Blackwell publishing</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1073-1105
ispartof Journal of law medicine & ethics, 2008, Vol.36 (4), p.752-759
issn 1073-1105
language eng
recordid cdi_kuleuven_dspace_123456789_210842
source Lirias (KU Leuven Association); HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Access via Wiley Online Library
title Donation after Uncontrolled Cardiac Death (uDCD): A Review of the Debate from a European Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T22%3A00%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kuleuven&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Donation%20after%20Uncontrolled%20Cardiac%20Death%20(uDCD):%20A%20Review%20of%20the%20Debate%20from%20a%20European%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20law%20medicine%20&%20ethics&rft.au=Borry,%20Pascal&rft.date=2008&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=752&rft.epage=759&rft.pages=752-759&rft.issn=1073-1105&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckuleuven%3E123456789_210842%3C/kuleuven%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true