Interpretation of Genotype × Environment Interaction of Sesame Yield Using

The AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) and GGE (genotype main effect and genotype by environment interaction) biplot which were accounted for a substantial part of total sum of square in the analysis of variance suggested to be more appropriate models for explaining G x E in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Korean journal of crop science 2015-09, Vol.60 (3), p.349-354
Hauptverfasser: Kang-Bo Shim, Seong-Hyu Shin, Ji-Young Shon, Shin-Gu Kang, Woon-Ho Yang, Sung-Gi Heu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 354
container_issue 3
container_start_page 349
container_title Korean journal of crop science
container_volume 60
creator Kang-Bo Shim
Seong-Hyu Shin
Ji-Young Shon
Shin-Gu Kang
Woon-Ho Yang
Sung-Gi Heu
description The AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) and GGE (genotype main effect and genotype by environment interaction) biplot which were accounted for a substantial part of total sum of square in the analysis of variance suggested to be more appropriate models for explaining G x E interaction. The grain yield of total ten sesame genotypes was significantly affected by environment which explained 61% of total variation, whereas genotype and genotype x environment interaction (G x E) were explained 16%, 24% respectively. From the results of experiment, three genotypes Miryang49, Koppoom and Ansan were unstable, whereas other three genotypes Kyeongbuk18, Miryang50 and Kanghuk which were shorter projections to AEA ordinate were relatively stable over the environments. Yangbak which was closeness to the mean yield and short projection of the genotype marker lines was regarded as genotype indicating good performance with stability. Ansan, Miryang48 and Yangbaek showed the best performance in the environments of Naju, Suwon, Iksan and Andong. Similarly, genotype Miyrang47 exhibited the best performance in the environments of Chuncheon and Miryang. Andong is the closest to the ideal environment, and therefore, is the most desirable among eight environments.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>koreascholar</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_koreascholar_journals_309916</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>309916</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-koreascholar_journals_3099163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyrsKwjAUgOEgCtbLOwScCzFtTTNLveCoDk4l1FNNbU9KEgWfxAfyxRTR3ekf_q9DAs5TEaZxxLskYDzhoRRC9MnAuYqxOBFMBmSzRg-2teCV1wapKekS0Ph7C_T5oBnetDXYAHr6kar4sS041QA9aKiPdO80nkakV6rawfjbIZksst18FV6MBeWKs6mVzStztfjeecSknM6i_9QLrk5AiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interpretation of Genotype × Environment Interaction of Sesame Yield Using</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>KoreaScience</source><creator>Kang-Bo Shim ; Seong-Hyu Shin ; Ji-Young Shon ; Shin-Gu Kang ; Woon-Ho Yang ; Sung-Gi Heu</creator><creatorcontrib>Kang-Bo Shim ; Seong-Hyu Shin ; Ji-Young Shon ; Shin-Gu Kang ; Woon-Ho Yang ; Sung-Gi Heu</creatorcontrib><description>The AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) and GGE (genotype main effect and genotype by environment interaction) biplot which were accounted for a substantial part of total sum of square in the analysis of variance suggested to be more appropriate models for explaining G x E interaction. The grain yield of total ten sesame genotypes was significantly affected by environment which explained 61% of total variation, whereas genotype and genotype x environment interaction (G x E) were explained 16%, 24% respectively. From the results of experiment, three genotypes Miryang49, Koppoom and Ansan were unstable, whereas other three genotypes Kyeongbuk18, Miryang50 and Kanghuk which were shorter projections to AEA ordinate were relatively stable over the environments. Yangbak which was closeness to the mean yield and short projection of the genotype marker lines was regarded as genotype indicating good performance with stability. Ansan, Miryang48 and Yangbaek showed the best performance in the environments of Naju, Suwon, Iksan and Andong. Similarly, genotype Miyrang47 exhibited the best performance in the environments of Chuncheon and Miryang. Andong is the closest to the ideal environment, and therefore, is the most desirable among eight environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0252-9777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2287-8432</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>한국작물학회</publisher><ispartof>Korean journal of crop science, 2015-09, Vol.60 (3), p.349-354</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kang-Bo Shim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seong-Hyu Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji-Young Shon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin-Gu Kang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woon-Ho Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung-Gi Heu</creatorcontrib><title>Interpretation of Genotype × Environment Interaction of Sesame Yield Using</title><title>Korean journal of crop science</title><description>The AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) and GGE (genotype main effect and genotype by environment interaction) biplot which were accounted for a substantial part of total sum of square in the analysis of variance suggested to be more appropriate models for explaining G x E interaction. The grain yield of total ten sesame genotypes was significantly affected by environment which explained 61% of total variation, whereas genotype and genotype x environment interaction (G x E) were explained 16%, 24% respectively. From the results of experiment, three genotypes Miryang49, Koppoom and Ansan were unstable, whereas other three genotypes Kyeongbuk18, Miryang50 and Kanghuk which were shorter projections to AEA ordinate were relatively stable over the environments. Yangbak which was closeness to the mean yield and short projection of the genotype marker lines was regarded as genotype indicating good performance with stability. Ansan, Miryang48 and Yangbaek showed the best performance in the environments of Naju, Suwon, Iksan and Andong. Similarly, genotype Miyrang47 exhibited the best performance in the environments of Chuncheon and Miryang. Andong is the closest to the ideal environment, and therefore, is the most desirable among eight environments.</description><issn>0252-9777</issn><issn>2287-8432</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyrsKwjAUgOEgCtbLOwScCzFtTTNLveCoDk4l1FNNbU9KEgWfxAfyxRTR3ekf_q9DAs5TEaZxxLskYDzhoRRC9MnAuYqxOBFMBmSzRg-2teCV1wapKekS0Ph7C_T5oBnetDXYAHr6kar4sS041QA9aKiPdO80nkakV6rawfjbIZksst18FV6MBeWKs6mVzStztfjeecSknM6i_9QLrk5AiQ</recordid><startdate>20150930</startdate><enddate>20150930</enddate><creator>Kang-Bo Shim</creator><creator>Seong-Hyu Shin</creator><creator>Ji-Young Shon</creator><creator>Shin-Gu Kang</creator><creator>Woon-Ho Yang</creator><creator>Sung-Gi Heu</creator><general>한국작물학회</general><scope>KROLR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150930</creationdate><title>Interpretation of Genotype × Environment Interaction of Sesame Yield Using</title><author>Kang-Bo Shim ; Seong-Hyu Shin ; Ji-Young Shon ; Shin-Gu Kang ; Woon-Ho Yang ; Sung-Gi Heu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-koreascholar_journals_3099163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kang-Bo Shim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seong-Hyu Shin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji-Young Shon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin-Gu Kang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woon-Ho Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sung-Gi Heu</creatorcontrib><collection>Korea Scholar</collection><jtitle>Korean journal of crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kang-Bo Shim</au><au>Seong-Hyu Shin</au><au>Ji-Young Shon</au><au>Shin-Gu Kang</au><au>Woon-Ho Yang</au><au>Sung-Gi Heu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interpretation of Genotype × Environment Interaction of Sesame Yield Using</atitle><jtitle>Korean journal of crop science</jtitle><date>2015-09-30</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>349</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>349-354</pages><issn>0252-9777</issn><eissn>2287-8432</eissn><abstract>The AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) and GGE (genotype main effect and genotype by environment interaction) biplot which were accounted for a substantial part of total sum of square in the analysis of variance suggested to be more appropriate models for explaining G x E interaction. The grain yield of total ten sesame genotypes was significantly affected by environment which explained 61% of total variation, whereas genotype and genotype x environment interaction (G x E) were explained 16%, 24% respectively. From the results of experiment, three genotypes Miryang49, Koppoom and Ansan were unstable, whereas other three genotypes Kyeongbuk18, Miryang50 and Kanghuk which were shorter projections to AEA ordinate were relatively stable over the environments. Yangbak which was closeness to the mean yield and short projection of the genotype marker lines was regarded as genotype indicating good performance with stability. Ansan, Miryang48 and Yangbaek showed the best performance in the environments of Naju, Suwon, Iksan and Andong. Similarly, genotype Miyrang47 exhibited the best performance in the environments of Chuncheon and Miryang. Andong is the closest to the ideal environment, and therefore, is the most desirable among eight environments.</abstract><pub>한국작물학회</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0252-9777
ispartof Korean journal of crop science, 2015-09, Vol.60 (3), p.349-354
issn 0252-9777
2287-8432
language eng
recordid cdi_koreascholar_journals_309916
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; KoreaScience
title Interpretation of Genotype × Environment Interaction of Sesame Yield Using
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T00%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-koreascholar&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interpretation%20of%20Genotype%20%C3%97%20Environment%20Interaction%20of%20Sesame%20Yield%20Using&rft.jtitle=Korean%20journal%20of%20crop%20science&rft.au=Kang-Bo%20Shim&rft.date=2015-09-30&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=349&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=349-354&rft.issn=0252-9777&rft.eissn=2287-8432&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckoreascholar%3E309916%3C/koreascholar%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true