Comparison of primordial germ cell differences at different developmental time points in chickens

Objective: Recently, the application in the field of germplasm resource conservation has become an important application of primordial germ cells (PGCs). However, due to the lack of deep understanding of the biological characteristics of PGCs at different time points, there is no systematic scheme f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Animal bioscience 2024, Vol.37 (11), p.1873-1886
Hauptverfasser: Wei Gong, Yichen Zou, Xin Liu, Yingjie Niu, Kai Jin, Bichun Li, Qisheng Zuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1886
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1873
container_title Animal bioscience
container_volume 37
creator Wei Gong
Yichen Zou
Xin Liu
Yingjie Niu
Kai Jin
Bichun Li
Qisheng Zuo
description Objective: Recently, the application in the field of germplasm resource conservation has become an important application of primordial germ cells (PGCs). However, due to the lack of deep understanding of the biological characteristics of PGCs at different time points, there is no systematic scheme for the selection of PGCs at which time points in practical application, which affects the practical application effect of PGCs. This study aims to clarify the differences in PGCs during development. Methods: Here, migration experiment, EdU proliferation assay and cell apoptosis assay were conducted to compare the differences in the migration ability, the proliferation ability and the recovery efficiency among female and male PGCs at E3.5, E4.5, and E5.5, which were explained by the following transcriptome sequencing analysis. Results: We found that there were larger differences between female and male PGCs at different embryonic ages, while smaller differences between female and male PGCs at the same embryonic age. Further comparison showed that the cell migration ability of female and male PGCs decreased gradually during development, so female and male PGCs at E3.5 are more suitable for in vitro allotransplantation. At the same time, the proliferation ability of PGCs gradually decreased during development, and cell adhesion and extracellular matrix communication were weakened, indicating that female and male PGCs of E3.5 are more suitable for in vitro long-term culture cell line establishment. Interestingly, female and male PGCs at E5.5 showed strong DNA damage repair ability, thus more suitable for in vitro long-term cryopreservation. Conclusion: This study provides a theoretical basis for systematically selecting PGCs at suitable developmental time points as cell materials for efficient utilization by analyzing the characteristics of female and male PGCs at different developmental time points based on transcriptome.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202432643620261</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO202432643620261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2024326436202613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyzsLwkAQBOBDFAya_7CNZSC5vEwpQREtbOzDmWx08R7hNvj7TaHWVvMNzMxEIMsij2KZ5vOvk221FCEz3eIsK2WVb6tAqNqZQXliZ8H1MHgyznekNNzRG2hRa-io79GjbZFBjb86CV-o3WAmT4eRDMLgyI4MZKF9UPtEy2ux6JVmDD-5EpvD_lofoyfxSI3tWDen3fkiY5mlssjSYlKRpP_u3jYaRi0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of primordial germ cell differences at different developmental time points in chickens</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wei Gong ; Yichen Zou ; Xin Liu ; Yingjie Niu ; Kai Jin ; Bichun Li ; Qisheng Zuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei Gong ; Yichen Zou ; Xin Liu ; Yingjie Niu ; Kai Jin ; Bichun Li ; Qisheng Zuo</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Recently, the application in the field of germplasm resource conservation has become an important application of primordial germ cells (PGCs). However, due to the lack of deep understanding of the biological characteristics of PGCs at different time points, there is no systematic scheme for the selection of PGCs at which time points in practical application, which affects the practical application effect of PGCs. This study aims to clarify the differences in PGCs during development. Methods: Here, migration experiment, EdU proliferation assay and cell apoptosis assay were conducted to compare the differences in the migration ability, the proliferation ability and the recovery efficiency among female and male PGCs at E3.5, E4.5, and E5.5, which were explained by the following transcriptome sequencing analysis. Results: We found that there were larger differences between female and male PGCs at different embryonic ages, while smaller differences between female and male PGCs at the same embryonic age. Further comparison showed that the cell migration ability of female and male PGCs decreased gradually during development, so female and male PGCs at E3.5 are more suitable for in vitro allotransplantation. At the same time, the proliferation ability of PGCs gradually decreased during development, and cell adhesion and extracellular matrix communication were weakened, indicating that female and male PGCs of E3.5 are more suitable for in vitro long-term culture cell line establishment. Interestingly, female and male PGCs at E5.5 showed strong DNA damage repair ability, thus more suitable for in vitro long-term cryopreservation. Conclusion: This study provides a theoretical basis for systematically selecting PGCs at suitable developmental time points as cell materials for efficient utilization by analyzing the characteristics of female and male PGCs at different developmental time points based on transcriptome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2765-0189</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2765-0235</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Animal bioscience, 2024, Vol.37 (11), p.1873-1886</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4009</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei Gong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yichen Zou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yingjie Niu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kai Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bichun Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qisheng Zuo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of primordial germ cell differences at different developmental time points in chickens</title><title>Animal bioscience</title><addtitle>Animal bioscience</addtitle><description>Objective: Recently, the application in the field of germplasm resource conservation has become an important application of primordial germ cells (PGCs). However, due to the lack of deep understanding of the biological characteristics of PGCs at different time points, there is no systematic scheme for the selection of PGCs at which time points in practical application, which affects the practical application effect of PGCs. This study aims to clarify the differences in PGCs during development. Methods: Here, migration experiment, EdU proliferation assay and cell apoptosis assay were conducted to compare the differences in the migration ability, the proliferation ability and the recovery efficiency among female and male PGCs at E3.5, E4.5, and E5.5, which were explained by the following transcriptome sequencing analysis. Results: We found that there were larger differences between female and male PGCs at different embryonic ages, while smaller differences between female and male PGCs at the same embryonic age. Further comparison showed that the cell migration ability of female and male PGCs decreased gradually during development, so female and male PGCs at E3.5 are more suitable for in vitro allotransplantation. At the same time, the proliferation ability of PGCs gradually decreased during development, and cell adhesion and extracellular matrix communication were weakened, indicating that female and male PGCs of E3.5 are more suitable for in vitro long-term culture cell line establishment. Interestingly, female and male PGCs at E5.5 showed strong DNA damage repair ability, thus more suitable for in vitro long-term cryopreservation. Conclusion: This study provides a theoretical basis for systematically selecting PGCs at suitable developmental time points as cell materials for efficient utilization by analyzing the characteristics of female and male PGCs at different developmental time points based on transcriptome.</description><issn>2765-0189</issn><issn>2765-0235</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNyzsLwkAQBOBDFAya_7CNZSC5vEwpQREtbOzDmWx08R7hNvj7TaHWVvMNzMxEIMsij2KZ5vOvk221FCEz3eIsK2WVb6tAqNqZQXliZ8H1MHgyznekNNzRG2hRa-io79GjbZFBjb86CV-o3WAmT4eRDMLgyI4MZKF9UPtEy2ux6JVmDD-5EpvD_lofoyfxSI3tWDen3fkiY5mlssjSYlKRpP_u3jYaRi0</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Wei Gong</creator><creator>Yichen Zou</creator><creator>Xin Liu</creator><creator>Yingjie Niu</creator><creator>Kai Jin</creator><creator>Bichun Li</creator><creator>Qisheng Zuo</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Comparison of primordial germ cell differences at different developmental time points in chickens</title><author>Wei Gong ; Yichen Zou ; Xin Liu ; Yingjie Niu ; Kai Jin ; Bichun Li ; Qisheng Zuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2024326436202613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei Gong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yichen Zou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xin Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yingjie Niu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kai Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bichun Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qisheng Zuo</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Animal bioscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei Gong</au><au>Yichen Zou</au><au>Xin Liu</au><au>Yingjie Niu</au><au>Kai Jin</au><au>Bichun Li</au><au>Qisheng Zuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of primordial germ cell differences at different developmental time points in chickens</atitle><jtitle>Animal bioscience</jtitle><addtitle>Animal bioscience</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1873</spage><epage>1886</epage><pages>1873-1886</pages><issn>2765-0189</issn><eissn>2765-0235</eissn><abstract>Objective: Recently, the application in the field of germplasm resource conservation has become an important application of primordial germ cells (PGCs). However, due to the lack of deep understanding of the biological characteristics of PGCs at different time points, there is no systematic scheme for the selection of PGCs at which time points in practical application, which affects the practical application effect of PGCs. This study aims to clarify the differences in PGCs during development. Methods: Here, migration experiment, EdU proliferation assay and cell apoptosis assay were conducted to compare the differences in the migration ability, the proliferation ability and the recovery efficiency among female and male PGCs at E3.5, E4.5, and E5.5, which were explained by the following transcriptome sequencing analysis. Results: We found that there were larger differences between female and male PGCs at different embryonic ages, while smaller differences between female and male PGCs at the same embryonic age. Further comparison showed that the cell migration ability of female and male PGCs decreased gradually during development, so female and male PGCs at E3.5 are more suitable for in vitro allotransplantation. At the same time, the proliferation ability of PGCs gradually decreased during development, and cell adhesion and extracellular matrix communication were weakened, indicating that female and male PGCs of E3.5 are more suitable for in vitro long-term culture cell line establishment. Interestingly, female and male PGCs at E5.5 showed strong DNA damage repair ability, thus more suitable for in vitro long-term cryopreservation. Conclusion: This study provides a theoretical basis for systematically selecting PGCs at suitable developmental time points as cell materials for efficient utilization by analyzing the characteristics of female and male PGCs at different developmental time points based on transcriptome.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2765-0189
ispartof Animal bioscience, 2024, Vol.37 (11), p.1873-1886
issn 2765-0189
2765-0235
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202432643620261
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
title Comparison of primordial germ cell differences at different developmental time points in chickens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A15%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20primordial%20germ%20cell%20differences%20at%20different%20developmental%20time%20points%20in%20chickens&rft.jtitle=Animal%20bioscience&rft.au=Wei%20Gong&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1873&rft.epage=1886&rft.pages=1873-1886&rft.issn=2765-0189&rft.eissn=2765-0235&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO202432643620261%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true