Analytic Hierarchy Process 기법을 활용한 개인용 체외진단의료기기 분류기준에 대한 우선순위 연구
Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has been challenging the healthcare service, i.e., the vitalization of the point of care accompanying self-testing in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs). This study aims to suggest priority criteria to classify self-testing IVDs using the analyt...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health policy and management 2023-06, Vol.33 (2), p.173-184 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | kor |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 184 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 173 |
container_title | Health policy and management |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | 김설인 Seol-ihn Kim 편도윤 Do-yun Pyeon 정용익 Yong-ik Jeong 조자현 Jahyun Cho 노가야 Gaya Noh 배그린 Green Bae 권혜영 Hye-young Kwon |
description | Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has been challenging the healthcare service, i.e., the vitalization of the point of care accompanying self-testing in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs). This study aims to suggest priority criteria to classify self-testing IVDs using the analytic hierarchy process technique.
Methods: Two dimensions of the characteristics embedded in the IVDs and the diseases to be diagnosed with self-testing IVDs were parallelly considered and independently investigated. In addition, three expert panels consisting of laboratory medical doctors (n=11), clinicians (n=10), and citizens (n=11) who have an interest in the selection of self-testing IVDs were asked to answer to questionnaires. Priorities were derived and compared among each expert panel.
Results: First of all, ease of specimen collection (0.241), urgency of the situation (0.224), and simplicity of device operation (0.214) were found to be the most important criteria in light of the functional characteristics of self-testing IVDs. Medical doctors valued the ease of specimen collection, but the citizen’s panel valued self-management of the disease more. Second, considering the characteristics of the diseases, the priority criteria were shown in the order of prevalence of diseases (0.421), fatality of disease (0.378), and disease with stigma (0.201). Third, medical doctors responded that self-testing IVDs were more than twice as suitable for non-communicable diseases as compared to communicable diseases (0.688 vs. 0.312), but the citizen’s group responded that self-testing IVDs were slightly more suitable for infectious diseases (0.511 vs. 0.489).
Conclusion: Our findings suggested that self-testing IVDs could be primarily classified as the items for diagnosis of non-communicable diseases for the purpose of self-management with easy specimen collection and simple operation of devices, taking into account the urgency of the situation as well as prevalence and fatality of the disease. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kiss_kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202320938686082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kiss_id>4032342</kiss_id><sourcerecordid>4032342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-k502-5f47e1794319a33d0e05ee26044eeac066c0ff519961226e4816acfd4ec4b5373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jz9Lw1AUxTMoWGo_gctbHAPvX17yxlLUqoU6dA-v6QuG1ip5XQoOHTIIdnAptiUFQUUFh1BU-pma2-9gRBEOnHvgdy6cLatEKHVsToXYsSrGRG1MqJQuI17Juq72VW84iAJUj3Ss4uB8iM7iy0Abg9arLF9OYJGgzSyF-dtmkqJ1lsJiVQQEyw-YreAlyW9fYTHNH8cFXwjlX0n-PC0ueBrB_R3Kx6OfJswzSB7gJoU0QXCfrT_fd63tUPWMrvx52WodHrRqdbvRPDquVRt218HUdkLuauJKzohUjHWwxo7WVGDOtVYBFiLAYegQKUUxVGjuEaGCsMN1wNsOc1nZ2v99243MIPL7HdPzT6qnTYopo1gyT3gCe7Tg9v4541_F0YWKhz7HjDJO2TcWBoBW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analytic Hierarchy Process 기법을 활용한 개인용 체외진단의료기기 분류기준에 대한 우선순위 연구</title><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><creator>김설인 ; Seol-ihn Kim ; 편도윤 ; Do-yun Pyeon ; 정용익 ; Yong-ik Jeong ; 조자현 ; Jahyun Cho ; 노가야 ; Gaya Noh ; 배그린 ; Green Bae ; 권혜영 ; Hye-young Kwon</creator><creatorcontrib>김설인 ; Seol-ihn Kim ; 편도윤 ; Do-yun Pyeon ; 정용익 ; Yong-ik Jeong ; 조자현 ; Jahyun Cho ; 노가야 ; Gaya Noh ; 배그린 ; Green Bae ; 권혜영 ; Hye-young Kwon</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has been challenging the healthcare service, i.e., the vitalization of the point of care accompanying self-testing in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs). This study aims to suggest priority criteria to classify self-testing IVDs using the analytic hierarchy process technique.
Methods: Two dimensions of the characteristics embedded in the IVDs and the diseases to be diagnosed with self-testing IVDs were parallelly considered and independently investigated. In addition, three expert panels consisting of laboratory medical doctors (n=11), clinicians (n=10), and citizens (n=11) who have an interest in the selection of self-testing IVDs were asked to answer to questionnaires. Priorities were derived and compared among each expert panel.
Results: First of all, ease of specimen collection (0.241), urgency of the situation (0.224), and simplicity of device operation (0.214) were found to be the most important criteria in light of the functional characteristics of self-testing IVDs. Medical doctors valued the ease of specimen collection, but the citizen’s panel valued self-management of the disease more. Second, considering the characteristics of the diseases, the priority criteria were shown in the order of prevalence of diseases (0.421), fatality of disease (0.378), and disease with stigma (0.201). Third, medical doctors responded that self-testing IVDs were more than twice as suitable for non-communicable diseases as compared to communicable diseases (0.688 vs. 0.312), but the citizen’s group responded that self-testing IVDs were slightly more suitable for infectious diseases (0.511 vs. 0.489).
Conclusion: Our findings suggested that self-testing IVDs could be primarily classified as the items for diagnosis of non-communicable diseases for the purpose of self-management with easy specimen collection and simple operation of devices, taking into account the urgency of the situation as well as prevalence and fatality of the disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1225-4266</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>한국보건행정학회</publisher><subject>Analytic hierarchy process ; In vitro diagnostic medical device ; Priority setting ; Self-testing</subject><ispartof>Health policy and management, 2023-06, Vol.33 (2), p.173-184</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,778,782,883</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>김설인</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seol-ihn Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>편도윤</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do-yun Pyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>정용익</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yong-ik Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>조자현</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahyun Cho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>노가야</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaya Noh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>배그린</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>권혜영</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hye-young Kwon</creatorcontrib><title>Analytic Hierarchy Process 기법을 활용한 개인용 체외진단의료기기 분류기준에 대한 우선순위 연구</title><title>Health policy and management</title><addtitle>보건행정학회지</addtitle><description>Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has been challenging the healthcare service, i.e., the vitalization of the point of care accompanying self-testing in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs). This study aims to suggest priority criteria to classify self-testing IVDs using the analytic hierarchy process technique.
Methods: Two dimensions of the characteristics embedded in the IVDs and the diseases to be diagnosed with self-testing IVDs were parallelly considered and independently investigated. In addition, three expert panels consisting of laboratory medical doctors (n=11), clinicians (n=10), and citizens (n=11) who have an interest in the selection of self-testing IVDs were asked to answer to questionnaires. Priorities were derived and compared among each expert panel.
Results: First of all, ease of specimen collection (0.241), urgency of the situation (0.224), and simplicity of device operation (0.214) were found to be the most important criteria in light of the functional characteristics of self-testing IVDs. Medical doctors valued the ease of specimen collection, but the citizen’s panel valued self-management of the disease more. Second, considering the characteristics of the diseases, the priority criteria were shown in the order of prevalence of diseases (0.421), fatality of disease (0.378), and disease with stigma (0.201). Third, medical doctors responded that self-testing IVDs were more than twice as suitable for non-communicable diseases as compared to communicable diseases (0.688 vs. 0.312), but the citizen’s group responded that self-testing IVDs were slightly more suitable for infectious diseases (0.511 vs. 0.489).
Conclusion: Our findings suggested that self-testing IVDs could be primarily classified as the items for diagnosis of non-communicable diseases for the purpose of self-management with easy specimen collection and simple operation of devices, taking into account the urgency of the situation as well as prevalence and fatality of the disease.</description><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>In vitro diagnostic medical device</subject><subject>Priority setting</subject><subject>Self-testing</subject><issn>1225-4266</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNo9jz9Lw1AUxTMoWGo_gctbHAPvX17yxlLUqoU6dA-v6QuG1ip5XQoOHTIIdnAptiUFQUUFh1BU-pma2-9gRBEOnHvgdy6cLatEKHVsToXYsSrGRG1MqJQuI17Juq72VW84iAJUj3Ss4uB8iM7iy0Abg9arLF9OYJGgzSyF-dtmkqJ1lsJiVQQEyw-YreAlyW9fYTHNH8cFXwjlX0n-PC0ueBrB_R3Kx6OfJswzSB7gJoU0QXCfrT_fd63tUPWMrvx52WodHrRqdbvRPDquVRt218HUdkLuauJKzohUjHWwxo7WVGDOtVYBFiLAYegQKUUxVGjuEaGCsMN1wNsOc1nZ2v99243MIPL7HdPzT6qnTYopo1gyT3gCe7Tg9v4541_F0YWKhz7HjDJO2TcWBoBW</recordid><startdate>20230630</startdate><enddate>20230630</enddate><creator>김설인</creator><creator>Seol-ihn Kim</creator><creator>편도윤</creator><creator>Do-yun Pyeon</creator><creator>정용익</creator><creator>Yong-ik Jeong</creator><creator>조자현</creator><creator>Jahyun Cho</creator><creator>노가야</creator><creator>Gaya Noh</creator><creator>배그린</creator><creator>Green Bae</creator><creator>권혜영</creator><creator>Hye-young Kwon</creator><general>한국보건행정학회</general><scope>HZB</scope><scope>Q5X</scope><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230630</creationdate><title>Analytic Hierarchy Process 기법을 활용한 개인용 체외진단의료기기 분류기준에 대한 우선순위 연구</title><author>김설인 ; Seol-ihn Kim ; 편도윤 ; Do-yun Pyeon ; 정용익 ; Yong-ik Jeong ; 조자현 ; Jahyun Cho ; 노가야 ; Gaya Noh ; 배그린 ; Green Bae ; 권혜영 ; Hye-young Kwon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-k502-5f47e1794319a33d0e05ee26044eeac066c0ff519961226e4816acfd4ec4b5373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>In vitro diagnostic medical device</topic><topic>Priority setting</topic><topic>Self-testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>김설인</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seol-ihn Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>편도윤</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Do-yun Pyeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>정용익</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yong-ik Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>조자현</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahyun Cho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>노가야</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaya Noh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>배그린</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green Bae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>권혜영</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hye-young Kwon</creatorcontrib><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS)</collection><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type</collection><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Health policy and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>김설인</au><au>Seol-ihn Kim</au><au>편도윤</au><au>Do-yun Pyeon</au><au>정용익</au><au>Yong-ik Jeong</au><au>조자현</au><au>Jahyun Cho</au><au>노가야</au><au>Gaya Noh</au><au>배그린</au><au>Green Bae</au><au>권혜영</au><au>Hye-young Kwon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analytic Hierarchy Process 기법을 활용한 개인용 체외진단의료기기 분류기준에 대한 우선순위 연구</atitle><jtitle>Health policy and management</jtitle><addtitle>보건행정학회지</addtitle><date>2023-06-30</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>184</epage><pages>173-184</pages><issn>1225-4266</issn><abstract>Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has been challenging the healthcare service, i.e., the vitalization of the point of care accompanying self-testing in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDs). This study aims to suggest priority criteria to classify self-testing IVDs using the analytic hierarchy process technique.
Methods: Two dimensions of the characteristics embedded in the IVDs and the diseases to be diagnosed with self-testing IVDs were parallelly considered and independently investigated. In addition, three expert panels consisting of laboratory medical doctors (n=11), clinicians (n=10), and citizens (n=11) who have an interest in the selection of self-testing IVDs were asked to answer to questionnaires. Priorities were derived and compared among each expert panel.
Results: First of all, ease of specimen collection (0.241), urgency of the situation (0.224), and simplicity of device operation (0.214) were found to be the most important criteria in light of the functional characteristics of self-testing IVDs. Medical doctors valued the ease of specimen collection, but the citizen’s panel valued self-management of the disease more. Second, considering the characteristics of the diseases, the priority criteria were shown in the order of prevalence of diseases (0.421), fatality of disease (0.378), and disease with stigma (0.201). Third, medical doctors responded that self-testing IVDs were more than twice as suitable for non-communicable diseases as compared to communicable diseases (0.688 vs. 0.312), but the citizen’s group responded that self-testing IVDs were slightly more suitable for infectious diseases (0.511 vs. 0.489).
Conclusion: Our findings suggested that self-testing IVDs could be primarily classified as the items for diagnosis of non-communicable diseases for the purpose of self-management with easy specimen collection and simple operation of devices, taking into account the urgency of the situation as well as prevalence and fatality of the disease.</abstract><pub>한국보건행정학회</pub><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1225-4266 |
ispartof | Health policy and management, 2023-06, Vol.33 (2), p.173-184 |
issn | 1225-4266 |
language | kor |
recordid | cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202320938686082 |
source | KoreaMed Open Access |
subjects | Analytic hierarchy process In vitro diagnostic medical device Priority setting Self-testing |
title | Analytic Hierarchy Process 기법을 활용한 개인용 체외진단의료기기 분류기준에 대한 우선순위 연구 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T17%3A56%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kiss_kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analytic%20Hierarchy%20Process%20%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95%EC%9D%84%20%ED%99%9C%EC%9A%A9%ED%95%9C%20%EA%B0%9C%EC%9D%B8%EC%9A%A9%20%EC%B2%B4%EC%99%B8%EC%A7%84%EB%8B%A8%EC%9D%98%EB%A3%8C%EA%B8%B0%EA%B8%B0%20%EB%B6%84%EB%A5%98%EA%B8%B0%EC%A4%80%EC%97%90%20%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%20%EC%9A%B0%EC%84%A0%EC%88%9C%EC%9C%84%20%EC%97%B0%EA%B5%AC&rft.jtitle=Health%20policy%20and%20management&rft.au=%EA%B9%80%EC%84%A4%EC%9D%B8&rft.date=2023-06-30&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=184&rft.pages=173-184&rft.issn=1225-4266&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckiss_kisti%3E4032342%3C/kiss_kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kiss_id=4032342&rfr_iscdi=true |