Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study

Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study

Purpose: This study evaluated the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors and the most frequently affected oral regions. Materials and Methods: A sample was obtained of CBCT images of 590 dental implants from 230 individuals who underwent diagnosis at a radiology center using cone-beam compu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Imaging science in dentistry 2022, Vol.52 (52), p.343-350
Hauptverfasser: Gabriel, Rizzo, Mayara Colpo, Prado, Lilian, Rigo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 350
container_issue 52
container_start_page 343
container_title Imaging science in dentistry
container_volume 52
creator Gabriel, Rizzo
Mayara Colpo, Prado
Lilian, Rigo
description Purpose: This study evaluated the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors and the most frequently affected oral regions. Materials and Methods: A sample was obtained of CBCT images of 590 dental implants from 230 individuals who underwent diagnosis at a radiology center using cone-beam computed tomography from 2017 to 2020. The following variables were considered: thread exposure, violation of the minimum distance between 2 adjacent implants and between the implant and tooth, and implant contact with anatomical structures. Descriptive data analysis and the Pearson chi-square test(P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202209769598859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO202209769598859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2022097695988593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirEKwjAURYMoWLT_kMWxEF9om7gVUYoOOriX0KYSjUnJi4J_r4I4e5Z74J4RSQA4z0rB2fjnAFOSIl7YmxxEWSwTUh-DfiirXaup72mnXVSWmttglYt08Gii8c64M9Uh-IArWtE2eMQMdfu53jXGe_eck0mvLOr0uzOy2G5O6zq7GoymcR3aZlftD8AAmCwLmUshcsn_7V6CSDyi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study</title><source>KoreaMed Synapse</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Gabriel, Rizzo ; Mayara Colpo, Prado ; Lilian, Rigo</creator><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Rizzo ; Mayara Colpo, Prado ; Lilian, Rigo</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: This study evaluated the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors and the most frequently affected oral regions. Materials and Methods: A sample was obtained of CBCT images of 590 dental implants from 230 individuals who underwent diagnosis at a radiology center using cone-beam computed tomography from 2017 to 2020. The following variables were considered: thread exposure, violation of the minimum distance between 2 adjacent implants and between the implant and tooth, and implant contact with anatomical structures. Descriptive data analysis and the Pearson chi-square test(P&lt;0.05) were performed to compare findings according to mouth regions. Results: Most (74.4%) of the 590 implants were poorly positioned, with the posterior region of the maxilla being the region most frequently affected by errors. Among the variables analyzed, the most prevalent was thread exposure (54.7%), followed by implant contact with anatomical structures, violation of the recommended distance between 2 implants and violation of the recommended distance between the implant and teeth. Thread exposure was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible (P&lt;0.05). The anterior region of the maxilla was associated with violation of the recommended tooth-implant distance (P&lt;0.05) and the recommended distance between 2 adjacent implants(P&lt;0.05). Implant contact with anatomical structures was significantly more likely to occur in the posterior region of the maxilla (P&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Many implants were poorly positioned in the posterior region of the maxilla. Thread exposure was particularly frequent and was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2233-7822</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2233-7830</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Imaging science in dentistry, 2022, Vol.52 (52), p.343-350</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Rizzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayara Colpo, Prado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilian, Rigo</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study</title><title>Imaging science in dentistry</title><addtitle>Imaging science in dentistry</addtitle><description>Purpose: This study evaluated the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors and the most frequently affected oral regions. Materials and Methods: A sample was obtained of CBCT images of 590 dental implants from 230 individuals who underwent diagnosis at a radiology center using cone-beam computed tomography from 2017 to 2020. The following variables were considered: thread exposure, violation of the minimum distance between 2 adjacent implants and between the implant and tooth, and implant contact with anatomical structures. Descriptive data analysis and the Pearson chi-square test(P&lt;0.05) were performed to compare findings according to mouth regions. Results: Most (74.4%) of the 590 implants were poorly positioned, with the posterior region of the maxilla being the region most frequently affected by errors. Among the variables analyzed, the most prevalent was thread exposure (54.7%), followed by implant contact with anatomical structures, violation of the recommended distance between 2 implants and violation of the recommended distance between the implant and teeth. Thread exposure was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible (P&lt;0.05). The anterior region of the maxilla was associated with violation of the recommended tooth-implant distance (P&lt;0.05) and the recommended distance between 2 adjacent implants(P&lt;0.05). Implant contact with anatomical structures was significantly more likely to occur in the posterior region of the maxilla (P&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Many implants were poorly positioned in the posterior region of the maxilla. Thread exposure was particularly frequent and was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible.</description><issn>2233-7822</issn><issn>2233-7830</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirEKwjAURYMoWLT_kMWxEF9om7gVUYoOOriX0KYSjUnJi4J_r4I4e5Z74J4RSQA4z0rB2fjnAFOSIl7YmxxEWSwTUh-DfiirXaup72mnXVSWmttglYt08Gii8c64M9Uh-IArWtE2eMQMdfu53jXGe_eck0mvLOr0uzOy2G5O6zq7GoymcR3aZlftD8AAmCwLmUshcsn_7V6CSDyi</recordid><startdate>2022</startdate><enddate>2022</enddate><creator>Gabriel, Rizzo</creator><creator>Mayara Colpo, Prado</creator><creator>Lilian, Rigo</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2022</creationdate><title>Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study</title><author>Gabriel, Rizzo ; Mayara Colpo, Prado ; Lilian, Rigo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2022097695988593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gabriel, Rizzo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayara Colpo, Prado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lilian, Rigo</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Imaging science in dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gabriel, Rizzo</au><au>Mayara Colpo, Prado</au><au>Lilian, Rigo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Imaging science in dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Imaging science in dentistry</addtitle><date>2022</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>52</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>350</epage><pages>343-350</pages><issn>2233-7822</issn><eissn>2233-7830</eissn><abstract>Purpose: This study evaluated the prevalence of dental implant positioning errors and the most frequently affected oral regions. Materials and Methods: A sample was obtained of CBCT images of 590 dental implants from 230 individuals who underwent diagnosis at a radiology center using cone-beam computed tomography from 2017 to 2020. The following variables were considered: thread exposure, violation of the minimum distance between 2 adjacent implants and between the implant and tooth, and implant contact with anatomical structures. Descriptive data analysis and the Pearson chi-square test(P&lt;0.05) were performed to compare findings according to mouth regions. Results: Most (74.4%) of the 590 implants were poorly positioned, with the posterior region of the maxilla being the region most frequently affected by errors. Among the variables analyzed, the most prevalent was thread exposure (54.7%), followed by implant contact with anatomical structures, violation of the recommended distance between 2 implants and violation of the recommended distance between the implant and teeth. Thread exposure was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible (P&lt;0.05). The anterior region of the maxilla was associated with violation of the recommended tooth-implant distance (P&lt;0.05) and the recommended distance between 2 adjacent implants(P&lt;0.05). Implant contact with anatomical structures was significantly more likely to occur in the posterior region of the maxilla (P&lt;0.05). Conclusion: Many implants were poorly positioned in the posterior region of the maxilla. Thread exposure was particularly frequent and was significantly associated with the anterior region of the mandible.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2233-7822
ispartof Imaging science in dentistry, 2022, Vol.52 (52), p.343-350
issn 2233-7822
2233-7830
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202209769598859
source KoreaMed Synapse; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; KoreaMed Open Access; PubMed Central
title Prevalence of dental implant positioning errors: A cross-sectional study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A45%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20of%20dental%20implant%20positioning%20errors:%20A%20cross-sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Imaging%20science%20in%20dentistry&rft.au=Gabriel,%20Rizzo&rft.date=2022&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=52&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=350&rft.pages=343-350&rft.issn=2233-7822&rft.eissn=2233-7830&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO202209769598859%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true