Ultrasound-guided needle decompression and steroid injection for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: risk factors for repeat procedures and outcome analysis

Background: Although ultrasound-guided needle decompression (US-GND) can treat calcific tendinitis of the shoulder effectively, repeat procedures might be required for unresolved symptoms. We evaluated the overall clinical outcomes of US-GND with subacromial steroid injection and the final results a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinics in shoulder and elbow 2021, Vol.24 (2), p.55-65
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Su Cheol, Lee, Sang Min, Park, Gun Tae, Jang, Min Chang, Yoo, Jae Chul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 65
container_issue 2
container_start_page 55
container_title Clinics in shoulder and elbow
container_volume 24
creator Kim, Su Cheol
Lee, Sang Min
Park, Gun Tae
Jang, Min Chang
Yoo, Jae Chul
description Background: Although ultrasound-guided needle decompression (US-GND) can treat calcific tendinitis of the shoulder effectively, repeat procedures might be required for unresolved symptoms. We evaluated the overall clinical outcomes of US-GND with subacromial steroid injection and the final results and factors predisposing toward repeat procedures. Methods: Ninety-eight patients who underwent US-GND for calcific tendinitis of the supraspinatus/infraspinatus were analyzed between March 2017 and December 2018. The clinical outcomes (pain visual analog scale, functional visual analog scale [FVAS], and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score) and final subjective satisfaction were compared between groups A (single US-GND) and B (repeat US-GND). The factors predisposing toward repeated US-GNDs were analyzed. Results: We found that 59.3% (58/98) of patient ASES scores were ≥80, and 73.5% of patients (72/98) were satisfied with the outcome. Group B (n=14) demonstrated a significantly higher rate of dominant-arm involvement compared to group A (78.6% vs. 48.8%, p=0.046). However, initial calcification size, shape, number, density, subscapularis involvement, lavage, and procedure time did not differ significantly between the groups. Group B showed poorer final FVAS (7 [interquartile range, 6-8] vs. 8 [interquartile range, 7-9], p=0.036) and subjective satisfaction compared to group A (satisfied: 5 [35.7%] vs. 67 [79.8%], p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202122349854765</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO202122349854765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2021223498547653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjTFOAzEQRS1EJCLIHaahXGnX3rAOHUIgBAVNqCPjmU2GGHvl8RYchrtiIg5A9Z--_tc7U0utrW3soLvzysaaxhozXKiVCL-3vdGboWvNUn2_hZKdpDlis58ZCSESYSBA8ulzylQPKYKLCFIoJ0bg-EG-_LZjyuBd8Dyyh0IROXJhgTRCORDIIc0BKd9CZjnC6HxJWU6vTBO5AlNOnnCulpMhzaVKqbILX8JypRajC0Krv7xU148P2_un5shSeBdRwu757uVVt7rT2vQbu-6Hm7X57-4HO01dXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ultrasound-guided needle decompression and steroid injection for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: risk factors for repeat procedures and outcome analysis</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Kim, Su Cheol ; Lee, Sang Min ; Park, Gun Tae ; Jang, Min Chang ; Yoo, Jae Chul</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Su Cheol ; Lee, Sang Min ; Park, Gun Tae ; Jang, Min Chang ; Yoo, Jae Chul</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Although ultrasound-guided needle decompression (US-GND) can treat calcific tendinitis of the shoulder effectively, repeat procedures might be required for unresolved symptoms. We evaluated the overall clinical outcomes of US-GND with subacromial steroid injection and the final results and factors predisposing toward repeat procedures. Methods: Ninety-eight patients who underwent US-GND for calcific tendinitis of the supraspinatus/infraspinatus were analyzed between March 2017 and December 2018. The clinical outcomes (pain visual analog scale, functional visual analog scale [FVAS], and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score) and final subjective satisfaction were compared between groups A (single US-GND) and B (repeat US-GND). The factors predisposing toward repeated US-GNDs were analyzed. Results: We found that 59.3% (58/98) of patient ASES scores were ≥80, and 73.5% of patients (72/98) were satisfied with the outcome. Group B (n=14) demonstrated a significantly higher rate of dominant-arm involvement compared to group A (78.6% vs. 48.8%, p=0.046). However, initial calcification size, shape, number, density, subscapularis involvement, lavage, and procedure time did not differ significantly between the groups. Group B showed poorer final FVAS (7 [interquartile range, 6-8] vs. 8 [interquartile range, 7-9], p=0.036) and subjective satisfaction compared to group A (satisfied: 5 [35.7%] vs. 67 [79.8%], p&lt;0.001]. Conclusions: US-GND with subacromial steroid injection is a viable treatment option for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Dominant-arm involvement was the only independent factor for repeated US-GND. Final outcome of repeated US-GND for unimproved patients was promising; however, these outcomes were poor compared to those of the patients who improved after the first procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2383-8337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2288-8721</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2021, Vol.24 (2), p.55-65</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Su Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Gun Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Min Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Jae Chul</creatorcontrib><title>Ultrasound-guided needle decompression and steroid injection for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: risk factors for repeat procedures and outcome analysis</title><title>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</title><addtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</addtitle><description>Background: Although ultrasound-guided needle decompression (US-GND) can treat calcific tendinitis of the shoulder effectively, repeat procedures might be required for unresolved symptoms. We evaluated the overall clinical outcomes of US-GND with subacromial steroid injection and the final results and factors predisposing toward repeat procedures. Methods: Ninety-eight patients who underwent US-GND for calcific tendinitis of the supraspinatus/infraspinatus were analyzed between March 2017 and December 2018. The clinical outcomes (pain visual analog scale, functional visual analog scale [FVAS], and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score) and final subjective satisfaction were compared between groups A (single US-GND) and B (repeat US-GND). The factors predisposing toward repeated US-GNDs were analyzed. Results: We found that 59.3% (58/98) of patient ASES scores were ≥80, and 73.5% of patients (72/98) were satisfied with the outcome. Group B (n=14) demonstrated a significantly higher rate of dominant-arm involvement compared to group A (78.6% vs. 48.8%, p=0.046). However, initial calcification size, shape, number, density, subscapularis involvement, lavage, and procedure time did not differ significantly between the groups. Group B showed poorer final FVAS (7 [interquartile range, 6-8] vs. 8 [interquartile range, 7-9], p=0.036) and subjective satisfaction compared to group A (satisfied: 5 [35.7%] vs. 67 [79.8%], p&lt;0.001]. Conclusions: US-GND with subacromial steroid injection is a viable treatment option for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Dominant-arm involvement was the only independent factor for repeated US-GND. Final outcome of repeated US-GND for unimproved patients was promising; however, these outcomes were poor compared to those of the patients who improved after the first procedure.</description><issn>2383-8337</issn><issn>2288-8721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjTFOAzEQRS1EJCLIHaahXGnX3rAOHUIgBAVNqCPjmU2GGHvl8RYchrtiIg5A9Z--_tc7U0utrW3soLvzysaaxhozXKiVCL-3vdGboWvNUn2_hZKdpDlis58ZCSESYSBA8ulzylQPKYKLCFIoJ0bg-EG-_LZjyuBd8Dyyh0IROXJhgTRCORDIIc0BKd9CZjnC6HxJWU6vTBO5AlNOnnCulpMhzaVKqbILX8JypRajC0Krv7xU148P2_un5shSeBdRwu757uVVt7rT2vQbu-6Hm7X57-4HO01dXA</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Kim, Su Cheol</creator><creator>Lee, Sang Min</creator><creator>Park, Gun Tae</creator><creator>Jang, Min Chang</creator><creator>Yoo, Jae Chul</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Ultrasound-guided needle decompression and steroid injection for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: risk factors for repeat procedures and outcome analysis</title><author>Kim, Su Cheol ; Lee, Sang Min ; Park, Gun Tae ; Jang, Min Chang ; Yoo, Jae Chul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2021223498547653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Su Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Gun Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Min Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Jae Chul</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Su Cheol</au><au>Lee, Sang Min</au><au>Park, Gun Tae</au><au>Jang, Min Chang</au><au>Yoo, Jae Chul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ultrasound-guided needle decompression and steroid injection for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: risk factors for repeat procedures and outcome analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</jtitle><addtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</addtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>65</epage><pages>55-65</pages><issn>2383-8337</issn><eissn>2288-8721</eissn><abstract>Background: Although ultrasound-guided needle decompression (US-GND) can treat calcific tendinitis of the shoulder effectively, repeat procedures might be required for unresolved symptoms. We evaluated the overall clinical outcomes of US-GND with subacromial steroid injection and the final results and factors predisposing toward repeat procedures. Methods: Ninety-eight patients who underwent US-GND for calcific tendinitis of the supraspinatus/infraspinatus were analyzed between March 2017 and December 2018. The clinical outcomes (pain visual analog scale, functional visual analog scale [FVAS], and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES] score) and final subjective satisfaction were compared between groups A (single US-GND) and B (repeat US-GND). The factors predisposing toward repeated US-GNDs were analyzed. Results: We found that 59.3% (58/98) of patient ASES scores were ≥80, and 73.5% of patients (72/98) were satisfied with the outcome. Group B (n=14) demonstrated a significantly higher rate of dominant-arm involvement compared to group A (78.6% vs. 48.8%, p=0.046). However, initial calcification size, shape, number, density, subscapularis involvement, lavage, and procedure time did not differ significantly between the groups. Group B showed poorer final FVAS (7 [interquartile range, 6-8] vs. 8 [interquartile range, 7-9], p=0.036) and subjective satisfaction compared to group A (satisfied: 5 [35.7%] vs. 67 [79.8%], p&lt;0.001]. Conclusions: US-GND with subacromial steroid injection is a viable treatment option for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder. Dominant-arm involvement was the only independent factor for repeated US-GND. Final outcome of repeated US-GND for unimproved patients was promising; however, these outcomes were poor compared to those of the patients who improved after the first procedure.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2383-8337
ispartof Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2021, Vol.24 (2), p.55-65
issn 2383-8337
2288-8721
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO202122349854765
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
title Ultrasound-guided needle decompression and steroid injection for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: risk factors for repeat procedures and outcome analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T06%3A32%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ultrasound-guided%20needle%20decompression%20and%20steroid%20injection%20for%20calcific%20tendinitis%20of%20the%20shoulder:%20risk%20factors%20for%20repeat%20procedures%20and%20outcome%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinics%20in%20shoulder%20and%20elbow&rft.au=Kim,%20Su%20Cheol&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=65&rft.pages=55-65&rft.issn=2383-8337&rft.eissn=2288-8721&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO202122349854765%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true