Oncologic Outcomes after Laparoscopic and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Propensity Score Matching Analysis

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the oncologic and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Materials and Methods: From July 2006 to November 2016, 384 patients underwent distal gastrectomy for AGC. Data on...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastric cancer 2019, Vol.19 (1), p.83-91
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Sang Hyun, Chung, Yoona, Kim, Yong Ho, Choi, Sung Il
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 91
container_issue 1
container_start_page 83
container_title Journal of gastric cancer
container_volume 19
creator Kim, Sang Hyun
Chung, Yoona
Kim, Yong Ho
Choi, Sung Il
description Purpose: This study aimed to compare the oncologic and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Materials and Methods: From July 2006 to November 2016, 384 patients underwent distal gastrectomy for AGC. Data on short- and long-term outcomes were prospectively collected and reviewed. Propensity score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare the LDG and ODG groups. Results: The operative times were longer for the LDG group than for the ODG group. However, the time to resumption of diet and the length of hospital stay were shorter in the LDG group than in the ODG group (4.7 vs. 5.6 days, P=0.049 and 9.6 vs. 11.5 days, P=0.035, respectively). The extent of lymph node dissection in the LDG group was more limited than in the ODG group (P=0.002), although there was no difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes between the 2 groups. The 3-year overall survival rates were 98% and 86.9% (P=0.018), and the 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 86.3% and 75.3% (P=0.259), respectively, in the LDG and ODG groups. Conclusions: LDG is safe and feasible for AGC, with earlier recovery after surgery and longterm oncologic outcomes comparable to those of ODG.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201912742273206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO201912742273206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2019127422732063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNTU1LAzEUDEWhRfsf3qXHQpJtt9bbUtuKH6ygB2_lkc3W1DRvyUuFPfrPjah35zIzzAwzECMtl8V0Xs7U2Z--0q9DMWY-yIx5qZTUI_FZB0Oe9s5AfUqGjpYB22QjPGCHkdhQlzMMDdSdDXDjOKGHLXKK1iQ69tBShKr5wGBs8xPkwerbxmt4ipRn7FIPz4aihUdM5s2FPVQBfc-OL8V5i57t-JcvxGSzflndTt_zlduFhv3urrqvtVRLpRczrReFlmXx394XWkdRHw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Oncologic Outcomes after Laparoscopic and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Propensity Score Matching Analysis</title><source>KoreaMed Synapse</source><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Kim, Sang Hyun ; Chung, Yoona ; Kim, Yong Ho ; Choi, Sung Il</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Hyun ; Chung, Yoona ; Kim, Yong Ho ; Choi, Sung Il</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: This study aimed to compare the oncologic and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Materials and Methods: From July 2006 to November 2016, 384 patients underwent distal gastrectomy for AGC. Data on short- and long-term outcomes were prospectively collected and reviewed. Propensity score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare the LDG and ODG groups. Results: The operative times were longer for the LDG group than for the ODG group. However, the time to resumption of diet and the length of hospital stay were shorter in the LDG group than in the ODG group (4.7 vs. 5.6 days, P=0.049 and 9.6 vs. 11.5 days, P=0.035, respectively). The extent of lymph node dissection in the LDG group was more limited than in the ODG group (P=0.002), although there was no difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes between the 2 groups. The 3-year overall survival rates were 98% and 86.9% (P=0.018), and the 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 86.3% and 75.3% (P=0.259), respectively, in the LDG and ODG groups. Conclusions: LDG is safe and feasible for AGC, with earlier recovery after surgery and longterm oncologic outcomes comparable to those of ODG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2093-582X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2093-5641</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Journal of gastric cancer, 2019, Vol.19 (1), p.83-91</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Yoona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sung Il</creatorcontrib><title>Oncologic Outcomes after Laparoscopic and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Propensity Score Matching Analysis</title><title>Journal of gastric cancer</title><addtitle>Journal of gastric cancer : jgc</addtitle><description>Purpose: This study aimed to compare the oncologic and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Materials and Methods: From July 2006 to November 2016, 384 patients underwent distal gastrectomy for AGC. Data on short- and long-term outcomes were prospectively collected and reviewed. Propensity score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare the LDG and ODG groups. Results: The operative times were longer for the LDG group than for the ODG group. However, the time to resumption of diet and the length of hospital stay were shorter in the LDG group than in the ODG group (4.7 vs. 5.6 days, P=0.049 and 9.6 vs. 11.5 days, P=0.035, respectively). The extent of lymph node dissection in the LDG group was more limited than in the ODG group (P=0.002), although there was no difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes between the 2 groups. The 3-year overall survival rates were 98% and 86.9% (P=0.018), and the 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 86.3% and 75.3% (P=0.259), respectively, in the LDG and ODG groups. Conclusions: LDG is safe and feasible for AGC, with earlier recovery after surgery and longterm oncologic outcomes comparable to those of ODG.</description><issn>2093-582X</issn><issn>2093-5641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNTU1LAzEUDEWhRfsf3qXHQpJtt9bbUtuKH6ygB2_lkc3W1DRvyUuFPfrPjah35zIzzAwzECMtl8V0Xs7U2Z--0q9DMWY-yIx5qZTUI_FZB0Oe9s5AfUqGjpYB22QjPGCHkdhQlzMMDdSdDXDjOKGHLXKK1iQ69tBShKr5wGBs8xPkwerbxmt4ipRn7FIPz4aihUdM5s2FPVQBfc-OL8V5i57t-JcvxGSzflndTt_zlduFhv3urrqvtVRLpRczrReFlmXx394XWkdRHw</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Kim, Sang Hyun</creator><creator>Chung, Yoona</creator><creator>Kim, Yong Ho</creator><creator>Choi, Sung Il</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Oncologic Outcomes after Laparoscopic and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Propensity Score Matching Analysis</title><author>Kim, Sang Hyun ; Chung, Yoona ; Kim, Yong Ho ; Choi, Sung Il</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2019127422732063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sang Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Yoona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Sung Il</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastric cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Sang Hyun</au><au>Chung, Yoona</au><au>Kim, Yong Ho</au><au>Choi, Sung Il</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Oncologic Outcomes after Laparoscopic and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Propensity Score Matching Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastric cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of gastric cancer : jgc</addtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>83</spage><epage>91</epage><pages>83-91</pages><issn>2093-582X</issn><eissn>2093-5641</eissn><abstract>Purpose: This study aimed to compare the oncologic and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Materials and Methods: From July 2006 to November 2016, 384 patients underwent distal gastrectomy for AGC. Data on short- and long-term outcomes were prospectively collected and reviewed. Propensity score matching was applied at a ratio of 1:1 to compare the LDG and ODG groups. Results: The operative times were longer for the LDG group than for the ODG group. However, the time to resumption of diet and the length of hospital stay were shorter in the LDG group than in the ODG group (4.7 vs. 5.6 days, P=0.049 and 9.6 vs. 11.5 days, P=0.035, respectively). The extent of lymph node dissection in the LDG group was more limited than in the ODG group (P=0.002), although there was no difference in the number of retrieved lymph nodes between the 2 groups. The 3-year overall survival rates were 98% and 86.9% (P=0.018), and the 3-year recurrence-free survival rates were 86.3% and 75.3% (P=0.259), respectively, in the LDG and ODG groups. Conclusions: LDG is safe and feasible for AGC, with earlier recovery after surgery and longterm oncologic outcomes comparable to those of ODG.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2093-582X
ispartof Journal of gastric cancer, 2019, Vol.19 (1), p.83-91
issn 2093-582X
2093-5641
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201912742273206
source KoreaMed Synapse; KoreaMed Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
title Oncologic Outcomes after Laparoscopic and Open Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Propensity Score Matching Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A08%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Oncologic%20Outcomes%20after%20Laparoscopic%20and%20Open%20Distal%20Gastrectomy%20for%20Advanced%20Gastric%20Cancer:%20Propensity%20Score%20Matching%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastric%20cancer&rft.au=Kim,%20Sang%20Hyun&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=83&rft.epage=91&rft.pages=83-91&rft.issn=2093-582X&rft.eissn=2093-5641&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO201912742273206%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true