Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle
Objective: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. Methods: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of $281{\pm}15.6kg$, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences 2018, Vol.31 (6), p.851-858 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | kor |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 858 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 851 |
container_title | Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Wei, Ming Chen, Zhiqiang Wei, Shengjuan Geng, Guangduo Yan, Peishi |
description | Objective: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. Methods: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of $281{\pm}15.6kg$, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. Results: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p>0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201813164519832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO201813164519832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2018131645198323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirEOgjAURRujiUb5h7c4kvBACoyGaIwOLsaVFHjFxtIaWkn8exn8AKdzc-6ZsRUWGQ_TFLP5tCPEME54tmSBc6qO0iiLC-R8xe6l7V9iUM4aEL01HfTkH7Z1YCWQlNR4NRKQoaH7AI1Cv4VXUzzdjR0MOKVFRyDtADXRJIX3mjZsIYV2FPy4Ztvj4VaewqdyXlWmdbo67y_XOMIcE-S7FIs8iZN_uy-SW0GO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wei, Ming ; Chen, Zhiqiang ; Wei, Shengjuan ; Geng, Guangduo ; Yan, Peishi</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ming ; Chen, Zhiqiang ; Wei, Shengjuan ; Geng, Guangduo ; Yan, Peishi</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. Methods: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of $281{\pm}15.6kg$, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. Results: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p>0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p<0.05). In addition, the corn silage estimates at the substitution ratio of 30% were similar to those estimated by direct and regression methods. Conclusion: In determining the energy value of corn silage using substitution method, there was a discrepancy between different substitution ratios, and the substitution ratio of 30% was more appropriate than 10% or 60% in the current study. The regression method based on multiple point substitution was more appropriate than single point substitution on energy evaluation of feedstuffs for beef cattle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-2367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1976-5517</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences, 2018, Vol.31 (6), p.851-858</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Shengjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Guangduo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Peishi</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle</title><title>Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences</title><addtitle>Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences</addtitle><description>Objective: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. Methods: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of $281{\pm}15.6kg$, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. Results: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p>0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p<0.05). In addition, the corn silage estimates at the substitution ratio of 30% were similar to those estimated by direct and regression methods. Conclusion: In determining the energy value of corn silage using substitution method, there was a discrepancy between different substitution ratios, and the substitution ratio of 30% was more appropriate than 10% or 60% in the current study. The regression method based on multiple point substitution was more appropriate than single point substitution on energy evaluation of feedstuffs for beef cattle.</description><issn>1011-2367</issn><issn>1976-5517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirEOgjAURRujiUb5h7c4kvBACoyGaIwOLsaVFHjFxtIaWkn8exn8AKdzc-6ZsRUWGQ_TFLP5tCPEME54tmSBc6qO0iiLC-R8xe6l7V9iUM4aEL01HfTkH7Z1YCWQlNR4NRKQoaH7AI1Cv4VXUzzdjR0MOKVFRyDtADXRJIX3mjZsIYV2FPy4Ztvj4VaewqdyXlWmdbo67y_XOMIcE-S7FIs8iZN_uy-SW0GO</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Wei, Ming</creator><creator>Chen, Zhiqiang</creator><creator>Wei, Shengjuan</creator><creator>Geng, Guangduo</creator><creator>Yan, Peishi</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle</title><author>Wei, Ming ; Chen, Zhiqiang ; Wei, Shengjuan ; Geng, Guangduo ; Yan, Peishi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2018131645198323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Shengjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Guangduo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Peishi</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Ming</au><au>Chen, Zhiqiang</au><au>Wei, Shengjuan</au><au>Geng, Guangduo</au><au>Yan, Peishi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle</atitle><jtitle>Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>851</spage><epage>858</epage><pages>851-858</pages><issn>1011-2367</issn><eissn>1976-5517</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. Methods: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of $281{\pm}15.6kg$, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. Results: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p>0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p<0.05). In addition, the corn silage estimates at the substitution ratio of 30% were similar to those estimated by direct and regression methods. Conclusion: In determining the energy value of corn silage using substitution method, there was a discrepancy between different substitution ratios, and the substitution ratio of 30% was more appropriate than 10% or 60% in the current study. The regression method based on multiple point substitution was more appropriate than single point substitution on energy evaluation of feedstuffs for beef cattle.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1011-2367 |
ispartof | Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences, 2018, Vol.31 (6), p.851-858 |
issn | 1011-2367 1976-5517 |
language | kor |
recordid | cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201813164519832 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
title | Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A57%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20among%20methods%20of%20effective%20energy%20evaluation%20of%20corn%20silage%20for%20beef%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Asian-australasian%20journal%20of%20animal%20sciences&rft.au=Wei,%20Ming&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=851&rft.epage=858&rft.pages=851-858&rft.issn=1011-2367&rft.eissn=1976-5517&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO201813164519832%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |