Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle

Objective: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. Methods: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of $281{\pm}15.6kg$, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences 2018, Vol.31 (6), p.851-858
Hauptverfasser: Wei, Ming, Chen, Zhiqiang, Wei, Shengjuan, Geng, Guangduo, Yan, Peishi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 858
container_issue 6
container_start_page 851
container_title Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences
container_volume 31
creator Wei, Ming
Chen, Zhiqiang
Wei, Shengjuan
Geng, Guangduo
Yan, Peishi
description Objective: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. Methods: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of $281{\pm}15.6kg$, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. Results: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p>0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201813164519832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO201813164519832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2018131645198323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirEOgjAURRujiUb5h7c4kvBACoyGaIwOLsaVFHjFxtIaWkn8exn8AKdzc-6ZsRUWGQ_TFLP5tCPEME54tmSBc6qO0iiLC-R8xe6l7V9iUM4aEL01HfTkH7Z1YCWQlNR4NRKQoaH7AI1Cv4VXUzzdjR0MOKVFRyDtADXRJIX3mjZsIYV2FPy4Ztvj4VaewqdyXlWmdbo67y_XOMIcE-S7FIs8iZN_uy-SW0GO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wei, Ming ; Chen, Zhiqiang ; Wei, Shengjuan ; Geng, Guangduo ; Yan, Peishi</creator><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ming ; Chen, Zhiqiang ; Wei, Shengjuan ; Geng, Guangduo ; Yan, Peishi</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. Methods: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of $281{\pm}15.6kg$, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. Results: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p&gt;0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p&lt;0.05). In addition, the corn silage estimates at the substitution ratio of 30% were similar to those estimated by direct and regression methods. Conclusion: In determining the energy value of corn silage using substitution method, there was a discrepancy between different substitution ratios, and the substitution ratio of 30% was more appropriate than 10% or 60% in the current study. The regression method based on multiple point substitution was more appropriate than single point substitution on energy evaluation of feedstuffs for beef cattle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1011-2367</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1976-5517</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences, 2018, Vol.31 (6), p.851-858</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Shengjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Guangduo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Peishi</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle</title><title>Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences</title><addtitle>Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences</addtitle><description>Objective: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. Methods: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of $281{\pm}15.6kg$, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. Results: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p&gt;0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p&lt;0.05). In addition, the corn silage estimates at the substitution ratio of 30% were similar to those estimated by direct and regression methods. Conclusion: In determining the energy value of corn silage using substitution method, there was a discrepancy between different substitution ratios, and the substitution ratio of 30% was more appropriate than 10% or 60% in the current study. The regression method based on multiple point substitution was more appropriate than single point substitution on energy evaluation of feedstuffs for beef cattle.</description><issn>1011-2367</issn><issn>1976-5517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirEOgjAURRujiUb5h7c4kvBACoyGaIwOLsaVFHjFxtIaWkn8exn8AKdzc-6ZsRUWGQ_TFLP5tCPEME54tmSBc6qO0iiLC-R8xe6l7V9iUM4aEL01HfTkH7Z1YCWQlNR4NRKQoaH7AI1Cv4VXUzzdjR0MOKVFRyDtADXRJIX3mjZsIYV2FPy4Ztvj4VaewqdyXlWmdbo67y_XOMIcE-S7FIs8iZN_uy-SW0GO</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Wei, Ming</creator><creator>Chen, Zhiqiang</creator><creator>Wei, Shengjuan</creator><creator>Geng, Guangduo</creator><creator>Yan, Peishi</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle</title><author>Wei, Ming ; Chen, Zhiqiang ; Wei, Shengjuan ; Geng, Guangduo ; Yan, Peishi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2018131645198323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Shengjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geng, Guangduo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Peishi</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wei, Ming</au><au>Chen, Zhiqiang</au><au>Wei, Shengjuan</au><au>Geng, Guangduo</au><au>Yan, Peishi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle</atitle><jtitle>Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>851</spage><epage>858</epage><pages>851-858</pages><issn>1011-2367</issn><eissn>1976-5517</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study was conducted to compare different methods on effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle. Methods: Twenty Wandong bulls (Chinese indigenous yellow cattle) with initial body weight of $281{\pm}15.6kg$, were assigned to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with 4 animals per treatment in a randomized complete block design. Five dietary treatments included group 1 with corn silage only diet, group 2 with corn silage-concentrate basal diet (BD) and 3 groups with 3 test diets, which were the BD partly substituted by corn silage at 10%, 30%, and 60%. The total collection digestion trial was conducted for 5 d for each block after a 10-d adaptation period, and then an open-circuit respiratory cage was used to measure the gas exchange of each animal in a consecutive 4-d period. Results: The direct method-derived metabolizable energy and net energy of corn silage were 8.86 and 5.15 MJ/kg dry matter (DM), expressed as net energy requirement for maintenance and gain were 5.28 and 2.90 MJ/kg DM, respectively; the corresponding regression method-derived estimates were 8.96, 5.34, 5.37, and 2.98 MJ/kg DM, respectively. The direct method-derived estimates were not different (p&gt;0.05) from those obtained using the regression method. Using substitution method, the nutrient apparent digestibility and effective energy values of corn silage varied with the increased corn silage substitution ratio (p&lt;0.05). In addition, the corn silage estimates at the substitution ratio of 30% were similar to those estimated by direct and regression methods. Conclusion: In determining the energy value of corn silage using substitution method, there was a discrepancy between different substitution ratios, and the substitution ratio of 30% was more appropriate than 10% or 60% in the current study. The regression method based on multiple point substitution was more appropriate than single point substitution on energy evaluation of feedstuffs for beef cattle.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1011-2367
ispartof Asian-australasian journal of animal sciences, 2018, Vol.31 (6), p.851-858
issn 1011-2367
1976-5517
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201813164519832
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
title Comparison among methods of effective energy evaluation of corn silage for beef cattle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A57%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20among%20methods%20of%20effective%20energy%20evaluation%20of%20corn%20silage%20for%20beef%20cattle&rft.jtitle=Asian-australasian%20journal%20of%20animal%20sciences&rft.au=Wei,%20Ming&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=851&rft.epage=858&rft.pages=851-858&rft.issn=1011-2367&rft.eissn=1976-5517&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO201813164519832%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true