The Radiologic Comparison of Operative Treatment Using a Hook Plate versus a Distal Clavicle Locking Plate of Distal Clavicle Fracture
Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiologic results of patients who underwent surgery with a hook plate and a locking plate in distal clavicle fractures. Methods: Sixty patients underwent surgical treatment for Neer type IIa, IIb, III, and V distal clavicle fracture. Twenty-e...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinics in shoulder and elbow 2018, Vol.21 (4), p.227-233 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | kor |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 233 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 227 |
| container_title | Clinics in shoulder and elbow |
| container_volume | 21 |
| creator | Yoon, Byungil Kim, Jae Yoon Lee, Jae-Sung Jung, Hyoung Seok |
| description | Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiologic results of patients who underwent surgery with a hook plate and a locking plate in distal clavicle fractures. Methods: Sixty patients underwent surgical treatment for Neer type IIa, IIb, III, and V distal clavicle fracture. Twenty-eight patients underwent fracture fixation with a hook plate and 32 with a locking plate. Coracoclavicular distance was measured on standard anteroposterior radiographs before and after the surgery, and union was confirmed by radiograph or computed tomography taken at 6 months postoperatively. Other radiologic complications like osteolysis was also checked. Results: Bony union was confirmed in 59 patients out of 60 patients, and 1 patient in the hook plate group showed delayed union. Coracoclavicular distance was decreased more in the hook plate group after surgery (p |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201810263413539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO201810263413539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2018102634135393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNzMFKw0AQBuBFFCzad5iLx0B2p5rtUaKlqFCReC5jOq1Dttmys80j-NxG9OSpp_n5-f45MxPnvC985ez5mNFj4RGrSzNVlY9yhm5e2RIn5qv5ZHijjcQQd9JCHfcHSqKxh7iF1YETZRkYmsSU99xneFfpd0CwjLGD10CZYeCkRx27B9FMAepAg7SB4SW23Y_-ZePD_2CRqM3HxNfmYktBefp3r8zN4rGpl0U3DmTdbzSsn-6fV6603pbuDmcWb3GOp7pvqqNSGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Radiologic Comparison of Operative Treatment Using a Hook Plate versus a Distal Clavicle Locking Plate of Distal Clavicle Fracture</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yoon, Byungil ; Kim, Jae Yoon ; Lee, Jae-Sung ; Jung, Hyoung Seok</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Byungil ; Kim, Jae Yoon ; Lee, Jae-Sung ; Jung, Hyoung Seok</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiologic results of patients who underwent surgery with a hook plate and a locking plate in distal clavicle fractures. Methods: Sixty patients underwent surgical treatment for Neer type IIa, IIb, III, and V distal clavicle fracture. Twenty-eight patients underwent fracture fixation with a hook plate and 32 with a locking plate. Coracoclavicular distance was measured on standard anteroposterior radiographs before and after the surgery, and union was confirmed by radiograph or computed tomography taken at 6 months postoperatively. Other radiologic complications like osteolysis was also checked. Results: Bony union was confirmed in 59 patients out of 60 patients, and 1 patient in the hook plate group showed delayed union. Coracoclavicular distance was decreased more in the hook plate group after surgery (p<0.01). After 6 weeks of the hook plate removal, the coracoclavicular distance was increased a little compared to before metal removal, but there was no difference compared to the contralateral shoulder. Eleven out of 28 patients (39.3%) showed osteolysis on the acromial undersurface in the hook plate group. Conclusions: Both the hook plate group and the locking plate group showed satisfactory radiologic results in distal clavicle fractures. Both hook plate and locking plate could be a good treatment option if it is used in proper indication in distal clavicle fracture with acromioclavicular subluxation or dislocation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2383-8337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2288-8721</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2018, Vol.21 (4), p.227-233</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Byungil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jae Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jae-Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hyoung Seok</creatorcontrib><title>The Radiologic Comparison of Operative Treatment Using a Hook Plate versus a Distal Clavicle Locking Plate of Distal Clavicle Fracture</title><title>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</title><addtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</addtitle><description>Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiologic results of patients who underwent surgery with a hook plate and a locking plate in distal clavicle fractures. Methods: Sixty patients underwent surgical treatment for Neer type IIa, IIb, III, and V distal clavicle fracture. Twenty-eight patients underwent fracture fixation with a hook plate and 32 with a locking plate. Coracoclavicular distance was measured on standard anteroposterior radiographs before and after the surgery, and union was confirmed by radiograph or computed tomography taken at 6 months postoperatively. Other radiologic complications like osteolysis was also checked. Results: Bony union was confirmed in 59 patients out of 60 patients, and 1 patient in the hook plate group showed delayed union. Coracoclavicular distance was decreased more in the hook plate group after surgery (p<0.01). After 6 weeks of the hook plate removal, the coracoclavicular distance was increased a little compared to before metal removal, but there was no difference compared to the contralateral shoulder. Eleven out of 28 patients (39.3%) showed osteolysis on the acromial undersurface in the hook plate group. Conclusions: Both the hook plate group and the locking plate group showed satisfactory radiologic results in distal clavicle fractures. Both hook plate and locking plate could be a good treatment option if it is used in proper indication in distal clavicle fracture with acromioclavicular subluxation or dislocation.</description><issn>2383-8337</issn><issn>2288-8721</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNzMFKw0AQBuBFFCzad5iLx0B2p5rtUaKlqFCReC5jOq1Dttmys80j-NxG9OSpp_n5-f45MxPnvC985ez5mNFj4RGrSzNVlY9yhm5e2RIn5qv5ZHijjcQQd9JCHfcHSqKxh7iF1YETZRkYmsSU99xneFfpd0CwjLGD10CZYeCkRx27B9FMAepAg7SB4SW23Y_-ZePD_2CRqM3HxNfmYktBefp3r8zN4rGpl0U3DmTdbzSsn-6fV6603pbuDmcWb3GOp7pvqqNSGw</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Yoon, Byungil</creator><creator>Kim, Jae Yoon</creator><creator>Lee, Jae-Sung</creator><creator>Jung, Hyoung Seok</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>The Radiologic Comparison of Operative Treatment Using a Hook Plate versus a Distal Clavicle Locking Plate of Distal Clavicle Fracture</title><author>Yoon, Byungil ; Kim, Jae Yoon ; Lee, Jae-Sung ; Jung, Hyoung Seok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2018102634135393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoon, Byungil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jae Yoon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jae-Sung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Hyoung Seok</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoon, Byungil</au><au>Kim, Jae Yoon</au><au>Lee, Jae-Sung</au><au>Jung, Hyoung Seok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Radiologic Comparison of Operative Treatment Using a Hook Plate versus a Distal Clavicle Locking Plate of Distal Clavicle Fracture</atitle><jtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</jtitle><addtitle>Clinics in shoulder and elbow</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>227</spage><epage>233</epage><pages>227-233</pages><issn>2383-8337</issn><eissn>2288-8721</eissn><abstract>Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the radiologic results of patients who underwent surgery with a hook plate and a locking plate in distal clavicle fractures. Methods: Sixty patients underwent surgical treatment for Neer type IIa, IIb, III, and V distal clavicle fracture. Twenty-eight patients underwent fracture fixation with a hook plate and 32 with a locking plate. Coracoclavicular distance was measured on standard anteroposterior radiographs before and after the surgery, and union was confirmed by radiograph or computed tomography taken at 6 months postoperatively. Other radiologic complications like osteolysis was also checked. Results: Bony union was confirmed in 59 patients out of 60 patients, and 1 patient in the hook plate group showed delayed union. Coracoclavicular distance was decreased more in the hook plate group after surgery (p<0.01). After 6 weeks of the hook plate removal, the coracoclavicular distance was increased a little compared to before metal removal, but there was no difference compared to the contralateral shoulder. Eleven out of 28 patients (39.3%) showed osteolysis on the acromial undersurface in the hook plate group. Conclusions: Both the hook plate group and the locking plate group showed satisfactory radiologic results in distal clavicle fractures. Both hook plate and locking plate could be a good treatment option if it is used in proper indication in distal clavicle fracture with acromioclavicular subluxation or dislocation.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2383-8337 |
| ispartof | Clinics in shoulder and elbow, 2018, Vol.21 (4), p.227-233 |
| issn | 2383-8337 2288-8721 |
| language | kor |
| recordid | cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201810263413539 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
| title | The Radiologic Comparison of Operative Treatment Using a Hook Plate versus a Distal Clavicle Locking Plate of Distal Clavicle Fracture |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T19%3A25%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Radiologic%20Comparison%20of%20Operative%20Treatment%20Using%20a%20Hook%20Plate%20versus%20a%20Distal%20Clavicle%20Locking%20Plate%20of%20Distal%20Clavicle%20Fracture&rft.jtitle=Clinics%20in%20shoulder%20and%20elbow&rft.au=Yoon,%20Byungil&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=227&rft.epage=233&rft.pages=227-233&rft.issn=2383-8337&rft.eissn=2288-8721&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO201810263413539%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |