A comparative evaluation of cytotoxicity of root canal sealers: an in vitro study

Objectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers i.e. Apexit Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent), Endomethasone N (Septodont), AH-26 (Dentsply) and Pulpdent Root Canal Sealer (Pulpdent), on a mouse fibroblast cell line (L929). Mat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Restorative dentistry & endodontics 2013, Vol.38 (4), p.204-209
Hauptverfasser: Badole, Gautam Pyarelal, Warhadpande, Manjusha Madhukar, Meshram, Ganesh Kothiramji, Bahadure, Rakesh Namdeoraoji, Tawani, Shubha Gopal, Tawani, Gopal, Badole, Shital Gautam
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 209
container_issue 4
container_start_page 204
container_title Restorative dentistry & endodontics
container_volume 38
creator Badole, Gautam Pyarelal
Warhadpande, Manjusha Madhukar
Meshram, Ganesh Kothiramji
Bahadure, Rakesh Namdeoraoji
Tawani, Shubha Gopal
Tawani, Gopal
Badole, Shital Gautam
description Objectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers i.e. Apexit Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent), Endomethasone N (Septodont), AH-26 (Dentsply) and Pulpdent Root Canal Sealer (Pulpdent), on a mouse fibroblast cell line (L929). Materials and Methods: Thirty two discs for each sealer (5 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height) were fabricated in Teflon mould. The sealer extraction was made in cell culture medium (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium, DMEM) using the ratio 1.25 $cm^2/mL$ between the surface of the sealer samples and the volume of medium in a shaker incubator. Extraction of each sealer was obtained at 24 hr, 7th day, 14th day, and one month of interval. These extracts were incubated with L929 cell line and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was done. Two-way ANOVA for interaction effects between sealer and time and Post-hoc multiple comparison using Tukey's test across all the 16 different groups were used for statistical analysis. Results: Apexit Plus root canal sealer was significantly less toxic than other sealers (p < 0.05) and showed higher cellular growth than control. Endomethasone N showed mild cytotoxicity. AH-26 showed severe toxicity which became mild after one month while Pulpdent Root Canal Sealer showed severe to moderate toxicity. Conclusions: Apexit Plus was relatively biocompatible sealer as compared to other three sealers which were cytotoxic at their initial stages, however, they became biocompatible with time.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201336448943189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO201336448943189</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2013364489431893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNikELgjAYQEcUJOV_-C4dBXVzzm4SRdQhgu6y5oTR2mKbkv--gujc6b0Hb4KiPMckKSml058XbI5i79U1JaQsGC7zCJ1rEPb-4I4HNUiQA9f9W60B24EYgw32qYQK46edtQEEN1yDl1xL59fADSgDgwrOgg99Oy7RrOPay_jLBVrttpfNPrkpH1RjWq-bQ3085WmGMSWEVQRnrML_fi8sDz_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative evaluation of cytotoxicity of root canal sealers: an in vitro study</title><source>KoreaMed Synapse</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Badole, Gautam Pyarelal ; Warhadpande, Manjusha Madhukar ; Meshram, Ganesh Kothiramji ; Bahadure, Rakesh Namdeoraoji ; Tawani, Shubha Gopal ; Tawani, Gopal ; Badole, Shital Gautam</creator><creatorcontrib>Badole, Gautam Pyarelal ; Warhadpande, Manjusha Madhukar ; Meshram, Ganesh Kothiramji ; Bahadure, Rakesh Namdeoraoji ; Tawani, Shubha Gopal ; Tawani, Gopal ; Badole, Shital Gautam</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers i.e. Apexit Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent), Endomethasone N (Septodont), AH-26 (Dentsply) and Pulpdent Root Canal Sealer (Pulpdent), on a mouse fibroblast cell line (L929). Materials and Methods: Thirty two discs for each sealer (5 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height) were fabricated in Teflon mould. The sealer extraction was made in cell culture medium (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium, DMEM) using the ratio 1.25 $cm^2/mL$ between the surface of the sealer samples and the volume of medium in a shaker incubator. Extraction of each sealer was obtained at 24 hr, 7th day, 14th day, and one month of interval. These extracts were incubated with L929 cell line and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was done. Two-way ANOVA for interaction effects between sealer and time and Post-hoc multiple comparison using Tukey's test across all the 16 different groups were used for statistical analysis. Results: Apexit Plus root canal sealer was significantly less toxic than other sealers (p &lt; 0.05) and showed higher cellular growth than control. Endomethasone N showed mild cytotoxicity. AH-26 showed severe toxicity which became mild after one month while Pulpdent Root Canal Sealer showed severe to moderate toxicity. Conclusions: Apexit Plus was relatively biocompatible sealer as compared to other three sealers which were cytotoxic at their initial stages, however, they became biocompatible with time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-7658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2234-7666</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics, 2013, Vol.38 (4), p.204-209</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Badole, Gautam Pyarelal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warhadpande, Manjusha Madhukar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meshram, Ganesh Kothiramji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahadure, Rakesh Namdeoraoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawani, Shubha Gopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawani, Gopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badole, Shital Gautam</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative evaluation of cytotoxicity of root canal sealers: an in vitro study</title><title>Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics</title><addtitle>RDE : Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics</addtitle><description>Objectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers i.e. Apexit Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent), Endomethasone N (Septodont), AH-26 (Dentsply) and Pulpdent Root Canal Sealer (Pulpdent), on a mouse fibroblast cell line (L929). Materials and Methods: Thirty two discs for each sealer (5 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height) were fabricated in Teflon mould. The sealer extraction was made in cell culture medium (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium, DMEM) using the ratio 1.25 $cm^2/mL$ between the surface of the sealer samples and the volume of medium in a shaker incubator. Extraction of each sealer was obtained at 24 hr, 7th day, 14th day, and one month of interval. These extracts were incubated with L929 cell line and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was done. Two-way ANOVA for interaction effects between sealer and time and Post-hoc multiple comparison using Tukey's test across all the 16 different groups were used for statistical analysis. Results: Apexit Plus root canal sealer was significantly less toxic than other sealers (p &lt; 0.05) and showed higher cellular growth than control. Endomethasone N showed mild cytotoxicity. AH-26 showed severe toxicity which became mild after one month while Pulpdent Root Canal Sealer showed severe to moderate toxicity. Conclusions: Apexit Plus was relatively biocompatible sealer as compared to other three sealers which were cytotoxic at their initial stages, however, they became biocompatible with time.</description><issn>2234-7658</issn><issn>2234-7666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNqNikELgjAYQEcUJOV_-C4dBXVzzm4SRdQhgu6y5oTR2mKbkv--gujc6b0Hb4KiPMckKSml058XbI5i79U1JaQsGC7zCJ1rEPb-4I4HNUiQA9f9W60B24EYgw32qYQK46edtQEEN1yDl1xL59fADSgDgwrOgg99Oy7RrOPay_jLBVrttpfNPrkpH1RjWq-bQ3085WmGMSWEVQRnrML_fi8sDz_s</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Badole, Gautam Pyarelal</creator><creator>Warhadpande, Manjusha Madhukar</creator><creator>Meshram, Ganesh Kothiramji</creator><creator>Bahadure, Rakesh Namdeoraoji</creator><creator>Tawani, Shubha Gopal</creator><creator>Tawani, Gopal</creator><creator>Badole, Shital Gautam</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>A comparative evaluation of cytotoxicity of root canal sealers: an in vitro study</title><author>Badole, Gautam Pyarelal ; Warhadpande, Manjusha Madhukar ; Meshram, Ganesh Kothiramji ; Bahadure, Rakesh Namdeoraoji ; Tawani, Shubha Gopal ; Tawani, Gopal ; Badole, Shital Gautam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2013364489431893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Badole, Gautam Pyarelal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warhadpande, Manjusha Madhukar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meshram, Ganesh Kothiramji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahadure, Rakesh Namdeoraoji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawani, Shubha Gopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tawani, Gopal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badole, Shital Gautam</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Badole, Gautam Pyarelal</au><au>Warhadpande, Manjusha Madhukar</au><au>Meshram, Ganesh Kothiramji</au><au>Bahadure, Rakesh Namdeoraoji</au><au>Tawani, Shubha Gopal</au><au>Tawani, Gopal</au><au>Badole, Shital Gautam</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative evaluation of cytotoxicity of root canal sealers: an in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics</jtitle><addtitle>RDE : Restorative dentistry &amp; endodontics</addtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>204-209</pages><issn>2234-7658</issn><eissn>2234-7666</eissn><abstract>Objectives: The objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the cytotoxicity of four different root canal sealers i.e. Apexit Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent), Endomethasone N (Septodont), AH-26 (Dentsply) and Pulpdent Root Canal Sealer (Pulpdent), on a mouse fibroblast cell line (L929). Materials and Methods: Thirty two discs for each sealer (5 mm in diameter and 2 mm in height) were fabricated in Teflon mould. The sealer extraction was made in cell culture medium (Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium, DMEM) using the ratio 1.25 $cm^2/mL$ between the surface of the sealer samples and the volume of medium in a shaker incubator. Extraction of each sealer was obtained at 24 hr, 7th day, 14th day, and one month of interval. These extracts were incubated with L929 cell line and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was done. Two-way ANOVA for interaction effects between sealer and time and Post-hoc multiple comparison using Tukey's test across all the 16 different groups were used for statistical analysis. Results: Apexit Plus root canal sealer was significantly less toxic than other sealers (p &lt; 0.05) and showed higher cellular growth than control. Endomethasone N showed mild cytotoxicity. AH-26 showed severe toxicity which became mild after one month while Pulpdent Root Canal Sealer showed severe to moderate toxicity. Conclusions: Apexit Plus was relatively biocompatible sealer as compared to other three sealers which were cytotoxic at their initial stages, however, they became biocompatible with time.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2234-7658
ispartof Restorative dentistry & endodontics, 2013, Vol.38 (4), p.204-209
issn 2234-7658
2234-7666
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201336448943189
source KoreaMed Synapse; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; KoreaMed Open Access; PubMed Central
title A comparative evaluation of cytotoxicity of root canal sealers: an in vitro study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T20%3A51%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20cytotoxicity%20of%20root%20canal%20sealers:%20an%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=Restorative%20dentistry%20&%20endodontics&rft.au=Badole,%20Gautam%20Pyarelal&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=204-209&rft.issn=2234-7658&rft.eissn=2234-7666&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO201336448943189%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true