사지의 미용적 미세수술적 재건

The aim of extremity reconstruction has focused on early wound coverage and functional recovery but rarely aesthetics. As the quality of life improves, however, the request for aesthetics has been growing. The authors has conducted retrospective reviews on the 86 cases that had extremity reconstruct...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:대한미세수술학회지 2011, Vol.20 (1), p.1-7
Hauptverfasser: 여현정, 손대구, 김준형, 한기환, Yeo, Hyeon-Jung, Son, Dae-Gu, Kim, Jun-Hyung, Han, Ki-Hwan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title 대한미세수술학회지
container_volume 20
creator 여현정
손대구
김준형
한기환
Yeo, Hyeon-Jung
Son, Dae-Gu
Kim, Jun-Hyung
Han, Ki-Hwan
description The aim of extremity reconstruction has focused on early wound coverage and functional recovery but rarely aesthetics. As the quality of life improves, however, the request for aesthetics has been growing. The authors has conducted retrospective reviews on the 86 cases that had extremity reconstruction using free flap, considering the characteristics of parts that had been assessed in primary operation between May 1996 and December 2010. Aesthetic grading was performed in four categories; color, texture, contour and marginal scar. Recipient sites were 42 hands, 19 feet, 14 lower extremities excluding feet and 10 upper extremities apart from the hand. Types of free flap were 16 latissimus dorsi free flaps, 13 anterolateral thigh free flaps, 12 dorsalis pedis free flaps, 8 transvers rectus abdominis free flaps, 7 gracillis free flaps, and 5 superficial temporal fascia free flaps. Total flap necrosis was seen in 8 cases(9.3%) and partial necrosis in 5 cases(5.8%). Secondary revision was done in 24 cases(27.9%) and the most common revision, debulking was done in 14 cases(16.3%). The authors has considered cosmetic aspects along with wound coverage and functional recovery in primary reconstruction. The results of aesthetic grading was 16.2 out of 20, and the secondary revision rate was reduced.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201130662197827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO201130662197827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2011306621978273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MrKw0DUysTBgYeA0NDIy0zUyNzDjYOAtLs5MMjAwNTWzMDcy4GTQetO05s3yhjdzZyi8Xr_jzayVbxY0glktO950zHjTsQDEfzNvzauNW3gYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4Oqm2uIs4dudmZxSWZ8XkpxTryXo7e_kYGhobGBmZmRoaW5hZG5MbHqAJRXPYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>사지의 미용적 미세수술적 재건</title><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><creator>여현정 ; 손대구 ; 김준형 ; 한기환 ; Yeo, Hyeon-Jung ; Son, Dae-Gu ; Kim, Jun-Hyung ; Han, Ki-Hwan</creator><creatorcontrib>여현정 ; 손대구 ; 김준형 ; 한기환 ; Yeo, Hyeon-Jung ; Son, Dae-Gu ; Kim, Jun-Hyung ; Han, Ki-Hwan</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of extremity reconstruction has focused on early wound coverage and functional recovery but rarely aesthetics. As the quality of life improves, however, the request for aesthetics has been growing. The authors has conducted retrospective reviews on the 86 cases that had extremity reconstruction using free flap, considering the characteristics of parts that had been assessed in primary operation between May 1996 and December 2010. Aesthetic grading was performed in four categories; color, texture, contour and marginal scar. Recipient sites were 42 hands, 19 feet, 14 lower extremities excluding feet and 10 upper extremities apart from the hand. Types of free flap were 16 latissimus dorsi free flaps, 13 anterolateral thigh free flaps, 12 dorsalis pedis free flaps, 8 transvers rectus abdominis free flaps, 7 gracillis free flaps, and 5 superficial temporal fascia free flaps. Total flap necrosis was seen in 8 cases(9.3%) and partial necrosis in 5 cases(5.8%). Secondary revision was done in 24 cases(27.9%) and the most common revision, debulking was done in 14 cases(16.3%). The authors has considered cosmetic aspects along with wound coverage and functional recovery in primary reconstruction. The results of aesthetic grading was 16.2 out of 20, and the secondary revision rate was reduced.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1226-2706</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2288-2480</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>대한미세수술학회지, 2011, Vol.20 (1), p.1-7</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>여현정</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>손대구</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>김준형</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>한기환</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Hyeon-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, Dae-Gu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jun-Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ki-Hwan</creatorcontrib><title>사지의 미용적 미세수술적 재건</title><title>대한미세수술학회지</title><addtitle>Journal of Korean society for microsurgery</addtitle><description>The aim of extremity reconstruction has focused on early wound coverage and functional recovery but rarely aesthetics. As the quality of life improves, however, the request for aesthetics has been growing. The authors has conducted retrospective reviews on the 86 cases that had extremity reconstruction using free flap, considering the characteristics of parts that had been assessed in primary operation between May 1996 and December 2010. Aesthetic grading was performed in four categories; color, texture, contour and marginal scar. Recipient sites were 42 hands, 19 feet, 14 lower extremities excluding feet and 10 upper extremities apart from the hand. Types of free flap were 16 latissimus dorsi free flaps, 13 anterolateral thigh free flaps, 12 dorsalis pedis free flaps, 8 transvers rectus abdominis free flaps, 7 gracillis free flaps, and 5 superficial temporal fascia free flaps. Total flap necrosis was seen in 8 cases(9.3%) and partial necrosis in 5 cases(5.8%). Secondary revision was done in 24 cases(27.9%) and the most common revision, debulking was done in 14 cases(16.3%). The authors has considered cosmetic aspects along with wound coverage and functional recovery in primary reconstruction. The results of aesthetic grading was 16.2 out of 20, and the secondary revision rate was reduced.</description><issn>1226-2706</issn><issn>2288-2480</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MrKw0DUysTBgYeA0NDIy0zUyNzDjYOAtLs5MMjAwNTWzMDcy4GTQetO05s3yhjdzZyi8Xr_jzayVbxY0glktO950zHjTsQDEfzNvzauNW3gYWNMSc4pTeaE0N4Oqm2uIs4dudmZxSWZ8XkpxTryXo7e_kYGhobGBmZmRoaW5hZG5MbHqAJRXPYw</recordid><startdate>2011</startdate><enddate>2011</enddate><creator>여현정</creator><creator>손대구</creator><creator>김준형</creator><creator>한기환</creator><creator>Yeo, Hyeon-Jung</creator><creator>Son, Dae-Gu</creator><creator>Kim, Jun-Hyung</creator><creator>Han, Ki-Hwan</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2011</creationdate><title>사지의 미용적 미세수술적 재건</title><author>여현정 ; 손대구 ; 김준형 ; 한기환 ; Yeo, Hyeon-Jung ; Son, Dae-Gu ; Kim, Jun-Hyung ; Han, Ki-Hwan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2011306621978273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>여현정</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>손대구</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>김준형</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>한기환</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeo, Hyeon-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Son, Dae-Gu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jun-Hyung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Ki-Hwan</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>대한미세수술학회지</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>여현정</au><au>손대구</au><au>김준형</au><au>한기환</au><au>Yeo, Hyeon-Jung</au><au>Son, Dae-Gu</au><au>Kim, Jun-Hyung</au><au>Han, Ki-Hwan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>사지의 미용적 미세수술적 재건</atitle><jtitle>대한미세수술학회지</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Korean society for microsurgery</addtitle><date>2011</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><issn>1226-2706</issn><eissn>2288-2480</eissn><abstract>The aim of extremity reconstruction has focused on early wound coverage and functional recovery but rarely aesthetics. As the quality of life improves, however, the request for aesthetics has been growing. The authors has conducted retrospective reviews on the 86 cases that had extremity reconstruction using free flap, considering the characteristics of parts that had been assessed in primary operation between May 1996 and December 2010. Aesthetic grading was performed in four categories; color, texture, contour and marginal scar. Recipient sites were 42 hands, 19 feet, 14 lower extremities excluding feet and 10 upper extremities apart from the hand. Types of free flap were 16 latissimus dorsi free flaps, 13 anterolateral thigh free flaps, 12 dorsalis pedis free flaps, 8 transvers rectus abdominis free flaps, 7 gracillis free flaps, and 5 superficial temporal fascia free flaps. Total flap necrosis was seen in 8 cases(9.3%) and partial necrosis in 5 cases(5.8%). Secondary revision was done in 24 cases(27.9%) and the most common revision, debulking was done in 14 cases(16.3%). The authors has considered cosmetic aspects along with wound coverage and functional recovery in primary reconstruction. The results of aesthetic grading was 16.2 out of 20, and the secondary revision rate was reduced.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1226-2706
ispartof 대한미세수술학회지, 2011, Vol.20 (1), p.1-7
issn 1226-2706
2288-2480
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO201130662197827
source KoreaMed Open Access
title 사지의 미용적 미세수술적 재건
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A08%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%EC%82%AC%EC%A7%80%EC%9D%98%20%EB%AF%B8%EC%9A%A9%EC%A0%81%20%EB%AF%B8%EC%84%B8%EC%88%98%EC%88%A0%EC%A0%81%20%EC%9E%AC%EA%B1%B4&rft.jtitle=%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%B8%EC%84%B8%EC%88%98%EC%88%A0%ED%95%99%ED%9A%8C%EC%A7%80&rft.au=%EC%97%AC%ED%98%84%EC%A0%95&rft.date=2011&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.issn=1226-2706&rft.eissn=2288-2480&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO201130662197827%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true