임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행

According to the ICH GCP, an audit is defined as 'a systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial-related activities were conducted and the data were recorded, analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:臨床藥理學會誌 2003, Vol.11 (2), p.91-100
Hauptverfasser: 김선하, 김화정, 박병주, Kim, Seon-Ha, Kim, Hwa-Jung, Park, Byung-Joo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 100
container_issue 2
container_start_page 91
container_title 臨床藥理學會誌
container_volume 11
creator 김선하
김화정
박병주
Kim, Seon-Ha
Kim, Hwa-Jung
Park, Byung-Joo
description According to the ICH GCP, an audit is defined as 'a systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial-related activities were conducted and the data were recorded, analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol, sponsor's SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s).' An audit usually starts with planning: then, follow in-house evaluation, actual survey at the center, preparation of the audit report, and submitting it, in that order. The audit conducted by the Clinical Research Center at Seoul National University Hospital identified some errors most frequently observed: absence of source documents (63.9% of total subject center), discrepancies between CRFs (Case Report Form) and source documents (61.1%), inappropriate handling of essential documents (52.8%), informed consents inappropriately acquired (36.1%), and violations of the protocol (22.2%). Like this well-planned and standardized audit would give a way to more qualified clinical trials.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO200303037009844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO200303037009844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2003030370098443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDIy1TU1MTPnYOAtLs5MMjA0MjQxM7Q04GSwfzOv5U1z45vuOW-nz3gzd4bCm-UdCq83b3mzbO6buS0Kb-a0vJ06R-HNggmvNjWApF9tmPO6dcKrzXsU3nTMeDutk4eBNS0xpziVF0pzM6i6uYY4e-hmZxaXZMbnpRTnxHs5evsbGRgYg6C5gYGlhYmJMbHqAD7eSCU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>김선하 ; 김화정 ; 박병주 ; Kim, Seon-Ha ; Kim, Hwa-Jung ; Park, Byung-Joo</creator><creatorcontrib>김선하 ; 김화정 ; 박병주 ; Kim, Seon-Ha ; Kim, Hwa-Jung ; Park, Byung-Joo</creatorcontrib><description>According to the ICH GCP, an audit is defined as 'a systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial-related activities were conducted and the data were recorded, analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol, sponsor's SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s).' An audit usually starts with planning: then, follow in-house evaluation, actual survey at the center, preparation of the audit report, and submitting it, in that order. The audit conducted by the Clinical Research Center at Seoul National University Hospital identified some errors most frequently observed: absence of source documents (63.9% of total subject center), discrepancies between CRFs (Case Report Form) and source documents (61.1%), inappropriate handling of essential documents (52.8%), informed consents inappropriately acquired (36.1%), and violations of the protocol (22.2%). Like this well-planned and standardized audit would give a way to more qualified clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1225-5467</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>臨床藥理學會誌, 2003, Vol.11 (2), p.91-100</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>김선하</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>김화정</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>박병주</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seon-Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hwa-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Byung-Joo</creatorcontrib><title>임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행</title><title>臨床藥理學會誌</title><addtitle>The journal of Korean society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics</addtitle><description>According to the ICH GCP, an audit is defined as 'a systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial-related activities were conducted and the data were recorded, analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol, sponsor's SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s).' An audit usually starts with planning: then, follow in-house evaluation, actual survey at the center, preparation of the audit report, and submitting it, in that order. The audit conducted by the Clinical Research Center at Seoul National University Hospital identified some errors most frequently observed: absence of source documents (63.9% of total subject center), discrepancies between CRFs (Case Report Form) and source documents (61.1%), inappropriate handling of essential documents (52.8%), informed consents inappropriately acquired (36.1%), and violations of the protocol (22.2%). Like this well-planned and standardized audit would give a way to more qualified clinical trials.</description><issn>1225-5467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDIy1TU1MTPnYOAtLs5MMjA0MjQxM7Q04GSwfzOv5U1z45vuOW-nz3gzd4bCm-UdCq83b3mzbO6buS0Kb-a0vJ06R-HNggmvNjWApF9tmPO6dcKrzXsU3nTMeDutk4eBNS0xpziVF0pzM6i6uYY4e-hmZxaXZMbnpRTnxHs5evsbGRgYg6C5gYGlhYmJMbHqAD7eSCU</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>김선하</creator><creator>김화정</creator><creator>박병주</creator><creator>Kim, Seon-Ha</creator><creator>Kim, Hwa-Jung</creator><creator>Park, Byung-Joo</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행</title><author>김선하 ; 김화정 ; 박병주 ; Kim, Seon-Ha ; Kim, Hwa-Jung ; Park, Byung-Joo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2003030370098443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>김선하</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>김화정</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>박병주</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seon-Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hwa-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Byung-Joo</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>臨床藥理學會誌</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>김선하</au><au>김화정</au><au>박병주</au><au>Kim, Seon-Ha</au><au>Kim, Hwa-Jung</au><au>Park, Byung-Joo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행</atitle><jtitle>臨床藥理學會誌</jtitle><addtitle>The journal of Korean society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>91-100</pages><issn>1225-5467</issn><abstract>According to the ICH GCP, an audit is defined as 'a systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial-related activities were conducted and the data were recorded, analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol, sponsor's SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s).' An audit usually starts with planning: then, follow in-house evaluation, actual survey at the center, preparation of the audit report, and submitting it, in that order. The audit conducted by the Clinical Research Center at Seoul National University Hospital identified some errors most frequently observed: absence of source documents (63.9% of total subject center), discrepancies between CRFs (Case Report Form) and source documents (61.1%), inappropriate handling of essential documents (52.8%), informed consents inappropriately acquired (36.1%), and violations of the protocol (22.2%). Like this well-planned and standardized audit would give a way to more qualified clinical trials.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1225-5467
ispartof 臨床藥理學會誌, 2003, Vol.11 (2), p.91-100
issn 1225-5467
language kor
recordid cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO200303037009844
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title 임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A33%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%EC%9E%84%EC%83%81%EC%8B%9C%ED%97%98%EC%9D%98%20%EC%A7%88%20%EB%B3%B4%EC%A6%9D%EC%9D%84%20%EC%9C%84%ED%95%9C%20%EC%A0%90%EA%B2%80%EC%9D%98%20%EA%B0%9C%EB%85%90%EA%B3%BC%20%EC%88%98%ED%96%89&rft.jtitle=%EF%A7%B6%E5%BA%8A%E8%97%A5%E7%90%86%E5%AD%B8%E6%9C%83%E8%AA%8C&rft.au=%EA%B9%80%EC%84%A0%ED%95%98&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=91-100&rft.issn=1225-5467&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO200303037009844%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true