임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행
According to the ICH GCP, an audit is defined as 'a systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial-related activities were conducted and the data were recorded, analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | 臨床藥理學會誌 2003, Vol.11 (2), p.91-100 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | kor |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 100 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 91 |
container_title | 臨床藥理學會誌 |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | 김선하 김화정 박병주 Kim, Seon-Ha Kim, Hwa-Jung Park, Byung-Joo |
description | According to the ICH GCP, an audit is defined as 'a systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial-related activities were conducted and the data were recorded, analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol, sponsor's SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s).' An audit usually starts with planning: then, follow in-house evaluation, actual survey at the center, preparation of the audit report, and submitting it, in that order. The audit conducted by the Clinical Research Center at Seoul National University Hospital identified some errors most frequently observed: absence of source documents (63.9% of total subject center), discrepancies between CRFs (Case Report Form) and source documents (61.1%), inappropriate handling of essential documents (52.8%), informed consents inappropriately acquired (36.1%), and violations of the protocol (22.2%). Like this well-planned and standardized audit would give a way to more qualified clinical trials. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kisti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO200303037009844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JAKO200303037009844</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2003030370098443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NDIy1TU1MTPnYOAtLs5MMjA0MjQxM7Q04GSwfzOv5U1z45vuOW-nz3gzd4bCm-UdCq83b3mzbO6buS0Kb-a0vJ06R-HNggmvNjWApF9tmPO6dcKrzXsU3nTMeDutk4eBNS0xpziVF0pzM6i6uYY4e-hmZxaXZMbnpRTnxHs5evsbGRgYg6C5gYGlhYmJMbHqAD7eSCU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>김선하 ; 김화정 ; 박병주 ; Kim, Seon-Ha ; Kim, Hwa-Jung ; Park, Byung-Joo</creator><creatorcontrib>김선하 ; 김화정 ; 박병주 ; Kim, Seon-Ha ; Kim, Hwa-Jung ; Park, Byung-Joo</creatorcontrib><description>According to the ICH GCP, an audit is defined as 'a systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial-related activities were conducted and the data were recorded, analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol, sponsor's SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s).' An audit usually starts with planning: then, follow in-house evaluation, actual survey at the center, preparation of the audit report, and submitting it, in that order. The audit conducted by the Clinical Research Center at Seoul National University Hospital identified some errors most frequently observed: absence of source documents (63.9% of total subject center), discrepancies between CRFs (Case Report Form) and source documents (61.1%), inappropriate handling of essential documents (52.8%), informed consents inappropriately acquired (36.1%), and violations of the protocol (22.2%). Like this well-planned and standardized audit would give a way to more qualified clinical trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1225-5467</identifier><language>kor</language><ispartof>臨床藥理學會誌, 2003, Vol.11 (2), p.91-100</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>김선하</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>김화정</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>박병주</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seon-Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hwa-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Byung-Joo</creatorcontrib><title>임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행</title><title>臨床藥理學會誌</title><addtitle>The journal of Korean society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics</addtitle><description>According to the ICH GCP, an audit is defined as 'a systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial-related activities were conducted and the data were recorded, analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol, sponsor's SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s).' An audit usually starts with planning: then, follow in-house evaluation, actual survey at the center, preparation of the audit report, and submitting it, in that order. The audit conducted by the Clinical Research Center at Seoul National University Hospital identified some errors most frequently observed: absence of source documents (63.9% of total subject center), discrepancies between CRFs (Case Report Form) and source documents (61.1%), inappropriate handling of essential documents (52.8%), informed consents inappropriately acquired (36.1%), and violations of the protocol (22.2%). Like this well-planned and standardized audit would give a way to more qualified clinical trials.</description><issn>1225-5467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JDI</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NDIy1TU1MTPnYOAtLs5MMjA0MjQxM7Q04GSwfzOv5U1z45vuOW-nz3gzd4bCm-UdCq83b3mzbO6buS0Kb-a0vJ06R-HNggmvNjWApF9tmPO6dcKrzXsU3nTMeDutk4eBNS0xpziVF0pzM6i6uYY4e-hmZxaXZMbnpRTnxHs5evsbGRgYg6C5gYGlhYmJMbHqAD7eSCU</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>김선하</creator><creator>김화정</creator><creator>박병주</creator><creator>Kim, Seon-Ha</creator><creator>Kim, Hwa-Jung</creator><creator>Park, Byung-Joo</creator><scope>JDI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행</title><author>김선하 ; 김화정 ; 박병주 ; Kim, Seon-Ha ; Kim, Hwa-Jung ; Park, Byung-Joo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kisti_ndsl_JAKO2003030370098443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>김선하</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>김화정</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>박병주</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Seon-Ha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hwa-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Byung-Joo</creatorcontrib><collection>KoreaScience</collection><jtitle>臨床藥理學會誌</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>김선하</au><au>김화정</au><au>박병주</au><au>Kim, Seon-Ha</au><au>Kim, Hwa-Jung</au><au>Park, Byung-Joo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행</atitle><jtitle>臨床藥理學會誌</jtitle><addtitle>The journal of Korean society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics</addtitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>91</spage><epage>100</epage><pages>91-100</pages><issn>1225-5467</issn><abstract>According to the ICH GCP, an audit is defined as 'a systematic and independent examination of trial-related activities and documents to determine whether the evaluated trial-related activities were conducted and the data were recorded, analyzed, and accurately reported according to the protocol, sponsor's SOPs, GCP, and the applicable regulatory requirement(s).' An audit usually starts with planning: then, follow in-house evaluation, actual survey at the center, preparation of the audit report, and submitting it, in that order. The audit conducted by the Clinical Research Center at Seoul National University Hospital identified some errors most frequently observed: absence of source documents (63.9% of total subject center), discrepancies between CRFs (Case Report Form) and source documents (61.1%), inappropriate handling of essential documents (52.8%), informed consents inappropriately acquired (36.1%), and violations of the protocol (22.2%). Like this well-planned and standardized audit would give a way to more qualified clinical trials.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1225-5467 |
ispartof | 臨床藥理學會誌, 2003, Vol.11 (2), p.91-100 |
issn | 1225-5467 |
language | kor |
recordid | cdi_kisti_ndsl_JAKO200303037009844 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
title | 임상시험의 질 보증을 위한 점검의 개념과 수행 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T17%3A33%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kisti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=%EC%9E%84%EC%83%81%EC%8B%9C%ED%97%98%EC%9D%98%20%EC%A7%88%20%EB%B3%B4%EC%A6%9D%EC%9D%84%20%EC%9C%84%ED%95%9C%20%EC%A0%90%EA%B2%80%EC%9D%98%20%EA%B0%9C%EB%85%90%EA%B3%BC%20%EC%88%98%ED%96%89&rft.jtitle=%EF%A7%B6%E5%BA%8A%E8%97%A5%E7%90%86%E5%AD%B8%E6%9C%83%E8%AA%8C&rft.au=%EA%B9%80%EC%84%A0%ED%95%98&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=91&rft.epage=100&rft.pages=91-100&rft.issn=1225-5467&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckisti%3EJAKO200303037009844%3C/kisti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |