카보메딕스 대동맥판막과 쎈트쥬드 대동맥판막의 임상성적
Materials and methods: Between 1984 to 1994, 136 patients underwent primary and isolated aortic valve replacement with 79 Carbomedics and 57 St. Jude prostheses. Results: Age ranged from 16 to 67 year(mean : 44.5${\pm}$12.7 years). Statistically significant differences in preoperative clinical chara...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Taehan Hyungbu Oekwa Hakhoe chi 1998, Vol.31 (8), p.781-786 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | kor |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Materials and methods: Between 1984 to 1994, 136 patients underwent primary and isolated aortic valve replacement with 79 Carbomedics and 57 St. Jude prostheses. Results: Age ranged from 16 to 67 year(mean : 44.5${\pm}$12.7 years). Statistically significant differences in preoperative clinical characteristics between two groups were not found. There was one early death in the St. Jude group and none in the Carbomedics group. Early prosthetic valve-related complications including death were not significantly different between the two groups(p value= 0.572). One hundred thirty five early survivors were followed for a total of 354.2 patient-years(mean=31.5${\pm}$16 months). In the CarboMedics group, actuarial survial rate at 5 years was 97.1${\pm}$1.9%, and in the St. Jude group, it was 95.9${\pm}$2.8%. In the CarboMedics group, actuarial free rate from all valve-related events at 5 years was 92.1${\pm}$3.1%, and in St. Jude group, it was 89.8${\pm}$5.0%. Conclusion: We conclude that early and late results after performing isolated aortic valve replacement with CarboMedics and St. Jude valve are not significantlly different. 대상 및 방법: 1984년부터 1994년까지 서울대학병원 흉부외과에서 79례의 카보메딕스판막과 57례의 쎈트쥬드판막을 사용한 단일 대동맥판막 치환술을 시행하였다. 결과: 연령분포는 16세에서 67세까지로 평균연령은 44.5$\pm$12.7세였다. 수술전 카보메딕스판막 환자군과 쎈트쥬드판막 환자군에서의 임상적 특성은 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다. 조기사망은 쎈트쥬드판막 환자군 에서 1례(1.7%)가 발생하였고, 카보메딕스판막 환자군에서는 조기사망환자가 없었다. 조기사망을 포함한 판막 관련 조기합병증은 두 군에서 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다(p value=0.572). 평균 추적기간은 31.5$\pm$16.1 개월이었으며, 5년 생존률은 카보메딕스환자군에서 97.1$\pm$1.9%이고, 쎈트쥬드판막환자군에서 95.9$\pm$2.8%였다 (p=0.7847). 판막관련 사망이나 합병증 없는 5년 생존률은 카보메딕스판막 환자군에서 92.1$\pm$3.1%이고, 쎈트쥬드판막 환자군 에서 89.8$\pm$5.0%였다(p value=0.8732). 결론: 결론적으로 카보메딕스판막과 쎈트쥬드판막을 사용하여 단일 대동맥치환술을 시행하였을 때, 조기 성적 및 만기성적은 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 없었다. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0301-2859 |