Perceptions and practice patterns of cancer survivorship care among Japanese gynecologic oncologists: The JGOG questionnaire survey

Objective: This study aimed to assess gynecologic oncologists (GOs)’ perceptions and attitudes toward cancer survivorship to help improve survivor care. Methods: We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey about survivorship issues for the GOs belonging to the Japan Gynecologic Oncology Group. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gynecologic oncology 2023-01, Vol.34 (1), p.1
Hauptverfasser: Mikiko Asai-sato, Nao Suzuki, Hitomi Sakai, Yoshio Itani, Shinya Sato, Masayuki Futagami, Yoshio Yoshida
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of gynecologic oncology
container_volume 34
creator Mikiko Asai-sato
Nao Suzuki
Hitomi Sakai
Yoshio Itani
Shinya Sato
Masayuki Futagami
Yoshio Yoshida
description Objective: This study aimed to assess gynecologic oncologists (GOs)’ perceptions and attitudes toward cancer survivorship to help improve survivor care. Methods: We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey about survivorship issues for the GOs belonging to the Japan Gynecologic Oncology Group. We analyzed the proactiveness of the participants toward addressing 25 survivor issues. In addition, the practice patterns and barriers to care for survivors’ long-term health issues, such as second primary cancer (SPC) and lifestyle-related diseases (LSRD), and return-to-work (RTW) support were assessed. Results: We received 313 responses. The respondents had a mean of 22 years of physician experience. The ratio of men to women was approximately 7:3, and 84.7% worked at facilities for multidisciplinary cancer treatment. The respondents’ proactiveness for addressing psychosocial problems was significantly lower than physical and gynecological issues (p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kiss</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kiss_primary_4002934</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kiss_id>4002934</kiss_id><sourcerecordid>4002934</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kiss_primary_40029343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jbnKAkEQhCdQ8HwCk34Bodn1TsUDk9_AXJqxXcdjZuwehY19cVf8Y6MqvqKqaqaZIQ77mE-wYVqqZ8TRGCdZ07y2LJZjcsErkD9AFLLJWYZIKbFUNBzBkrcsoA95umcQPblYMWGgW_AFbCiSZ2UoSs82XEPhLAT_dZp0BrsTw2b1t4L7g_Vz5slV9c8glx1TP9JVufuvbdNbLnbzdf_iVPdR3I2k3A8Qs2k-yH-nby1zTLE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions and practice patterns of cancer survivorship care among Japanese gynecologic oncologists: The JGOG questionnaire survey</title><source>KoreaMed Synapse</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mikiko Asai-sato ; Nao Suzuki ; Hitomi Sakai ; Yoshio Itani ; Shinya Sato ; Masayuki Futagami ; Yoshio Yoshida</creator><creatorcontrib>Mikiko Asai-sato ; Nao Suzuki ; Hitomi Sakai ; Yoshio Itani ; Shinya Sato ; Masayuki Futagami ; Yoshio Yoshida</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study aimed to assess gynecologic oncologists (GOs)’ perceptions and attitudes toward cancer survivorship to help improve survivor care. Methods: We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey about survivorship issues for the GOs belonging to the Japan Gynecologic Oncology Group. We analyzed the proactiveness of the participants toward addressing 25 survivor issues. In addition, the practice patterns and barriers to care for survivors’ long-term health issues, such as second primary cancer (SPC) and lifestyle-related diseases (LSRD), and return-to-work (RTW) support were assessed. Results: We received 313 responses. The respondents had a mean of 22 years of physician experience. The ratio of men to women was approximately 7:3, and 84.7% worked at facilities for multidisciplinary cancer treatment. The respondents’ proactiveness for addressing psychosocial problems was significantly lower than physical and gynecological issues (p&lt;0.01 by χ2 test). However, most GOs tried to contribute to such issues according to patients’ demands. Women GOs were more proactively involved in some survivorship issues than the men (p&lt;0.05 by logistic regression analysis). The rates of the respondents who proactively discussed SPC, LSRD, and RTW were unexpectedly high (60.7%, 36.1%, and 52.4%, respectively). However, the GOs only provided verbal support for these issues in many cases. Conclusion: The Japanese GOs were enthusiastic about survivorship care. However, their tendency to deal with survivors’ problems through their own knowledge and judgments raises concerns about the quality of care. Therefore, creating survivorship care guidelines and enhancing multidisciplinary collaboration should be prioritized.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2005-0380</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>대한부인종양학회</publisher><subject>Cancer Survivorship ; Female ; Genital Neoplasms ; Oncologists ; Physicians ; Practice Patterns ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2023-01, Vol.34 (1), p.1</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mikiko Asai-sato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nao Suzuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitomi Sakai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshio Itani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinya Sato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masayuki Futagami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshio Yoshida</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions and practice patterns of cancer survivorship care among Japanese gynecologic oncologists: The JGOG questionnaire survey</title><title>Journal of gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO)</addtitle><description>Objective: This study aimed to assess gynecologic oncologists (GOs)’ perceptions and attitudes toward cancer survivorship to help improve survivor care. Methods: We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey about survivorship issues for the GOs belonging to the Japan Gynecologic Oncology Group. We analyzed the proactiveness of the participants toward addressing 25 survivor issues. In addition, the practice patterns and barriers to care for survivors’ long-term health issues, such as second primary cancer (SPC) and lifestyle-related diseases (LSRD), and return-to-work (RTW) support were assessed. Results: We received 313 responses. The respondents had a mean of 22 years of physician experience. The ratio of men to women was approximately 7:3, and 84.7% worked at facilities for multidisciplinary cancer treatment. The respondents’ proactiveness for addressing psychosocial problems was significantly lower than physical and gynecological issues (p&lt;0.01 by χ2 test). However, most GOs tried to contribute to such issues according to patients’ demands. Women GOs were more proactively involved in some survivorship issues than the men (p&lt;0.05 by logistic regression analysis). The rates of the respondents who proactively discussed SPC, LSRD, and RTW were unexpectedly high (60.7%, 36.1%, and 52.4%, respectively). However, the GOs only provided verbal support for these issues in many cases. Conclusion: The Japanese GOs were enthusiastic about survivorship care. However, their tendency to deal with survivors’ problems through their own knowledge and judgments raises concerns about the quality of care. Therefore, creating survivorship care guidelines and enhancing multidisciplinary collaboration should be prioritized.</description><subject>Cancer Survivorship</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital Neoplasms</subject><subject>Oncologists</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Patterns</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>2005-0380</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9jbnKAkEQhCdQ8HwCk34Bodn1TsUDk9_AXJqxXcdjZuwehY19cVf8Y6MqvqKqaqaZIQ77mE-wYVqqZ8TRGCdZ07y2LJZjcsErkD9AFLLJWYZIKbFUNBzBkrcsoA95umcQPblYMWGgW_AFbCiSZ2UoSs82XEPhLAT_dZp0BrsTw2b1t4L7g_Vz5slV9c8glx1TP9JVufuvbdNbLnbzdf_iVPdR3I2k3A8Qs2k-yH-nby1zTLE</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Mikiko Asai-sato</creator><creator>Nao Suzuki</creator><creator>Hitomi Sakai</creator><creator>Yoshio Itani</creator><creator>Shinya Sato</creator><creator>Masayuki Futagami</creator><creator>Yoshio Yoshida</creator><general>대한부인종양학회</general><scope>HZB</scope><scope>Q5X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Perceptions and practice patterns of cancer survivorship care among Japanese gynecologic oncologists: The JGOG questionnaire survey</title><author>Mikiko Asai-sato ; Nao Suzuki ; Hitomi Sakai ; Yoshio Itani ; Shinya Sato ; Masayuki Futagami ; Yoshio Yoshida</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_40029343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cancer Survivorship</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital Neoplasms</topic><topic>Oncologists</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Patterns</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mikiko Asai-sato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nao Suzuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hitomi Sakai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshio Itani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shinya Sato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masayuki Futagami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshio Yoshida</creatorcontrib><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS)</collection><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type</collection><jtitle>Journal of gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mikiko Asai-sato</au><au>Nao Suzuki</au><au>Hitomi Sakai</au><au>Yoshio Itani</au><au>Shinya Sato</au><au>Masayuki Futagami</au><au>Yoshio Yoshida</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions and practice patterns of cancer survivorship care among Japanese gynecologic oncologists: The JGOG questionnaire survey</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO)</addtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>2005-0380</issn><abstract>Objective: This study aimed to assess gynecologic oncologists (GOs)’ perceptions and attitudes toward cancer survivorship to help improve survivor care. Methods: We conducted a web-based questionnaire survey about survivorship issues for the GOs belonging to the Japan Gynecologic Oncology Group. We analyzed the proactiveness of the participants toward addressing 25 survivor issues. In addition, the practice patterns and barriers to care for survivors’ long-term health issues, such as second primary cancer (SPC) and lifestyle-related diseases (LSRD), and return-to-work (RTW) support were assessed. Results: We received 313 responses. The respondents had a mean of 22 years of physician experience. The ratio of men to women was approximately 7:3, and 84.7% worked at facilities for multidisciplinary cancer treatment. The respondents’ proactiveness for addressing psychosocial problems was significantly lower than physical and gynecological issues (p&lt;0.01 by χ2 test). However, most GOs tried to contribute to such issues according to patients’ demands. Women GOs were more proactively involved in some survivorship issues than the men (p&lt;0.05 by logistic regression analysis). The rates of the respondents who proactively discussed SPC, LSRD, and RTW were unexpectedly high (60.7%, 36.1%, and 52.4%, respectively). However, the GOs only provided verbal support for these issues in many cases. Conclusion: The Japanese GOs were enthusiastic about survivorship care. However, their tendency to deal with survivors’ problems through their own knowledge and judgments raises concerns about the quality of care. Therefore, creating survivorship care guidelines and enhancing multidisciplinary collaboration should be prioritized.</abstract><pub>대한부인종양학회</pub><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2005-0380
ispartof Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2023-01, Vol.34 (1), p.1
issn 2005-0380
language kor
recordid cdi_kiss_primary_4002934
source KoreaMed Synapse; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; KoreaMed Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Cancer Survivorship
Female
Genital Neoplasms
Oncologists
Physicians
Practice Patterns
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Perceptions and practice patterns of cancer survivorship care among Japanese gynecologic oncologists: The JGOG questionnaire survey
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T12%3A29%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20and%20practice%20patterns%20of%20cancer%20survivorship%20care%20among%20Japanese%20gynecologic%20oncologists:%20The%20JGOG%20questionnaire%20survey&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Mikiko%20Asai-sato&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=2005-0380&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckiss%3E4002934%3C/kiss%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kiss_id=4002934&rfr_iscdi=true