Forgotten Joint Score for early outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty: Is it really useful?
Background: Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) has become a popular tool for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but almost all studies had assessment performed 1 year after surgery. There is a need for a sensitive tool for earlier outcome assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of F...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Knee surgery & related research 2020-12, Vol.32, p.1 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | kor |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Knee surgery & related research |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Lee Qunn Jid Chang Wai Yee Esther Wong Yiu Chung |
| description | Background: Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) has become a popular tool for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but almost all studies had assessment performed 1 year after surgery. There is a need for a sensitive tool for earlier outcome assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of FJS within the first year after TKA.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Patients within the first year after primary TKA were recruited. FJS was translated into the local language with a cross-cultural adaptation and was validated by assessing the correlation with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score (WOMAC). Ceiling and floor effects (highest or lowest 10% or 15%) of both scores were compared. Skewness of scores was assessed with a histogram.
Results: One hundred sixty-three subjects were recruited: 84 (51.5%) had evaluation at 3 months after the operation, 56 (34.4%) at 6 months, and 23 (14.1%) at 12 months. FJS had fewer patients at the highest 10% (10.7% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.046) or 15% (19.6% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.027) at 6 months and within the first year overall (6.7% vs. 13.5%, P |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>kiss</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kiss_primary_3831198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kiss_id>3831198</kiss_id><sourcerecordid>3831198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kiss_primary_38311983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9izEOgkAQAK_QRKO-wGY_QAIcitpYGInaam9Os6cXD5bsLgW_l8LaaoqZGZlpntsiSct8PTELkfBIV2lpizIvpsZXxC9SxQYuFBqF65MYwRMDOo49UKdPqhGcCIrUOCTOKzIoqYvwaXBwrG-mNjrRfgdngaDA6OKwd4K-i_u5GXsXBRc_zsyyOt4Op-QTRO4th9pxf7cbm2Xbjf1vv7ONQiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forgotten Joint Score for early outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty: Is it really useful?</title><source>KoreaMed Synapse</source><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Lee Qunn Jid ; Chang Wai Yee Esther ; Wong Yiu Chung</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee Qunn Jid ; Chang Wai Yee Esther ; Wong Yiu Chung</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Background: Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) has become a popular tool for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but almost all studies had assessment performed 1 year after surgery. There is a need for a sensitive tool for earlier outcome assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of FJS within the first year after TKA.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Patients within the first year after primary TKA were recruited. FJS was translated into the local language with a cross-cultural adaptation and was validated by assessing the correlation with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score (WOMAC). Ceiling and floor effects (highest or lowest 10% or 15%) of both scores were compared. Skewness of scores was assessed with a histogram.
Results: One hundred sixty-three subjects were recruited: 84 (51.5%) had evaluation at 3 months after the operation, 56 (34.4%) at 6 months, and 23 (14.1%) at 12 months. FJS had fewer patients at the highest 10% (10.7% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.046) or 15% (19.6% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.027) at 6 months and within the first year overall (6.7% vs. 13.5%, P <0.001; 14.1% vs. 22.7%, P <0.001). Also, it had more patients at the lowest 10% (16.7% vs. 0%, P <0.001) or 15% (21.4% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) at 3 months, 6 months (10.7% vs. 0%, P <0.001), and overall (12.9% vs. 0%, P <0.001; 16.6% vs. 0%, P <0.001). The skewness was much less than WOMAC (0.09 vs. -0.56).
Conclusions: FJS has a low ceiling effect but a high floor effect in the first year after TKA. Such characteristics make it less useful for the general assessment of early patient report outcome after operation.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2234-0726</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>대한슬관절학회</publisher><subject>Ceiling effect ; Early results ; Floor effect ; Forgotten Joint Score ; Patient report outcome ; Total knee arthroplasty</subject><ispartof>Knee surgery & related research, 2020-12, Vol.32, p.1</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee Qunn Jid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang Wai Yee Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong Yiu Chung</creatorcontrib><title>Forgotten Joint Score for early outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty: Is it really useful?</title><title>Knee surgery & related research</title><addtitle>Knee Surgery and Related Research (Knee Surg Relat Res)</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Background: Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) has become a popular tool for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but almost all studies had assessment performed 1 year after surgery. There is a need for a sensitive tool for earlier outcome assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of FJS within the first year after TKA.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Patients within the first year after primary TKA were recruited. FJS was translated into the local language with a cross-cultural adaptation and was validated by assessing the correlation with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score (WOMAC). Ceiling and floor effects (highest or lowest 10% or 15%) of both scores were compared. Skewness of scores was assessed with a histogram.
Results: One hundred sixty-three subjects were recruited: 84 (51.5%) had evaluation at 3 months after the operation, 56 (34.4%) at 6 months, and 23 (14.1%) at 12 months. FJS had fewer patients at the highest 10% (10.7% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.046) or 15% (19.6% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.027) at 6 months and within the first year overall (6.7% vs. 13.5%, P <0.001; 14.1% vs. 22.7%, P <0.001). Also, it had more patients at the lowest 10% (16.7% vs. 0%, P <0.001) or 15% (21.4% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) at 3 months, 6 months (10.7% vs. 0%, P <0.001), and overall (12.9% vs. 0%, P <0.001; 16.6% vs. 0%, P <0.001). The skewness was much less than WOMAC (0.09 vs. -0.56).
Conclusions: FJS has a low ceiling effect but a high floor effect in the first year after TKA. Such characteristics make it less useful for the general assessment of early patient report outcome after operation.]]></description><subject>Ceiling effect</subject><subject>Early results</subject><subject>Floor effect</subject><subject>Forgotten Joint Score</subject><subject>Patient report outcome</subject><subject>Total knee arthroplasty</subject><issn>2234-0726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9izEOgkAQAK_QRKO-wGY_QAIcitpYGInaam9Os6cXD5bsLgW_l8LaaoqZGZlpntsiSct8PTELkfBIV2lpizIvpsZXxC9SxQYuFBqF65MYwRMDOo49UKdPqhGcCIrUOCTOKzIoqYvwaXBwrG-mNjrRfgdngaDA6OKwd4K-i_u5GXsXBRc_zsyyOt4Op-QTRO4th9pxf7cbm2Xbjf1vv7ONQiA</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Lee Qunn Jid</creator><creator>Chang Wai Yee Esther</creator><creator>Wong Yiu Chung</creator><general>대한슬관절학회</general><scope>HZB</scope><scope>Q5X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Forgotten Joint Score for early outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty: Is it really useful?</title><author>Lee Qunn Jid ; Chang Wai Yee Esther ; Wong Yiu Chung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_38311983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ceiling effect</topic><topic>Early results</topic><topic>Floor effect</topic><topic>Forgotten Joint Score</topic><topic>Patient report outcome</topic><topic>Total knee arthroplasty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee Qunn Jid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang Wai Yee Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong Yiu Chung</creatorcontrib><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS)</collection><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type</collection><jtitle>Knee surgery & related research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee Qunn Jid</au><au>Chang Wai Yee Esther</au><au>Wong Yiu Chung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forgotten Joint Score for early outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty: Is it really useful?</atitle><jtitle>Knee surgery & related research</jtitle><addtitle>Knee Surgery and Related Research (Knee Surg Relat Res)</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>2234-0726</issn><abstract><![CDATA[Background: Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) has become a popular tool for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but almost all studies had assessment performed 1 year after surgery. There is a need for a sensitive tool for earlier outcome assessment. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of FJS within the first year after TKA.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study. Patients within the first year after primary TKA were recruited. FJS was translated into the local language with a cross-cultural adaptation and was validated by assessing the correlation with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score (WOMAC). Ceiling and floor effects (highest or lowest 10% or 15%) of both scores were compared. Skewness of scores was assessed with a histogram.
Results: One hundred sixty-three subjects were recruited: 84 (51.5%) had evaluation at 3 months after the operation, 56 (34.4%) at 6 months, and 23 (14.1%) at 12 months. FJS had fewer patients at the highest 10% (10.7% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.046) or 15% (19.6% vs. 32.1%, P = 0.027) at 6 months and within the first year overall (6.7% vs. 13.5%, P <0.001; 14.1% vs. 22.7%, P <0.001). Also, it had more patients at the lowest 10% (16.7% vs. 0%, P <0.001) or 15% (21.4% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) at 3 months, 6 months (10.7% vs. 0%, P <0.001), and overall (12.9% vs. 0%, P <0.001; 16.6% vs. 0%, P <0.001). The skewness was much less than WOMAC (0.09 vs. -0.56).
Conclusions: FJS has a low ceiling effect but a high floor effect in the first year after TKA. Such characteristics make it less useful for the general assessment of early patient report outcome after operation.]]></abstract><pub>대한슬관절학회</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2234-0726 |
| ispartof | Knee surgery & related research, 2020-12, Vol.32, p.1 |
| issn | 2234-0726 |
| language | kor |
| recordid | cdi_kiss_primary_3831198 |
| source | KoreaMed Synapse; KoreaMed Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
| subjects | Ceiling effect Early results Floor effect Forgotten Joint Score Patient report outcome Total knee arthroplasty |
| title | Forgotten Joint Score for early outcome assessment after total knee arthroplasty: Is it really useful? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T21%3A17%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forgotten%20Joint%20Score%20for%20early%20outcome%20assessment%20after%20total%20knee%20arthroplasty:%20Is%20it%20really%20useful?&rft.jtitle=Knee%20surgery%20&%20related%20research&rft.au=Lee%20Qunn%20Jid&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=32&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=2234-0726&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckiss%3E3831198%3C/kiss%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kiss_id=3831198&rfr_iscdi=true |