The Fixation Method according to the Fracture Type of the Greater Trochanter in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Undergoing Arthroplasty

The Fixation Method according to the Fracture Type of the Greater Trochanter in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Undergoing Arthroplasty

Purpose: We conducted a study on patients who underwent hip joint arthroplasty because of unstable femur intertrochanteric fractures with greater trochanter bony fragments. After dividing patients into three groups depending on their fracture patterns, we evaluated the clinical and radiological outc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hip & pelvis 2017-03, Vol.29 (1), p.62
Hauptverfasser: Doohoon Sun, Byeong-seop Park, Gun-il Jang, Bongjoo Lee
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Schlagworte:
Greater trochanter reattatchment
Hip joint arthroplasty
Intertrochanteric fracture
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 62
container_title Hip & pelvis
container_volume 29
creator Doohoon Sun
Byeong-seop Park
Gun-il Jang
Bongjoo Lee
description Purpose: We conducted a study on patients who underwent hip joint arthroplasty because of unstable femur intertrochanteric fractures with greater trochanter bony fragments. After dividing patients into three groups depending on their fracture patterns, we evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of different operation methods applied to each of these groups. Materials and Methods: Using Evan`s classification, we defined an unstable intertrochanteric fracture as those characterized as stage 4 or 5. Of the 137 patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture with osteoporosis (bone mineral density,
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kiss</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kiss_primary_3515395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kiss_id>3515395</kiss_id><sourcerecordid>3515395</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kiss_primary_35153953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9TcsKwkAQ24OCov0CL_MDQt1SH0cRXwdv9SzjdrSrdbfMjmD_wY_Wing0l4QkJC3V1Xo6GSZ6HHdUFMIlfmOqx6NYd9UzKwhW9oFivYMdSeFzQGM859adQTxIU2A0cmeCrK4I_OljrplQiCFjbwp0jbQO9i4IHkuCbePIL7PmtxLepZz47JuHOUvBvioxSN1X7ROWgaIv99RgtcwWm-HVhnCo2N6Q60OSjtJklib_0xcZrVAq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Fixation Method according to the Fracture Type of the Greater Trochanter in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Undergoing Arthroplasty</title><source>KoreaMed Synapse</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Doohoon Sun ; Byeong-seop Park ; Gun-il Jang ; Bongjoo Lee</creator><creatorcontrib>Doohoon Sun ; Byeong-seop Park ; Gun-il Jang ; Bongjoo Lee</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: We conducted a study on patients who underwent hip joint arthroplasty because of unstable femur intertrochanteric fractures with greater trochanter bony fragments. After dividing patients into three groups depending on their fracture patterns, we evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of different operation methods applied to each of these groups. Materials and Methods: Using Evan`s classification, we defined an unstable intertrochanteric fracture as those characterized as stage 4 or 5. Of the 137 patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture with osteoporosis (bone mineral density, &lt;-2.5) between March 2014 and October 2015, 63 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study. Next, patients were divided into three groups based on their greater trochanter fracture patterns (discerned with three-dimensional computed tomography images); different fixation methods were applied to each group by a single orthopaedic surgeon. Results: Taken as a whole, 50 out of 63 patients experienced no reduction in walking distance in their daily lives. Harris hip score increased from 74.8 to 85.7 point and we considered this a relatively good result. Radiologically, we observed complete bone union in 62 cases (98.4%); the lone exception was in a patient who experienced osteolysis. There were also 3 cases who removed greater trochanter reattachment device due to broken implant and 1 case of dislocation. Conclusion: The different fixation methods applied to three distinct groups with varying fractures patterns were successful in achieving proper reduction and fixation of greater trochanteric fractures. We also observed reduced bone union periods when arthroplasty was performed in patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Lastly, we believe these approaches may also aid in achieving early ambulation and early rehabilitations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2287-3260</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>대한고관절학회</publisher><subject>Greater trochanter reattatchment ; Hip joint arthroplasty ; Intertrochanteric fracture</subject><ispartof>Hip &amp; pelvis, 2017-03, Vol.29 (1), p.62</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doohoon Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byeong-seop Park</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gun-il Jang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongjoo Lee</creatorcontrib><title>The Fixation Method according to the Fracture Type of the Greater Trochanter in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Undergoing Arthroplasty</title><title>Hip &amp; pelvis</title><addtitle>Hip &amp; Pelvis(구 대한고관절학회지)</addtitle><description>Purpose: We conducted a study on patients who underwent hip joint arthroplasty because of unstable femur intertrochanteric fractures with greater trochanter bony fragments. After dividing patients into three groups depending on their fracture patterns, we evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of different operation methods applied to each of these groups. Materials and Methods: Using Evan`s classification, we defined an unstable intertrochanteric fracture as those characterized as stage 4 or 5. Of the 137 patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture with osteoporosis (bone mineral density, &lt;-2.5) between March 2014 and October 2015, 63 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study. Next, patients were divided into three groups based on their greater trochanter fracture patterns (discerned with three-dimensional computed tomography images); different fixation methods were applied to each group by a single orthopaedic surgeon. Results: Taken as a whole, 50 out of 63 patients experienced no reduction in walking distance in their daily lives. Harris hip score increased from 74.8 to 85.7 point and we considered this a relatively good result. Radiologically, we observed complete bone union in 62 cases (98.4%); the lone exception was in a patient who experienced osteolysis. There were also 3 cases who removed greater trochanter reattachment device due to broken implant and 1 case of dislocation. Conclusion: The different fixation methods applied to three distinct groups with varying fractures patterns were successful in achieving proper reduction and fixation of greater trochanteric fractures. We also observed reduced bone union periods when arthroplasty was performed in patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Lastly, we believe these approaches may also aid in achieving early ambulation and early rehabilitations.</description><subject>Greater trochanter reattatchment</subject><subject>Hip joint arthroplasty</subject><subject>Intertrochanteric fracture</subject><issn>2287-3260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9TcsKwkAQ24OCov0CL_MDQt1SH0cRXwdv9SzjdrSrdbfMjmD_wY_Wing0l4QkJC3V1Xo6GSZ6HHdUFMIlfmOqx6NYd9UzKwhW9oFivYMdSeFzQGM859adQTxIU2A0cmeCrK4I_OljrplQiCFjbwp0jbQO9i4IHkuCbePIL7PmtxLepZz47JuHOUvBvioxSN1X7ROWgaIv99RgtcwWm-HVhnCo2N6Q60OSjtJklib_0xcZrVAq</recordid><startdate>20170331</startdate><enddate>20170331</enddate><creator>Doohoon Sun</creator><creator>Byeong-seop Park</creator><creator>Gun-il Jang</creator><creator>Bongjoo Lee</creator><general>대한고관절학회</general><scope>HZB</scope><scope>Q5X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170331</creationdate><title>The Fixation Method according to the Fracture Type of the Greater Trochanter in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Undergoing Arthroplasty</title><author>Doohoon Sun ; Byeong-seop Park ; Gun-il Jang ; Bongjoo Lee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_35153953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Greater trochanter reattatchment</topic><topic>Hip joint arthroplasty</topic><topic>Intertrochanteric fracture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doohoon Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Byeong-seop Park</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gun-il Jang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bongjoo Lee</creatorcontrib><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS)</collection><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type</collection><jtitle>Hip &amp; pelvis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doohoon Sun</au><au>Byeong-seop Park</au><au>Gun-il Jang</au><au>Bongjoo Lee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Fixation Method according to the Fracture Type of the Greater Trochanter in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Undergoing Arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Hip &amp; pelvis</jtitle><addtitle>Hip &amp; Pelvis(구 대한고관절학회지)</addtitle><date>2017-03-31</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>62</spage><pages>62-</pages><issn>2287-3260</issn><abstract>Purpose: We conducted a study on patients who underwent hip joint arthroplasty because of unstable femur intertrochanteric fractures with greater trochanter bony fragments. After dividing patients into three groups depending on their fracture patterns, we evaluated the clinical and radiological outcomes of different operation methods applied to each of these groups. Materials and Methods: Using Evan`s classification, we defined an unstable intertrochanteric fracture as those characterized as stage 4 or 5. Of the 137 patients presenting with an intertrochanteric fracture with osteoporosis (bone mineral density, &lt;-2.5) between March 2014 and October 2015, 63 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this study. Next, patients were divided into three groups based on their greater trochanter fracture patterns (discerned with three-dimensional computed tomography images); different fixation methods were applied to each group by a single orthopaedic surgeon. Results: Taken as a whole, 50 out of 63 patients experienced no reduction in walking distance in their daily lives. Harris hip score increased from 74.8 to 85.7 point and we considered this a relatively good result. Radiologically, we observed complete bone union in 62 cases (98.4%); the lone exception was in a patient who experienced osteolysis. There were also 3 cases who removed greater trochanter reattachment device due to broken implant and 1 case of dislocation. Conclusion: The different fixation methods applied to three distinct groups with varying fractures patterns were successful in achieving proper reduction and fixation of greater trochanteric fractures. We also observed reduced bone union periods when arthroplasty was performed in patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Lastly, we believe these approaches may also aid in achieving early ambulation and early rehabilitations.</abstract><pub>대한고관절학회</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2287-3260
ispartof Hip & pelvis, 2017-03, Vol.29 (1), p.62
issn 2287-3260
language kor
recordid cdi_kiss_primary_3515395
source KoreaMed Synapse; PubMed Central Open Access; KoreaMed Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Greater trochanter reattatchment
Hip joint arthroplasty
Intertrochanteric fracture
title The Fixation Method according to the Fracture Type of the Greater Trochanter in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Undergoing Arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A32%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Fixation%20Method%20according%20to%20the%20Fracture%20Type%20of%20the%20Greater%20Trochanter%20in%20Unstable%20Intertrochanteric%20Fractures%20Undergoing%20Arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Hip%20&%20pelvis&rft.au=Doohoon%20Sun&rft.date=2017-03-31&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft.pages=62-&rft.issn=2287-3260&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckiss%3E3515395%3C/kiss%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kiss_id=3515395&rfr_iscdi=true