Surgical Results of the Cephalomedullary Nail for the Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: Comparison between Non-experienced Surgeons and Experienced Surgeon

Purpose: Cephalomedullary nail (CM nail) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures is in the lime light in recent years. The purpose of this study is to compare surgical outcomes between experienced surgeon and non-experienced surgeons in respect of CM nail for femoral intertrochanteri...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hip & pelvis 2016-12, Vol.28 (4), p.225
Hauptverfasser: Jae-seong Seo, Hak-jin Min, Dong Min Kim, Seung-min Oh, Sang-min Kim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:kor
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 225
container_title Hip & pelvis
container_volume 28
creator Jae-seong Seo
Hak-jin Min
Dong Min Kim
Seung-min Oh
Sang-min Kim
description Purpose: Cephalomedullary nail (CM nail) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures is in the lime light in recent years. The purpose of this study is to compare surgical outcomes between experienced surgeon and non-experienced surgeons in respect of CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: The 129 patients underwent CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fracture more than six months of follow-up from April 2011 to March 2014 in Seoul Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) were participated in this study. For this study, group A consisted of experienced surgeons who performed more than 500 times of CM nail, and group B consisted of non-experienced surgeons who performed less than 50 times of CM nail. Clinical and radiologic outcomes, complications and the need for reoperation between both groups were compared in the study. Results: According to clinical result, both the mean operation time and transfusion volume were significantly longer and greater in group B (P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>kiss</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_kiss_primary_3486764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><kiss_id>3486764</kiss_id><sourcerecordid>3486764</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-kiss_primary_34867643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9jsFOw0AMRPdQJKrSL-DiH4iUbqo06jVqBJcegHtlNg7ZdrOO7I2Aj-FfSRE3JOYyI72xPAuztLbaZYUt81uzVj3nsypbbnK7NF_Pk7x5hwGeSKeQFLiD1BPUNPYYeKB2CgHlE47oA3QsP7ShgWU-eoyJJAm7Hq_JO2gEXZqE9lDzMKJ45QivlN6JIhw5ZvQxzkWKjlq4PieOChhbOPwFd-amw6C0_vWVuW8OL_VDdvGqp1H8MC87Fduq3JXb4n_6DXoZVtI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical Results of the Cephalomedullary Nail for the Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: Comparison between Non-experienced Surgeons and Experienced Surgeon</title><source>KoreaMed Synapse</source><source>KoreaMed Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Jae-seong Seo ; Hak-jin Min ; Dong Min Kim ; Seung-min Oh ; Sang-min Kim</creator><creatorcontrib>Jae-seong Seo ; Hak-jin Min ; Dong Min Kim ; Seung-min Oh ; Sang-min Kim</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Cephalomedullary nail (CM nail) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures is in the lime light in recent years. The purpose of this study is to compare surgical outcomes between experienced surgeon and non-experienced surgeons in respect of CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: The 129 patients underwent CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fracture more than six months of follow-up from April 2011 to March 2014 in Seoul Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) were participated in this study. For this study, group A consisted of experienced surgeons who performed more than 500 times of CM nail, and group B consisted of non-experienced surgeons who performed less than 50 times of CM nail. Clinical and radiologic outcomes, complications and the need for reoperation between both groups were compared in the study. Results: According to clinical result, both the mean operation time and transfusion volume were significantly longer and greater in group B (P&lt;0.05). In the radiologic outcomes, adequacy of reduction, tip-apex distance and numbers of case placed in the Cleveland zones 5, 6 and 8; there was no statistical difference between both groups. Moreover, rate of complication and reoperation had same results as radiologic outcomes. Conclusion: There was no significant difference with statistical data in complications from CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fractures between experienced surgeon and non-experienced surgeon. Although the operation time and transfusion volume were significantly longer and greater in the case of operation by non-experienced surgeon, satisfactory performance was seen in the complications and the need for reoperation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2287-3260</identifier><language>kor</language><publisher>대한고관절학회</publisher><subject>Cephalomedullary nail ; Femur ; Intertrochanteric fractures</subject><ispartof>Hip &amp; pelvis, 2016-12, Vol.28 (4), p.225</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jae-seong Seo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hak-jin Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong Min Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seung-min Oh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang-min Kim</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical Results of the Cephalomedullary Nail for the Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: Comparison between Non-experienced Surgeons and Experienced Surgeon</title><title>Hip &amp; pelvis</title><addtitle>Hip &amp; Pelvis(구 대한고관절학회지)</addtitle><description>Purpose: Cephalomedullary nail (CM nail) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures is in the lime light in recent years. The purpose of this study is to compare surgical outcomes between experienced surgeon and non-experienced surgeons in respect of CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: The 129 patients underwent CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fracture more than six months of follow-up from April 2011 to March 2014 in Seoul Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) were participated in this study. For this study, group A consisted of experienced surgeons who performed more than 500 times of CM nail, and group B consisted of non-experienced surgeons who performed less than 50 times of CM nail. Clinical and radiologic outcomes, complications and the need for reoperation between both groups were compared in the study. Results: According to clinical result, both the mean operation time and transfusion volume were significantly longer and greater in group B (P&lt;0.05). In the radiologic outcomes, adequacy of reduction, tip-apex distance and numbers of case placed in the Cleveland zones 5, 6 and 8; there was no statistical difference between both groups. Moreover, rate of complication and reoperation had same results as radiologic outcomes. Conclusion: There was no significant difference with statistical data in complications from CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fractures between experienced surgeon and non-experienced surgeon. Although the operation time and transfusion volume were significantly longer and greater in the case of operation by non-experienced surgeon, satisfactory performance was seen in the complications and the need for reoperation.</description><subject>Cephalomedullary nail</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Intertrochanteric fractures</subject><issn>2287-3260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9jsFOw0AMRPdQJKrSL-DiH4iUbqo06jVqBJcegHtlNg7ZdrOO7I2Aj-FfSRE3JOYyI72xPAuztLbaZYUt81uzVj3nsypbbnK7NF_Pk7x5hwGeSKeQFLiD1BPUNPYYeKB2CgHlE47oA3QsP7ShgWU-eoyJJAm7Hq_JO2gEXZqE9lDzMKJ45QivlN6JIhw5ZvQxzkWKjlq4PieOChhbOPwFd-amw6C0_vWVuW8OL_VDdvGqp1H8MC87Fduq3JXb4n_6DXoZVtI</recordid><startdate>20161231</startdate><enddate>20161231</enddate><creator>Jae-seong Seo</creator><creator>Hak-jin Min</creator><creator>Dong Min Kim</creator><creator>Seung-min Oh</creator><creator>Sang-min Kim</creator><general>대한고관절학회</general><scope>HZB</scope><scope>Q5X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161231</creationdate><title>Surgical Results of the Cephalomedullary Nail for the Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: Comparison between Non-experienced Surgeons and Experienced Surgeon</title><author>Jae-seong Seo ; Hak-jin Min ; Dong Min Kim ; Seung-min Oh ; Sang-min Kim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-kiss_primary_34867643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>kor</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cephalomedullary nail</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Intertrochanteric fractures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jae-seong Seo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hak-jin Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong Min Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seung-min Oh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang-min Kim</creatorcontrib><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS)</collection><collection>Korean Studies Information Service System (KISS) B-Type</collection><jtitle>Hip &amp; pelvis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jae-seong Seo</au><au>Hak-jin Min</au><au>Dong Min Kim</au><au>Seung-min Oh</au><au>Sang-min Kim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical Results of the Cephalomedullary Nail for the Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: Comparison between Non-experienced Surgeons and Experienced Surgeon</atitle><jtitle>Hip &amp; pelvis</jtitle><addtitle>Hip &amp; Pelvis(구 대한고관절학회지)</addtitle><date>2016-12-31</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>225</spage><pages>225-</pages><issn>2287-3260</issn><abstract>Purpose: Cephalomedullary nail (CM nail) in the treatment of femoral intertrochanteric fractures is in the lime light in recent years. The purpose of this study is to compare surgical outcomes between experienced surgeon and non-experienced surgeons in respect of CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fractures. Materials and Methods: The 129 patients underwent CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fracture more than six months of follow-up from April 2011 to March 2014 in Seoul Medical Center (Seoul, Korea) were participated in this study. For this study, group A consisted of experienced surgeons who performed more than 500 times of CM nail, and group B consisted of non-experienced surgeons who performed less than 50 times of CM nail. Clinical and radiologic outcomes, complications and the need for reoperation between both groups were compared in the study. Results: According to clinical result, both the mean operation time and transfusion volume were significantly longer and greater in group B (P&lt;0.05). In the radiologic outcomes, adequacy of reduction, tip-apex distance and numbers of case placed in the Cleveland zones 5, 6 and 8; there was no statistical difference between both groups. Moreover, rate of complication and reoperation had same results as radiologic outcomes. Conclusion: There was no significant difference with statistical data in complications from CM nail for femoral intertrochanteric fractures between experienced surgeon and non-experienced surgeon. Although the operation time and transfusion volume were significantly longer and greater in the case of operation by non-experienced surgeon, satisfactory performance was seen in the complications and the need for reoperation.</abstract><pub>대한고관절학회</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2287-3260
ispartof Hip & pelvis, 2016-12, Vol.28 (4), p.225
issn 2287-3260
language kor
recordid cdi_kiss_primary_3486764
source KoreaMed Synapse; KoreaMed Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Cephalomedullary nail
Femur
Intertrochanteric fractures
title Surgical Results of the Cephalomedullary Nail for the Femoral Intertrochanteric Fracture: Comparison between Non-experienced Surgeons and Experienced Surgeon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T04%3A45%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-kiss&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20Results%20of%20the%20Cephalomedullary%20Nail%20for%20the%20Femoral%20Intertrochanteric%20Fracture:%20Comparison%20between%20Non-experienced%20Surgeons%20and%20Experienced%20Surgeon&rft.jtitle=Hip%20&%20pelvis&rft.au=Jae-seong%20Seo&rft.date=2016-12-31&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=225&rft.pages=225-&rft.issn=2287-3260&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ckiss%3E3486764%3C/kiss%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_kiss_id=3486764&rfr_iscdi=true