Minimal Transurethral Prostatectomy plus Bladder Neck Incision versus Standard Transurethral Prostatectomy in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomised Prospective Study

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of the combination of minimal transurethral resection of the prostate and bladder neck incision in comparison with those of the standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods: Forty patients with prostates of ≤...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urologia internationalis 2002-01, Vol.69 (4), p.283-286
Hauptverfasser: Yeni, Ercan, Unal, Doǧan, Verit, Ayhan, Gulum, Mehmet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 286
container_issue 4
container_start_page 283
container_title Urologia internationalis
container_volume 69
creator Yeni, Ercan
Unal, Doǧan
Verit, Ayhan
Gulum, Mehmet
description Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of the combination of minimal transurethral resection of the prostate and bladder neck incision in comparison with those of the standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods: Forty patients with prostates of ≤25 ml were randomized to two equal groups (20 cases in each). In group I minimal transurethral resection of the prostate followed by bladder neck incision at the 6 o’clock position and in group II standard TURP were performed. Patients were evaluated in terms of the change in symptom severity, maximal flow rate and sexual function in addition to operating time, length of hospital stay, problems of catheter positioning at the end of the operation and the rate of bladder neck contracture using χ 2 and independent t tests. Results: Age, prostate volume postoperative follow-up time, improvement in international prostate symptom score and maximal flow rate, length of hospital stay and erectile dysfunction rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Operation time was shorter in group I (p = 0.001). Although the urethral catheter was easily positioned at the end of the operation in group I, it was not possible in group II for 4 patients (p = 0.053). Postoperative retrograde ejaculation for groups I and II were determined in 7 and 16 patients, respectively (p = 0.005). Bladder neck contracture was not found in group I, while it was seen in 2 patients in group II (p = 0.487). Conclusion: The combination of minimal transurethral resection and bladder neck incision in patients with small prostates appears to provide a satisfactory clinical outcome, comparable with standard TURP, while preventing the difficulty of urethral catheter positioning at the end of the operation, decreasing bladder neck contracture and lowering the incidence of retrograde ejaculation.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000066127
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_66127</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72716264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-f78a998fc6088010633ca0516415d905f0fd7417b17d9f61bdcac67c8376cf5b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90c9PFDEUB_DGaGRBD55NTGOCiYfRdtppO96AiGyCSBTOk7f9AZXZztB2IPuf-edZ2AUuxl6a5n3y7ct7CL2h5BOlTfuZlCMEreUzNKO8ZhVhbfsczQjhdUUpU1toO6XfhBTcypdoi9ac81rxGfrz3Qe_hB6fRQhpijZfxvI6jUPKkK3Ow3KFx35KeL8HY2zEJ1Zf4XnQPvkh4BsbUyn-yhAMRPPfGB_wKWRvQ0741udLvG-DvwgPymt8tBptHHtIHr7gPfyzhA5Ln6y5N2PJ8Te2fDaZ1Sv0wkGf7OvNvYPOD7-eHRxVxz--zQ_2jivNGpUrJxW0rXJaEKUIJYIxDaShgtPGtKRxxBnJqVxQaVon6MJo0EJqxaTQrlmwHfRhnTvG4XqyKXelIW37HoIdptTJWlJRC17gxzXUpdUUrevGWCYbVx0l3d2ausc1FftuEzotltY8yc1eCtjdAEgaelemWgb-5DhTvOGsuLdrdwXxwsZH8PDN-39Wz-cn96AbjWN_AWYRsxM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>72716264</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Minimal Transurethral Prostatectomy plus Bladder Neck Incision versus Standard Transurethral Prostatectomy in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomised Prospective Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Yeni, Ercan ; Unal, Doǧan ; Verit, Ayhan ; Gulum, Mehmet</creator><creatorcontrib>Yeni, Ercan ; Unal, Doǧan ; Verit, Ayhan ; Gulum, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of the combination of minimal transurethral resection of the prostate and bladder neck incision in comparison with those of the standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods: Forty patients with prostates of ≤25 ml were randomized to two equal groups (20 cases in each). In group I minimal transurethral resection of the prostate followed by bladder neck incision at the 6 o’clock position and in group II standard TURP were performed. Patients were evaluated in terms of the change in symptom severity, maximal flow rate and sexual function in addition to operating time, length of hospital stay, problems of catheter positioning at the end of the operation and the rate of bladder neck contracture using χ 2 and independent t tests. Results: Age, prostate volume postoperative follow-up time, improvement in international prostate symptom score and maximal flow rate, length of hospital stay and erectile dysfunction rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Operation time was shorter in group I (p = 0.001). Although the urethral catheter was easily positioned at the end of the operation in group I, it was not possible in group II for 4 patients (p = 0.053). Postoperative retrograde ejaculation for groups I and II were determined in 7 and 16 patients, respectively (p = 0.005). Bladder neck contracture was not found in group I, while it was seen in 2 patients in group II (p = 0.487). Conclusion: The combination of minimal transurethral resection and bladder neck incision in patients with small prostates appears to provide a satisfactory clinical outcome, comparable with standard TURP, while preventing the difficulty of urethral catheter positioning at the end of the operation, decreasing bladder neck contracture and lowering the incidence of retrograde ejaculation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-1138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000066127</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12444284</identifier><identifier>CODEN: URINAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: Karger</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Neck - surgery ; Original Paper ; Prospective Studies ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate - methods</subject><ispartof>Urologia internationalis, 2002-01, Vol.69 (4), p.283-286</ispartof><rights>2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-f78a998fc6088010633ca0516415d905f0fd7417b17d9f61bdcac67c8376cf5b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-f78a998fc6088010633ca0516415d905f0fd7417b17d9f61bdcac67c8376cf5b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2423,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14384543$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12444284$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yeni, Ercan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unal, Doǧan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verit, Ayhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulum, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><title>Minimal Transurethral Prostatectomy plus Bladder Neck Incision versus Standard Transurethral Prostatectomy in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomised Prospective Study</title><title>Urologia internationalis</title><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><description>Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of the combination of minimal transurethral resection of the prostate and bladder neck incision in comparison with those of the standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods: Forty patients with prostates of ≤25 ml were randomized to two equal groups (20 cases in each). In group I minimal transurethral resection of the prostate followed by bladder neck incision at the 6 o’clock position and in group II standard TURP were performed. Patients were evaluated in terms of the change in symptom severity, maximal flow rate and sexual function in addition to operating time, length of hospital stay, problems of catheter positioning at the end of the operation and the rate of bladder neck contracture using χ 2 and independent t tests. Results: Age, prostate volume postoperative follow-up time, improvement in international prostate symptom score and maximal flow rate, length of hospital stay and erectile dysfunction rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Operation time was shorter in group I (p = 0.001). Although the urethral catheter was easily positioned at the end of the operation in group I, it was not possible in group II for 4 patients (p = 0.053). Postoperative retrograde ejaculation for groups I and II were determined in 7 and 16 patients, respectively (p = 0.005). Bladder neck contracture was not found in group I, while it was seen in 2 patients in group II (p = 0.487). Conclusion: The combination of minimal transurethral resection and bladder neck incision in patients with small prostates appears to provide a satisfactory clinical outcome, comparable with standard TURP, while preventing the difficulty of urethral catheter positioning at the end of the operation, decreasing bladder neck contracture and lowering the incidence of retrograde ejaculation.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neck - surgery</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</subject><subject>Transurethral Resection of Prostate - methods</subject><issn>0042-1138</issn><issn>1423-0399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90c9PFDEUB_DGaGRBD55NTGOCiYfRdtppO96AiGyCSBTOk7f9AZXZztB2IPuf-edZ2AUuxl6a5n3y7ct7CL2h5BOlTfuZlCMEreUzNKO8ZhVhbfsczQjhdUUpU1toO6XfhBTcypdoi9ac81rxGfrz3Qe_hB6fRQhpijZfxvI6jUPKkK3Ow3KFx35KeL8HY2zEJ1Zf4XnQPvkh4BsbUyn-yhAMRPPfGB_wKWRvQ0741udLvG-DvwgPymt8tBptHHtIHr7gPfyzhA5Ln6y5N2PJ8Te2fDaZ1Sv0wkGf7OvNvYPOD7-eHRxVxz--zQ_2jivNGpUrJxW0rXJaEKUIJYIxDaShgtPGtKRxxBnJqVxQaVon6MJo0EJqxaTQrlmwHfRhnTvG4XqyKXelIW37HoIdptTJWlJRC17gxzXUpdUUrevGWCYbVx0l3d2ausc1FftuEzotltY8yc1eCtjdAEgaelemWgb-5DhTvOGsuLdrdwXxwsZH8PDN-39Wz-cn96AbjWN_AWYRsxM</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Yeni, Ercan</creator><creator>Unal, Doǧan</creator><creator>Verit, Ayhan</creator><creator>Gulum, Mehmet</creator><general>Karger</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Minimal Transurethral Prostatectomy plus Bladder Neck Incision versus Standard Transurethral Prostatectomy in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomised Prospective Study</title><author>Yeni, Ercan ; Unal, Doǧan ; Verit, Ayhan ; Gulum, Mehmet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-f78a998fc6088010633ca0516415d905f0fd7417b17d9f61bdcac67c8376cf5b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neck - surgery</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland</topic><topic>Transurethral Resection of Prostate - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yeni, Ercan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unal, Doǧan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verit, Ayhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gulum, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yeni, Ercan</au><au>Unal, Doǧan</au><au>Verit, Ayhan</au><au>Gulum, Mehmet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Minimal Transurethral Prostatectomy plus Bladder Neck Incision versus Standard Transurethral Prostatectomy in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomised Prospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>283-286</pages><issn>0042-1138</issn><eissn>1423-0399</eissn><coden>URINAC</coden><abstract>Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and complications of the combination of minimal transurethral resection of the prostate and bladder neck incision in comparison with those of the standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods: Forty patients with prostates of ≤25 ml were randomized to two equal groups (20 cases in each). In group I minimal transurethral resection of the prostate followed by bladder neck incision at the 6 o’clock position and in group II standard TURP were performed. Patients were evaluated in terms of the change in symptom severity, maximal flow rate and sexual function in addition to operating time, length of hospital stay, problems of catheter positioning at the end of the operation and the rate of bladder neck contracture using χ 2 and independent t tests. Results: Age, prostate volume postoperative follow-up time, improvement in international prostate symptom score and maximal flow rate, length of hospital stay and erectile dysfunction rates were not statistically different between the 2 groups. Operation time was shorter in group I (p = 0.001). Although the urethral catheter was easily positioned at the end of the operation in group I, it was not possible in group II for 4 patients (p = 0.053). Postoperative retrograde ejaculation for groups I and II were determined in 7 and 16 patients, respectively (p = 0.005). Bladder neck contracture was not found in group I, while it was seen in 2 patients in group II (p = 0.487). Conclusion: The combination of minimal transurethral resection and bladder neck incision in patients with small prostates appears to provide a satisfactory clinical outcome, comparable with standard TURP, while preventing the difficulty of urethral catheter positioning at the end of the operation, decreasing bladder neck contracture and lowering the incidence of retrograde ejaculation.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>Karger</pub><pmid>12444284</pmid><doi>10.1159/000066127</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-1138
ispartof Urologia internationalis, 2002-01, Vol.69 (4), p.283-286
issn 0042-1138
1423-0399
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_66127
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Neck - surgery
Original Paper
Prospective Studies
Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the genital tract and mammary gland
Transurethral Resection of Prostate - methods
title Minimal Transurethral Prostatectomy plus Bladder Neck Incision versus Standard Transurethral Prostatectomy in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomised Prospective Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T14%3A36%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Minimal%20Transurethral%20Prostatectomy%20plus%20Bladder%20Neck%20Incision%20versus%20Standard%20Transurethral%20Prostatectomy%20in%20Patients%20with%20Benign%20Prostatic%20Hyperplasia:%20A%20Randomised%20Prospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Urologia%20internationalis&rft.au=Yeni,%20Ercan&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=283-286&rft.issn=0042-1138&rft.eissn=1423-0399&rft.coden=URINAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000066127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E72716264%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=72716264&rft_id=info:pmid/12444284&rfr_iscdi=true