Predicting Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth in Cataract Patients Using Scheimpflug Slit Photography
Purpose: To predict the postoperative anterior chamber (AC) depth from the preoperative in situ position of the lens central clear zone (CCZ) using Scheimpflug slit photography. Methods: 111 eyes of 78 cases that underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were examined. 74...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic research 2002-09, Vol.34 (5), p.265-272 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 272 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 265 |
container_title | Ophthalmic research |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Sasaki, Hiroshi Sakamoto, Yasuo Harada, Sachiko Sakamoto, Akiko Kawakami, Yutaka Nagai, Kouta Takahashi, Nobuo Sasaki, Kazuyuki |
description | Purpose: To predict the postoperative anterior chamber (AC) depth from the preoperative in situ position of the lens central clear zone (CCZ) using Scheimpflug slit photography. Methods: 111 eyes of 78 cases that underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were examined. 748 eyes of 383 healthy subjects with transparent lenses were used as the control. Scheimpflug slit photography was done under maximal mydriasis, and biometry was performed on the photographs. Two types of acrylic IOLs (MA30BA and MA60BM, both from Alcon) were used in this study. The preoperative AC depth (L1), the distance between the anterior lens capsule and lens CCZ (L2) and the postoperative AC depth (I1) were determined. I2, the predicted postoperative AC depth, was then determined from a linear regression of L1 + L2 and I1. Results: L2 thickened by 0.014 mm/year, and L1 decreased by 0.016 mm/year in the transparent lenses. L1 + L2 changed little with aging in both cataractous and transparent lenses. L1 + L2 and I1 showed a linear correlation with r = 0.80 in the MA30BA and r = 0.77 in the MA60BM groups. The mean error values between I1 and I2 were 0.095 ± 0.096 and 0.123 ± 0.114 mm in MA30BA and MA60BM, respectively. The error between I1 and I2 was within ± 0.17 and ± 0.33 mm or less in 72.9 and 91.5% of MA30BA and in 82.7 and 96.2% of MA60BM. In contrast, the error between I2 and I1 when calculated using the SRK/T formula was much larger – in excess of ± 0.33 mm in 38.7% of the eyes. Conclusions: L1 + L2 changes little with aging and is considered a useful marker of the position of the crystalline lens in situ. There was a high correlation between I1 and L1 + L2. These allow a far more accurate prediction of I1 than previous methods. In combination with the conventional regression formula and ray tracing, a highly accurate IOL power calculation can be attained. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000065597 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_65597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>677521401</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-757e4a3b65dad2d33081aad32e08729b3b7be5653a029fdb39bbeb54b13c86a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0EtLxDAQB_Agiq6rB8-CFA-Ch2oeTR9HWdcHCLv4OJeknbbRtqlJKuy3t3VXBXEuGZjfDOGP0BHBF4Tw5BIPFXKeRFtoQgLKfEx5so0mGDPssyiI9tC-ta8YDzjBu2iPUBaTOA4nqFwayFXmVFt6S22d7sAIpz7Au2odGKWNN6tEI8F419C5ylOtNxNOGJE5bzlIaJ31Xuy4_5RVoJquqPuhr9Uwr7TTpRFdtTpAO4WoLRxu3il6uZk_z-78h8Xt_ezqwc8Y586PeASBYDLkuchpzhiOiRA5o4DjiCaSyUgCDzkTmCZFLlkiJUgeSMKyOBSETdHZ-m5n9HsP1qWNshnUtWhB9zaNKIkJIyM8_QNfdW_a4W8ppZgEIQlHdL5GmdHWGijSzqhGmFVKcDpGn_5EP9iTzcFeNpD_yk3WAzhegzdhSjA_4Hv99N_p4nH-BdIuL9gnsOSTKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220146161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predicting Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth in Cataract Patients Using Scheimpflug Slit Photography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Sasaki, Hiroshi ; Sakamoto, Yasuo ; Harada, Sachiko ; Sakamoto, Akiko ; Kawakami, Yutaka ; Nagai, Kouta ; Takahashi, Nobuo ; Sasaki, Kazuyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Hiroshi ; Sakamoto, Yasuo ; Harada, Sachiko ; Sakamoto, Akiko ; Kawakami, Yutaka ; Nagai, Kouta ; Takahashi, Nobuo ; Sasaki, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To predict the postoperative anterior chamber (AC) depth from the preoperative in situ position of the lens central clear zone (CCZ) using Scheimpflug slit photography. Methods: 111 eyes of 78 cases that underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were examined. 748 eyes of 383 healthy subjects with transparent lenses were used as the control. Scheimpflug slit photography was done under maximal mydriasis, and biometry was performed on the photographs. Two types of acrylic IOLs (MA30BA and MA60BM, both from Alcon) were used in this study. The preoperative AC depth (L1), the distance between the anterior lens capsule and lens CCZ (L2) and the postoperative AC depth (I1) were determined. I2, the predicted postoperative AC depth, was then determined from a linear regression of L1 + L2 and I1. Results: L2 thickened by 0.014 mm/year, and L1 decreased by 0.016 mm/year in the transparent lenses. L1 + L2 changed little with aging in both cataractous and transparent lenses. L1 + L2 and I1 showed a linear correlation with r = 0.80 in the MA30BA and r = 0.77 in the MA60BM groups. The mean error values between I1 and I2 were 0.095 ± 0.096 and 0.123 ± 0.114 mm in MA30BA and MA60BM, respectively. The error between I1 and I2 was within ± 0.17 and ± 0.33 mm or less in 72.9 and 91.5% of MA30BA and in 82.7 and 96.2% of MA60BM. In contrast, the error between I2 and I1 when calculated using the SRK/T formula was much larger – in excess of ± 0.33 mm in 38.7% of the eyes. Conclusions: L1 + L2 changes little with aging and is considered a useful marker of the position of the crystalline lens in situ. There was a high correlation between I1 and L1 + L2. These allow a far more accurate prediction of I1 than previous methods. In combination with the conventional regression formula and ray tracing, a highly accurate IOL power calculation can be attained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-3747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0259</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000065597</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12381886</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anterior Chamber - pathology ; Anthropometry - methods ; Cataract - pathology ; Cataract Extraction ; Female ; Forecasting ; Humans ; Lenses, Intraocular ; Male ; Original Paper ; Phacoemulsification ; Photography - methods ; Postoperative Period</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmic research, 2002-09, Vol.34 (5), p.265-272</ispartof><rights>2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-757e4a3b65dad2d33081aad32e08729b3b7be5653a029fdb39bbeb54b13c86a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-757e4a3b65dad2d33081aad32e08729b3b7be5653a029fdb39bbeb54b13c86a13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2429,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12381886$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Sachiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Kouta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Predicting Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth in Cataract Patients Using Scheimpflug Slit Photography</title><title>Ophthalmic research</title><addtitle>Ophthalmic Res</addtitle><description>Purpose: To predict the postoperative anterior chamber (AC) depth from the preoperative in situ position of the lens central clear zone (CCZ) using Scheimpflug slit photography. Methods: 111 eyes of 78 cases that underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were examined. 748 eyes of 383 healthy subjects with transparent lenses were used as the control. Scheimpflug slit photography was done under maximal mydriasis, and biometry was performed on the photographs. Two types of acrylic IOLs (MA30BA and MA60BM, both from Alcon) were used in this study. The preoperative AC depth (L1), the distance between the anterior lens capsule and lens CCZ (L2) and the postoperative AC depth (I1) were determined. I2, the predicted postoperative AC depth, was then determined from a linear regression of L1 + L2 and I1. Results: L2 thickened by 0.014 mm/year, and L1 decreased by 0.016 mm/year in the transparent lenses. L1 + L2 changed little with aging in both cataractous and transparent lenses. L1 + L2 and I1 showed a linear correlation with r = 0.80 in the MA30BA and r = 0.77 in the MA60BM groups. The mean error values between I1 and I2 were 0.095 ± 0.096 and 0.123 ± 0.114 mm in MA30BA and MA60BM, respectively. The error between I1 and I2 was within ± 0.17 and ± 0.33 mm or less in 72.9 and 91.5% of MA30BA and in 82.7 and 96.2% of MA60BM. In contrast, the error between I2 and I1 when calculated using the SRK/T formula was much larger – in excess of ± 0.33 mm in 38.7% of the eyes. Conclusions: L1 + L2 changes little with aging and is considered a useful marker of the position of the crystalline lens in situ. There was a high correlation between I1 and L1 + L2. These allow a far more accurate prediction of I1 than previous methods. In combination with the conventional regression formula and ray tracing, a highly accurate IOL power calculation can be attained.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anterior Chamber - pathology</subject><subject>Anthropometry - methods</subject><subject>Cataract - pathology</subject><subject>Cataract Extraction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Phacoemulsification</subject><subject>Photography - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><issn>0030-3747</issn><issn>1423-0259</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0EtLxDAQB_Agiq6rB8-CFA-Ch2oeTR9HWdcHCLv4OJeknbbRtqlJKuy3t3VXBXEuGZjfDOGP0BHBF4Tw5BIPFXKeRFtoQgLKfEx5so0mGDPssyiI9tC-ta8YDzjBu2iPUBaTOA4nqFwayFXmVFt6S22d7sAIpz7Au2odGKWNN6tEI8F419C5ylOtNxNOGJE5bzlIaJ31Xuy4_5RVoJquqPuhr9Uwr7TTpRFdtTpAO4WoLRxu3il6uZk_z-78h8Xt_ezqwc8Y586PeASBYDLkuchpzhiOiRA5o4DjiCaSyUgCDzkTmCZFLlkiJUgeSMKyOBSETdHZ-m5n9HsP1qWNshnUtWhB9zaNKIkJIyM8_QNfdW_a4W8ppZgEIQlHdL5GmdHWGijSzqhGmFVKcDpGn_5EP9iTzcFeNpD_yk3WAzhegzdhSjA_4Hv99N_p4nH-BdIuL9gnsOSTKQ</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>Sasaki, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Yasuo</creator><creator>Harada, Sachiko</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Akiko</creator><creator>Kawakami, Yutaka</creator><creator>Nagai, Kouta</creator><creator>Takahashi, Nobuo</creator><creator>Sasaki, Kazuyuki</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>Predicting Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth in Cataract Patients Using Scheimpflug Slit Photography</title><author>Sasaki, Hiroshi ; Sakamoto, Yasuo ; Harada, Sachiko ; Sakamoto, Akiko ; Kawakami, Yutaka ; Nagai, Kouta ; Takahashi, Nobuo ; Sasaki, Kazuyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-757e4a3b65dad2d33081aad32e08729b3b7be5653a029fdb39bbeb54b13c86a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anterior Chamber - pathology</topic><topic>Anthropometry - methods</topic><topic>Cataract - pathology</topic><topic>Cataract Extraction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Phacoemulsification</topic><topic>Photography - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harada, Sachiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Akiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Yutaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Kouta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Nobuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sasaki, Hiroshi</au><au>Sakamoto, Yasuo</au><au>Harada, Sachiko</au><au>Sakamoto, Akiko</au><au>Kawakami, Yutaka</au><au>Nagai, Kouta</au><au>Takahashi, Nobuo</au><au>Sasaki, Kazuyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predicting Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth in Cataract Patients Using Scheimpflug Slit Photography</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmic research</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmic Res</addtitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>265</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>265-272</pages><issn>0030-3747</issn><eissn>1423-0259</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To predict the postoperative anterior chamber (AC) depth from the preoperative in situ position of the lens central clear zone (CCZ) using Scheimpflug slit photography. Methods: 111 eyes of 78 cases that underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation were examined. 748 eyes of 383 healthy subjects with transparent lenses were used as the control. Scheimpflug slit photography was done under maximal mydriasis, and biometry was performed on the photographs. Two types of acrylic IOLs (MA30BA and MA60BM, both from Alcon) were used in this study. The preoperative AC depth (L1), the distance between the anterior lens capsule and lens CCZ (L2) and the postoperative AC depth (I1) were determined. I2, the predicted postoperative AC depth, was then determined from a linear regression of L1 + L2 and I1. Results: L2 thickened by 0.014 mm/year, and L1 decreased by 0.016 mm/year in the transparent lenses. L1 + L2 changed little with aging in both cataractous and transparent lenses. L1 + L2 and I1 showed a linear correlation with r = 0.80 in the MA30BA and r = 0.77 in the MA60BM groups. The mean error values between I1 and I2 were 0.095 ± 0.096 and 0.123 ± 0.114 mm in MA30BA and MA60BM, respectively. The error between I1 and I2 was within ± 0.17 and ± 0.33 mm or less in 72.9 and 91.5% of MA30BA and in 82.7 and 96.2% of MA60BM. In contrast, the error between I2 and I1 when calculated using the SRK/T formula was much larger – in excess of ± 0.33 mm in 38.7% of the eyes. Conclusions: L1 + L2 changes little with aging and is considered a useful marker of the position of the crystalline lens in situ. There was a high correlation between I1 and L1 + L2. These allow a far more accurate prediction of I1 than previous methods. In combination with the conventional regression formula and ray tracing, a highly accurate IOL power calculation can be attained.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>12381886</pmid><doi>10.1159/000065597</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0030-3747 |
ispartof | Ophthalmic research, 2002-09, Vol.34 (5), p.265-272 |
issn | 0030-3747 1423-0259 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_karger_primary_65597 |
source | MEDLINE; Karger Journals |
subjects | Aged Anterior Chamber - pathology Anthropometry - methods Cataract - pathology Cataract Extraction Female Forecasting Humans Lenses, Intraocular Male Original Paper Phacoemulsification Photography - methods Postoperative Period |
title | Predicting Postoperative Anterior Chamber Depth in Cataract Patients Using Scheimpflug Slit Photography |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T05%3A51%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting%20Postoperative%20Anterior%20Chamber%20Depth%20in%20Cataract%20Patients%20Using%20Scheimpflug%20Slit%20Photography&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmic%20research&rft.au=Sasaki,%20Hiroshi&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=265&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=265-272&rft.issn=0030-3747&rft.eissn=1423-0259&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000065597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E677521401%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220146161&rft_id=info:pmid/12381886&rfr_iscdi=true |