Characterizing the Effect of Processing Technique and Solution Type on Cytomorphology Using Liquid-Based Cytology

Introduction: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is increasingly used for nongynecologic applications. However, the cytological preparation of LBC specimens is influenced by the processing technique and the preservative used. In this study, the influence of the processing techniques and preservatives on ce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta cytologica 2022-01, Vol.66 (1), p.55-60
Hauptverfasser: Ikeda, Katsuhide, Oboshi, Wataru, Hashimoto, Yusuke, Komene, Tetsuya, Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka, Sato, Shouichi, Maruyama, Sayumi, Furukawa, Nozomi, Sakabe, Nanako, Nagata, Kohzo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 60
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Acta cytologica
container_volume 66
creator Ikeda, Katsuhide
Oboshi, Wataru
Hashimoto, Yusuke
Komene, Tetsuya
Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka
Sato, Shouichi
Maruyama, Sayumi
Furukawa, Nozomi
Sakabe, Nanako
Nagata, Kohzo
description Introduction: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is increasingly used for nongynecologic applications. However, the cytological preparation of LBC specimens is influenced by the processing technique and the preservative used. In this study, the influence of the processing techniques and preservatives on cell morphology was examined mathematically and statistically. Methods: Cytological specimens were prepared using the ThinPrep (TP), SurePath (SP), and AutoSmear methods, with 5 different preservative solutions. The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of Papanicolaou-stained specimens were measured for all samples. Results: The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas were smaller in cells prepared using the 2 LBC methods, compared to that prepared using the AutoSmear method, irrespective of the preservative used. The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of cells prepared using the SP method were smaller than those of cells prepared using the TP method, irrespective of the preservative used. There were fewer differences among the cytoplasmic areas of cells prepared with different preservative solutions using the TP method; however, the cytoplasmic areas of cells prepared using the SP method changed with the preservative solution used. Conclusions: The most significant difference affecting the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas was the processing technique. The TP method increased the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas, while the methanol-based PreservCyt solution enabled the highest enlargement of the cell. LBC is a superior preparation technique for standardization of the specimens. Our results offer a better understanding of methods suitable for specimen preparation for developing precision AI-based diagnosis in cytology.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000519335
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_519335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2582112194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-601679202e688f46cd0c6680187d4785e73d62b5718645b1e82eff181c18d63f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkDtPwzAUhS0EgvIY2BGyxAJDwO-4I0TlIVUCiTIwRal93QbSOLXTofx60gedmI5073fPPToInVNyS6ns3xFCJO1zLvdQr1OdMCXJPup1c5pIKdIjdBzjFyGcK8UP0REXSoiUsB6aZ9MiFKaFUP6U9QS3U8AD58C02Dv8FryBGFeLEZhpXc4XgIva4ndfLdrS13i0bAB3mi1bP_OhmfrKT5b4Y30z7PjSJg9FBLsmVrtTdOCKKsLZVk_Qx-NglD0nw9enl-x-mBhBSJsoQlXaZ4SB0toJZSwxSmlCdWpFqiWk3Co2linVSsgxBc3AOaqpodoq7vgJut74NsF3sWObz8pooKqKGvwi5kxqRimjfdGhNxvUBB9jAJc3oZwVYZlTkq8azncNd-zl1nYxnoHdkX-VdsDVBvguwgTCDrjPPjcWeWNX6S7-pbZffgHR-Ipy</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2582112194</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Characterizing the Effect of Processing Technique and Solution Type on Cytomorphology Using Liquid-Based Cytology</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ikeda, Katsuhide ; Oboshi, Wataru ; Hashimoto, Yusuke ; Komene, Tetsuya ; Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka ; Sato, Shouichi ; Maruyama, Sayumi ; Furukawa, Nozomi ; Sakabe, Nanako ; Nagata, Kohzo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Katsuhide ; Oboshi, Wataru ; Hashimoto, Yusuke ; Komene, Tetsuya ; Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka ; Sato, Shouichi ; Maruyama, Sayumi ; Furukawa, Nozomi ; Sakabe, Nanako ; Nagata, Kohzo</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is increasingly used for nongynecologic applications. However, the cytological preparation of LBC specimens is influenced by the processing technique and the preservative used. In this study, the influence of the processing techniques and preservatives on cell morphology was examined mathematically and statistically. Methods: Cytological specimens were prepared using the ThinPrep (TP), SurePath (SP), and AutoSmear methods, with 5 different preservative solutions. The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of Papanicolaou-stained specimens were measured for all samples. Results: The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas were smaller in cells prepared using the 2 LBC methods, compared to that prepared using the AutoSmear method, irrespective of the preservative used. The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of cells prepared using the SP method were smaller than those of cells prepared using the TP method, irrespective of the preservative used. There were fewer differences among the cytoplasmic areas of cells prepared with different preservative solutions using the TP method; however, the cytoplasmic areas of cells prepared using the SP method changed with the preservative solution used. Conclusions: The most significant difference affecting the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas was the processing technique. The TP method increased the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas, while the methanol-based PreservCyt solution enabled the highest enlargement of the cell. LBC is a superior preparation technique for standardization of the specimens. Our results offer a better understanding of methods suitable for specimen preparation for developing precision AI-based diagnosis in cytology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-2650</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000519335</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34644702</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Cytodiagnosis - methods ; Cytological Techniques ; Fixatives ; Humans ; Nongynecologic Cytopathology</subject><ispartof>Acta cytologica, 2022-01, Vol.66 (1), p.55-60</ispartof><rights>2021 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-601679202e688f46cd0c6680187d4785e73d62b5718645b1e82eff181c18d63f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-601679202e688f46cd0c6680187d4785e73d62b5718645b1e82eff181c18d63f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2423,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644702$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Katsuhide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oboshi, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komene, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shouichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Sayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furukawa, Nozomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakabe, Nanako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Kohzo</creatorcontrib><title>Characterizing the Effect of Processing Technique and Solution Type on Cytomorphology Using Liquid-Based Cytology</title><title>Acta cytologica</title><addtitle>Acta Cytologica</addtitle><description>Introduction: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is increasingly used for nongynecologic applications. However, the cytological preparation of LBC specimens is influenced by the processing technique and the preservative used. In this study, the influence of the processing techniques and preservatives on cell morphology was examined mathematically and statistically. Methods: Cytological specimens were prepared using the ThinPrep (TP), SurePath (SP), and AutoSmear methods, with 5 different preservative solutions. The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of Papanicolaou-stained specimens were measured for all samples. Results: The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas were smaller in cells prepared using the 2 LBC methods, compared to that prepared using the AutoSmear method, irrespective of the preservative used. The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of cells prepared using the SP method were smaller than those of cells prepared using the TP method, irrespective of the preservative used. There were fewer differences among the cytoplasmic areas of cells prepared with different preservative solutions using the TP method; however, the cytoplasmic areas of cells prepared using the SP method changed with the preservative solution used. Conclusions: The most significant difference affecting the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas was the processing technique. The TP method increased the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas, while the methanol-based PreservCyt solution enabled the highest enlargement of the cell. LBC is a superior preparation technique for standardization of the specimens. Our results offer a better understanding of methods suitable for specimen preparation for developing precision AI-based diagnosis in cytology.</description><subject>Cytodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Cytological Techniques</subject><subject>Fixatives</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Nongynecologic Cytopathology</subject><issn>0001-5547</issn><issn>1938-2650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkDtPwzAUhS0EgvIY2BGyxAJDwO-4I0TlIVUCiTIwRal93QbSOLXTofx60gedmI5073fPPToInVNyS6ns3xFCJO1zLvdQr1OdMCXJPup1c5pIKdIjdBzjFyGcK8UP0REXSoiUsB6aZ9MiFKaFUP6U9QS3U8AD58C02Dv8FryBGFeLEZhpXc4XgIva4ndfLdrS13i0bAB3mi1bP_OhmfrKT5b4Y30z7PjSJg9FBLsmVrtTdOCKKsLZVk_Qx-NglD0nw9enl-x-mBhBSJsoQlXaZ4SB0toJZSwxSmlCdWpFqiWk3Co2linVSsgxBc3AOaqpodoq7vgJut74NsF3sWObz8pooKqKGvwi5kxqRimjfdGhNxvUBB9jAJc3oZwVYZlTkq8azncNd-zl1nYxnoHdkX-VdsDVBvguwgTCDrjPPjcWeWNX6S7-pbZffgHR-Ipy</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Ikeda, Katsuhide</creator><creator>Oboshi, Wataru</creator><creator>Hashimoto, Yusuke</creator><creator>Komene, Tetsuya</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka</creator><creator>Sato, Shouichi</creator><creator>Maruyama, Sayumi</creator><creator>Furukawa, Nozomi</creator><creator>Sakabe, Nanako</creator><creator>Nagata, Kohzo</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Characterizing the Effect of Processing Technique and Solution Type on Cytomorphology Using Liquid-Based Cytology</title><author>Ikeda, Katsuhide ; Oboshi, Wataru ; Hashimoto, Yusuke ; Komene, Tetsuya ; Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka ; Sato, Shouichi ; Maruyama, Sayumi ; Furukawa, Nozomi ; Sakabe, Nanako ; Nagata, Kohzo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-601679202e688f46cd0c6680187d4785e73d62b5718645b1e82eff181c18d63f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Cytodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Cytological Techniques</topic><topic>Fixatives</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Nongynecologic Cytopathology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Katsuhide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oboshi, Wataru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Yusuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komene, Tetsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Shouichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruyama, Sayumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furukawa, Nozomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakabe, Nanako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagata, Kohzo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ikeda, Katsuhide</au><au>Oboshi, Wataru</au><au>Hashimoto, Yusuke</au><au>Komene, Tetsuya</au><au>Yamaguchi, Yoshitaka</au><au>Sato, Shouichi</au><au>Maruyama, Sayumi</au><au>Furukawa, Nozomi</au><au>Sakabe, Nanako</au><au>Nagata, Kohzo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Characterizing the Effect of Processing Technique and Solution Type on Cytomorphology Using Liquid-Based Cytology</atitle><jtitle>Acta cytologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Cytologica</addtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>55-60</pages><issn>0001-5547</issn><eissn>1938-2650</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is increasingly used for nongynecologic applications. However, the cytological preparation of LBC specimens is influenced by the processing technique and the preservative used. In this study, the influence of the processing techniques and preservatives on cell morphology was examined mathematically and statistically. Methods: Cytological specimens were prepared using the ThinPrep (TP), SurePath (SP), and AutoSmear methods, with 5 different preservative solutions. The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of Papanicolaou-stained specimens were measured for all samples. Results: The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas were smaller in cells prepared using the 2 LBC methods, compared to that prepared using the AutoSmear method, irrespective of the preservative used. The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of cells prepared using the SP method were smaller than those of cells prepared using the TP method, irrespective of the preservative used. There were fewer differences among the cytoplasmic areas of cells prepared with different preservative solutions using the TP method; however, the cytoplasmic areas of cells prepared using the SP method changed with the preservative solution used. Conclusions: The most significant difference affecting the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas was the processing technique. The TP method increased the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas, while the methanol-based PreservCyt solution enabled the highest enlargement of the cell. LBC is a superior preparation technique for standardization of the specimens. Our results offer a better understanding of methods suitable for specimen preparation for developing precision AI-based diagnosis in cytology.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>34644702</pmid><doi>10.1159/000519335</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-5547
ispartof Acta cytologica, 2022-01, Vol.66 (1), p.55-60
issn 0001-5547
1938-2650
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_519335
source Karger Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Cytodiagnosis - methods
Cytological Techniques
Fixatives
Humans
Nongynecologic Cytopathology
title Characterizing the Effect of Processing Technique and Solution Type on Cytomorphology Using Liquid-Based Cytology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T08%3A20%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Characterizing%20the%20Effect%20of%20Processing%20Technique%20and%20Solution%20Type%20on%20Cytomorphology%20Using%20Liquid-Based%20Cytology&rft.jtitle=Acta%20cytologica&rft.au=Ikeda,%20Katsuhide&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=55-60&rft.issn=0001-5547&rft.eissn=1938-2650&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000519335&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E2582112194%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2582112194&rft_id=info:pmid/34644702&rfr_iscdi=true