Comparison between Single- and Double-Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Study

Background: The supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block is a commonly employed regional anesthesia technique for providing surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing upper limb fractures. With ultrasound (US) guidance, the success rate of the block is increased...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dubai Medical Journal 2021-10, Vol.4 (3), p.198-203
Hauptverfasser: Vallapureddy, Suresh Kumar, Fultambkar, Gajanan, Rajeswar Rao, V., Kukreja, Vinay, Gurram, Rammohan, Nair, Abhijit
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 203
container_issue 3
container_start_page 198
container_title Dubai Medical Journal
container_volume 4
creator Vallapureddy, Suresh Kumar
Fultambkar, Gajanan
Rajeswar Rao, V.
Kukreja, Vinay
Gurram, Rammohan
Nair, Abhijit
description Background: The supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block is a commonly employed regional anesthesia technique for providing surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing upper limb fractures. With ultrasound (US) guidance, the success rate of the block is increased, and complications like pneumothorax and vascular puncture are minimized. The block can be performed using single injection at the corner pocket or double injection, that is, half of the drug at the corner pocket and the remaining half at the cluster of brachial plexus divisions. Methods: After institutional ethics committee approval, we randomized 40 patients scheduled with fractures for elective upper extremity surgery under US-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Twenty patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic at the corner pocket (group SI), and 20 patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic using the dual-injection technique in divided doses (group DI). Demographic data, time to block performance, time to sensory and motor block, total anesthesia-related time (TART), block success, and failure were compared between both groups. Results: The demographic data were comparable between both groups. The DI group had a significantly faster onset than the SI group (p = 0.0172). There was a statistically significant lesser performance time in group SI than in group DI (p < 0.034). The sensory and motor block achieved was comparable between both groups. Conclusion: The success rates in both the SI and DI techniques are comparable. The DI technique results in a faster onset and hence a shorter TART; however, it may not be clinically relevant.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000517357
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_517357</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A726512084</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1d030a4466ca472dbc56d83ed377ca9c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A726512084</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7d3514a0af3e98f5d356845362ccba63a55f6ec70933be1eb05213c6120797283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkcFu1DAQhiMEElXpoXcOljhxSLHj2E64LVtoF7VCoq3UWzSxx4u3XnvrJKBy5sHrErTiUM1hxjPf_GPNFMUxoyeMifYDpVQwxYV6URxUQrFSVfL25X_x6-JoGDYZqzgTrKEHxZ9l3O4guSEG0uP4CzGQKxfWHksCwZDTOPU5XoUN6tFl6Br1j-DuJyQ2JnLjxwRDnIIpzyZn0JCraZdAe_jp9OQhkU8-6ruPZEG-Z7m4db8zs4xhTNH7J3yczMOb4pUFP-DRP39Y3Hz5fL08Ly--na2Wi4tS17UcS2W4YDVQsBzbxor8lE0tuKy07kFyEMJK1Iq2nPfIsKeiYlxLVlHVqqrhh8Vq1jURNt0uuS2khy6C6_4mYlp3kEanPXbMUE4hj5UaalWZXgtpGo6GK6Wh1VnrZNZaQ8ZdsDFvQmczuHU6BrQu5xd56yLPb-rc8H5u0CkOQ0K7_wCj3dP5uv35Mvt2Zu8grTHtyX353bPl08uvM9HtjOWPrq6iJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison between Single- and Double-Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Karger Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Vallapureddy, Suresh Kumar ; Fultambkar, Gajanan ; Rajeswar Rao, V. ; Kukreja, Vinay ; Gurram, Rammohan ; Nair, Abhijit</creator><creatorcontrib>Vallapureddy, Suresh Kumar ; Fultambkar, Gajanan ; Rajeswar Rao, V. ; Kukreja, Vinay ; Gurram, Rammohan ; Nair, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block is a commonly employed regional anesthesia technique for providing surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing upper limb fractures. With ultrasound (US) guidance, the success rate of the block is increased, and complications like pneumothorax and vascular puncture are minimized. The block can be performed using single injection at the corner pocket or double injection, that is, half of the drug at the corner pocket and the remaining half at the cluster of brachial plexus divisions. Methods: After institutional ethics committee approval, we randomized 40 patients scheduled with fractures for elective upper extremity surgery under US-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Twenty patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic at the corner pocket (group SI), and 20 patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic using the dual-injection technique in divided doses (group DI). Demographic data, time to block performance, time to sensory and motor block, total anesthesia-related time (TART), block success, and failure were compared between both groups. Results: The demographic data were comparable between both groups. The DI group had a significantly faster onset than the SI group (p = 0.0172). There was a statistically significant lesser performance time in group SI than in group DI (p &lt; 0.034). The sensory and motor block achieved was comparable between both groups. Conclusion: The success rates in both the SI and DI techniques are comparable. The DI technique results in a faster onset and hence a shorter TART; however, it may not be clinically relevant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2571-726X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2571-726X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000517357</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>acute pain ; Anesthesia ; brachial plexus ; Methods ; regional anesthesia ; Research Article ; supraclavicular block ; ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Dubai Medical Journal, 2021-10, Vol.4 (3), p.198-203</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 S. Karger AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7d3514a0af3e98f5d356845362ccba63a55f6ec70933be1eb05213c6120797283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7d3514a0af3e98f5d356845362ccba63a55f6ec70933be1eb05213c6120797283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2102,27635,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vallapureddy, Suresh Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fultambkar, Gajanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajeswar Rao, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukreja, Vinay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurram, Rammohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison between Single- and Double-Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><title>Dubai Medical Journal</title><addtitle>Dubai Med J</addtitle><description>Background: The supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block is a commonly employed regional anesthesia technique for providing surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing upper limb fractures. With ultrasound (US) guidance, the success rate of the block is increased, and complications like pneumothorax and vascular puncture are minimized. The block can be performed using single injection at the corner pocket or double injection, that is, half of the drug at the corner pocket and the remaining half at the cluster of brachial plexus divisions. Methods: After institutional ethics committee approval, we randomized 40 patients scheduled with fractures for elective upper extremity surgery under US-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Twenty patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic at the corner pocket (group SI), and 20 patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic using the dual-injection technique in divided doses (group DI). Demographic data, time to block performance, time to sensory and motor block, total anesthesia-related time (TART), block success, and failure were compared between both groups. Results: The demographic data were comparable between both groups. The DI group had a significantly faster onset than the SI group (p = 0.0172). There was a statistically significant lesser performance time in group SI than in group DI (p &lt; 0.034). The sensory and motor block achieved was comparable between both groups. Conclusion: The success rates in both the SI and DI techniques are comparable. The DI technique results in a faster onset and hence a shorter TART; however, it may not be clinically relevant.</description><subject>acute pain</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>brachial plexus</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>regional anesthesia</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>supraclavicular block</subject><subject>ultrasonography</subject><issn>2571-726X</issn><issn>2571-726X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M--</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkcFu1DAQhiMEElXpoXcOljhxSLHj2E64LVtoF7VCoq3UWzSxx4u3XnvrJKBy5sHrErTiUM1hxjPf_GPNFMUxoyeMifYDpVQwxYV6URxUQrFSVfL25X_x6-JoGDYZqzgTrKEHxZ9l3O4guSEG0uP4CzGQKxfWHksCwZDTOPU5XoUN6tFl6Br1j-DuJyQ2JnLjxwRDnIIpzyZn0JCraZdAe_jp9OQhkU8-6ruPZEG-Z7m4db8zs4xhTNH7J3yczMOb4pUFP-DRP39Y3Hz5fL08Ly--na2Wi4tS17UcS2W4YDVQsBzbxor8lE0tuKy07kFyEMJK1Iq2nPfIsKeiYlxLVlHVqqrhh8Vq1jURNt0uuS2khy6C6_4mYlp3kEanPXbMUE4hj5UaalWZXgtpGo6GK6Wh1VnrZNZaQ8ZdsDFvQmczuHU6BrQu5xd56yLPb-rc8H5u0CkOQ0K7_wCj3dP5uv35Mvt2Zu8grTHtyX353bPl08uvM9HtjOWPrq6iJw</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Vallapureddy, Suresh Kumar</creator><creator>Fultambkar, Gajanan</creator><creator>Rajeswar Rao, V.</creator><creator>Kukreja, Vinay</creator><creator>Gurram, Rammohan</creator><creator>Nair, Abhijit</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><general>Karger Publishers</general><scope>M--</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Comparison between Single- and Double-Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Study</title><author>Vallapureddy, Suresh Kumar ; Fultambkar, Gajanan ; Rajeswar Rao, V. ; Kukreja, Vinay ; Gurram, Rammohan ; Nair, Abhijit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-7d3514a0af3e98f5d356845362ccba63a55f6ec70933be1eb05213c6120797283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>acute pain</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>brachial plexus</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>regional anesthesia</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>supraclavicular block</topic><topic>ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vallapureddy, Suresh Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fultambkar, Gajanan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rajeswar Rao, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kukreja, Vinay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurram, Rammohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nair, Abhijit</creatorcontrib><collection>Karger Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Dubai Medical Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vallapureddy, Suresh Kumar</au><au>Fultambkar, Gajanan</au><au>Rajeswar Rao, V.</au><au>Kukreja, Vinay</au><au>Gurram, Rammohan</au><au>Nair, Abhijit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison between Single- and Double-Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Study</atitle><jtitle>Dubai Medical Journal</jtitle><addtitle>Dubai Med J</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>198</spage><epage>203</epage><pages>198-203</pages><issn>2571-726X</issn><eissn>2571-726X</eissn><abstract>Background: The supraclavicular approach to brachial plexus block is a commonly employed regional anesthesia technique for providing surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia for patients undergoing upper limb fractures. With ultrasound (US) guidance, the success rate of the block is increased, and complications like pneumothorax and vascular puncture are minimized. The block can be performed using single injection at the corner pocket or double injection, that is, half of the drug at the corner pocket and the remaining half at the cluster of brachial plexus divisions. Methods: After institutional ethics committee approval, we randomized 40 patients scheduled with fractures for elective upper extremity surgery under US-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Twenty patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic at the corner pocket (group SI), and 20 patients received 30 mL of local anesthetic using the dual-injection technique in divided doses (group DI). Demographic data, time to block performance, time to sensory and motor block, total anesthesia-related time (TART), block success, and failure were compared between both groups. Results: The demographic data were comparable between both groups. The DI group had a significantly faster onset than the SI group (p = 0.0172). There was a statistically significant lesser performance time in group SI than in group DI (p &lt; 0.034). The sensory and motor block achieved was comparable between both groups. Conclusion: The success rates in both the SI and DI techniques are comparable. The DI technique results in a faster onset and hence a shorter TART; however, it may not be clinically relevant.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><doi>10.1159/000517357</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2571-726X
ispartof Dubai Medical Journal, 2021-10, Vol.4 (3), p.198-203
issn 2571-726X
2571-726X
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_517357
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Karger Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects acute pain
Anesthesia
brachial plexus
Methods
regional anesthesia
Research Article
supraclavicular block
ultrasonography
title Comparison between Single- and Double-Injection Technique for Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Block: A Randomized Controlled Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T13%3A20%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20between%20Single-%20and%20Double-Injection%20Technique%20for%20Ultrasound-Guided%20Supraclavicular%20Block:%20A%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Study&rft.jtitle=Dubai%20Medical%20Journal&rft.au=Vallapureddy,%20Suresh%20Kumar&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=198&rft.epage=203&rft.pages=198-203&rft.issn=2571-726X&rft.eissn=2571-726X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000517357&rft_dat=%3Cgale_karge%3EA726512084%3C/gale_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A726512084&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_1d030a4466ca472dbc56d83ed377ca9c&rfr_iscdi=true