Improvements in Inflammation and Calcium Balance of Citrate versus Acetate as Dialysate Buffer in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Unicentric, Cross-Over, Prospective Study

Introduction: The composition of the dialysate is a crucial feature in the dialysis treatment. Two of its most debated elements are the optimal calcium concentration and the use of acetate as a buffer. Moreover, among the different alternatives to achieve acetate-free dialysis, the use of citrate is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Blood purification 2021-09, Vol.50 (6), p.914-920
Hauptverfasser: Broseta, José Jesús, López-Romero, Luis Carlos, Cerveró, Alba, Devesa-Such, Ramón, Soldevila, Amparo, Bea-Granell, Sergio, Sánchez-Pérez, Pilar, Hernández-Jaras, Julio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 920
container_issue 6
container_start_page 914
container_title Blood purification
container_volume 50
creator Broseta, José Jesús
López-Romero, Luis Carlos
Cerveró, Alba
Devesa-Such, Ramón
Soldevila, Amparo
Bea-Granell, Sergio
Sánchez-Pérez, Pilar
Hernández-Jaras, Julio
description Introduction: The composition of the dialysate is a crucial feature in the dialysis treatment. Two of its most debated elements are the optimal calcium concentration and the use of acetate as a buffer. Moreover, among the different alternatives to achieve acetate-free dialysis, the use of citrate is postulated as the most suitable option. The objective of this study is to identify the potential beneficial effects of citrate when compared to acetate dialysate (AD) both in short-term effects (especially regarding intradialytic calcium balance and cardiac damage biomarkers) and in medium-term ones with CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and inflammatory biomarkers measured after twelve sessions performed with each dialysate. Methods: This is a unicentric, cross-over, prospective study. Each patient underwent 24 dialysis sessions, 12 with each dialysate buffer. Blood samples were taken in 2 different sessions with each acidifier. They include CKD-MBD and inflammatory biomarkers. The calcium concentration of both dialysates was 1.5 mmol/L, while all other dialysis parameters and patients’ treatment remained unchanged during the study period. Results: When comparing AD and citrate dialysate (CD), there were no differences in pre-dialysis ionized calcium (iCa) (1.11 vs. 1.08 mmol/L) in both groups. However, there was a significant increase in iCa with the use of AD in immediate and 30-min post-dialysis blood samples. In contrast, iCa levels remained stable with the use of citrate. Inflammatory biomarkers were also reduced after the use of CD. Conclusions: The use of citrate provides interesting advantages when compared to acetate. It maintains iCa levels stable during dialysis sessions with a neutral or negative effect on calcium balance, and it improves the chronic inflammatory condition that comes with long-time hemodialysis treatment. These beneficial effects may lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000513419
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_513419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2486464092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-fed6320d898edadd0d4ef71d9e813b471680e913c9de5aefa32f187fa4c0757a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCgTtClriA1FA7tpOY226gdKWiVip7jlx7jAyxs7WdlfYX8TdJumVPnOzRfO_N2A-hN5R8olTIC0KIoIxT-QwtKC9pIWsmnqMFKQUrBKmaU_QypV-EUF4J-QKdMiaYKGm5QH_WfhuHHXgIOWEX8DrYXnmvshsCVsHgVvXajR6vVK-CBjxY3LocVQa8g5jGhJca8lyqhL841e_TXKxGayHOjt-VCxnCo_gK_GAeGZc-4yXeBKenydHpc9zGIaXiZjI9x7fTfQs6ux3guzya_St0YlWf4PXTeYY2l19_tFfF9c23dbu8LjRjPBcWTMVKYhrZgFHGEMPB1tRIaCi75zWtGgKSMi0NCAVWsdLSpraKa1KLWrEz9OHgO_3Kwwgpd94lDf30dhjG1JW8qXjFiSwn9OMB1fPiEWy3jc6ruO8o6eZcumMuE_vuyXa892CO5L8gJuDtAfit4k-IR-Cof__f9up2cyC6rbHsL_sBn54</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2486464092</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvements in Inflammation and Calcium Balance of Citrate versus Acetate as Dialysate Buffer in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Unicentric, Cross-Over, Prospective Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Broseta, José Jesús ; López-Romero, Luis Carlos ; Cerveró, Alba ; Devesa-Such, Ramón ; Soldevila, Amparo ; Bea-Granell, Sergio ; Sánchez-Pérez, Pilar ; Hernández-Jaras, Julio</creator><creatorcontrib>Broseta, José Jesús ; López-Romero, Luis Carlos ; Cerveró, Alba ; Devesa-Such, Ramón ; Soldevila, Amparo ; Bea-Granell, Sergio ; Sánchez-Pérez, Pilar ; Hernández-Jaras, Julio</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The composition of the dialysate is a crucial feature in the dialysis treatment. Two of its most debated elements are the optimal calcium concentration and the use of acetate as a buffer. Moreover, among the different alternatives to achieve acetate-free dialysis, the use of citrate is postulated as the most suitable option. The objective of this study is to identify the potential beneficial effects of citrate when compared to acetate dialysate (AD) both in short-term effects (especially regarding intradialytic calcium balance and cardiac damage biomarkers) and in medium-term ones with CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and inflammatory biomarkers measured after twelve sessions performed with each dialysate. Methods: This is a unicentric, cross-over, prospective study. Each patient underwent 24 dialysis sessions, 12 with each dialysate buffer. Blood samples were taken in 2 different sessions with each acidifier. They include CKD-MBD and inflammatory biomarkers. The calcium concentration of both dialysates was 1.5 mmol/L, while all other dialysis parameters and patients’ treatment remained unchanged during the study period. Results: When comparing AD and citrate dialysate (CD), there were no differences in pre-dialysis ionized calcium (iCa) (1.11 vs. 1.08 mmol/L) in both groups. However, there was a significant increase in iCa with the use of AD in immediate and 30-min post-dialysis blood samples. In contrast, iCa levels remained stable with the use of citrate. Inflammatory biomarkers were also reduced after the use of CD. Conclusions: The use of citrate provides interesting advantages when compared to acetate. It maintains iCa levels stable during dialysis sessions with a neutral or negative effect on calcium balance, and it improves the chronic inflammatory condition that comes with long-time hemodialysis treatment. These beneficial effects may lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0253-5068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000513419</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33535212</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Acetates - therapeutic use ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Calcium - blood ; Calcium - therapeutic use ; Citric Acid - therapeutic use ; Cross-Over Studies ; Dialysis Solutions - therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Inflammation - blood ; Inflammation - prevention &amp; control ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prospective Studies ; Renal Dialysis - methods ; Research Article</subject><ispartof>Blood purification, 2021-09, Vol.50 (6), p.914-920</ispartof><rights>2021 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-fed6320d898edadd0d4ef71d9e813b471680e913c9de5aefa32f187fa4c0757a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-fed6320d898edadd0d4ef71d9e813b471680e913c9de5aefa32f187fa4c0757a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4559-9083</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2429,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33535212$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Broseta, José Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Romero, Luis Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerveró, Alba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devesa-Such, Ramón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldevila, Amparo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bea-Granell, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Pérez, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Jaras, Julio</creatorcontrib><title>Improvements in Inflammation and Calcium Balance of Citrate versus Acetate as Dialysate Buffer in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Unicentric, Cross-Over, Prospective Study</title><title>Blood purification</title><addtitle>Blood Purif</addtitle><description>Introduction: The composition of the dialysate is a crucial feature in the dialysis treatment. Two of its most debated elements are the optimal calcium concentration and the use of acetate as a buffer. Moreover, among the different alternatives to achieve acetate-free dialysis, the use of citrate is postulated as the most suitable option. The objective of this study is to identify the potential beneficial effects of citrate when compared to acetate dialysate (AD) both in short-term effects (especially regarding intradialytic calcium balance and cardiac damage biomarkers) and in medium-term ones with CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and inflammatory biomarkers measured after twelve sessions performed with each dialysate. Methods: This is a unicentric, cross-over, prospective study. Each patient underwent 24 dialysis sessions, 12 with each dialysate buffer. Blood samples were taken in 2 different sessions with each acidifier. They include CKD-MBD and inflammatory biomarkers. The calcium concentration of both dialysates was 1.5 mmol/L, while all other dialysis parameters and patients’ treatment remained unchanged during the study period. Results: When comparing AD and citrate dialysate (CD), there were no differences in pre-dialysis ionized calcium (iCa) (1.11 vs. 1.08 mmol/L) in both groups. However, there was a significant increase in iCa with the use of AD in immediate and 30-min post-dialysis blood samples. In contrast, iCa levels remained stable with the use of citrate. Inflammatory biomarkers were also reduced after the use of CD. Conclusions: The use of citrate provides interesting advantages when compared to acetate. It maintains iCa levels stable during dialysis sessions with a neutral or negative effect on calcium balance, and it improves the chronic inflammatory condition that comes with long-time hemodialysis treatment. These beneficial effects may lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Acetates - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Calcium - blood</subject><subject>Calcium - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Citric Acid - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Dialysis Solutions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation - blood</subject><subject>Inflammation - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - methods</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><issn>0253-5068</issn><issn>1421-9735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUFv1DAQhS1ERZfCgTtClriA1FA7tpOY226gdKWiVip7jlx7jAyxs7WdlfYX8TdJumVPnOzRfO_N2A-hN5R8olTIC0KIoIxT-QwtKC9pIWsmnqMFKQUrBKmaU_QypV-EUF4J-QKdMiaYKGm5QH_WfhuHHXgIOWEX8DrYXnmvshsCVsHgVvXajR6vVK-CBjxY3LocVQa8g5jGhJca8lyqhL841e_TXKxGayHOjt-VCxnCo_gK_GAeGZc-4yXeBKenydHpc9zGIaXiZjI9x7fTfQs6ux3guzya_St0YlWf4PXTeYY2l19_tFfF9c23dbu8LjRjPBcWTMVKYhrZgFHGEMPB1tRIaCi75zWtGgKSMi0NCAVWsdLSpraKa1KLWrEz9OHgO_3Kwwgpd94lDf30dhjG1JW8qXjFiSwn9OMB1fPiEWy3jc6ruO8o6eZcumMuE_vuyXa892CO5L8gJuDtAfit4k-IR-Cof__f9up2cyC6rbHsL_sBn54</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Broseta, José Jesús</creator><creator>López-Romero, Luis Carlos</creator><creator>Cerveró, Alba</creator><creator>Devesa-Such, Ramón</creator><creator>Soldevila, Amparo</creator><creator>Bea-Granell, Sergio</creator><creator>Sánchez-Pérez, Pilar</creator><creator>Hernández-Jaras, Julio</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-9083</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Improvements in Inflammation and Calcium Balance of Citrate versus Acetate as Dialysate Buffer in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Unicentric, Cross-Over, Prospective Study</title><author>Broseta, José Jesús ; López-Romero, Luis Carlos ; Cerveró, Alba ; Devesa-Such, Ramón ; Soldevila, Amparo ; Bea-Granell, Sergio ; Sánchez-Pérez, Pilar ; Hernández-Jaras, Julio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-fed6320d898edadd0d4ef71d9e813b471680e913c9de5aefa32f187fa4c0757a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acetates - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Calcium - blood</topic><topic>Calcium - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Citric Acid - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Dialysis Solutions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation - blood</topic><topic>Inflammation - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - methods</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Broseta, José Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López-Romero, Luis Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerveró, Alba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Devesa-Such, Ramón</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldevila, Amparo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bea-Granell, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Pérez, Pilar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernández-Jaras, Julio</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Blood purification</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Broseta, José Jesús</au><au>López-Romero, Luis Carlos</au><au>Cerveró, Alba</au><au>Devesa-Such, Ramón</au><au>Soldevila, Amparo</au><au>Bea-Granell, Sergio</au><au>Sánchez-Pérez, Pilar</au><au>Hernández-Jaras, Julio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvements in Inflammation and Calcium Balance of Citrate versus Acetate as Dialysate Buffer in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Unicentric, Cross-Over, Prospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Blood purification</jtitle><addtitle>Blood Purif</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>914</spage><epage>920</epage><pages>914-920</pages><issn>0253-5068</issn><eissn>1421-9735</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The composition of the dialysate is a crucial feature in the dialysis treatment. Two of its most debated elements are the optimal calcium concentration and the use of acetate as a buffer. Moreover, among the different alternatives to achieve acetate-free dialysis, the use of citrate is postulated as the most suitable option. The objective of this study is to identify the potential beneficial effects of citrate when compared to acetate dialysate (AD) both in short-term effects (especially regarding intradialytic calcium balance and cardiac damage biomarkers) and in medium-term ones with CKD-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) and inflammatory biomarkers measured after twelve sessions performed with each dialysate. Methods: This is a unicentric, cross-over, prospective study. Each patient underwent 24 dialysis sessions, 12 with each dialysate buffer. Blood samples were taken in 2 different sessions with each acidifier. They include CKD-MBD and inflammatory biomarkers. The calcium concentration of both dialysates was 1.5 mmol/L, while all other dialysis parameters and patients’ treatment remained unchanged during the study period. Results: When comparing AD and citrate dialysate (CD), there were no differences in pre-dialysis ionized calcium (iCa) (1.11 vs. 1.08 mmol/L) in both groups. However, there was a significant increase in iCa with the use of AD in immediate and 30-min post-dialysis blood samples. In contrast, iCa levels remained stable with the use of citrate. Inflammatory biomarkers were also reduced after the use of CD. Conclusions: The use of citrate provides interesting advantages when compared to acetate. It maintains iCa levels stable during dialysis sessions with a neutral or negative effect on calcium balance, and it improves the chronic inflammatory condition that comes with long-time hemodialysis treatment. These beneficial effects may lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>33535212</pmid><doi>10.1159/000513419</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4559-9083</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0253-5068
ispartof Blood purification, 2021-09, Vol.50 (6), p.914-920
issn 0253-5068
1421-9735
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_513419
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals
subjects Acetates - therapeutic use
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Calcium - blood
Calcium - therapeutic use
Citric Acid - therapeutic use
Cross-Over Studies
Dialysis Solutions - therapeutic use
Female
Humans
Inflammation - blood
Inflammation - prevention & control
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Renal Dialysis - methods
Research Article
title Improvements in Inflammation and Calcium Balance of Citrate versus Acetate as Dialysate Buffer in Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Unicentric, Cross-Over, Prospective Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A20%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvements%20in%20Inflammation%20and%20Calcium%20Balance%20of%20Citrate%20versus%20Acetate%20as%20Dialysate%20Buffer%20in%20Maintenance%20Hemodialysis:%20A%20Unicentric,%20Cross-Over,%20Prospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Blood%20purification&rft.au=Broseta,%20Jos%C3%A9%20Jes%C3%BAs&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=914&rft.epage=920&rft.pages=914-920&rft.issn=0253-5068&rft.eissn=1421-9735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000513419&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E2486464092%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2486464092&rft_id=info:pmid/33535212&rfr_iscdi=true