Surgical Management of Non-Malignant Esophageal Perforations: A Single-Center Analysis Over a 15-Year Period

Purpose: Esophageal perforations are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Different nonoperative and operative treatment options have been proposed. This study focuses on the impact of different surgical treatments in nonmalignant esophageal perforations and tries to identify predictors of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive surgery 2020, Vol.37 (4), p.302-311
Hauptverfasser: Karstens, Karl-Frederick, Bellon, Eugen, Tachezy, Michael, Izbicki, Jakob R., Ghadban, Tarik, Duprée, Anna, Uzunoglu, Faik G., Bachmann, Kai, Koenig, Alexandra, Reeh, Matthias
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 311
container_issue 4
container_start_page 302
container_title Digestive surgery
container_volume 37
creator Karstens, Karl-Frederick
Bellon, Eugen
Tachezy, Michael
Izbicki, Jakob R.
Ghadban, Tarik
Duprée, Anna
Uzunoglu, Faik G.
Bachmann, Kai
Koenig, Alexandra
Reeh, Matthias
description Purpose: Esophageal perforations are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Different nonoperative and operative treatment options have been proposed. This study focuses on the impact of different surgical treatments in nonmalignant esophageal perforations and tries to identify predictors of mortality in a single tertiary center over a 15-year period. Methods: From 2002 to 2017, patients with surgically managed esophageal perforation were identified from our database. Patients with esophageal malignancies were excluded. Etiology, clinical data, treatment, and outcome were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact on mortality. Results: A total of 72 patients were identified. The majority of perforations were iatrogenic (54.2%) followed by Boerhaave’s syndrome (23.6%). Most ruptures were found in the distal third of the esophagus (59.7%) measuring
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000504342
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_504342</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2319501197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ad9f5827c72c30172773e1fd6a6a37c16bbb23549639253e358533315810ba0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0M9PwjAUB_DGaBTRg3djlnjRw7Rvb103bwTxRwJighw8LW9bN6djxRZM-O8tATl5atp-3rfpl7Ez4DcAIrnlnAseYhjssQ6EAfhJHOM-6_BAoB_GcXTEjq39dAyjBA7ZEYKUAkTYYc1kaao6p8YbUUuVmql24enSe9GtP6KmrlpyBwOr5x_u1rFXZUptaFHr1t55PW9St1Wj_L6bU8brtdSsbG298Y_bkQfCf1dk1lO1Lk7YQUmNVafbtcumD4O3_pM_HD8-93tDP0cMFz4VSSniQOYyyJGDDKREBWURUUQoc4iyLAtQhEmEifuhQhELRAQRA8-IZ9hlV5vcudHfS2UX6ay2uWoaapVe2jRASAQHSKSj1xuaG22tUWU6N_WMzCoFnq7LTXflOnuxjV1mM1Xs5F-bDlxuwBeZSpkduJ9MNxHpvCidOv9XbV_5BaPUhuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2319501197</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Surgical Management of Non-Malignant Esophageal Perforations: A Single-Center Analysis Over a 15-Year Period</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Karstens, Karl-Frederick ; Bellon, Eugen ; Tachezy, Michael ; Izbicki, Jakob R. ; Ghadban, Tarik ; Duprée, Anna ; Uzunoglu, Faik G. ; Bachmann, Kai ; Koenig, Alexandra ; Reeh, Matthias</creator><creatorcontrib>Karstens, Karl-Frederick ; Bellon, Eugen ; Tachezy, Michael ; Izbicki, Jakob R. ; Ghadban, Tarik ; Duprée, Anna ; Uzunoglu, Faik G. ; Bachmann, Kai ; Koenig, Alexandra ; Reeh, Matthias</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: Esophageal perforations are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Different nonoperative and operative treatment options have been proposed. This study focuses on the impact of different surgical treatments in nonmalignant esophageal perforations and tries to identify predictors of mortality in a single tertiary center over a 15-year period. Methods: From 2002 to 2017, patients with surgically managed esophageal perforation were identified from our database. Patients with esophageal malignancies were excluded. Etiology, clinical data, treatment, and outcome were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact on mortality. Results: A total of 72 patients were identified. The majority of perforations were iatrogenic (54.2%) followed by Boerhaave’s syndrome (23.6%). Most ruptures were found in the distal third of the esophagus (59.7%) measuring &lt;3 cm (61.1%). Patients were treated with exploration and drainage (8.3%), primary suture and patch reinforcement (36.1%), resection and restoration of continuity (25.0%), or resection without restoration of continuity (30.6%). Delayed therapy significantly correlated with sepsis (p &lt; 0.0001) and mortality (p = 0.032). A correlation between an increasing perforation length with sepsis (p = 0.012) was observed. A higher Perforation Severity Score (PSS; OR 4.430; 95% CI 1.143–17.174; p = 0.031) and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 2.923; 95% CI 1.011–8.448; p = 0.048) were associated with mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Esophageal perforations are associated with high mortality, and larger ruptures are associated with worse outcome. Rapid diagnosis and treatment are crucial for patient survival. Hence, PSS and ASA score help to identify high-risk patients. The advantage of surgical management lies in the rapid control of the septic focus in an already critically ill patient. Though, the kind of surgical technique needs to be adjusted to the individual situation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0253-4886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000504342</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31775154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Echocardiography, Transesophageal - adverse effects ; Esophageal Perforation - complications ; Esophageal Perforation - etiology ; Esophageal Perforation - mortality ; Esophageal Perforation - pathology ; Esophageal Perforation - surgery ; Esophagus - pathology ; Female ; Gastroscopy - adverse effects ; Humans ; Male ; Mediastinal Diseases - complications ; Middle Aged ; Research Article ; Risk Factors ; Sepsis - etiology ; Severity of Illness Index ; Time-to-Treatment</subject><ispartof>Digestive surgery, 2020, Vol.37 (4), p.302-311</ispartof><rights>2019 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ad9f5827c72c30172773e1fd6a6a37c16bbb23549639253e358533315810ba0b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2423,4010,27904,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31775154$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karstens, Karl-Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellon, Eugen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachezy, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izbicki, Jakob R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghadban, Tarik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duprée, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzunoglu, Faik G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachmann, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeh, Matthias</creatorcontrib><title>Surgical Management of Non-Malignant Esophageal Perforations: A Single-Center Analysis Over a 15-Year Period</title><title>Digestive surgery</title><addtitle>Dig Surg</addtitle><description>Purpose: Esophageal perforations are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Different nonoperative and operative treatment options have been proposed. This study focuses on the impact of different surgical treatments in nonmalignant esophageal perforations and tries to identify predictors of mortality in a single tertiary center over a 15-year period. Methods: From 2002 to 2017, patients with surgically managed esophageal perforation were identified from our database. Patients with esophageal malignancies were excluded. Etiology, clinical data, treatment, and outcome were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact on mortality. Results: A total of 72 patients were identified. The majority of perforations were iatrogenic (54.2%) followed by Boerhaave’s syndrome (23.6%). Most ruptures were found in the distal third of the esophagus (59.7%) measuring &lt;3 cm (61.1%). Patients were treated with exploration and drainage (8.3%), primary suture and patch reinforcement (36.1%), resection and restoration of continuity (25.0%), or resection without restoration of continuity (30.6%). Delayed therapy significantly correlated with sepsis (p &lt; 0.0001) and mortality (p = 0.032). A correlation between an increasing perforation length with sepsis (p = 0.012) was observed. A higher Perforation Severity Score (PSS; OR 4.430; 95% CI 1.143–17.174; p = 0.031) and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 2.923; 95% CI 1.011–8.448; p = 0.048) were associated with mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Esophageal perforations are associated with high mortality, and larger ruptures are associated with worse outcome. Rapid diagnosis and treatment are crucial for patient survival. Hence, PSS and ASA score help to identify high-risk patients. The advantage of surgical management lies in the rapid control of the septic focus in an already critically ill patient. Though, the kind of surgical technique needs to be adjusted to the individual situation.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Echocardiography, Transesophageal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Esophageal Perforation - complications</subject><subject>Esophageal Perforation - etiology</subject><subject>Esophageal Perforation - mortality</subject><subject>Esophageal Perforation - pathology</subject><subject>Esophageal Perforation - surgery</subject><subject>Esophagus - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mediastinal Diseases - complications</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Sepsis - etiology</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Time-to-Treatment</subject><issn>0253-4886</issn><issn>1421-9883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0M9PwjAUB_DGaBTRg3djlnjRw7Rvb103bwTxRwJighw8LW9bN6djxRZM-O8tATl5atp-3rfpl7Ez4DcAIrnlnAseYhjssQ6EAfhJHOM-6_BAoB_GcXTEjq39dAyjBA7ZEYKUAkTYYc1kaao6p8YbUUuVmql24enSe9GtP6KmrlpyBwOr5x_u1rFXZUptaFHr1t55PW9St1Wj_L6bU8brtdSsbG298Y_bkQfCf1dk1lO1Lk7YQUmNVafbtcumD4O3_pM_HD8-93tDP0cMFz4VSSniQOYyyJGDDKREBWURUUQoc4iyLAtQhEmEifuhQhELRAQRA8-IZ9hlV5vcudHfS2UX6ay2uWoaapVe2jRASAQHSKSj1xuaG22tUWU6N_WMzCoFnq7LTXflOnuxjV1mM1Xs5F-bDlxuwBeZSpkduJ9MNxHpvCidOv9XbV_5BaPUhuA</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Karstens, Karl-Frederick</creator><creator>Bellon, Eugen</creator><creator>Tachezy, Michael</creator><creator>Izbicki, Jakob R.</creator><creator>Ghadban, Tarik</creator><creator>Duprée, Anna</creator><creator>Uzunoglu, Faik G.</creator><creator>Bachmann, Kai</creator><creator>Koenig, Alexandra</creator><creator>Reeh, Matthias</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Surgical Management of Non-Malignant Esophageal Perforations: A Single-Center Analysis Over a 15-Year Period</title><author>Karstens, Karl-Frederick ; Bellon, Eugen ; Tachezy, Michael ; Izbicki, Jakob R. ; Ghadban, Tarik ; Duprée, Anna ; Uzunoglu, Faik G. ; Bachmann, Kai ; Koenig, Alexandra ; Reeh, Matthias</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-ad9f5827c72c30172773e1fd6a6a37c16bbb23549639253e358533315810ba0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Echocardiography, Transesophageal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Esophageal Perforation - complications</topic><topic>Esophageal Perforation - etiology</topic><topic>Esophageal Perforation - mortality</topic><topic>Esophageal Perforation - pathology</topic><topic>Esophageal Perforation - surgery</topic><topic>Esophagus - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mediastinal Diseases - complications</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Sepsis - etiology</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Time-to-Treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karstens, Karl-Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellon, Eugen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tachezy, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izbicki, Jakob R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghadban, Tarik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duprée, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uzunoglu, Faik G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachmann, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koenig, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeh, Matthias</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Digestive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karstens, Karl-Frederick</au><au>Bellon, Eugen</au><au>Tachezy, Michael</au><au>Izbicki, Jakob R.</au><au>Ghadban, Tarik</au><au>Duprée, Anna</au><au>Uzunoglu, Faik G.</au><au>Bachmann, Kai</au><au>Koenig, Alexandra</au><au>Reeh, Matthias</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Surgical Management of Non-Malignant Esophageal Perforations: A Single-Center Analysis Over a 15-Year Period</atitle><jtitle>Digestive surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Dig Surg</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>302</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>302-311</pages><issn>0253-4886</issn><eissn>1421-9883</eissn><abstract>Purpose: Esophageal perforations are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Different nonoperative and operative treatment options have been proposed. This study focuses on the impact of different surgical treatments in nonmalignant esophageal perforations and tries to identify predictors of mortality in a single tertiary center over a 15-year period. Methods: From 2002 to 2017, patients with surgically managed esophageal perforation were identified from our database. Patients with esophageal malignancies were excluded. Etiology, clinical data, treatment, and outcome were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact on mortality. Results: A total of 72 patients were identified. The majority of perforations were iatrogenic (54.2%) followed by Boerhaave’s syndrome (23.6%). Most ruptures were found in the distal third of the esophagus (59.7%) measuring &lt;3 cm (61.1%). Patients were treated with exploration and drainage (8.3%), primary suture and patch reinforcement (36.1%), resection and restoration of continuity (25.0%), or resection without restoration of continuity (30.6%). Delayed therapy significantly correlated with sepsis (p &lt; 0.0001) and mortality (p = 0.032). A correlation between an increasing perforation length with sepsis (p = 0.012) was observed. A higher Perforation Severity Score (PSS; OR 4.430; 95% CI 1.143–17.174; p = 0.031) and a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 2.923; 95% CI 1.011–8.448; p = 0.048) were associated with mortality in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Esophageal perforations are associated with high mortality, and larger ruptures are associated with worse outcome. Rapid diagnosis and treatment are crucial for patient survival. Hence, PSS and ASA score help to identify high-risk patients. The advantage of surgical management lies in the rapid control of the septic focus in an already critically ill patient. Though, the kind of surgical technique needs to be adjusted to the individual situation.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>31775154</pmid><doi>10.1159/000504342</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0253-4886
ispartof Digestive surgery, 2020, Vol.37 (4), p.302-311
issn 0253-4886
1421-9883
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_504342
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Echocardiography, Transesophageal - adverse effects
Esophageal Perforation - complications
Esophageal Perforation - etiology
Esophageal Perforation - mortality
Esophageal Perforation - pathology
Esophageal Perforation - surgery
Esophagus - pathology
Female
Gastroscopy - adverse effects
Humans
Male
Mediastinal Diseases - complications
Middle Aged
Research Article
Risk Factors
Sepsis - etiology
Severity of Illness Index
Time-to-Treatment
title Surgical Management of Non-Malignant Esophageal Perforations: A Single-Center Analysis Over a 15-Year Period
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A20%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Surgical%20Management%20of%20Non-Malignant%20Esophageal%20Perforations:%20A%20Single-Center%20Analysis%20Over%20a%2015-Year%20Period&rft.jtitle=Digestive%20surgery&rft.au=Karstens,%20Karl-Frederick&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=302&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=302-311&rft.issn=0253-4886&rft.eissn=1421-9883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000504342&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E2319501197%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2319501197&rft_id=info:pmid/31775154&rfr_iscdi=true