Comparison of Active Substance Losses and Total Weight Losses of Tablets Administered Via Feeding Tube

Background/Aims: Administration of tablets via feeding tube (FT) is often associated with significant drug losses, as was confirmed by weighing. The aim of this study was to measure the proportion of active substance losses (ASLs) in an in vitro model. Methods: A film-coated tablet (FilmCT) containi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmacology 2019-04, Vol.103 (5-6), p.246-249
Hauptverfasser: Papiez, Adriana, Odehnalova, Klara, Sramek, Vladimir, Suk, Pavel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 249
container_issue 5-6
container_start_page 246
container_title Pharmacology
container_volume 103
creator Papiez, Adriana
Odehnalova, Klara
Sramek, Vladimir
Suk, Pavel
description Background/Aims: Administration of tablets via feeding tube (FT) is often associated with significant drug losses, as was confirmed by weighing. The aim of this study was to measure the proportion of active substance losses (ASLs) in an in vitro model. Methods: A film-coated tablet (FilmCT) containing clopidogrel (Trombex®) and a tablet with enteric coating (EntericCT) containing pantoprazole (Controloc®) were crushed in a mortar and transferred by method A (tablet powder was transferred into the beaker, poured into the syringe and water added) and method B (water was added into the mortar, suspension drawn into the syringe) and administered via FT in an in vitro model. Total losses were measured with analytical balance and, simultaneously, ASL were analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography UV-detection (HPLC-UV). Results: ASL was different to weighing only in the case of EntericCT prepared by method B (2.0 ± 4.2 and 10.7 ± 0.8% for HPLC-UV and weighing, respectively; p = 0.004). HPLC-UV confirmed significantly lower ASL when method B was used for either EntericCT (34.3 ± 7.2 vs. 2.0 ± 4.2%; p < 0.001) or FilmCT (14.1 ± 2.2 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1%; p < 0.01). Conclusion: Drug loss analysis with analytical balance may overestimate ASL, as was proved for EntericCT in this study. ASL were significantly lower when method B was used.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000496423
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_496423</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A630870299</galeid><sourcerecordid>A630870299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-b485d3a5a0f300832dec1c27664c6e92f4e635fb47afbc9b43c882e0a89be29e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0c9rFDEUB_Agit1WD95FAr3oYWommclkjsNiW2FBwVWPIT9e1ujMZE0ygv-9KdMuCCWHBy-fb3jkIfSqJld13fbvCSFNzxvKnqBNXUpFWM2eog0ptepITc_QeUo_C-O0E8_RGSMd5aIRG-S2YTqq6FOYcXB4MNn_Afxl0Smr2QDehZQgYTVbvA9Zjfg7-MOP_NAvkb3SI-SEBzv52acMESz-5hW-BrB-PuD9ouEFeubUmODlfb1AX68_7Le31e7TzcftsKtMw7tc6Ua0lqlWEccIEYxaMLWhHeeN4dBT1wBnrdNNp5w2vW6YEYICUaLXQHtgF-jt-u4xht8LpCwnnwyMo5ohLElSSkgnWiJ4oZcrPagRpJ9dyFGZOy4HzojoCO37oq4eUeVYmLwJMzhf-v8F3q0BE8sXRXDyGP2k4l9ZE3m3LXnaVrFv7qdd9AT2JB_WU8DrFfxS8QDxBE75y0evP98Oq5BH69g_6Q6iLQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2200785086</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Active Substance Losses and Total Weight Losses of Tablets Administered Via Feeding Tube</title><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Papiez, Adriana ; Odehnalova, Klara ; Sramek, Vladimir ; Suk, Pavel</creator><creatorcontrib>Papiez, Adriana ; Odehnalova, Klara ; Sramek, Vladimir ; Suk, Pavel</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Aims: Administration of tablets via feeding tube (FT) is often associated with significant drug losses, as was confirmed by weighing. The aim of this study was to measure the proportion of active substance losses (ASLs) in an in vitro model. Methods: A film-coated tablet (FilmCT) containing clopidogrel (Trombex®) and a tablet with enteric coating (EntericCT) containing pantoprazole (Controloc®) were crushed in a mortar and transferred by method A (tablet powder was transferred into the beaker, poured into the syringe and water added) and method B (water was added into the mortar, suspension drawn into the syringe) and administered via FT in an in vitro model. Total losses were measured with analytical balance and, simultaneously, ASL were analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography UV-detection (HPLC-UV). Results: ASL was different to weighing only in the case of EntericCT prepared by method B (2.0 ± 4.2 and 10.7 ± 0.8% for HPLC-UV and weighing, respectively; p = 0.004). HPLC-UV confirmed significantly lower ASL when method B was used for either EntericCT (34.3 ± 7.2 vs. 2.0 ± 4.2%; p &lt; 0.001) or FilmCT (14.1 ± 2.2 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1%; p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: Drug loss analysis with analytical balance may overestimate ASL, as was proved for EntericCT in this study. ASL were significantly lower when method B was used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-7012</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000496423</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30726848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Brief Report ; Dosage and administration ; Drug delivery systems ; Enteral feeding equipment ; Evaluation ; Tablets (Pharmacy)</subject><ispartof>Pharmacology, 2019-04, Vol.103 (5-6), p.246-249</ispartof><rights>2019 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 S. Karger AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-b485d3a5a0f300832dec1c27664c6e92f4e635fb47afbc9b43c882e0a89be29e3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0001-5292-2654</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2427,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30726848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papiez, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odehnalova, Klara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sramek, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suk, Pavel</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Active Substance Losses and Total Weight Losses of Tablets Administered Via Feeding Tube</title><title>Pharmacology</title><addtitle>Pharmacology</addtitle><description>Background/Aims: Administration of tablets via feeding tube (FT) is often associated with significant drug losses, as was confirmed by weighing. The aim of this study was to measure the proportion of active substance losses (ASLs) in an in vitro model. Methods: A film-coated tablet (FilmCT) containing clopidogrel (Trombex®) and a tablet with enteric coating (EntericCT) containing pantoprazole (Controloc®) were crushed in a mortar and transferred by method A (tablet powder was transferred into the beaker, poured into the syringe and water added) and method B (water was added into the mortar, suspension drawn into the syringe) and administered via FT in an in vitro model. Total losses were measured with analytical balance and, simultaneously, ASL were analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography UV-detection (HPLC-UV). Results: ASL was different to weighing only in the case of EntericCT prepared by method B (2.0 ± 4.2 and 10.7 ± 0.8% for HPLC-UV and weighing, respectively; p = 0.004). HPLC-UV confirmed significantly lower ASL when method B was used for either EntericCT (34.3 ± 7.2 vs. 2.0 ± 4.2%; p &lt; 0.001) or FilmCT (14.1 ± 2.2 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1%; p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: Drug loss analysis with analytical balance may overestimate ASL, as was proved for EntericCT in this study. ASL were significantly lower when method B was used.</description><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Drug delivery systems</subject><subject>Enteral feeding equipment</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Tablets (Pharmacy)</subject><issn>0031-7012</issn><issn>1423-0313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0c9rFDEUB_Agit1WD95FAr3oYWommclkjsNiW2FBwVWPIT9e1ujMZE0ygv-9KdMuCCWHBy-fb3jkIfSqJld13fbvCSFNzxvKnqBNXUpFWM2eog0ptepITc_QeUo_C-O0E8_RGSMd5aIRG-S2YTqq6FOYcXB4MNn_Afxl0Smr2QDehZQgYTVbvA9Zjfg7-MOP_NAvkb3SI-SEBzv52acMESz-5hW-BrB-PuD9ouEFeubUmODlfb1AX68_7Le31e7TzcftsKtMw7tc6Ua0lqlWEccIEYxaMLWhHeeN4dBT1wBnrdNNp5w2vW6YEYICUaLXQHtgF-jt-u4xht8LpCwnnwyMo5ohLElSSkgnWiJ4oZcrPagRpJ9dyFGZOy4HzojoCO37oq4eUeVYmLwJMzhf-v8F3q0BE8sXRXDyGP2k4l9ZE3m3LXnaVrFv7qdd9AT2JB_WU8DrFfxS8QDxBE75y0evP98Oq5BH69g_6Q6iLQ</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Papiez, Adriana</creator><creator>Odehnalova, Klara</creator><creator>Sramek, Vladimir</creator><creator>Suk, Pavel</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5292-2654</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Comparison of Active Substance Losses and Total Weight Losses of Tablets Administered Via Feeding Tube</title><author>Papiez, Adriana ; Odehnalova, Klara ; Sramek, Vladimir ; Suk, Pavel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-b485d3a5a0f300832dec1c27664c6e92f4e635fb47afbc9b43c882e0a89be29e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Drug delivery systems</topic><topic>Enteral feeding equipment</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Tablets (Pharmacy)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papiez, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odehnalova, Klara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sramek, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suk, Pavel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papiez, Adriana</au><au>Odehnalova, Klara</au><au>Sramek, Vladimir</au><au>Suk, Pavel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Active Substance Losses and Total Weight Losses of Tablets Administered Via Feeding Tube</atitle><jtitle>Pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Pharmacology</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>103</volume><issue>5-6</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>249</epage><pages>246-249</pages><issn>0031-7012</issn><eissn>1423-0313</eissn><abstract>Background/Aims: Administration of tablets via feeding tube (FT) is often associated with significant drug losses, as was confirmed by weighing. The aim of this study was to measure the proportion of active substance losses (ASLs) in an in vitro model. Methods: A film-coated tablet (FilmCT) containing clopidogrel (Trombex®) and a tablet with enteric coating (EntericCT) containing pantoprazole (Controloc®) were crushed in a mortar and transferred by method A (tablet powder was transferred into the beaker, poured into the syringe and water added) and method B (water was added into the mortar, suspension drawn into the syringe) and administered via FT in an in vitro model. Total losses were measured with analytical balance and, simultaneously, ASL were analyzed with high-performance liquid chromatography UV-detection (HPLC-UV). Results: ASL was different to weighing only in the case of EntericCT prepared by method B (2.0 ± 4.2 and 10.7 ± 0.8% for HPLC-UV and weighing, respectively; p = 0.004). HPLC-UV confirmed significantly lower ASL when method B was used for either EntericCT (34.3 ± 7.2 vs. 2.0 ± 4.2%; p &lt; 0.001) or FilmCT (14.1 ± 2.2 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1%; p &lt; 0.01). Conclusion: Drug loss analysis with analytical balance may overestimate ASL, as was proved for EntericCT in this study. ASL were significantly lower when method B was used.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>30726848</pmid><doi>10.1159/000496423</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5292-2654</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-7012
ispartof Pharmacology, 2019-04, Vol.103 (5-6), p.246-249
issn 0031-7012
1423-0313
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_496423
source Karger Journals
subjects Brief Report
Dosage and administration
Drug delivery systems
Enteral feeding equipment
Evaluation
Tablets (Pharmacy)
title Comparison of Active Substance Losses and Total Weight Losses of Tablets Administered Via Feeding Tube
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A06%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Active%20Substance%20Losses%20and%20Total%20Weight%20Losses%20of%20Tablets%20Administered%20Via%20Feeding%20Tube&rft.jtitle=Pharmacology&rft.au=Papiez,%20Adriana&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=103&rft.issue=5-6&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=249&rft.pages=246-249&rft.issn=0031-7012&rft.eissn=1423-0313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000496423&rft_dat=%3Cgale_karge%3EA630870299%3C/gale_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2200785086&rft_id=info:pmid/30726848&rft_galeid=A630870299&rfr_iscdi=true