Comparison of the Accuracy of the Novel PrisMax Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy System to the Classic Prismaflex System
Background/Aims: We assessed how the novel PrisMax continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) system performed in an international multicentre setting. The system has multiple novel tools aiming to increase accuracy and dose delivery. Methods: Data was prospectively collected from 7 intensive care...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Blood purification 2019-01, Vol.47 (1-3), p.166-170 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 170 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1-3 |
container_start_page | 166 |
container_title | Blood purification |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Bell, Max Broman, Marcus Joannes-Boyau, Olivier Ronco, Claudio |
description | Background/Aims: We assessed how the novel PrisMax continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) system performed in an international multicentre setting. The system has multiple novel tools aiming to increase accuracy and dose delivery. Methods: Data was prospectively collected from 7 intensive care units in 6 countries. The PrisMax device data logs constituted the raw material and last generation Prismaflex data was used as comparison. Clinical parameters like treatment time, filter life span, downtime as well as prescribed and delivered dose were recorded. Results: PrisMax delivered/prescribed effluent ratios (mean ± SD) 0.92 ± 0.15 vs. Prismaflex ratios 0.85 ± 0.21, p < 0.001; delivered effluent dose (mL/kg/h) was 18.16 ± 12.93 vs. 10.95 ± 10.96, p < 0.0001; and (Kt/V) 0.76 ± 0.52 vs. 0.44 ± 0.44, p < 0.0001. Moreover, downtime was 27 minutes less for the newer device. Conclusion: The PrisMax CRRT device outperforms its predecessor with regard to dose delivery and accuracy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000494764 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_494764</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2133823342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fbd101f6a63fd7169c2505977fb6c5c3c79d8094f6dd6b6d774ffa48c8e5737e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0c1P1jAcB_DGYOQRPXg3pAkXPUzb9W07wuJbgkAUzk3X_SqDbR3tpjyJf7yVjefEpW_55PtL80XoDSUfKBXlR0IIL7mS_BnaUJ7TrFRM7KENyQXLBJHFPnoZ4w0hlEtRvkD7jPC84FJt0N_K96MJbfQD9g5P14CPrZ2DsdvH-5n_DR2-SOa7uceVH6Z2mP0c8Q8YTJfWsTMWehgmfHkNwYxb_HMbJ-jx5B8Cqs7E2NqHiN64Du5X8Ao9d6aL8HrdD9DV50-X1dfs9PzLt-r4NLNM5VPm6oYS6qSRzDWKytLmgohSKVdLKyyzqmwKUnInm0bWslGKO2d4YQsQiilgByhbcuMfGOdaj6HtTdhqb1q9Pt2mE2hecMpJ8u8WPwZ_N0OcdN9GC11nBkgf1zllrMgZ43mi7xdqg48xgNuFU6L_l6N35SR7uMbOdQ_NTj62kcDRAm5N-AVhB04urpYIPTYuqbdPqnXKP7mioGM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2133823342</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Accuracy of the Novel PrisMax Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy System to the Classic Prismaflex System</title><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Bell, Max ; Broman, Marcus ; Joannes-Boyau, Olivier ; Ronco, Claudio</creator><creatorcontrib>Bell, Max ; Broman, Marcus ; Joannes-Boyau, Olivier ; Ronco, Claudio</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Aims: We assessed how the novel PrisMax continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) system performed in an international multicentre setting. The system has multiple novel tools aiming to increase accuracy and dose delivery. Methods: Data was prospectively collected from 7 intensive care units in 6 countries. The PrisMax device data logs constituted the raw material and last generation Prismaflex data was used as comparison. Clinical parameters like treatment time, filter life span, downtime as well as prescribed and delivered dose were recorded. Results: PrisMax delivered/prescribed effluent ratios (mean ± SD) 0.92 ± 0.15 vs. Prismaflex ratios 0.85 ± 0.21, p < 0.001; delivered effluent dose (mL/kg/h) was 18.16 ± 12.93 vs. 10.95 ± 10.96, p < 0.0001; and (Kt/V) 0.76 ± 0.52 vs. 0.44 ± 0.44, p < 0.0001. Moreover, downtime was 27 minutes less for the newer device. Conclusion: The PrisMax CRRT device outperforms its predecessor with regard to dose delivery and accuracy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0253-5068</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000494764</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30428467</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Critical Care Nephrology – Research Article</subject><ispartof>Blood purification, 2019-01, Vol.47 (1-3), p.166-170</ispartof><rights>2018 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fbd101f6a63fd7169c2505977fb6c5c3c79d8094f6dd6b6d774ffa48c8e5737e3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-4320-898X ; 0000-0001-7464-0324 ; 0000-0002-6697-4065</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,2423,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30428467$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:140489003$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bell, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broman, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joannes-Boyau, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronco, Claudio</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Accuracy of the Novel PrisMax Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy System to the Classic Prismaflex System</title><title>Blood purification</title><addtitle>Blood Purif</addtitle><description>Background/Aims: We assessed how the novel PrisMax continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) system performed in an international multicentre setting. The system has multiple novel tools aiming to increase accuracy and dose delivery. Methods: Data was prospectively collected from 7 intensive care units in 6 countries. The PrisMax device data logs constituted the raw material and last generation Prismaflex data was used as comparison. Clinical parameters like treatment time, filter life span, downtime as well as prescribed and delivered dose were recorded. Results: PrisMax delivered/prescribed effluent ratios (mean ± SD) 0.92 ± 0.15 vs. Prismaflex ratios 0.85 ± 0.21, p < 0.001; delivered effluent dose (mL/kg/h) was 18.16 ± 12.93 vs. 10.95 ± 10.96, p < 0.0001; and (Kt/V) 0.76 ± 0.52 vs. 0.44 ± 0.44, p < 0.0001. Moreover, downtime was 27 minutes less for the newer device. Conclusion: The PrisMax CRRT device outperforms its predecessor with regard to dose delivery and accuracy.</description><subject>Critical Care Nephrology – Research Article</subject><issn>0253-5068</issn><issn>1421-9735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0c1P1jAcB_DGYOQRPXg3pAkXPUzb9W07wuJbgkAUzk3X_SqDbR3tpjyJf7yVjefEpW_55PtL80XoDSUfKBXlR0IIL7mS_BnaUJ7TrFRM7KENyQXLBJHFPnoZ4w0hlEtRvkD7jPC84FJt0N_K96MJbfQD9g5P14CPrZ2DsdvH-5n_DR2-SOa7uceVH6Z2mP0c8Q8YTJfWsTMWehgmfHkNwYxb_HMbJ-jx5B8Cqs7E2NqHiN64Du5X8Ao9d6aL8HrdD9DV50-X1dfs9PzLt-r4NLNM5VPm6oYS6qSRzDWKytLmgohSKVdLKyyzqmwKUnInm0bWslGKO2d4YQsQiilgByhbcuMfGOdaj6HtTdhqb1q9Pt2mE2hecMpJ8u8WPwZ_N0OcdN9GC11nBkgf1zllrMgZ43mi7xdqg48xgNuFU6L_l6N35SR7uMbOdQ_NTj62kcDRAm5N-AVhB04urpYIPTYuqbdPqnXKP7mioGM</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Bell, Max</creator><creator>Broman, Marcus</creator><creator>Joannes-Boyau, Olivier</creator><creator>Ronco, Claudio</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4320-898X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-0324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-4065</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Accuracy of the Novel PrisMax Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy System to the Classic Prismaflex System</title><author>Bell, Max ; Broman, Marcus ; Joannes-Boyau, Olivier ; Ronco, Claudio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-fbd101f6a63fd7169c2505977fb6c5c3c79d8094f6dd6b6d774ffa48c8e5737e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Critical Care Nephrology – Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bell, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broman, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joannes-Boyau, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ronco, Claudio</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><jtitle>Blood purification</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bell, Max</au><au>Broman, Marcus</au><au>Joannes-Boyau, Olivier</au><au>Ronco, Claudio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Accuracy of the Novel PrisMax Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy System to the Classic Prismaflex System</atitle><jtitle>Blood purification</jtitle><addtitle>Blood Purif</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>166</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>166-170</pages><issn>0253-5068</issn><eissn>1421-9735</eissn><abstract>Background/Aims: We assessed how the novel PrisMax continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) system performed in an international multicentre setting. The system has multiple novel tools aiming to increase accuracy and dose delivery. Methods: Data was prospectively collected from 7 intensive care units in 6 countries. The PrisMax device data logs constituted the raw material and last generation Prismaflex data was used as comparison. Clinical parameters like treatment time, filter life span, downtime as well as prescribed and delivered dose were recorded. Results: PrisMax delivered/prescribed effluent ratios (mean ± SD) 0.92 ± 0.15 vs. Prismaflex ratios 0.85 ± 0.21, p < 0.001; delivered effluent dose (mL/kg/h) was 18.16 ± 12.93 vs. 10.95 ± 10.96, p < 0.0001; and (Kt/V) 0.76 ± 0.52 vs. 0.44 ± 0.44, p < 0.0001. Moreover, downtime was 27 minutes less for the newer device. Conclusion: The PrisMax CRRT device outperforms its predecessor with regard to dose delivery and accuracy.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>30428467</pmid><doi>10.1159/000494764</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4320-898X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7464-0324</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-4065</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0253-5068 |
ispartof | Blood purification, 2019-01, Vol.47 (1-3), p.166-170 |
issn | 0253-5068 1421-9735 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_karger_primary_494764 |
source | Karger Journals |
subjects | Critical Care Nephrology – Research Article |
title | Comparison of the Accuracy of the Novel PrisMax Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy System to the Classic Prismaflex System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A17%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Accuracy%20of%20the%20Novel%20PrisMax%20Continuous%20Renal%20Replacement%20Therapy%20System%20to%20the%20Classic%20Prismaflex%20System&rft.jtitle=Blood%20purification&rft.au=Bell,%20Max&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=166&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=166-170&rft.issn=0253-5068&rft.eissn=1421-9735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000494764&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E2133823342%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2133823342&rft_id=info:pmid/30428467&rfr_iscdi=true |