Burden of Oral Mucositis: A Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research
Background: Surprisingly little is known about the burden of oral mucositis (OM). We provide a systematic review of studies on the burden of OM (incidence, economic impact, health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). Methods: Systematic literature searches were made in BIOSIS, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Incl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oncology research and treatment 2018, Vol.41 (6), p.399-405 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 405 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 399 |
container_title | Oncology research and treatment |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Berger, Karin Schopohl, Dorothee Bollig, Antonia Strobach, Dorothea Rieger, Christina Rublee, Dale Ostermann, Helmut |
description | Background: Surprisingly little is known about the burden of oral mucositis (OM). We provide a systematic review of studies on the burden of OM (incidence, economic impact, health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). Methods: Systematic literature searches were made in BIOSIS, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria were studies on OM in hematology/oncology patients of ≥ 18 years, journal articles, English language, and published between 2000 and 2016; OM treatment studies were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: We screened 4,996 hits, and identified 68 studies of which 13 were without transparency on OM grading. The evidence level of 65 studies was rated ‘low' or ‘very low' in 58.5%, ‘moderate' in 20% and ‘high' in 21.5%. Mean value of incidence (7 studies) was 83.5% for all grades of OM with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. OM incidence for all grades in head and neck cancer patients was 59.4-100%. Considering the economic impact, 16 studies showed highly variable numbers. HRQoL was measured in 16 studies using 13 different instruments. Statistically significant changes in HRQoL scores were demonstrated. Conclusion: OM is common, burdensome, costly and imposes major reductions in HRQoL. However, from a quality standpoint, the level of current evidence in OM is disappointing. The field needs continued attention to address methodological challenges. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000487085 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_487085</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2036201508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-3c3ec6f886eeaf4f7da10ae8f5f54e57ba0150ada6f689d153f143ca43935b653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90D1PwzAQBmALgWhVOrAj5BGGgL_jsJWKQqWiSgXmyHXOEMhHsRNQ_z2pWjLd6fTcO7wInVNyQ6lMbgkhQsdEyyM0ZCxRkWSKHfd7TAZoHMJnxyiTUsfJKRqwJOaCajFEq_vWZ1Dh2uGlNwV-bm0d8iYPd3iCX7ahgdI0ucUr-MnhF5sqw_NyU-S2u9ZVwK72eNY2rYeOBDDefpyhE2eKAOPDHKG32cPr9ClaLB_n08kisoLETcQtB6uc1grAOOHizFBiQDvppAAZrw2hkpjMKKd0klHJHRXcGsETLtdK8hG62udufP3dQmjSMg8WisJUULchZYQrtsvQHb3eU-vrEDy4dOPz0vhtSkm6azHtW-zs5SG2XZeQ9fK_sw5c7MGX8e_ge3D4_wNN_nTB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2036201508</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Burden of Oral Mucositis: A Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Berger, Karin ; Schopohl, Dorothee ; Bollig, Antonia ; Strobach, Dorothea ; Rieger, Christina ; Rublee, Dale ; Ostermann, Helmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, Karin ; Schopohl, Dorothee ; Bollig, Antonia ; Strobach, Dorothea ; Rieger, Christina ; Rublee, Dale ; Ostermann, Helmut</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Surprisingly little is known about the burden of oral mucositis (OM). We provide a systematic review of studies on the burden of OM (incidence, economic impact, health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). Methods: Systematic literature searches were made in BIOSIS, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria were studies on OM in hematology/oncology patients of ≥ 18 years, journal articles, English language, and published between 2000 and 2016; OM treatment studies were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: We screened 4,996 hits, and identified 68 studies of which 13 were without transparency on OM grading. The evidence level of 65 studies was rated ‘low' or ‘very low' in 58.5%, ‘moderate' in 20% and ‘high' in 21.5%. Mean value of incidence (7 studies) was 83.5% for all grades of OM with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. OM incidence for all grades in head and neck cancer patients was 59.4-100%. Considering the economic impact, 16 studies showed highly variable numbers. HRQoL was measured in 16 studies using 13 different instruments. Statistically significant changes in HRQoL scores were demonstrated. Conclusion: OM is common, burdensome, costly and imposes major reductions in HRQoL. However, from a quality standpoint, the level of current evidence in OM is disappointing. The field needs continued attention to address methodological challenges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2296-5270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2296-5262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000487085</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29734184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - methods ; Biomedical Research - trends ; Cost of Illness ; Forecasting ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - complications ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - methods ; Humans ; Quality of Life ; Stomatitis - complications ; Stomatitis - economics ; Stomatitis - therapy ; Systematic Review</subject><ispartof>Oncology research and treatment, 2018, Vol.41 (6), p.399-405</ispartof><rights>2018 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg</rights><rights>2018 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-3c3ec6f886eeaf4f7da10ae8f5f54e57ba0150ada6f689d153f143ca43935b653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-3c3ec6f886eeaf4f7da10ae8f5f54e57ba0150ada6f689d153f143ca43935b653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4208-4762</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2423,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29734184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schopohl, Dorothee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollig, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strobach, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rublee, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostermann, Helmut</creatorcontrib><title>Burden of Oral Mucositis: A Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research</title><title>Oncology research and treatment</title><addtitle>Oncol Res Treat</addtitle><description>Background: Surprisingly little is known about the burden of oral mucositis (OM). We provide a systematic review of studies on the burden of OM (incidence, economic impact, health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). Methods: Systematic literature searches were made in BIOSIS, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria were studies on OM in hematology/oncology patients of ≥ 18 years, journal articles, English language, and published between 2000 and 2016; OM treatment studies were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: We screened 4,996 hits, and identified 68 studies of which 13 were without transparency on OM grading. The evidence level of 65 studies was rated ‘low' or ‘very low' in 58.5%, ‘moderate' in 20% and ‘high' in 21.5%. Mean value of incidence (7 studies) was 83.5% for all grades of OM with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. OM incidence for all grades in head and neck cancer patients was 59.4-100%. Considering the economic impact, 16 studies showed highly variable numbers. HRQoL was measured in 16 studies using 13 different instruments. Statistically significant changes in HRQoL scores were demonstrated. Conclusion: OM is common, burdensome, costly and imposes major reductions in HRQoL. However, from a quality standpoint, the level of current evidence in OM is disappointing. The field needs continued attention to address methodological challenges.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - methods</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - trends</subject><subject>Cost of Illness</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Stomatitis - complications</subject><subject>Stomatitis - economics</subject><subject>Stomatitis - therapy</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><issn>2296-5270</issn><issn>2296-5262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo90D1PwzAQBmALgWhVOrAj5BGGgL_jsJWKQqWiSgXmyHXOEMhHsRNQ_z2pWjLd6fTcO7wInVNyQ6lMbgkhQsdEyyM0ZCxRkWSKHfd7TAZoHMJnxyiTUsfJKRqwJOaCajFEq_vWZ1Dh2uGlNwV-bm0d8iYPd3iCX7ahgdI0ucUr-MnhF5sqw_NyU-S2u9ZVwK72eNY2rYeOBDDefpyhE2eKAOPDHKG32cPr9ClaLB_n08kisoLETcQtB6uc1grAOOHizFBiQDvppAAZrw2hkpjMKKd0klHJHRXcGsETLtdK8hG62udufP3dQmjSMg8WisJUULchZYQrtsvQHb3eU-vrEDy4dOPz0vhtSkm6azHtW-zs5SG2XZeQ9fK_sw5c7MGX8e_ge3D4_wNN_nTB</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Berger, Karin</creator><creator>Schopohl, Dorothee</creator><creator>Bollig, Antonia</creator><creator>Strobach, Dorothea</creator><creator>Rieger, Christina</creator><creator>Rublee, Dale</creator><creator>Ostermann, Helmut</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4208-4762</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>Burden of Oral Mucositis: A Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research</title><author>Berger, Karin ; Schopohl, Dorothee ; Bollig, Antonia ; Strobach, Dorothea ; Rieger, Christina ; Rublee, Dale ; Ostermann, Helmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-3c3ec6f886eeaf4f7da10ae8f5f54e57ba0150ada6f689d153f143ca43935b653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - methods</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - trends</topic><topic>Cost of Illness</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Stomatitis - complications</topic><topic>Stomatitis - economics</topic><topic>Stomatitis - therapy</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schopohl, Dorothee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollig, Antonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strobach, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieger, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rublee, Dale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ostermann, Helmut</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oncology research and treatment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, Karin</au><au>Schopohl, Dorothee</au><au>Bollig, Antonia</au><au>Strobach, Dorothea</au><au>Rieger, Christina</au><au>Rublee, Dale</au><au>Ostermann, Helmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Burden of Oral Mucositis: A Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research</atitle><jtitle>Oncology research and treatment</jtitle><addtitle>Oncol Res Treat</addtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>405</epage><pages>399-405</pages><issn>2296-5270</issn><eissn>2296-5262</eissn><abstract>Background: Surprisingly little is known about the burden of oral mucositis (OM). We provide a systematic review of studies on the burden of OM (incidence, economic impact, health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). Methods: Systematic literature searches were made in BIOSIS, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Inclusion criteria were studies on OM in hematology/oncology patients of ≥ 18 years, journal articles, English language, and published between 2000 and 2016; OM treatment studies were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Results: We screened 4,996 hits, and identified 68 studies of which 13 were without transparency on OM grading. The evidence level of 65 studies was rated ‘low' or ‘very low' in 58.5%, ‘moderate' in 20% and ‘high' in 21.5%. Mean value of incidence (7 studies) was 83.5% for all grades of OM with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. OM incidence for all grades in head and neck cancer patients was 59.4-100%. Considering the economic impact, 16 studies showed highly variable numbers. HRQoL was measured in 16 studies using 13 different instruments. Statistically significant changes in HRQoL scores were demonstrated. Conclusion: OM is common, burdensome, costly and imposes major reductions in HRQoL. However, from a quality standpoint, the level of current evidence in OM is disappointing. The field needs continued attention to address methodological challenges.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>29734184</pmid><doi>10.1159/000487085</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4208-4762</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2296-5270 |
ispartof | Oncology research and treatment, 2018, Vol.41 (6), p.399-405 |
issn | 2296-5270 2296-5262 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_karger_primary_487085 |
source | Karger Journals; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biomedical Research - methods Biomedical Research - trends Cost of Illness Forecasting Head and Neck Neoplasms - complications Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation - methods Humans Quality of Life Stomatitis - complications Stomatitis - economics Stomatitis - therapy Systematic Review |
title | Burden of Oral Mucositis: A Systematic Review and Implications for Future Research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T19%3A43%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Burden%20of%20Oral%20Mucositis:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Implications%20for%20Future%20Research&rft.jtitle=Oncology%20research%20and%20treatment&rft.au=Berger,%20Karin&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=405&rft.pages=399-405&rft.issn=2296-5270&rft.eissn=2296-5262&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000487085&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E2036201508%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2036201508&rft_id=info:pmid/29734184&rfr_iscdi=true |