Implementation of a New High-Volume Circular Stapler in Stapled Anopexy for Hemorrhoidal Disease: Is Patient’s Short-Term Outcome Affected by a Higher Volume of Resected Tissue?

Background: Stapled anopexy is a safe technique for the treatment of hemorrhoids but carries a higher risk of recurrence, which might be caused due to the limited volume of resected tissue. In this study, we investigated the introduction of a high-volume circular stapling device; in particular wheth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive surgery 2018-01, Vol.35 (5), p.406-410
Hauptverfasser: Grotenhuis, Brechtje A., Nonner, Joost, de Graaf, Eelco J.R., Doornebosch, Pascal G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 410
container_issue 5
container_start_page 406
container_title Digestive surgery
container_volume 35
creator Grotenhuis, Brechtje A.
Nonner, Joost
de Graaf, Eelco J.R.
Doornebosch, Pascal G.
description Background: Stapled anopexy is a safe technique for the treatment of hemorrhoids but carries a higher risk of recurrence, which might be caused due to the limited volume of resected tissue. In this study, we investigated the introduction of a high-volume circular stapling device; in particular whether an increased amount of resected tissue could affect patients’ short-term postoperative outcome. Methods: Between 2011 and 2015, stapled anopexy was performed for hemorrhoids and/or anal prolapse in 141 patients (n = 25 conventional PPH-3 © -stapler versus n = 116 high-volume CHEX © -stapler). In this prospectively collected dataset, operation details and short-term postoperative outcome were compared. Results: With the high-volume stapler, a significantly higher amount of tissue was resected: 9.8 g (range 6.2–11.4) vs. 6.4 g (range 4.9–8.8) with the conventional stapler, p < 0.01. Postoperative short-term outcome did not differ in terms of readmission and complication rates. In all 5 patients who underwent a redo operation for residual hemorrhoids or prolapse, the high-volume stapler was used in the primary operation. Conclusion: A high-volume stapling device for stapled anopexy was introduced safely with a significantly higher amount of resected tissue without a worse short-term outcome. However, it remains unclear whether higher stapling volumes may lead to improved long-term outcome with less reinterventions.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000480355
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_480355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1963484571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9fecc2d2242afddc231a65c941aa4b0bae6b27fab9e486589c8c6a391a81b6a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUFu1DAYRi0EokNhwR4hS2xgEbBjJ7XZoNEUmJEqipgp2-iP87sTSOJgJ2pnxzU4BzfiJLhKmBUrW_LTe5Y-Qp5y9przTL9hjEnFRJbdIwsuU55opcR9smBpJhKpVH5CHoXwLWIi1_whOUk1F5xptSC_N23fYIvdAEPtOuosBfoJb-i6vt4nX10ztkhXtTdjA55uB4i0p3U3Xyu67FyPtwdqnadrbJ33e1dX0NDzOiAEfEs3gX6O8pj48_NXoNu980OyQ9_Sy3EwLvqX1qIZoqw8xPpdOTbmdvzQFwzT864OYcR3j8kDC03AJ_N5Sq4-vN-t1snF5cfNanmRGCHkkOgoNWmVpjIFW1UmFRzyzGjJAWTJSsC8TM8slBqlyjOljTI5CM1B8TIHJU7Jy8nbe_djxDAUbR0MNg106MZQcJ0LqWR2xiP6akKNdyF4tEXv6xb8oeCsuNuoOG4U2eezdixbrI7kv1Ei8GICvoO_Rn8EzrdXk6LoKxupZ_-l5spf4SekRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1963484571</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of a New High-Volume Circular Stapler in Stapled Anopexy for Hemorrhoidal Disease: Is Patient’s Short-Term Outcome Affected by a Higher Volume of Resected Tissue?</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Grotenhuis, Brechtje A. ; Nonner, Joost ; de Graaf, Eelco J.R. ; Doornebosch, Pascal G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grotenhuis, Brechtje A. ; Nonner, Joost ; de Graaf, Eelco J.R. ; Doornebosch, Pascal G.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Stapled anopexy is a safe technique for the treatment of hemorrhoids but carries a higher risk of recurrence, which might be caused due to the limited volume of resected tissue. In this study, we investigated the introduction of a high-volume circular stapling device; in particular whether an increased amount of resected tissue could affect patients’ short-term postoperative outcome. Methods: Between 2011 and 2015, stapled anopexy was performed for hemorrhoids and/or anal prolapse in 141 patients (n = 25 conventional PPH-3 © -stapler versus n = 116 high-volume CHEX © -stapler). In this prospectively collected dataset, operation details and short-term postoperative outcome were compared. Results: With the high-volume stapler, a significantly higher amount of tissue was resected: 9.8 g (range 6.2–11.4) vs. 6.4 g (range 4.9–8.8) with the conventional stapler, p &lt; 0.01. Postoperative short-term outcome did not differ in terms of readmission and complication rates. In all 5 patients who underwent a redo operation for residual hemorrhoids or prolapse, the high-volume stapler was used in the primary operation. Conclusion: A high-volume stapling device for stapled anopexy was introduced safely with a significantly higher amount of resected tissue without a worse short-term outcome. However, it remains unclear whether higher stapling volumes may lead to improved long-term outcome with less reinterventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0253-4886</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000480355</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29131098</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anal Canal - surgery ; Female ; Hemorrhoidectomy - adverse effects ; Hemorrhoidectomy - instrumentation ; Hemorrhoidectomy - methods ; Hemorrhoids - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original Paper ; Patient Readmission ; Rectal Prolapse - surgery ; Reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgical Staplers ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Digestive surgery, 2018-01, Vol.35 (5), p.406-410</ispartof><rights>2017 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9fecc2d2242afddc231a65c941aa4b0bae6b27fab9e486589c8c6a391a81b6a83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9fecc2d2242afddc231a65c941aa4b0bae6b27fab9e486589c8c6a391a81b6a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2423,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29131098$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grotenhuis, Brechtje A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonner, Joost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graaf, Eelco J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doornebosch, Pascal G.</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of a New High-Volume Circular Stapler in Stapled Anopexy for Hemorrhoidal Disease: Is Patient’s Short-Term Outcome Affected by a Higher Volume of Resected Tissue?</title><title>Digestive surgery</title><addtitle>Dig Surg</addtitle><description>Background: Stapled anopexy is a safe technique for the treatment of hemorrhoids but carries a higher risk of recurrence, which might be caused due to the limited volume of resected tissue. In this study, we investigated the introduction of a high-volume circular stapling device; in particular whether an increased amount of resected tissue could affect patients’ short-term postoperative outcome. Methods: Between 2011 and 2015, stapled anopexy was performed for hemorrhoids and/or anal prolapse in 141 patients (n = 25 conventional PPH-3 © -stapler versus n = 116 high-volume CHEX © -stapler). In this prospectively collected dataset, operation details and short-term postoperative outcome were compared. Results: With the high-volume stapler, a significantly higher amount of tissue was resected: 9.8 g (range 6.2–11.4) vs. 6.4 g (range 4.9–8.8) with the conventional stapler, p &lt; 0.01. Postoperative short-term outcome did not differ in terms of readmission and complication rates. In all 5 patients who underwent a redo operation for residual hemorrhoids or prolapse, the high-volume stapler was used in the primary operation. Conclusion: A high-volume stapling device for stapled anopexy was introduced safely with a significantly higher amount of resected tissue without a worse short-term outcome. However, it remains unclear whether higher stapling volumes may lead to improved long-term outcome with less reinterventions.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anal Canal - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemorrhoidectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Hemorrhoidectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Hemorrhoidectomy - methods</subject><subject>Hemorrhoids - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Patient Readmission</subject><subject>Rectal Prolapse - surgery</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgical Staplers</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0253-4886</issn><issn>1421-9883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUFu1DAYRi0EokNhwR4hS2xgEbBjJ7XZoNEUmJEqipgp2-iP87sTSOJgJ2pnxzU4BzfiJLhKmBUrW_LTe5Y-Qp5y9przTL9hjEnFRJbdIwsuU55opcR9smBpJhKpVH5CHoXwLWIi1_whOUk1F5xptSC_N23fYIvdAEPtOuosBfoJb-i6vt4nX10ztkhXtTdjA55uB4i0p3U3Xyu67FyPtwdqnadrbJ33e1dX0NDzOiAEfEs3gX6O8pj48_NXoNu980OyQ9_Sy3EwLvqX1qIZoqw8xPpdOTbmdvzQFwzT864OYcR3j8kDC03AJ_N5Sq4-vN-t1snF5cfNanmRGCHkkOgoNWmVpjIFW1UmFRzyzGjJAWTJSsC8TM8slBqlyjOljTI5CM1B8TIHJU7Jy8nbe_djxDAUbR0MNg106MZQcJ0LqWR2xiP6akKNdyF4tEXv6xb8oeCsuNuoOG4U2eezdixbrI7kv1Ei8GICvoO_Rn8EzrdXk6LoKxupZ_-l5spf4SekRg</recordid><startdate>20180101</startdate><enddate>20180101</enddate><creator>Grotenhuis, Brechtje A.</creator><creator>Nonner, Joost</creator><creator>de Graaf, Eelco J.R.</creator><creator>Doornebosch, Pascal G.</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180101</creationdate><title>Implementation of a New High-Volume Circular Stapler in Stapled Anopexy for Hemorrhoidal Disease: Is Patient’s Short-Term Outcome Affected by a Higher Volume of Resected Tissue?</title><author>Grotenhuis, Brechtje A. ; Nonner, Joost ; de Graaf, Eelco J.R. ; Doornebosch, Pascal G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-9fecc2d2242afddc231a65c941aa4b0bae6b27fab9e486589c8c6a391a81b6a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anal Canal - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemorrhoidectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Hemorrhoidectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Hemorrhoidectomy - methods</topic><topic>Hemorrhoids - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Patient Readmission</topic><topic>Rectal Prolapse - surgery</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgical Staplers</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grotenhuis, Brechtje A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nonner, Joost</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Graaf, Eelco J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doornebosch, Pascal G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Digestive surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grotenhuis, Brechtje A.</au><au>Nonner, Joost</au><au>de Graaf, Eelco J.R.</au><au>Doornebosch, Pascal G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of a New High-Volume Circular Stapler in Stapled Anopexy for Hemorrhoidal Disease: Is Patient’s Short-Term Outcome Affected by a Higher Volume of Resected Tissue?</atitle><jtitle>Digestive surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Dig Surg</addtitle><date>2018-01-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>406</spage><epage>410</epage><pages>406-410</pages><issn>0253-4886</issn><eissn>1421-9883</eissn><abstract>Background: Stapled anopexy is a safe technique for the treatment of hemorrhoids but carries a higher risk of recurrence, which might be caused due to the limited volume of resected tissue. In this study, we investigated the introduction of a high-volume circular stapling device; in particular whether an increased amount of resected tissue could affect patients’ short-term postoperative outcome. Methods: Between 2011 and 2015, stapled anopexy was performed for hemorrhoids and/or anal prolapse in 141 patients (n = 25 conventional PPH-3 © -stapler versus n = 116 high-volume CHEX © -stapler). In this prospectively collected dataset, operation details and short-term postoperative outcome were compared. Results: With the high-volume stapler, a significantly higher amount of tissue was resected: 9.8 g (range 6.2–11.4) vs. 6.4 g (range 4.9–8.8) with the conventional stapler, p &lt; 0.01. Postoperative short-term outcome did not differ in terms of readmission and complication rates. In all 5 patients who underwent a redo operation for residual hemorrhoids or prolapse, the high-volume stapler was used in the primary operation. Conclusion: A high-volume stapling device for stapled anopexy was introduced safely with a significantly higher amount of resected tissue without a worse short-term outcome. However, it remains unclear whether higher stapling volumes may lead to improved long-term outcome with less reinterventions.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>29131098</pmid><doi>10.1159/000480355</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0253-4886
ispartof Digestive surgery, 2018-01, Vol.35 (5), p.406-410
issn 0253-4886
1421-9883
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_480355
source Karger Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anal Canal - surgery
Female
Hemorrhoidectomy - adverse effects
Hemorrhoidectomy - instrumentation
Hemorrhoidectomy - methods
Hemorrhoids - surgery
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Original Paper
Patient Readmission
Rectal Prolapse - surgery
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Surgical Staplers
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Implementation of a New High-Volume Circular Stapler in Stapled Anopexy for Hemorrhoidal Disease: Is Patient’s Short-Term Outcome Affected by a Higher Volume of Resected Tissue?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A52%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20a%20New%20High-Volume%20Circular%20Stapler%20in%20Stapled%20Anopexy%20for%20Hemorrhoidal%20Disease:%20Is%20Patient%E2%80%99s%20Short-Term%20Outcome%20Affected%20by%20a%20Higher%20Volume%20of%20Resected%20Tissue?&rft.jtitle=Digestive%20surgery&rft.au=Grotenhuis,%20Brechtje%C2%A0A.&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=406&rft.epage=410&rft.pages=406-410&rft.issn=0253-4886&rft.eissn=1421-9883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000480355&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E1963484571%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1963484571&rft_id=info:pmid/29131098&rfr_iscdi=true