A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Old-Old Subjects with a Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5: The Kurihara Project

Background: Evidence as to the benefits of nonpharmacological interventions for the boundary state between normal aging and dementia [mild cognitive impairment or a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5] remains weak due to a lack of positive controls. Aims: To directly compare the effects of cognit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra 2015-05, Vol.5 (2), p.221-232
Hauptverfasser: Nakatsuka, Masahiro, Nakamura, Kei, Hamanosono, Ryo, Takahashi, Yumi, Kasai, Mari, Sato, Yuko, Suto, Teiko, Nagatomi, Ryoichi, Meguro, Kenichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 232
container_issue 2
container_start_page 221
container_title Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra
container_volume 5
creator Nakatsuka, Masahiro
Nakamura, Kei
Hamanosono, Ryo
Takahashi, Yumi
Kasai, Mari
Sato, Yuko
Suto, Teiko
Nagatomi, Ryoichi
Meguro, Kenichi
description Background: Evidence as to the benefits of nonpharmacological interventions for the boundary state between normal aging and dementia [mild cognitive impairment or a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5] remains weak due to a lack of positive controls. Aims: To directly compare the effects of cognitive interventions (CI), physical activities (PA) and a group reminiscence approach (GRA), we conducted a pilot study on the basis of a cluster randomized controlled trial design. Method: A total of 127 participants aged >74 years with a CDR of 0.5 were cluster randomized into three groups for CI, PA and GRA. The intervention lasted 12 weeks and consisted of weekly group sessions and home assignments. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail Making Test part A (TMT-A), word fluency (WF), 6-meter walk time and Quality of Life (QOL) Face Scale scores were evaluated as primary outcomes. Results: Methodology-related benefits of CI and PA were found for MMSE scores and walk time, respectively. TMT-A, WF and QOL Face Scale scores improved irrespective of the methodologies used. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CI and PA may be beneficial to cognitive and physical abilities, respectively. Executive functions and QOL may improve irrespective of the intervention methodologies used.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000380816
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_380816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_96f4e782b47046ee9328c38c230f25f6</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1698034150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-962287b0f2e03fe0226c80ccd5b7f34a2eba666b185d9000d28cd03b2ce35703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEolXpgTtClrjAIcXxV2wOlartAisqimDvluNMdr048WInRfBX-LN4u2XVShwsWzPPvO_YnqJ4XuGzquLqLcaYSiwr8ag4roRgJWeCPb53PipOU9pkDHOumGJPiyMiKsVVLY-LPxdo5qc0QkRfzdCG3v2GFs3CMMbgfT4uozMehQ59DsN2bWJvbPBh5WyOLoZcdwPD6MKQUBciuvZtmRf6NjUbsGNCP924RiZ7uOG25BL6HW-y2-iG1U4Yn_F3aLkG9GmKLjsY9CWGXfWz4klnfILTu_2kWL6fL2cfy6vrD4vZxVVpmcJjqQQhsm5wRwDTDjAhwkpsbcubuqPMEGiMEKKpJG9VfoWWSNti2hALlNeYnhSLvWwbzEZvo-tN_KWDcfo2EOJKmzg660Er0TGoJWlYjZkAUDRrUWkJze68E1nrfK-1nZoeWpvvGo1_IPowM7i1XoUbzZik-W-ywOs7gRh-TJBG3btkwXszQJiSroSSmLKK7_p-s0dtDClF6A42Fda70dCH0cjsy_t9Hch_g5CBF3vgu4kriAfgUP_qv-nL-XxP6G3b0b-NLsld</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1698034150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Old-Old Subjects with a Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5: The Kurihara Project</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Karger Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nakatsuka, Masahiro ; Nakamura, Kei ; Hamanosono, Ryo ; Takahashi, Yumi ; Kasai, Mari ; Sato, Yuko ; Suto, Teiko ; Nagatomi, Ryoichi ; Meguro, Kenichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakatsuka, Masahiro ; Nakamura, Kei ; Hamanosono, Ryo ; Takahashi, Yumi ; Kasai, Mari ; Sato, Yuko ; Suto, Teiko ; Nagatomi, Ryoichi ; Meguro, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Evidence as to the benefits of nonpharmacological interventions for the boundary state between normal aging and dementia [mild cognitive impairment or a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5] remains weak due to a lack of positive controls. Aims: To directly compare the effects of cognitive interventions (CI), physical activities (PA) and a group reminiscence approach (GRA), we conducted a pilot study on the basis of a cluster randomized controlled trial design. Method: A total of 127 participants aged &gt;74 years with a CDR of 0.5 were cluster randomized into three groups for CI, PA and GRA. The intervention lasted 12 weeks and consisted of weekly group sessions and home assignments. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail Making Test part A (TMT-A), word fluency (WF), 6-meter walk time and Quality of Life (QOL) Face Scale scores were evaluated as primary outcomes. Results: Methodology-related benefits of CI and PA were found for MMSE scores and walk time, respectively. TMT-A, WF and QOL Face Scale scores improved irrespective of the methodologies used. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CI and PA may be beneficial to cognitive and physical abilities, respectively. Executive functions and QOL may improve irrespective of the intervention methodologies used.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1664-5464</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1664-5464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000380816</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26195978</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Clinical Dementia Rating ; Nonpharmacological intervention ; Old-old subjects ; Original ; Original Research Article</subject><ispartof>Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra, 2015-05, Vol.5 (2), p.221-232</ispartof><rights>2015 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 by S. Karger AG, Basel 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-962287b0f2e03fe0226c80ccd5b7f34a2eba666b185d9000d28cd03b2ce35703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-962287b0f2e03fe0226c80ccd5b7f34a2eba666b185d9000d28cd03b2ce35703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7030-1496</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4483494/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4483494/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2101,27634,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26195978$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakatsuka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamanosono, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Yumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasai, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suto, Teiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagatomi, Ryoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguro, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><title>A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Old-Old Subjects with a Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5: The Kurihara Project</title><title>Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra</title><addtitle>Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra</addtitle><description>Background: Evidence as to the benefits of nonpharmacological interventions for the boundary state between normal aging and dementia [mild cognitive impairment or a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5] remains weak due to a lack of positive controls. Aims: To directly compare the effects of cognitive interventions (CI), physical activities (PA) and a group reminiscence approach (GRA), we conducted a pilot study on the basis of a cluster randomized controlled trial design. Method: A total of 127 participants aged &gt;74 years with a CDR of 0.5 were cluster randomized into three groups for CI, PA and GRA. The intervention lasted 12 weeks and consisted of weekly group sessions and home assignments. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail Making Test part A (TMT-A), word fluency (WF), 6-meter walk time and Quality of Life (QOL) Face Scale scores were evaluated as primary outcomes. Results: Methodology-related benefits of CI and PA were found for MMSE scores and walk time, respectively. TMT-A, WF and QOL Face Scale scores improved irrespective of the methodologies used. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CI and PA may be beneficial to cognitive and physical abilities, respectively. Executive functions and QOL may improve irrespective of the intervention methodologies used.</description><subject>Clinical Dementia Rating</subject><subject>Nonpharmacological intervention</subject><subject>Old-old subjects</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Research Article</subject><issn>1664-5464</issn><issn>1664-5464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M--</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEolXpgTtClrjAIcXxV2wOlartAisqimDvluNMdr048WInRfBX-LN4u2XVShwsWzPPvO_YnqJ4XuGzquLqLcaYSiwr8ag4roRgJWeCPb53PipOU9pkDHOumGJPiyMiKsVVLY-LPxdo5qc0QkRfzdCG3v2GFs3CMMbgfT4uozMehQ59DsN2bWJvbPBh5WyOLoZcdwPD6MKQUBciuvZtmRf6NjUbsGNCP924RiZ7uOG25BL6HW-y2-iG1U4Yn_F3aLkG9GmKLjsY9CWGXfWz4klnfILTu_2kWL6fL2cfy6vrD4vZxVVpmcJjqQQhsm5wRwDTDjAhwkpsbcubuqPMEGiMEKKpJG9VfoWWSNti2hALlNeYnhSLvWwbzEZvo-tN_KWDcfo2EOJKmzg660Er0TGoJWlYjZkAUDRrUWkJze68E1nrfK-1nZoeWpvvGo1_IPowM7i1XoUbzZik-W-ywOs7gRh-TJBG3btkwXszQJiSroSSmLKK7_p-s0dtDClF6A42Fda70dCH0cjsy_t9Hch_g5CBF3vgu4kriAfgUP_qv-nL-XxP6G3b0b-NLsld</recordid><startdate>20150530</startdate><enddate>20150530</enddate><creator>Nakatsuka, Masahiro</creator><creator>Nakamura, Kei</creator><creator>Hamanosono, Ryo</creator><creator>Takahashi, Yumi</creator><creator>Kasai, Mari</creator><creator>Sato, Yuko</creator><creator>Suto, Teiko</creator><creator>Nagatomi, Ryoichi</creator><creator>Meguro, Kenichi</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><general>Karger Publishers</general><scope>M--</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-1496</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20150530</creationdate><title>A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Old-Old Subjects with a Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5: The Kurihara Project</title><author>Nakatsuka, Masahiro ; Nakamura, Kei ; Hamanosono, Ryo ; Takahashi, Yumi ; Kasai, Mari ; Sato, Yuko ; Suto, Teiko ; Nagatomi, Ryoichi ; Meguro, Kenichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-962287b0f2e03fe0226c80ccd5b7f34a2eba666b185d9000d28cd03b2ce35703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Clinical Dementia Rating</topic><topic>Nonpharmacological intervention</topic><topic>Old-old subjects</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Research Article</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakatsuka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamanosono, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahashi, Yumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasai, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Yuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suto, Teiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagatomi, Ryoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meguro, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Karger Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakatsuka, Masahiro</au><au>Nakamura, Kei</au><au>Hamanosono, Ryo</au><au>Takahashi, Yumi</au><au>Kasai, Mari</au><au>Sato, Yuko</au><au>Suto, Teiko</au><au>Nagatomi, Ryoichi</au><au>Meguro, Kenichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Old-Old Subjects with a Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5: The Kurihara Project</atitle><jtitle>Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra</jtitle><addtitle>Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Extra</addtitle><date>2015-05-30</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>232</epage><pages>221-232</pages><issn>1664-5464</issn><eissn>1664-5464</eissn><abstract>Background: Evidence as to the benefits of nonpharmacological interventions for the boundary state between normal aging and dementia [mild cognitive impairment or a Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0.5] remains weak due to a lack of positive controls. Aims: To directly compare the effects of cognitive interventions (CI), physical activities (PA) and a group reminiscence approach (GRA), we conducted a pilot study on the basis of a cluster randomized controlled trial design. Method: A total of 127 participants aged &gt;74 years with a CDR of 0.5 were cluster randomized into three groups for CI, PA and GRA. The intervention lasted 12 weeks and consisted of weekly group sessions and home assignments. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Trail Making Test part A (TMT-A), word fluency (WF), 6-meter walk time and Quality of Life (QOL) Face Scale scores were evaluated as primary outcomes. Results: Methodology-related benefits of CI and PA were found for MMSE scores and walk time, respectively. TMT-A, WF and QOL Face Scale scores improved irrespective of the methodologies used. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that CI and PA may be beneficial to cognitive and physical abilities, respectively. Executive functions and QOL may improve irrespective of the intervention methodologies used.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>26195978</pmid><doi>10.1159/000380816</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7030-1496</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1664-5464
ispartof Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders extra, 2015-05, Vol.5 (2), p.221-232
issn 1664-5464
1664-5464
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_380816
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Karger Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Clinical Dementia Rating
Nonpharmacological intervention
Old-old subjects
Original
Original Research Article
title A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Nonpharmacological Interventions for Old-Old Subjects with a Clinical Dementia Rating of 0.5: The Kurihara Project
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A17%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Cluster%20Randomized%20Controlled%20Trial%20of%20Nonpharmacological%20Interventions%20for%20Old-Old%20Subjects%20with%20a%20Clinical%20Dementia%20Rating%20of%200.5:%20The%20Kurihara%20Project&rft.jtitle=Dementia%20and%20geriatric%20cognitive%20disorders%20extra&rft.au=Nakatsuka,%20Masahiro&rft.date=2015-05-30&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=232&rft.pages=221-232&rft.issn=1664-5464&rft.eissn=1664-5464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000380816&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E1698034150%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1698034150&rft_id=info:pmid/26195978&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_96f4e782b47046ee9328c38c230f25f6&rfr_iscdi=true