Limitations of Sniff Nasal Pressure as an Outcome Measurement in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients in a Clinical Trial

Background: The forced vital capacity (FVC) is an established measure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical trials. Recently the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) test has been increasingly used as a respiratory measure. Objectives: It was the aim of this study to assess the feasibil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiration 2012-01, Vol.84 (4), p.306-311
Hauptverfasser: Bauer, M., Czell, D., Hartmann, S., Goldman, B., Müller, D., Weber, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: The forced vital capacity (FVC) is an established measure in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) clinical trials. Recently the sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) test has been increasingly used as a respiratory measure. Objectives: It was the aim of this study to assess the feasibility of SNIP as an outcome measure in a phase III clinical trial with a lead-in design. Methods: Twenty patients were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial. FVC, SNIP in sitting (SNIPsitt) and supine (SNIPsup) positions, and the ALS functional rating scale score (ALSFRS-R) were measured every 4 weeks. Results: Complete data were available for 19 patients over 5 months. Baseline values were normal for FVC (101 ± 14%) but abnormal for SNIPsitt and SNIPsup (84 ± 34% and 82 ± 33%). While FVC and ALSFRS-R declined in parallel, SNIPsitt measures declined significantly less compared to ALSFRS-R (p < 0.05) and FVC (p < 0.001) up to 4 months after enrollment. Over 50% of patients still had values equal to or above baseline SNIPsitt measures after 3 months despite abnormal baseline values. Conclusions: The delayed decline in SNIP measurements suggests a learning effect over time. The optimal number of SNIPs in ALS clinical trials has yet to be determined. SNIP measures should be used with caution in trials with a lead-in design.
ISSN:0025-7931
1423-0356
DOI:10.1159/000339415