On Some Novel Aspects of Consanguineous Marriages
Consanguineous marriages, often viewed as incestuous and objectionable, are more widespread than commonly perceived. They integrate multiple facets of human adaptation: economic, cultural and genetic. The widely touted explanation for the origin and persistence of consanguinity is that it provides m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Community genetics 2011-01, Vol.14 (3), p.162-168 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 168 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 162 |
container_title | Community genetics |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Denic, S. Nagelkerke, N. Agarwal, M.M. |
description | Consanguineous marriages, often viewed as incestuous and objectionable, are more widespread than commonly perceived. They integrate multiple facets of human adaptation: economic, cultural and genetic. The widely touted explanation for the origin and persistence of consanguinity is that it provides many socioeconomic benefits; however, this view may be too simplistic. The bias against consanguinity may preclude an objective understanding of this sociobiological puzzle. Inbreeding increases the speed of selection of beneficial recessive and co-dominant alleles, e.g. those that protect against diseases. In populations endemic with malaria, the prevalence of consanguineous marriages and the frequency of alleles protective against malaria are both very high. Thus, consanguinity could theoretically increase the relative fitness of a population under specific ecological conditions; sometimes, the overall genetic benefits may exceed genetic costs of inbreeding. We discuss some recent evidence from studies on inbreeding along with the reasons responsible for the mating strategy found in some human populations. We contend that a better appreciation of our inherent biases and potential genetic benefits of inbreeding in specific ecological conditions would help us to appreciate the wider picture of consanguinity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000321771 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_321771</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26776996</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26776996</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-12d3c65072e17d00efa3e8fcb300164693a425db47b429cc6494610cc98420c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0D1PwzAQBmALgWgpDOyAIhbEEDh_5ByPVcWXVOgAzJHjOlVKGhc7QeLfE0gpEpNPuufOp5eQYwpXlCbqGgA4o1LSHTKkiCxOAfnuphZM4IAchLAEQIGA-2TAujGgmA4JndXRs1vZ6Ml92Coah7U1TYhcEU1cHXS9aMvaujZEj9r7Ui9sOCR7ha6CPdq8I_J6e_MyuY-ns7uHyXgaG56IJqZszg0mIJmlcg5gC81tWpicQ_ezQMW1YMk8FzIXTBmDQgmkYIxKBQPD-Yhc9HvX3r23NjTZqgzGVpX-OShLUQqZphQ7ef5PLl3r6-64TCWgeKqk6tBlj4x3IXhbZGtfrrT_zChk3ylm2xQ7e7ZZ2OYrO9_K39g6cNKDN-0X1m_Bdv60by9D4_66DKVEpZB_Aejfe40</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>950938979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On Some Novel Aspects of Consanguineous Marriages</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Karger Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Denic, S. ; Nagelkerke, N. ; Agarwal, M.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Denic, S. ; Nagelkerke, N. ; Agarwal, M.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Consanguineous marriages, often viewed as incestuous and objectionable, are more widespread than commonly perceived. They integrate multiple facets of human adaptation: economic, cultural and genetic. The widely touted explanation for the origin and persistence of consanguinity is that it provides many socioeconomic benefits; however, this view may be too simplistic. The bias against consanguinity may preclude an objective understanding of this sociobiological puzzle. Inbreeding increases the speed of selection of beneficial recessive and co-dominant alleles, e.g. those that protect against diseases. In populations endemic with malaria, the prevalence of consanguineous marriages and the frequency of alleles protective against malaria are both very high. Thus, consanguinity could theoretically increase the relative fitness of a population under specific ecological conditions; sometimes, the overall genetic benefits may exceed genetic costs of inbreeding. We discuss some recent evidence from studies on inbreeding along with the reasons responsible for the mating strategy found in some human populations. We contend that a better appreciation of our inherent biases and potential genetic benefits of inbreeding in specific ecological conditions would help us to appreciate the wider picture of consanguinity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1662-4246</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1662-8063</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000321771</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21150168</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Consanguinity ; Ecological conditions ; Female ; Human populations ; Humans ; Inbreeding ; Malaria ; Male ; Review ; Vector-borne diseases</subject><ispartof>Community genetics, 2011-01, Vol.14 (3), p.162-168</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2010 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-12d3c65072e17d00efa3e8fcb300164693a425db47b429cc6494610cc98420c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-12d3c65072e17d00efa3e8fcb300164693a425db47b429cc6494610cc98420c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26776996$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26776996$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,2429,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21150168$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Denic, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagelkerke, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, M.M.</creatorcontrib><title>On Some Novel Aspects of Consanguineous Marriages</title><title>Community genetics</title><addtitle>Public Health Genomics</addtitle><description>Consanguineous marriages, often viewed as incestuous and objectionable, are more widespread than commonly perceived. They integrate multiple facets of human adaptation: economic, cultural and genetic. The widely touted explanation for the origin and persistence of consanguinity is that it provides many socioeconomic benefits; however, this view may be too simplistic. The bias against consanguinity may preclude an objective understanding of this sociobiological puzzle. Inbreeding increases the speed of selection of beneficial recessive and co-dominant alleles, e.g. those that protect against diseases. In populations endemic with malaria, the prevalence of consanguineous marriages and the frequency of alleles protective against malaria are both very high. Thus, consanguinity could theoretically increase the relative fitness of a population under specific ecological conditions; sometimes, the overall genetic benefits may exceed genetic costs of inbreeding. We discuss some recent evidence from studies on inbreeding along with the reasons responsible for the mating strategy found in some human populations. We contend that a better appreciation of our inherent biases and potential genetic benefits of inbreeding in specific ecological conditions would help us to appreciate the wider picture of consanguinity.</description><subject>Consanguinity</subject><subject>Ecological conditions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human populations</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inbreeding</subject><subject>Malaria</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><issn>1662-4246</issn><issn>1662-8063</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0D1PwzAQBmALgWgpDOyAIhbEEDh_5ByPVcWXVOgAzJHjOlVKGhc7QeLfE0gpEpNPuufOp5eQYwpXlCbqGgA4o1LSHTKkiCxOAfnuphZM4IAchLAEQIGA-2TAujGgmA4JndXRs1vZ6Ml92Coah7U1TYhcEU1cHXS9aMvaujZEj9r7Ui9sOCR7ha6CPdq8I_J6e_MyuY-ns7uHyXgaG56IJqZszg0mIJmlcg5gC81tWpicQ_ezQMW1YMk8FzIXTBmDQgmkYIxKBQPD-Yhc9HvX3r23NjTZqgzGVpX-OShLUQqZphQ7ef5PLl3r6-64TCWgeKqk6tBlj4x3IXhbZGtfrrT_zChk3ylm2xQ7e7ZZ2OYrO9_K39g6cNKDN-0X1m_Bdv60by9D4_66DKVEpZB_Aejfe40</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Denic, S.</creator><creator>Nagelkerke, N.</creator><creator>Agarwal, M.M.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>On Some Novel Aspects of Consanguineous Marriages</title><author>Denic, S. ; Nagelkerke, N. ; Agarwal, M.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-12d3c65072e17d00efa3e8fcb300164693a425db47b429cc6494610cc98420c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Consanguinity</topic><topic>Ecological conditions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human populations</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inbreeding</topic><topic>Malaria</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Denic, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagelkerke, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agarwal, M.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Community genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Denic, S.</au><au>Nagelkerke, N.</au><au>Agarwal, M.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On Some Novel Aspects of Consanguineous Marriages</atitle><jtitle>Community genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Public Health Genomics</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>162-168</pages><issn>1662-4246</issn><eissn>1662-8063</eissn><abstract>Consanguineous marriages, often viewed as incestuous and objectionable, are more widespread than commonly perceived. They integrate multiple facets of human adaptation: economic, cultural and genetic. The widely touted explanation for the origin and persistence of consanguinity is that it provides many socioeconomic benefits; however, this view may be too simplistic. The bias against consanguinity may preclude an objective understanding of this sociobiological puzzle. Inbreeding increases the speed of selection of beneficial recessive and co-dominant alleles, e.g. those that protect against diseases. In populations endemic with malaria, the prevalence of consanguineous marriages and the frequency of alleles protective against malaria are both very high. Thus, consanguinity could theoretically increase the relative fitness of a population under specific ecological conditions; sometimes, the overall genetic benefits may exceed genetic costs of inbreeding. We discuss some recent evidence from studies on inbreeding along with the reasons responsible for the mating strategy found in some human populations. We contend that a better appreciation of our inherent biases and potential genetic benefits of inbreeding in specific ecological conditions would help us to appreciate the wider picture of consanguinity.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>21150168</pmid><doi>10.1159/000321771</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1662-4246 |
ispartof | Community genetics, 2011-01, Vol.14 (3), p.162-168 |
issn | 1662-4246 1662-8063 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_karger_primary_321771 |
source | MEDLINE; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Karger Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Consanguinity Ecological conditions Female Human populations Humans Inbreeding Malaria Male Review Vector-borne diseases |
title | On Some Novel Aspects of Consanguineous Marriages |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T12%3A24%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20Some%20Novel%20Aspects%20of%20Consanguineous%20Marriages&rft.jtitle=Community%20genetics&rft.au=Denic,%20S.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=162-168&rft.issn=1662-4246&rft.eissn=1662-8063&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000321771&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_karge%3E26776996%3C/jstor_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=950938979&rft_id=info:pmid/21150168&rft_jstor_id=26776996&rfr_iscdi=true |