Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence: A Review
Impulsivity can be defined as choosing a smaller, immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward. From this perspective, addictive behaviors such as substance abuse and pathological gambling reflect a series of impulsive choices. However, impulsivity is not a homogeneous construct. Laboratory measur...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European addiction research 2011-01, Vol.17 (2), p.64-71 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 71 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 64 |
container_title | European addiction research |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Aragues, M. Jurado, R. Quinto, R. Rubio, G. |
description | Impulsivity can be defined as choosing a smaller, immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward. From this perspective, addictive behaviors such as substance abuse and pathological gambling reflect a series of impulsive choices. However, impulsivity is not a homogeneous construct. Laboratory measures of impulsivity reflect two types of processes. The first is related to behavioral inhibition and refers to an individual’s ability to appropriately inhibit thoughts or actions. The second is the delay of reward dimension, namely the degree to which immediate (rewarding) consequences have more control over an individual’s behavior than consequences that are delayed. In this review, we describe how alcohol is associated with significant impairments in these paradigms. We also suggest that they may have a role in the development of alcohol dependence. These results are in agreement with a model in which delay of gratification might be a marker for early use and/or abuse of alcohol, whereas impairment in behavioral inhibition might be a marker for maintained use in time and, therefore, for progression towards alcohol dependence. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000321345 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_321345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26790538</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26790538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-bf00f390b6f8e60da84f6fc01b45d827c2219b2050712d15e87f09ebf33acf253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgitPpwbtK8SIeqi9J06Texvw1GOhBzyVtk9nZNjVphf33RjoreMqDfL6PxxehEwzXGLPkBgAowTRiO-gARwSHiUjwrp-BkDAWnE_QoXNrAI8530cT4mNAgB2g26XMjJWdsZvgRVpZlKvaBUYHi7rtK1d-ld0mkE0RzKrcvJsquFOtagrV5OoI7WlZOXW8fafo7eH-df4ULp8fF_PZMswpi7ow0wCaJpDFWqgYCikiHesccBaxQhCeE4KTzB8DHJMCMyW4hkRlmlKZa8LoFF0Oe1trPnvlurQuXa6qSjbK9C4VDEdcCC68vPgn16a3jT_OI8ajOKLYo6sB5dY4Z5VOW1vW0m5SDOlPnelYp7fn24V9VqtilL_9eXA6gA9pV8qOYMyfDd9r5xv-i8c88WFBvwGThH_p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>855746431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence: A Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Karger Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Aragues, M. ; Jurado, R. ; Quinto, R. ; Rubio, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aragues, M. ; Jurado, R. ; Quinto, R. ; Rubio, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Impulsivity can be defined as choosing a smaller, immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward. From this perspective, addictive behaviors such as substance abuse and pathological gambling reflect a series of impulsive choices. However, impulsivity is not a homogeneous construct. Laboratory measures of impulsivity reflect two types of processes. The first is related to behavioral inhibition and refers to an individual’s ability to appropriately inhibit thoughts or actions. The second is the delay of reward dimension, namely the degree to which immediate (rewarding) consequences have more control over an individual’s behavior than consequences that are delayed. In this review, we describe how alcohol is associated with significant impairments in these paradigms. We also suggest that they may have a role in the development of alcohol dependence. These results are in agreement with a model in which delay of gratification might be a marker for early use and/or abuse of alcohol, whereas impairment in behavioral inhibition might be a marker for maintained use in time and, therefore, for progression towards alcohol dependence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1022-6877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000321345</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21150205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Addictive behaviors ; Alcohol use ; Alcoholism - psychology ; Behavior, Addictive - psychology ; Drug abuse ; Gambling ; Humans ; Impulsive Behavior - psychology ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Measurement ; Psychomotor Performance ; Research Design ; Review ; Reward</subject><ispartof>European addiction research, 2011-01, Vol.17 (2), p.64-71</ispartof><rights>2010 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright S. Karger AG 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-bf00f390b6f8e60da84f6fc01b45d827c2219b2050712d15e87f09ebf33acf253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-bf00f390b6f8e60da84f6fc01b45d827c2219b2050712d15e87f09ebf33acf253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26790538$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26790538$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,2425,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21150205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aragues, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurado, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinto, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence: A Review</title><title>European addiction research</title><addtitle>Eur Addict Res</addtitle><description>Impulsivity can be defined as choosing a smaller, immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward. From this perspective, addictive behaviors such as substance abuse and pathological gambling reflect a series of impulsive choices. However, impulsivity is not a homogeneous construct. Laboratory measures of impulsivity reflect two types of processes. The first is related to behavioral inhibition and refers to an individual’s ability to appropriately inhibit thoughts or actions. The second is the delay of reward dimension, namely the degree to which immediate (rewarding) consequences have more control over an individual’s behavior than consequences that are delayed. In this review, we describe how alcohol is associated with significant impairments in these paradigms. We also suggest that they may have a role in the development of alcohol dependence. These results are in agreement with a model in which delay of gratification might be a marker for early use and/or abuse of alcohol, whereas impairment in behavioral inhibition might be a marker for maintained use in time and, therefore, for progression towards alcohol dependence.</description><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Alcoholism - psychology</subject><subject>Behavior, Addictive - psychology</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Gambling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impulsive Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reward</subject><issn>1022-6877</issn><issn>1421-9891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgitPpwbtK8SIeqi9J06Texvw1GOhBzyVtk9nZNjVphf33RjoreMqDfL6PxxehEwzXGLPkBgAowTRiO-gARwSHiUjwrp-BkDAWnE_QoXNrAI8530cT4mNAgB2g26XMjJWdsZvgRVpZlKvaBUYHi7rtK1d-ld0mkE0RzKrcvJsquFOtagrV5OoI7WlZOXW8fafo7eH-df4ULp8fF_PZMswpi7ow0wCaJpDFWqgYCikiHesccBaxQhCeE4KTzB8DHJMCMyW4hkRlmlKZa8LoFF0Oe1trPnvlurQuXa6qSjbK9C4VDEdcCC68vPgn16a3jT_OI8ajOKLYo6sB5dY4Z5VOW1vW0m5SDOlPnelYp7fn24V9VqtilL_9eXA6gA9pV8qOYMyfDd9r5xv-i8c88WFBvwGThH_p</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Aragues, M.</creator><creator>Jurado, R.</creator><creator>Quinto, R.</creator><creator>Rubio, G.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence</title><author>Aragues, M. ; Jurado, R. ; Quinto, R. ; Rubio, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-bf00f390b6f8e60da84f6fc01b45d827c2219b2050712d15e87f09ebf33acf253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Alcoholism - psychology</topic><topic>Behavior, Addictive - psychology</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Gambling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impulsive Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reward</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aragues, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurado, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinto, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European addiction research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aragues, M.</au><au>Jurado, R.</au><au>Quinto, R.</au><au>Rubio, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence: A Review</atitle><jtitle>European addiction research</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Addict Res</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>64-71</pages><issn>1022-6877</issn><eissn>1421-9891</eissn><abstract>Impulsivity can be defined as choosing a smaller, immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward. From this perspective, addictive behaviors such as substance abuse and pathological gambling reflect a series of impulsive choices. However, impulsivity is not a homogeneous construct. Laboratory measures of impulsivity reflect two types of processes. The first is related to behavioral inhibition and refers to an individual’s ability to appropriately inhibit thoughts or actions. The second is the delay of reward dimension, namely the degree to which immediate (rewarding) consequences have more control over an individual’s behavior than consequences that are delayed. In this review, we describe how alcohol is associated with significant impairments in these paradigms. We also suggest that they may have a role in the development of alcohol dependence. These results are in agreement with a model in which delay of gratification might be a marker for early use and/or abuse of alcohol, whereas impairment in behavioral inhibition might be a marker for maintained use in time and, therefore, for progression towards alcohol dependence.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>21150205</pmid><doi>10.1159/000321345</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1022-6877 |
ispartof | European addiction research, 2011-01, Vol.17 (2), p.64-71 |
issn | 1022-6877 1421-9891 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_karger_primary_321345 |
source | MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; Karger Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Addictive behaviors Alcohol use Alcoholism - psychology Behavior, Addictive - psychology Drug abuse Gambling Humans Impulsive Behavior - psychology Inhibition (Psychology) Measurement Psychomotor Performance Research Design Review Reward |
title | Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence: A Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T23%3A18%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laboratory%20Paradigms%20of%20Impulsivity%20and%20Alcohol%20Dependence:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=European%20addiction%20research&rft.au=Aragues,%20M.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=64-71&rft.issn=1022-6877&rft.eissn=1421-9891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000321345&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_karge%3E26790538%3C/jstor_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=855746431&rft_id=info:pmid/21150205&rft_jstor_id=26790538&rfr_iscdi=true |