Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence: A Review

Impulsivity can be defined as choosing a smaller, immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward. From this perspective, addictive behaviors such as substance abuse and pathological gambling reflect a series of impulsive choices. However, impulsivity is not a homogeneous construct. Laboratory measur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European addiction research 2011-01, Vol.17 (2), p.64-71
Hauptverfasser: Aragues, M., Jurado, R., Quinto, R., Rubio, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 71
container_issue 2
container_start_page 64
container_title European addiction research
container_volume 17
creator Aragues, M.
Jurado, R.
Quinto, R.
Rubio, G.
description Impulsivity can be defined as choosing a smaller, immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward. From this perspective, addictive behaviors such as substance abuse and pathological gambling reflect a series of impulsive choices. However, impulsivity is not a homogeneous construct. Laboratory measures of impulsivity reflect two types of processes. The first is related to behavioral inhibition and refers to an individual’s ability to appropriately inhibit thoughts or actions. The second is the delay of reward dimension, namely the degree to which immediate (rewarding) consequences have more control over an individual’s behavior than consequences that are delayed. In this review, we describe how alcohol is associated with significant impairments in these paradigms. We also suggest that they may have a role in the development of alcohol dependence. These results are in agreement with a model in which delay of gratification might be a marker for early use and/or abuse of alcohol, whereas impairment in behavioral inhibition might be a marker for maintained use in time and, therefore, for progression towards alcohol dependence.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000321345
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_321345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26790538</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26790538</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-bf00f390b6f8e60da84f6fc01b45d827c2219b2050712d15e87f09ebf33acf253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgitPpwbtK8SIeqi9J06Texvw1GOhBzyVtk9nZNjVphf33RjoreMqDfL6PxxehEwzXGLPkBgAowTRiO-gARwSHiUjwrp-BkDAWnE_QoXNrAI8530cT4mNAgB2g26XMjJWdsZvgRVpZlKvaBUYHi7rtK1d-ld0mkE0RzKrcvJsquFOtagrV5OoI7WlZOXW8fafo7eH-df4ULp8fF_PZMswpi7ow0wCaJpDFWqgYCikiHesccBaxQhCeE4KTzB8DHJMCMyW4hkRlmlKZa8LoFF0Oe1trPnvlurQuXa6qSjbK9C4VDEdcCC68vPgn16a3jT_OI8ajOKLYo6sB5dY4Z5VOW1vW0m5SDOlPnelYp7fn24V9VqtilL_9eXA6gA9pV8qOYMyfDd9r5xv-i8c88WFBvwGThH_p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>855746431</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence: A Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Karger Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Aragues, M. ; Jurado, R. ; Quinto, R. ; Rubio, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Aragues, M. ; Jurado, R. ; Quinto, R. ; Rubio, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Impulsivity can be defined as choosing a smaller, immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward. From this perspective, addictive behaviors such as substance abuse and pathological gambling reflect a series of impulsive choices. However, impulsivity is not a homogeneous construct. Laboratory measures of impulsivity reflect two types of processes. The first is related to behavioral inhibition and refers to an individual’s ability to appropriately inhibit thoughts or actions. The second is the delay of reward dimension, namely the degree to which immediate (rewarding) consequences have more control over an individual’s behavior than consequences that are delayed. In this review, we describe how alcohol is associated with significant impairments in these paradigms. We also suggest that they may have a role in the development of alcohol dependence. These results are in agreement with a model in which delay of gratification might be a marker for early use and/or abuse of alcohol, whereas impairment in behavioral inhibition might be a marker for maintained use in time and, therefore, for progression towards alcohol dependence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1022-6877</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9891</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000321345</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21150205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Addictive behaviors ; Alcohol use ; Alcoholism - psychology ; Behavior, Addictive - psychology ; Drug abuse ; Gambling ; Humans ; Impulsive Behavior - psychology ; Inhibition (Psychology) ; Measurement ; Psychomotor Performance ; Research Design ; Review ; Reward</subject><ispartof>European addiction research, 2011-01, Vol.17 (2), p.64-71</ispartof><rights>2010 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright S. Karger AG 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-bf00f390b6f8e60da84f6fc01b45d827c2219b2050712d15e87f09ebf33acf253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-bf00f390b6f8e60da84f6fc01b45d827c2219b2050712d15e87f09ebf33acf253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26790538$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26790538$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,801,2425,27911,27912,58004,58237</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21150205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aragues, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurado, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinto, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio, G.</creatorcontrib><title>Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence: A Review</title><title>European addiction research</title><addtitle>Eur Addict Res</addtitle><description>Impulsivity can be defined as choosing a smaller, immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward. From this perspective, addictive behaviors such as substance abuse and pathological gambling reflect a series of impulsive choices. However, impulsivity is not a homogeneous construct. Laboratory measures of impulsivity reflect two types of processes. The first is related to behavioral inhibition and refers to an individual’s ability to appropriately inhibit thoughts or actions. The second is the delay of reward dimension, namely the degree to which immediate (rewarding) consequences have more control over an individual’s behavior than consequences that are delayed. In this review, we describe how alcohol is associated with significant impairments in these paradigms. We also suggest that they may have a role in the development of alcohol dependence. These results are in agreement with a model in which delay of gratification might be a marker for early use and/or abuse of alcohol, whereas impairment in behavioral inhibition might be a marker for maintained use in time and, therefore, for progression towards alcohol dependence.</description><subject>Addictive behaviors</subject><subject>Alcohol use</subject><subject>Alcoholism - psychology</subject><subject>Behavior, Addictive - psychology</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Gambling</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Impulsive Behavior - psychology</subject><subject>Inhibition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Reward</subject><issn>1022-6877</issn><issn>1421-9891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0M9LwzAUB_AgitPpwbtK8SIeqi9J06Texvw1GOhBzyVtk9nZNjVphf33RjoreMqDfL6PxxehEwzXGLPkBgAowTRiO-gARwSHiUjwrp-BkDAWnE_QoXNrAI8530cT4mNAgB2g26XMjJWdsZvgRVpZlKvaBUYHi7rtK1d-ld0mkE0RzKrcvJsquFOtagrV5OoI7WlZOXW8fafo7eH-df4ULp8fF_PZMswpi7ow0wCaJpDFWqgYCikiHesccBaxQhCeE4KTzB8DHJMCMyW4hkRlmlKZa8LoFF0Oe1trPnvlurQuXa6qSjbK9C4VDEdcCC68vPgn16a3jT_OI8ajOKLYo6sB5dY4Z5VOW1vW0m5SDOlPnelYp7fn24V9VqtilL_9eXA6gA9pV8qOYMyfDd9r5xv-i8c88WFBvwGThH_p</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Aragues, M.</creator><creator>Jurado, R.</creator><creator>Quinto, R.</creator><creator>Rubio, G.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence</title><author>Aragues, M. ; Jurado, R. ; Quinto, R. ; Rubio, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-bf00f390b6f8e60da84f6fc01b45d827c2219b2050712d15e87f09ebf33acf253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Addictive behaviors</topic><topic>Alcohol use</topic><topic>Alcoholism - psychology</topic><topic>Behavior, Addictive - psychology</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Gambling</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Impulsive Behavior - psychology</topic><topic>Inhibition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Reward</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aragues, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurado, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinto, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European addiction research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aragues, M.</au><au>Jurado, R.</au><au>Quinto, R.</au><au>Rubio, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence: A Review</atitle><jtitle>European addiction research</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Addict Res</addtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>64-71</pages><issn>1022-6877</issn><eissn>1421-9891</eissn><abstract>Impulsivity can be defined as choosing a smaller, immediate reward over a larger, delayed reward. From this perspective, addictive behaviors such as substance abuse and pathological gambling reflect a series of impulsive choices. However, impulsivity is not a homogeneous construct. Laboratory measures of impulsivity reflect two types of processes. The first is related to behavioral inhibition and refers to an individual’s ability to appropriately inhibit thoughts or actions. The second is the delay of reward dimension, namely the degree to which immediate (rewarding) consequences have more control over an individual’s behavior than consequences that are delayed. In this review, we describe how alcohol is associated with significant impairments in these paradigms. We also suggest that they may have a role in the development of alcohol dependence. These results are in agreement with a model in which delay of gratification might be a marker for early use and/or abuse of alcohol, whereas impairment in behavioral inhibition might be a marker for maintained use in time and, therefore, for progression towards alcohol dependence.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>21150205</pmid><doi>10.1159/000321345</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1022-6877
ispartof European addiction research, 2011-01, Vol.17 (2), p.64-71
issn 1022-6877
1421-9891
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_321345
source MEDLINE; Jstor Complete Legacy; Karger Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Addictive behaviors
Alcohol use
Alcoholism - psychology
Behavior, Addictive - psychology
Drug abuse
Gambling
Humans
Impulsive Behavior - psychology
Inhibition (Psychology)
Measurement
Psychomotor Performance
Research Design
Review
Reward
title Laboratory Paradigms of Impulsivity and Alcohol Dependence: A Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T23%3A18%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laboratory%20Paradigms%20of%20Impulsivity%20and%20Alcohol%20Dependence:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=European%20addiction%20research&rft.au=Aragues,%20M.&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=64-71&rft.issn=1022-6877&rft.eissn=1421-9891&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000321345&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_karge%3E26790538%3C/jstor_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=855746431&rft_id=info:pmid/21150205&rft_jstor_id=26790538&rfr_iscdi=true