Sexual Impairment in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery for Genital Prolapse: A Hospital-Based Cohort Study
Introduction: No data regarding sexuality following laparoscopic prolapse surgery are available to date. Our hypothesis is that laparoscopic sacropexy does not influence sexuality negatively, whereas concomitant (vaginal) surgery negatively influences sexuality. Methods: Participants were 132 patien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urologia internationalis 2010-01, Vol.85 (4), p.447-454 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction: No data regarding sexuality following laparoscopic prolapse surgery are available to date. Our hypothesis is that laparoscopic sacropexy does not influence sexuality negatively, whereas concomitant (vaginal) surgery negatively influences sexuality. Methods: Participants were 132 patients who underwent laparoscopic sacropexy. We compared pre- and postoperative sexual scores by 2 validated questionnaires. Results: The response rate was 84% (111/132). No change in sexual activity was reported after surgery. In the sexually active group (56.8%; 63/111) the impairment of sexuality was significantly reduced in all age groups independently of concomitant vaginal surgery. In the sexually inactive group, only 4.3% (2/48) were inactive because of vaginal symptoms before operation. After the operation these patients stayed inactive; however, 1 reported reasons unrelated to prolapse. Conclusions: Laparoscopic prolapse surgery reduces sexual impairment in sexually active patients. There appears to be no benefit for patients who are not sexually active for reasons related to the prolapse. Concomitant surgery does not affect sexual activity. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0042-1138 1423-0399 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000316406 |