Thick Loop Transurethral Resection of the Prostate

Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new resection loops for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). These loops, which are both thicker and have a modified shape, allow simultaneous resection, increased tissue vaporization, and improved hemostasis. Methods: Two open studie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European urology 1999-02, Vol.35 (2), p.161-165
Hauptverfasser: Perlmutter, AaronP, Vallancien, Guy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 2
container_start_page 161
container_title European urology
container_volume 35
creator Perlmutter, AaronP
Vallancien, Guy
description Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new resection loops for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). These loops, which are both thicker and have a modified shape, allow simultaneous resection, increased tissue vaporization, and improved hemostasis. Methods: Two open studies have been performed with the thick resection loop. In one series, 91 patients underwent TURP with the Vapor Cut (G. Vallancien, Paris), and in another series, 65 patients underwent Wedge (Microvasive, Natick, Mass., USA) resection (A. Perlmutter, New York). Results: At 1 year follow-up, patients who underwent thick loop resection enjoyed the same clinical benefit of thin loop TURP without additional morbidity. Peak urinary flow rate improved to 18.4 and 16.3 cm 3 /s at 1 year with the Vapor Cut and Wedge, respectively. IPSS fell to 7.2 (Vapor Cut) and 6.2 (Wedge). Postoperative bleeding, meatal stenosis, and urethral stricture were noted, but no impotence or incontinence was observed. Conclusions: Thick loop resection offers the advantage of improved surgical vision during resection, thus allowing a more accurate and safer resection. This can be performed with only minor modifications of the standard TURP technique.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000019837
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_19837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69570101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-ebf658342a869029c63e88ed0fb934c9632811fe5b83e713bc1f387248a831143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkD1PwzAQhi0EKqUwMCOkTEgMAV8uTuwRVXxJkUCozJHjnmloWhfbGfj3BFqVW254n3t1ehg7B34DINQtHwaUxPKAjUGWmJai4IdszJFnaSZRHrOTED4HCoXCERsphSiBj1k2W7RmmVTObZKZ1-vQe4oLr7vkjQKZ2Lp14mwSF5S8eheijnTKjqzuAp3t9oS9P9zPpk9p9fL4PL2rUoNKxJQaWwiJeaZloXimTIEkJc25bRTmRhWYSQBLopFIJWBjwKIss1xqiQA5TtjVtnfj3VdPIdarNhjqOr0m14e6UKLkwGEAr7egGT4Mnmy98e1K--8aeP3rp977GdjLXWnfrGi-J3dChvximy-1_yD_3_R3_QOlfGZS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>69570101</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Thick Loop Transurethral Resection of the Prostate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Perlmutter, AaronP ; Vallancien, Guy</creator><creatorcontrib>Perlmutter, AaronP ; Vallancien, Guy</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new resection loops for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). These loops, which are both thicker and have a modified shape, allow simultaneous resection, increased tissue vaporization, and improved hemostasis. Methods: Two open studies have been performed with the thick resection loop. In one series, 91 patients underwent TURP with the Vapor Cut (G. Vallancien, Paris), and in another series, 65 patients underwent Wedge (Microvasive, Natick, Mass., USA) resection (A. Perlmutter, New York). Results: At 1 year follow-up, patients who underwent thick loop resection enjoyed the same clinical benefit of thin loop TURP without additional morbidity. Peak urinary flow rate improved to 18.4 and 16.3 cm 3 /s at 1 year with the Vapor Cut and Wedge, respectively. IPSS fell to 7.2 (Vapor Cut) and 6.2 (Wedge). Postoperative bleeding, meatal stenosis, and urethral stricture were noted, but no impotence or incontinence was observed. Conclusions: Thick loop resection offers the advantage of improved surgical vision during resection, thus allowing a more accurate and safer resection. This can be performed with only minor modifications of the standard TURP technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-2838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-993X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000019837</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9933810</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Alternative Instrumental Treatments in BPH ; Electrosurgery - instrumentation ; Electrosurgery - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</subject><ispartof>European urology, 1999-02, Vol.35 (2), p.161-165</ispartof><rights>1999 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-ebf658342a869029c63e88ed0fb934c9632811fe5b83e713bc1f387248a831143</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2429,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9933810$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Perlmutter, AaronP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallancien, Guy</creatorcontrib><title>Thick Loop Transurethral Resection of the Prostate</title><title>European urology</title><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><description>Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new resection loops for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). These loops, which are both thicker and have a modified shape, allow simultaneous resection, increased tissue vaporization, and improved hemostasis. Methods: Two open studies have been performed with the thick resection loop. In one series, 91 patients underwent TURP with the Vapor Cut (G. Vallancien, Paris), and in another series, 65 patients underwent Wedge (Microvasive, Natick, Mass., USA) resection (A. Perlmutter, New York). Results: At 1 year follow-up, patients who underwent thick loop resection enjoyed the same clinical benefit of thin loop TURP without additional morbidity. Peak urinary flow rate improved to 18.4 and 16.3 cm 3 /s at 1 year with the Vapor Cut and Wedge, respectively. IPSS fell to 7.2 (Vapor Cut) and 6.2 (Wedge). Postoperative bleeding, meatal stenosis, and urethral stricture were noted, but no impotence or incontinence was observed. Conclusions: Thick loop resection offers the advantage of improved surgical vision during resection, thus allowing a more accurate and safer resection. This can be performed with only minor modifications of the standard TURP technique.</description><subject>Alternative Instrumental Treatments in BPH</subject><subject>Electrosurgery - instrumentation</subject><subject>Electrosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</subject><issn>0302-2838</issn><issn>1873-7560</issn><issn>1421-993X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkD1PwzAQhi0EKqUwMCOkTEgMAV8uTuwRVXxJkUCozJHjnmloWhfbGfj3BFqVW254n3t1ehg7B34DINQtHwaUxPKAjUGWmJai4IdszJFnaSZRHrOTED4HCoXCERsphSiBj1k2W7RmmVTObZKZ1-vQe4oLr7vkjQKZ2Lp14mwSF5S8eheijnTKjqzuAp3t9oS9P9zPpk9p9fL4PL2rUoNKxJQaWwiJeaZloXimTIEkJc25bRTmRhWYSQBLopFIJWBjwKIss1xqiQA5TtjVtnfj3VdPIdarNhjqOr0m14e6UKLkwGEAr7egGT4Mnmy98e1K--8aeP3rp977GdjLXWnfrGi-J3dChvximy-1_yD_3_R3_QOlfGZS</recordid><startdate>19990201</startdate><enddate>19990201</enddate><creator>Perlmutter, AaronP</creator><creator>Vallancien, Guy</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990201</creationdate><title>Thick Loop Transurethral Resection of the Prostate</title><author>Perlmutter, AaronP ; Vallancien, Guy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-ebf658342a869029c63e88ed0fb934c9632811fe5b83e713bc1f387248a831143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Alternative Instrumental Treatments in BPH</topic><topic>Electrosurgery - instrumentation</topic><topic>Electrosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Perlmutter, AaronP</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vallancien, Guy</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Perlmutter, AaronP</au><au>Vallancien, Guy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Thick Loop Transurethral Resection of the Prostate</atitle><jtitle>European urology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Urol</addtitle><date>1999-02-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>161</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>161-165</pages><issn>0302-2838</issn><eissn>1873-7560</eissn><eissn>1421-993X</eissn><abstract>Objectives: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new resection loops for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). These loops, which are both thicker and have a modified shape, allow simultaneous resection, increased tissue vaporization, and improved hemostasis. Methods: Two open studies have been performed with the thick resection loop. In one series, 91 patients underwent TURP with the Vapor Cut (G. Vallancien, Paris), and in another series, 65 patients underwent Wedge (Microvasive, Natick, Mass., USA) resection (A. Perlmutter, New York). Results: At 1 year follow-up, patients who underwent thick loop resection enjoyed the same clinical benefit of thin loop TURP without additional morbidity. Peak urinary flow rate improved to 18.4 and 16.3 cm 3 /s at 1 year with the Vapor Cut and Wedge, respectively. IPSS fell to 7.2 (Vapor Cut) and 6.2 (Wedge). Postoperative bleeding, meatal stenosis, and urethral stricture were noted, but no impotence or incontinence was observed. Conclusions: Thick loop resection offers the advantage of improved surgical vision during resection, thus allowing a more accurate and safer resection. This can be performed with only minor modifications of the standard TURP technique.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>9933810</pmid><doi>10.1159/000019837</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-2838
ispartof European urology, 1999-02, Vol.35 (2), p.161-165
issn 0302-2838
1873-7560
1421-993X
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_19837
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals
subjects Alternative Instrumental Treatments in BPH
Electrosurgery - instrumentation
Electrosurgery - methods
Humans
Male
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery
title Thick Loop Transurethral Resection of the Prostate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T09%3A07%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Thick%20Loop%20Transurethral%20Resection%20of%20the%20Prostate&rft.jtitle=European%20urology&rft.au=Perlmutter,%20AaronP&rft.date=1999-02-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=161&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=161-165&rft.issn=0302-2838&rft.eissn=1873-7560&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000019837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E69570101%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=69570101&rft_id=info:pmid/9933810&rfr_iscdi=true