Awareness and Knowledge of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Parkinson’s Disease among German Neurologists
Background/Aims: With increasing diagnostic and therapeutic options of Parkinsonian syndromes (PS), evidence-based medicine clinical practice guidelines for Parkinson’s disease and related disorders have been published. This study evaluates the awareness and the knowledge of the German practice guid...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European neurology 2009-01, Vol.61 (4), p.216-222 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 222 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 216 |
| container_title | European neurology |
| container_volume | 61 |
| creator | Eggert, Karla Larisch, Astrid Dodel, Richard Bormann, Cornelia Oertel, Wolfgang H. |
| description | Background/Aims: With increasing diagnostic and therapeutic options of Parkinsonian syndromes (PS), evidence-based medicine clinical practice guidelines for Parkinson’s disease and related disorders have been published. This study evaluates the awareness and the knowledge of the German practice guideline for Parkinson’s disease among neurologists. Methods: The cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in 2005 in Germany on a survey of 181 neurologists in private practice. Results: 53.1% (n = 95) of the participants specified to be aware of the guideline. A low level of knowledge was reported in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for motor and nonmotor complications (including depression and dementia), and in the diagnostic features of atypical PS. Neurologists who were aware of the guideline had a significantly better knowledge of the different clinical features of idiopathic (94.7 vs. 84.3%; p = 0.023) versus nonidiopathic (88.3 vs. 77.1%; p = 0.048) PS in general, and specifically of multiple system atrophy (54.3 vs. 36.1%; p = 0.016) as well as of characteristics concerning increased daytime sleepiness (95.7 vs. 86.7%; p = 0.032). Conclusion: The awareness and the knowledge of the guideline in everyday medical practice are still limited. Future interventions for a better implementation must include strategies which are suitable to modify behavior patterns. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000197106 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_197106</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67019110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ea02e2c4fe1f535ecfc801c9ef2f27a123dd1b7f5993bebda515edb50403eb333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0cFO3DAQBmCrApUt9NA7QlYPlXpI8dhxgo-rbbtUoMKhPUeOM14MiQ12IsSN1-jr8SQ17KpFXDiNPPo80sxPyAdgXwCkOmSMgaqBVW_IDEoOhVIgtsgst8tCMM53yLuULvNTqvroLdkBBXWlKj4jw_xWR_SYEtW-oyc-3PbYrZAGS8cLpIveeWd0T8-jNqMzSJeT6zB3M_H0XMcr51PwD_d_Ev3qEuqEVA_Br-gS46A9_YlTDH1YuTSmPbJtdZ_w_abukt_fv_1aHBenZ8sfi_lpYUTFxwI148hNaRGsFBKNNUcMjELLLa81cNF10NZWKiVabDstQWLXSlYyga0QYpd8Ws-9juFmwjQ2g0sG-157DFNqqjofDIC9CjlTrFYlz_DjC3gZpujzEg2oUnHBmczo8xqZGFKKaJvr6AYd7xpgzWNSzb-ksj3YDJzaAbv_chNNBvtrcKXjCuMz8PT_L3TomDY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194923205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Awareness and Knowledge of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Parkinson’s Disease among German Neurologists</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger_医学期刊</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Eggert, Karla ; Larisch, Astrid ; Dodel, Richard ; Bormann, Cornelia ; Oertel, Wolfgang H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eggert, Karla ; Larisch, Astrid ; Dodel, Richard ; Bormann, Cornelia ; Oertel, Wolfgang H.</creatorcontrib><description>Background/Aims: With increasing diagnostic and therapeutic options of Parkinsonian syndromes (PS), evidence-based medicine clinical practice guidelines for Parkinson’s disease and related disorders have been published. This study evaluates the awareness and the knowledge of the German practice guideline for Parkinson’s disease among neurologists. Methods: The cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in 2005 in Germany on a survey of 181 neurologists in private practice. Results: 53.1% (n = 95) of the participants specified to be aware of the guideline. A low level of knowledge was reported in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for motor and nonmotor complications (including depression and dementia), and in the diagnostic features of atypical PS. Neurologists who were aware of the guideline had a significantly better knowledge of the different clinical features of idiopathic (94.7 vs. 84.3%; p = 0.023) versus nonidiopathic (88.3 vs. 77.1%; p = 0.048) PS in general, and specifically of multiple system atrophy (54.3 vs. 36.1%; p = 0.016) as well as of characteristics concerning increased daytime sleepiness (95.7 vs. 86.7%; p = 0.032). Conclusion: The awareness and the knowledge of the guideline in everyday medical practice are still limited. Future interventions for a better implementation must include strategies which are suitable to modify behavior patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-3022</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000197106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19176962</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EUNEAP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Clinical Competence ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Germany ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurology - education ; Original Paper ; Parkinson Disease - diagnosis ; Parkinson Disease - therapy ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Private Practice ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>European neurology, 2009-01, Vol.61 (4), p.216-222</ispartof><rights>2009 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ea02e2c4fe1f535ecfc801c9ef2f27a123dd1b7f5993bebda515edb50403eb333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ea02e2c4fe1f535ecfc801c9ef2f27a123dd1b7f5993bebda515edb50403eb333</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,2429,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19176962$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eggert, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larisch, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodel, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bormann, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oertel, Wolfgang H.</creatorcontrib><title>Awareness and Knowledge of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Parkinson’s Disease among German Neurologists</title><title>European neurology</title><addtitle>Eur Neurol</addtitle><description>Background/Aims: With increasing diagnostic and therapeutic options of Parkinsonian syndromes (PS), evidence-based medicine clinical practice guidelines for Parkinson’s disease and related disorders have been published. This study evaluates the awareness and the knowledge of the German practice guideline for Parkinson’s disease among neurologists. Methods: The cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in 2005 in Germany on a survey of 181 neurologists in private practice. Results: 53.1% (n = 95) of the participants specified to be aware of the guideline. A low level of knowledge was reported in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for motor and nonmotor complications (including depression and dementia), and in the diagnostic features of atypical PS. Neurologists who were aware of the guideline had a significantly better knowledge of the different clinical features of idiopathic (94.7 vs. 84.3%; p = 0.023) versus nonidiopathic (88.3 vs. 77.1%; p = 0.048) PS in general, and specifically of multiple system atrophy (54.3 vs. 36.1%; p = 0.016) as well as of characteristics concerning increased daytime sleepiness (95.7 vs. 86.7%; p = 0.032). Conclusion: The awareness and the knowledge of the guideline in everyday medical practice are still limited. Future interventions for a better implementation must include strategies which are suitable to modify behavior patterns.</description><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurology - education</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Private Practice</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0014-3022</issn><issn>1421-9913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0cFO3DAQBmCrApUt9NA7QlYPlXpI8dhxgo-rbbtUoMKhPUeOM14MiQ12IsSN1-jr8SQ17KpFXDiNPPo80sxPyAdgXwCkOmSMgaqBVW_IDEoOhVIgtsgst8tCMM53yLuULvNTqvroLdkBBXWlKj4jw_xWR_SYEtW-oyc-3PbYrZAGS8cLpIveeWd0T8-jNqMzSJeT6zB3M_H0XMcr51PwD_d_Ev3qEuqEVA_Br-gS46A9_YlTDH1YuTSmPbJtdZ_w_abukt_fv_1aHBenZ8sfi_lpYUTFxwI148hNaRGsFBKNNUcMjELLLa81cNF10NZWKiVabDstQWLXSlYyga0QYpd8Ws-9juFmwjQ2g0sG-157DFNqqjofDIC9CjlTrFYlz_DjC3gZpujzEg2oUnHBmczo8xqZGFKKaJvr6AYd7xpgzWNSzb-ksj3YDJzaAbv_chNNBvtrcKXjCuMz8PT_L3TomDY</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Eggert, Karla</creator><creator>Larisch, Astrid</creator><creator>Dodel, Richard</creator><creator>Bormann, Cornelia</creator><creator>Oertel, Wolfgang H.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Awareness and Knowledge of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Parkinson’s Disease among German Neurologists</title><author>Eggert, Karla ; Larisch, Astrid ; Dodel, Richard ; Bormann, Cornelia ; Oertel, Wolfgang H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-ea02e2c4fe1f535ecfc801c9ef2f27a123dd1b7f5993bebda515edb50403eb333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurology - education</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - diagnosis</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Private Practice</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eggert, Karla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larisch, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dodel, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bormann, Cornelia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oertel, Wolfgang H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eggert, Karla</au><au>Larisch, Astrid</au><au>Dodel, Richard</au><au>Bormann, Cornelia</au><au>Oertel, Wolfgang H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Awareness and Knowledge of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Parkinson’s Disease among German Neurologists</atitle><jtitle>European neurology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur Neurol</addtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>216</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>216-222</pages><issn>0014-3022</issn><eissn>1421-9913</eissn><coden>EUNEAP</coden><abstract>Background/Aims: With increasing diagnostic and therapeutic options of Parkinsonian syndromes (PS), evidence-based medicine clinical practice guidelines for Parkinson’s disease and related disorders have been published. This study evaluates the awareness and the knowledge of the German practice guideline for Parkinson’s disease among neurologists. Methods: The cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted in 2005 in Germany on a survey of 181 neurologists in private practice. Results: 53.1% (n = 95) of the participants specified to be aware of the guideline. A low level of knowledge was reported in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for motor and nonmotor complications (including depression and dementia), and in the diagnostic features of atypical PS. Neurologists who were aware of the guideline had a significantly better knowledge of the different clinical features of idiopathic (94.7 vs. 84.3%; p = 0.023) versus nonidiopathic (88.3 vs. 77.1%; p = 0.048) PS in general, and specifically of multiple system atrophy (54.3 vs. 36.1%; p = 0.016) as well as of characteristics concerning increased daytime sleepiness (95.7 vs. 86.7%; p = 0.032). Conclusion: The awareness and the knowledge of the guideline in everyday medical practice are still limited. Future interventions for a better implementation must include strategies which are suitable to modify behavior patterns.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>19176962</pmid><doi>10.1159/000197106</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0014-3022 |
| ispartof | European neurology, 2009-01, Vol.61 (4), p.216-222 |
| issn | 0014-3022 1421-9913 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_karger_primary_197106 |
| source | MEDLINE; Karger_医学期刊; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Clinical Competence Cross-Sectional Studies Female Germany Humans Male Middle Aged Neurology - education Original Paper Parkinson Disease - diagnosis Parkinson Disease - therapy Practice Guidelines as Topic Private Practice Surveys and Questionnaires |
| title | Awareness and Knowledge of the Clinical Practice Guideline on Parkinson’s Disease among German Neurologists |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A13%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Awareness%20and%20Knowledge%20of%20the%20Clinical%20Practice%20Guideline%20on%20Parkinson%E2%80%99s%20Disease%20among%20German%20Neurologists&rft.jtitle=European%20neurology&rft.au=Eggert,%20Karla&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=216&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=216-222&rft.issn=0014-3022&rft.eissn=1421-9913&rft.coden=EUNEAP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000197106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E67019110%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194923205&rft_id=info:pmid/19176962&rfr_iscdi=true |