Effect of Apis mellifera Propolis from Two Brazilian Regions on Caries Development in Desalivated Rats

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of Apis mellifera propolis collected from two regions of Brazil on caries development in desalivated rats. Ethanolic extracts of propolis (EEP) were prepared from crude propolis samples collected in Minas Gerais state (MG), southeastern Bra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Caries research 1999-09, Vol.33 (5), p.393-400
Hauptverfasser: Koo, H., Rosalen, P.L., Cury, J.A., Park, Y.K., Ikegaki, M., Sattler, A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 400
container_issue 5
container_start_page 393
container_title Caries research
container_volume 33
creator Koo, H.
Rosalen, P.L.
Cury, J.A.
Park, Y.K.
Ikegaki, M.
Sattler, A.
description The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of Apis mellifera propolis collected from two regions of Brazil on caries development in desalivated rats. Ethanolic extracts of propolis (EEP) were prepared from crude propolis samples collected in Minas Gerais state (MG), southeastern Brazil, and Rio Grande do Sul state (RS), southern Brazil. The flavonoid composition of EEP was analyzed by high–performance thin–layer chromatography (HPTLC) and reversed–phase high–performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For the animal study, 30 specific pathogen–free Wistar rats were infected with Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 and surgically desalivated. The rats were randomly divided into three groups which were treated with 80% ethanol (control), EEP from MG and EEP from RS. The animals were placed in a König–Höfer programmed feeder and received 17 meals of diet 2000 daily at hourly intervals. The solutions were applied on the rat molars (25 μl on molars of each quadrant) twice a day, by using graduate syringes. After 3 weeks, the animals were killed by CO 2 asphyxiation. For microbial assessment, the left jaw was removed and sonicated in 154 mM NaCl solution. Dental caries was evaluated according to Larson’s modification of Keyes’ system. The HPTLC patterns and HPLC profiles demonstrated that both quality and quantity of flavonoid aglycones of EEP from MG were different compared to EEP from RS. In general, it is apparent that EEP from RS contained the highest concentrations of pinocembrin, chrysin, acacetin and galangin. The group of animals treated with EEP from RS showed the lowest smooth–surface and sulcal caries scores as well as less caries severity in smooth–surface and sulcal lesions, and these data were statistically different when compared with the control group. The group treated with EEP from MG only demonstrated a significant difference in the severity of sulcal lesions when compared to the control group. The percentage of S. sobrinus was lower in the groups treated with EEP, but did not differ statistically from the control group. The results showed that the cariostatic effect of propolis depends on its composition, and consequently the region of collection of propolis samples.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000016539
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_16539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>69991805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-5ba11a5a7fc2312ec8e7f3e54ac2aff385aa55acdbf8851ae09b4bb627885f383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0d1LwzAQAPAgipsfDz4LEvYg-FBt0iZtH-ecHyAoQ8G3cu0uktk2Nekm-tcb3VARwbyEu_vlwnGE7LHwmDGRnYT-MCmibI30WcxZkCXyYZ30fToNpJBpj2w5N_MoljLdJD0WxjLMZNwnaqwUlh01ig5b7WiNVaUVWqC31rSm8illTU3vXgw9tfCmKw0NneCjNo2jpqEjsBodPcMFVqatsemobnzooNIL6HBKJ9C5HbKhoHK4u7q3yf35-G50GVzfXFyNhtdBGQveBaIAxkBAokoeMY5liomKUMRQclAqSgWAEFBOC5WmggGGWREXheSJD3052iaHy76tNc9zdF1ea1f6maBBM3e5zLKMpaH4F7Ik9r9x5uHgF5yZuW38EDnnoQdcJB4dLVFpjXMWVd5aXYN9zVmYf6wo_1qRtwerhvOixukPudyJB_tL8AT2Ee03WD0f_FkdTcafIG-nKnoHtymf2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220213257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Apis mellifera Propolis from Two Brazilian Regions on Caries Development in Desalivated Rats</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Koo, H. ; Rosalen, P.L. ; Cury, J.A. ; Park, Y.K. ; Ikegaki, M. ; Sattler, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Koo, H. ; Rosalen, P.L. ; Cury, J.A. ; Park, Y.K. ; Ikegaki, M. ; Sattler, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of Apis mellifera propolis collected from two regions of Brazil on caries development in desalivated rats. Ethanolic extracts of propolis (EEP) were prepared from crude propolis samples collected in Minas Gerais state (MG), southeastern Brazil, and Rio Grande do Sul state (RS), southern Brazil. The flavonoid composition of EEP was analyzed by high–performance thin–layer chromatography (HPTLC) and reversed–phase high–performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For the animal study, 30 specific pathogen–free Wistar rats were infected with Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 and surgically desalivated. The rats were randomly divided into three groups which were treated with 80% ethanol (control), EEP from MG and EEP from RS. The animals were placed in a König–Höfer programmed feeder and received 17 meals of diet 2000 daily at hourly intervals. The solutions were applied on the rat molars (25 μl on molars of each quadrant) twice a day, by using graduate syringes. After 3 weeks, the animals were killed by CO 2 asphyxiation. For microbial assessment, the left jaw was removed and sonicated in 154 mM NaCl solution. Dental caries was evaluated according to Larson’s modification of Keyes’ system. The HPTLC patterns and HPLC profiles demonstrated that both quality and quantity of flavonoid aglycones of EEP from MG were different compared to EEP from RS. In general, it is apparent that EEP from RS contained the highest concentrations of pinocembrin, chrysin, acacetin and galangin. The group of animals treated with EEP from RS showed the lowest smooth–surface and sulcal caries scores as well as less caries severity in smooth–surface and sulcal lesions, and these data were statistically different when compared with the control group. The group treated with EEP from MG only demonstrated a significant difference in the severity of sulcal lesions when compared to the control group. The percentage of S. sobrinus was lower in the groups treated with EEP, but did not differ statistically from the control group. The results showed that the cariostatic effect of propolis depends on its composition, and consequently the region of collection of propolis samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-6568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-976X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000016539</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10460964</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CAREBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Animals ; Apidae ; Apis mellifera ; Bees ; Brazil ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; Chromatography, Thin Layer ; Dental Caries - microbiology ; Dental Caries - prevention &amp; control ; Dentistry ; Flavonoids - analysis ; Original Paper ; propolis ; Propolis - chemistry ; Propolis - pharmacology ; Propolis - therapeutic use ; Random Allocation ; Rats ; Rats, Wistar ; Species Specificity ; Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Streptococcus sobrinus - drug effects</subject><ispartof>Caries research, 1999-09, Vol.33 (5), p.393-400</ispartof><rights>1999 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright S. Karger AG Sep/Oct 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-5ba11a5a7fc2312ec8e7f3e54ac2aff385aa55acdbf8851ae09b4bb627885f383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-5ba11a5a7fc2312ec8e7f3e54ac2aff385aa55acdbf8851ae09b4bb627885f383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2423,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10460964$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koo, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosalen, P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cury, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Y.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikegaki, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sattler, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Apis mellifera Propolis from Two Brazilian Regions on Caries Development in Desalivated Rats</title><title>Caries research</title><addtitle>Caries Res</addtitle><description>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of Apis mellifera propolis collected from two regions of Brazil on caries development in desalivated rats. Ethanolic extracts of propolis (EEP) were prepared from crude propolis samples collected in Minas Gerais state (MG), southeastern Brazil, and Rio Grande do Sul state (RS), southern Brazil. The flavonoid composition of EEP was analyzed by high–performance thin–layer chromatography (HPTLC) and reversed–phase high–performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For the animal study, 30 specific pathogen–free Wistar rats were infected with Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 and surgically desalivated. The rats were randomly divided into three groups which were treated with 80% ethanol (control), EEP from MG and EEP from RS. The animals were placed in a König–Höfer programmed feeder and received 17 meals of diet 2000 daily at hourly intervals. The solutions were applied on the rat molars (25 μl on molars of each quadrant) twice a day, by using graduate syringes. After 3 weeks, the animals were killed by CO 2 asphyxiation. For microbial assessment, the left jaw was removed and sonicated in 154 mM NaCl solution. Dental caries was evaluated according to Larson’s modification of Keyes’ system. The HPTLC patterns and HPLC profiles demonstrated that both quality and quantity of flavonoid aglycones of EEP from MG were different compared to EEP from RS. In general, it is apparent that EEP from RS contained the highest concentrations of pinocembrin, chrysin, acacetin and galangin. The group of animals treated with EEP from RS showed the lowest smooth–surface and sulcal caries scores as well as less caries severity in smooth–surface and sulcal lesions, and these data were statistically different when compared with the control group. The group treated with EEP from MG only demonstrated a significant difference in the severity of sulcal lesions when compared to the control group. The percentage of S. sobrinus was lower in the groups treated with EEP, but did not differ statistically from the control group. The results showed that the cariostatic effect of propolis depends on its composition, and consequently the region of collection of propolis samples.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apidae</subject><subject>Apis mellifera</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</subject><subject>Chromatography, Thin Layer</subject><subject>Dental Caries - microbiology</subject><subject>Dental Caries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Flavonoids - analysis</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>propolis</subject><subject>Propolis - chemistry</subject><subject>Propolis - pharmacology</subject><subject>Propolis - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Random Allocation</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Rats, Wistar</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Streptococcus sobrinus - drug effects</subject><issn>0008-6568</issn><issn>1421-976X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0d1LwzAQAPAgipsfDz4LEvYg-FBt0iZtH-ecHyAoQ8G3cu0uktk2Nekm-tcb3VARwbyEu_vlwnGE7LHwmDGRnYT-MCmibI30WcxZkCXyYZ30fToNpJBpj2w5N_MoljLdJD0WxjLMZNwnaqwUlh01ig5b7WiNVaUVWqC31rSm8illTU3vXgw9tfCmKw0NneCjNo2jpqEjsBodPcMFVqatsemobnzooNIL6HBKJ9C5HbKhoHK4u7q3yf35-G50GVzfXFyNhtdBGQveBaIAxkBAokoeMY5liomKUMRQclAqSgWAEFBOC5WmggGGWREXheSJD3052iaHy76tNc9zdF1ea1f6maBBM3e5zLKMpaH4F7Ik9r9x5uHgF5yZuW38EDnnoQdcJB4dLVFpjXMWVd5aXYN9zVmYf6wo_1qRtwerhvOixukPudyJB_tL8AT2Ee03WD0f_FkdTcafIG-nKnoHtymf2A</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Koo, H.</creator><creator>Rosalen, P.L.</creator><creator>Cury, J.A.</creator><creator>Park, Y.K.</creator><creator>Ikegaki, M.</creator><creator>Sattler, A.</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>Effect of Apis mellifera Propolis from Two Brazilian Regions on Caries Development in Desalivated Rats</title><author>Koo, H. ; Rosalen, P.L. ; Cury, J.A. ; Park, Y.K. ; Ikegaki, M. ; Sattler, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-5ba11a5a7fc2312ec8e7f3e54ac2aff385aa55acdbf8851ae09b4bb627885f383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apidae</topic><topic>Apis mellifera</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</topic><topic>Chromatography, Thin Layer</topic><topic>Dental Caries - microbiology</topic><topic>Dental Caries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Flavonoids - analysis</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>propolis</topic><topic>Propolis - chemistry</topic><topic>Propolis - pharmacology</topic><topic>Propolis - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Random Allocation</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Rats, Wistar</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Streptococcus sobrinus - drug effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koo, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosalen, P.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cury, J.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Y.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikegaki, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sattler, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Caries research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koo, H.</au><au>Rosalen, P.L.</au><au>Cury, J.A.</au><au>Park, Y.K.</au><au>Ikegaki, M.</au><au>Sattler, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Apis mellifera Propolis from Two Brazilian Regions on Caries Development in Desalivated Rats</atitle><jtitle>Caries research</jtitle><addtitle>Caries Res</addtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>393</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>393-400</pages><issn>0008-6568</issn><eissn>1421-976X</eissn><coden>CAREBK</coden><abstract>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of Apis mellifera propolis collected from two regions of Brazil on caries development in desalivated rats. Ethanolic extracts of propolis (EEP) were prepared from crude propolis samples collected in Minas Gerais state (MG), southeastern Brazil, and Rio Grande do Sul state (RS), southern Brazil. The flavonoid composition of EEP was analyzed by high–performance thin–layer chromatography (HPTLC) and reversed–phase high–performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). For the animal study, 30 specific pathogen–free Wistar rats were infected with Streptococcus sobrinus 6715 and surgically desalivated. The rats were randomly divided into three groups which were treated with 80% ethanol (control), EEP from MG and EEP from RS. The animals were placed in a König–Höfer programmed feeder and received 17 meals of diet 2000 daily at hourly intervals. The solutions were applied on the rat molars (25 μl on molars of each quadrant) twice a day, by using graduate syringes. After 3 weeks, the animals were killed by CO 2 asphyxiation. For microbial assessment, the left jaw was removed and sonicated in 154 mM NaCl solution. Dental caries was evaluated according to Larson’s modification of Keyes’ system. The HPTLC patterns and HPLC profiles demonstrated that both quality and quantity of flavonoid aglycones of EEP from MG were different compared to EEP from RS. In general, it is apparent that EEP from RS contained the highest concentrations of pinocembrin, chrysin, acacetin and galangin. The group of animals treated with EEP from RS showed the lowest smooth–surface and sulcal caries scores as well as less caries severity in smooth–surface and sulcal lesions, and these data were statistically different when compared with the control group. The group treated with EEP from MG only demonstrated a significant difference in the severity of sulcal lesions when compared to the control group. The percentage of S. sobrinus was lower in the groups treated with EEP, but did not differ statistically from the control group. The results showed that the cariostatic effect of propolis depends on its composition, and consequently the region of collection of propolis samples.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>10460964</pmid><doi>10.1159/000016539</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-6568
ispartof Caries research, 1999-09, Vol.33 (5), p.393-400
issn 0008-6568
1421-976X
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_16539
source Karger Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Analysis of Variance
Animals
Apidae
Apis mellifera
Bees
Brazil
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Chromatography, Thin Layer
Dental Caries - microbiology
Dental Caries - prevention & control
Dentistry
Flavonoids - analysis
Original Paper
propolis
Propolis - chemistry
Propolis - pharmacology
Propolis - therapeutic use
Random Allocation
Rats
Rats, Wistar
Species Specificity
Specific Pathogen-Free Organisms
Statistics, Nonparametric
Streptococcus sobrinus - drug effects
title Effect of Apis mellifera Propolis from Two Brazilian Regions on Caries Development in Desalivated Rats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T22%3A20%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Apis%20mellifera%20Propolis%20from%20Two%20Brazilian%20Regions%20on%20Caries%20Development%20in%20Desalivated%20Rats&rft.jtitle=Caries%20research&rft.au=Koo,%20H.&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=393&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=393-400&rft.issn=0008-6568&rft.eissn=1421-976X&rft.coden=CAREBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000016539&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_karge%3E69991805%3C/proquest_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220213257&rft_id=info:pmid/10460964&rfr_iscdi=true