Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Chemotherapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Background: The De Gramont regimen (or high-dose LV5FU2, HD-LV5FU2) is considered a standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the costs of three regimens as compared to HD-LV5FU2: raltitrexed (R), LV5FU2 with a lower dose of folinic ac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oncology 2006-12, Vol.71 (1-2), p.40-48, Article 40
Hauptverfasser: Borget, Isabelle, Aupérin, Anne, Pignon, Jean-Pierre, Abbas, Moncef, Bouché, Olivier, Mousseau, Mireille, Raoul, Jean-Luc, Bedenne, Laurent, Cassan, Philippe, Clavero-Fabri, Marie-Christine, Stremsdoerfer, Noël, Nasca, Salvador, Queuniet, Anne-Marie, Ducreux, Michel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 48
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 40
container_title Oncology
container_volume 71
creator Borget, Isabelle
Aupérin, Anne
Pignon, Jean-Pierre
Abbas, Moncef
Bouché, Olivier
Mousseau, Mireille
Raoul, Jean-Luc
Bedenne, Laurent
Cassan, Philippe
Clavero-Fabri, Marie-Christine
Stremsdoerfer, Noël
Nasca, Salvador
Queuniet, Anne-Marie
Ducreux, Michel
description Background: The De Gramont regimen (or high-dose LV5FU2, HD-LV5FU2) is considered a standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the costs of three regimens as compared to HD-LV5FU2: raltitrexed (R), LV5FU2 with a lower dose of folinic acid (LD-LV5FU2), and weekly infusional 5FU (WI-FU). Methods: An economic analysis was performed prospectively as part of a randomized trial comparing first-line chemotherapy regimens in 294 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Direct medical costs were computed from the health system viewpoint using 2001 unit costs. Results: None of the three regimens improved EFS as compared to HD-LV5FU2. R was less effective and more toxic. The mean total cost per patient was € 15,970 for HD-LV5FU2. The cost of R (€ 10,687) was lower than that of HD-LV5FU2 (p = 0.008). The cost of LD-LV5FU2 (€ 14,888) and of WI-FU (€ 13,760) was not significantly different from that of HD-LV5FU2. Conclusion: The lower efficacy and increased toxicity of R made it a clinically inferior regimen despite its easy administration and lower cost. The HD-LV5FU2 protocol remains a better treatment. LD-LV5FU2 appeared a good alternative regimen because it reduced costs without jeopardizing its efficacy. The WI-FU regimen did not show a significant difference in terms of efficacy, but suggested toxicity to be slightly increased.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000100448
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>karger_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_karger_primary_100448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>100448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c958-8e09f9708df589d6727f6a49fe7c003de3cfcee5cdffb1e746109cd7b266c8dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkDFPwzAUhC0EoqUwsDN4ZQh9Thw7HquoBaQilg5skes8U0MaV7aF1H9PShFCiOmGu_t0OkKuGdwxVqopADAAzqsTMmY8LzLIi_yUjAEKyHLO-IhcxPg2xGTJxTkZMVlwLiSMyUvtY8rm1qJJ7gN7jJHOet3to4vUW7pwYfCXrkdab3Dr0waD3jmM1PX0CZOOSSdnaO07HwaG7mite4PhkpxZ3UW8-tYJWS3mq_ohWz7fP9azZWZUWWUVgrJKQtXaslKtkLm0QnNlUZphfYuFsQaxNK21a4aSCwbKtHKdC2Gq1hQTcnvEmuBjDGibXXBbHfYNg-ZwTvNzzpCd_skad1jv-xS06_5t3Bwb7zq8YvjF_rI_AbiKbn8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Chemotherapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer</title><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Borget, Isabelle ; Aupérin, Anne ; Pignon, Jean-Pierre ; Abbas, Moncef ; Bouché, Olivier ; Mousseau, Mireille ; Raoul, Jean-Luc ; Bedenne, Laurent ; Cassan, Philippe ; Clavero-Fabri, Marie-Christine ; Stremsdoerfer, Noël ; Nasca, Salvador ; Queuniet, Anne-Marie ; Ducreux, Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Borget, Isabelle ; Aupérin, Anne ; Pignon, Jean-Pierre ; Abbas, Moncef ; Bouché, Olivier ; Mousseau, Mireille ; Raoul, Jean-Luc ; Bedenne, Laurent ; Cassan, Philippe ; Clavero-Fabri, Marie-Christine ; Stremsdoerfer, Noël ; Nasca, Salvador ; Queuniet, Anne-Marie ; Ducreux, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The De Gramont regimen (or high-dose LV5FU2, HD-LV5FU2) is considered a standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the costs of three regimens as compared to HD-LV5FU2: raltitrexed (R), LV5FU2 with a lower dose of folinic acid (LD-LV5FU2), and weekly infusional 5FU (WI-FU). Methods: An economic analysis was performed prospectively as part of a randomized trial comparing first-line chemotherapy regimens in 294 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Direct medical costs were computed from the health system viewpoint using 2001 unit costs. Results: None of the three regimens improved EFS as compared to HD-LV5FU2. R was less effective and more toxic. The mean total cost per patient was € 15,970 for HD-LV5FU2. The cost of R (€ 10,687) was lower than that of HD-LV5FU2 (p = 0.008). The cost of LD-LV5FU2 (€ 14,888) and of WI-FU (€ 13,760) was not significantly different from that of HD-LV5FU2. Conclusion: The lower efficacy and increased toxicity of R made it a clinically inferior regimen despite its easy administration and lower cost. The HD-LV5FU2 protocol remains a better treatment. LD-LV5FU2 appeared a good alternative regimen because it reduced costs without jeopardizing its efficacy. The WI-FU regimen did not show a significant difference in terms of efficacy, but suggested toxicity to be slightly increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-2414</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0232</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000100448</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17344670</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland</publisher><subject>Clinical Study</subject><ispartof>Oncology, 2006-12, Vol.71 (1-2), p.40-48, Article 40</ispartof><rights>2006 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c958-8e09f9708df589d6727f6a49fe7c003de3cfcee5cdffb1e746109cd7b266c8dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c958-8e09f9708df589d6727f6a49fe7c003de3cfcee5cdffb1e746109cd7b266c8dc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,2423,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borget, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aupérin, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignon, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Moncef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouché, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousseau, Mireille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raoul, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedenne, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassan, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavero-Fabri, Marie-Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stremsdoerfer, Noël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasca, Salvador</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queuniet, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducreux, Michel</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Chemotherapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer</title><title>Oncology</title><addtitle>Oncology</addtitle><description>Background: The De Gramont regimen (or high-dose LV5FU2, HD-LV5FU2) is considered a standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the costs of three regimens as compared to HD-LV5FU2: raltitrexed (R), LV5FU2 with a lower dose of folinic acid (LD-LV5FU2), and weekly infusional 5FU (WI-FU). Methods: An economic analysis was performed prospectively as part of a randomized trial comparing first-line chemotherapy regimens in 294 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Direct medical costs were computed from the health system viewpoint using 2001 unit costs. Results: None of the three regimens improved EFS as compared to HD-LV5FU2. R was less effective and more toxic. The mean total cost per patient was € 15,970 for HD-LV5FU2. The cost of R (€ 10,687) was lower than that of HD-LV5FU2 (p = 0.008). The cost of LD-LV5FU2 (€ 14,888) and of WI-FU (€ 13,760) was not significantly different from that of HD-LV5FU2. Conclusion: The lower efficacy and increased toxicity of R made it a clinically inferior regimen despite its easy administration and lower cost. The HD-LV5FU2 protocol remains a better treatment. LD-LV5FU2 appeared a good alternative regimen because it reduced costs without jeopardizing its efficacy. The WI-FU regimen did not show a significant difference in terms of efficacy, but suggested toxicity to be slightly increased.</description><subject>Clinical Study</subject><issn>0030-2414</issn><issn>1423-0232</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkDFPwzAUhC0EoqUwsDN4ZQh9Thw7HquoBaQilg5skes8U0MaV7aF1H9PShFCiOmGu_t0OkKuGdwxVqopADAAzqsTMmY8LzLIi_yUjAEKyHLO-IhcxPg2xGTJxTkZMVlwLiSMyUvtY8rm1qJJ7gN7jJHOet3to4vUW7pwYfCXrkdab3Dr0waD3jmM1PX0CZOOSSdnaO07HwaG7mite4PhkpxZ3UW8-tYJWS3mq_ohWz7fP9azZWZUWWUVgrJKQtXaslKtkLm0QnNlUZphfYuFsQaxNK21a4aSCwbKtHKdC2Gq1hQTcnvEmuBjDGibXXBbHfYNg-ZwTvNzzpCd_skad1jv-xS06_5t3Bwb7zq8YvjF_rI_AbiKbn8</recordid><startdate>200612</startdate><enddate>200612</enddate><creator>Borget, Isabelle</creator><creator>Aupérin, Anne</creator><creator>Pignon, Jean-Pierre</creator><creator>Abbas, Moncef</creator><creator>Bouché, Olivier</creator><creator>Mousseau, Mireille</creator><creator>Raoul, Jean-Luc</creator><creator>Bedenne, Laurent</creator><creator>Cassan, Philippe</creator><creator>Clavero-Fabri, Marie-Christine</creator><creator>Stremsdoerfer, Noël</creator><creator>Nasca, Salvador</creator><creator>Queuniet, Anne-Marie</creator><creator>Ducreux, Michel</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200612</creationdate><title>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Chemotherapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer</title><author>Borget, Isabelle ; Aupérin, Anne ; Pignon, Jean-Pierre ; Abbas, Moncef ; Bouché, Olivier ; Mousseau, Mireille ; Raoul, Jean-Luc ; Bedenne, Laurent ; Cassan, Philippe ; Clavero-Fabri, Marie-Christine ; Stremsdoerfer, Noël ; Nasca, Salvador ; Queuniet, Anne-Marie ; Ducreux, Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c958-8e09f9708df589d6727f6a49fe7c003de3cfcee5cdffb1e746109cd7b266c8dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Clinical Study</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borget, Isabelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aupérin, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pignon, Jean-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Moncef</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouché, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousseau, Mireille</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raoul, Jean-Luc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedenne, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassan, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavero-Fabri, Marie-Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stremsdoerfer, Noël</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasca, Salvador</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queuniet, Anne-Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducreux, Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borget, Isabelle</au><au>Aupérin, Anne</au><au>Pignon, Jean-Pierre</au><au>Abbas, Moncef</au><au>Bouché, Olivier</au><au>Mousseau, Mireille</au><au>Raoul, Jean-Luc</au><au>Bedenne, Laurent</au><au>Cassan, Philippe</au><au>Clavero-Fabri, Marie-Christine</au><au>Stremsdoerfer, Noël</au><au>Nasca, Salvador</au><au>Queuniet, Anne-Marie</au><au>Ducreux, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Chemotherapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer</atitle><jtitle>Oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Oncology</addtitle><date>2006-12</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>48</epage><pages>40-48</pages><artnum>40</artnum><issn>0030-2414</issn><eissn>1423-0232</eissn><abstract>Background: The De Gramont regimen (or high-dose LV5FU2, HD-LV5FU2) is considered a standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and the costs of three regimens as compared to HD-LV5FU2: raltitrexed (R), LV5FU2 with a lower dose of folinic acid (LD-LV5FU2), and weekly infusional 5FU (WI-FU). Methods: An economic analysis was performed prospectively as part of a randomized trial comparing first-line chemotherapy regimens in 294 patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Direct medical costs were computed from the health system viewpoint using 2001 unit costs. Results: None of the three regimens improved EFS as compared to HD-LV5FU2. R was less effective and more toxic. The mean total cost per patient was € 15,970 for HD-LV5FU2. The cost of R (€ 10,687) was lower than that of HD-LV5FU2 (p = 0.008). The cost of LD-LV5FU2 (€ 14,888) and of WI-FU (€ 13,760) was not significantly different from that of HD-LV5FU2. Conclusion: The lower efficacy and increased toxicity of R made it a clinically inferior regimen despite its easy administration and lower cost. The HD-LV5FU2 protocol remains a better treatment. LD-LV5FU2 appeared a good alternative regimen because it reduced costs without jeopardizing its efficacy. The WI-FU regimen did not show a significant difference in terms of efficacy, but suggested toxicity to be slightly increased.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pmid>17344670</pmid><doi>10.1159/000100448</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-2414
ispartof Oncology, 2006-12, Vol.71 (1-2), p.40-48, Article 40
issn 0030-2414
1423-0232
language eng
recordid cdi_karger_primary_100448
source Karger Journals
subjects Clinical Study
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Chemotherapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T23%3A27%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-karger_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-Effectiveness%20Analysis%20of%20First-Line%20Chemotherapies%20in%20Metastatic%20Colorectal%20Cancer&rft.jtitle=Oncology&rft.au=Borget,%20Isabelle&rft.date=2006-12&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=48&rft.pages=40-48&rft.artnum=40&rft.issn=0030-2414&rft.eissn=1423-0232&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000100448&rft_dat=%3Ckarger_cross%3E100448%3C/karger_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/17344670&rfr_iscdi=true