Through The ATS Door, Now What? The Prevalence of MNC Misconduct, Disguise & Manipulation

On November 10, 1995, nine leaders of the Ogoni region of Nigeria were executed by an extrajudicial tribunal. What followed was a series of international denunciations, sanctions on the Nigerian regime, boycotts of Royal Dutch Petroleum (“Shell”), and a string of lawsuits against the multinational....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:UCLA journal of international law and foreign affairs 2022-01, Vol.26 (1), p.151-182
1. Verfasser: Souto, Mara González
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 182
container_issue 1
container_start_page 151
container_title UCLA journal of international law and foreign affairs
container_volume 26
creator Souto, Mara González
description On November 10, 1995, nine leaders of the Ogoni region of Nigeria were executed by an extrajudicial tribunal. What followed was a series of international denunciations, sanctions on the Nigerian regime, boycotts of Royal Dutch Petroleum (“Shell”), and a string of lawsuits against the multinational. Two key lawsuits, Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, consolidated into one proceeding that nearly reached the trial phase, eventually settling for $15.5 million. Given Shell’s unusual move to settle, this Comment examines the main procedural and substantive developments of pre-trial discovery in Wiwa as a means of understanding how Shell and other extractive multinational corporations (MNCs) operate abroad and stand in the way of accountability and reparation for victims of human rights abuses. Ultimately, this Comment is important for understanding how extractive MNCs use procedural warfare to distract, delay, and deny justice to victims. In the process, it identifies key areas for reform and makes recommendations for better redress to victims and their communities.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_48774496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48774496</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48774496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_487744963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFyU0LgjAcgPERBdnLRwj-p04J86WppwgtuihBQnSSYdNNbJNNi759EN07PfB7RshyHRLZQeh5Y2Q5OIxsl-DtFM2MaTDGLiGOhW4512qoOeScwT6_QKKU3kCmXnDltN99_azZk7ZMlgxUBWkWQypMqeR9KPsNJMLUgzAM1pBSKbqhpb1QcoEmFW0NW_46R6vjIY9PdmN6pYtOiwfV78IPg8D3I-L9-x-DxT0G</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Through The ATS Door, Now What? The Prevalence of MNC Misconduct, Disguise &amp; Manipulation</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Souto, Mara González</creator><creatorcontrib>Souto, Mara González</creatorcontrib><description>On November 10, 1995, nine leaders of the Ogoni region of Nigeria were executed by an extrajudicial tribunal. What followed was a series of international denunciations, sanctions on the Nigerian regime, boycotts of Royal Dutch Petroleum (“Shell”), and a string of lawsuits against the multinational. Two key lawsuits, Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, consolidated into one proceeding that nearly reached the trial phase, eventually settling for $15.5 million. Given Shell’s unusual move to settle, this Comment examines the main procedural and substantive developments of pre-trial discovery in Wiwa as a means of understanding how Shell and other extractive multinational corporations (MNCs) operate abroad and stand in the way of accountability and reparation for victims of human rights abuses. Ultimately, this Comment is important for understanding how extractive MNCs use procedural warfare to distract, delay, and deny justice to victims. In the process, it identifies key areas for reform and makes recommendations for better redress to victims and their communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1089-2605</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-7833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs</publisher><subject>Articles and Comments</subject><ispartof>UCLA journal of international law and foreign affairs, 2022-01, Vol.26 (1), p.151-182</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48774496$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48774496$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Souto, Mara González</creatorcontrib><title>Through The ATS Door, Now What? The Prevalence of MNC Misconduct, Disguise &amp; Manipulation</title><title>UCLA journal of international law and foreign affairs</title><description>On November 10, 1995, nine leaders of the Ogoni region of Nigeria were executed by an extrajudicial tribunal. What followed was a series of international denunciations, sanctions on the Nigerian regime, boycotts of Royal Dutch Petroleum (“Shell”), and a string of lawsuits against the multinational. Two key lawsuits, Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, consolidated into one proceeding that nearly reached the trial phase, eventually settling for $15.5 million. Given Shell’s unusual move to settle, this Comment examines the main procedural and substantive developments of pre-trial discovery in Wiwa as a means of understanding how Shell and other extractive multinational corporations (MNCs) operate abroad and stand in the way of accountability and reparation for victims of human rights abuses. Ultimately, this Comment is important for understanding how extractive MNCs use procedural warfare to distract, delay, and deny justice to victims. In the process, it identifies key areas for reform and makes recommendations for better redress to victims and their communities.</description><subject>Articles and Comments</subject><issn>1089-2605</issn><issn>2169-7833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFyU0LgjAcgPERBdnLRwj-p04J86WppwgtuihBQnSSYdNNbJNNi759EN07PfB7RshyHRLZQeh5Y2Q5OIxsl-DtFM2MaTDGLiGOhW4512qoOeScwT6_QKKU3kCmXnDltN99_azZk7ZMlgxUBWkWQypMqeR9KPsNJMLUgzAM1pBSKbqhpb1QcoEmFW0NW_46R6vjIY9PdmN6pYtOiwfV78IPg8D3I-L9-x-DxT0G</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Souto, Mara González</creator><general>UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Through The ATS Door, Now What? The Prevalence of MNC Misconduct, Disguise &amp; Manipulation</title><author>Souto, Mara González</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_487744963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Articles and Comments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Souto, Mara González</creatorcontrib><jtitle>UCLA journal of international law and foreign affairs</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Souto, Mara González</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Through The ATS Door, Now What? The Prevalence of MNC Misconduct, Disguise &amp; Manipulation</atitle><jtitle>UCLA journal of international law and foreign affairs</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>182</epage><pages>151-182</pages><issn>1089-2605</issn><eissn>2169-7833</eissn><abstract>On November 10, 1995, nine leaders of the Ogoni region of Nigeria were executed by an extrajudicial tribunal. What followed was a series of international denunciations, sanctions on the Nigerian regime, boycotts of Royal Dutch Petroleum (“Shell”), and a string of lawsuits against the multinational. Two key lawsuits, Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum and Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, consolidated into one proceeding that nearly reached the trial phase, eventually settling for $15.5 million. Given Shell’s unusual move to settle, this Comment examines the main procedural and substantive developments of pre-trial discovery in Wiwa as a means of understanding how Shell and other extractive multinational corporations (MNCs) operate abroad and stand in the way of accountability and reparation for victims of human rights abuses. Ultimately, this Comment is important for understanding how extractive MNCs use procedural warfare to distract, delay, and deny justice to victims. In the process, it identifies key areas for reform and makes recommendations for better redress to victims and their communities.</abstract><pub>UCLA Journal of International Law and Foreign Affairs</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1089-2605
ispartof UCLA journal of international law and foreign affairs, 2022-01, Vol.26 (1), p.151-182
issn 1089-2605
2169-7833
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_48774496
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Articles and Comments
title Through The ATS Door, Now What? The Prevalence of MNC Misconduct, Disguise & Manipulation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T19%3A38%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Through%20The%20ATS%20Door,%20Now%20What?%20The%20Prevalence%20of%20MNC%20Misconduct,%20Disguise%20&%20Manipulation&rft.jtitle=UCLA%20journal%20of%20international%20law%20and%20foreign%20affairs&rft.au=Souto,%20Mara%20Gonz%C3%A1lez&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=182&rft.pages=151-182&rft.issn=1089-2605&rft.eissn=2169-7833&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E48774496%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48774496&rfr_iscdi=true