Competitive Advantage in the Russo-Ukrainian War: Ukraine’s Technological Potential Against a Kremlin Goliath

This study explains the technological context and miscalculations that led to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and explores how public opinion shaped the technological factors that are helping Ukraine gain and maintain a competitive advantage. NATO overestimated Russia in information technology and did...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The cyber defense review 2023-10, Vol.8 (3), p.121-134
1. Verfasser: Vargas, Melissa
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 134
container_issue 3
container_start_page 121
container_title The cyber defense review
container_volume 8
creator Vargas, Melissa
description This study explains the technological context and miscalculations that led to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and explores how public opinion shaped the technological factors that are helping Ukraine gain and maintain a competitive advantage. NATO overestimated Russia in information technology and did not account for collective hybrid efforts outside of Ukraine, emboldening Russia to push physical and ethical boundaries. However, Ukrainian forces and benefactors have been using information technology more efficiently than Russia, among other enablers, to gain a competitive advantage over its seemingly larger and more powerful adversary. Research must be conducted to understand the factors of Russia’s shortfalls, properly integrate corporations using a common language, and establish rules of engagement among civilian and military agencies in the cyber domain. History and case study methodologies were used for this research. Russia’s historical identity and impunity emboldened the Kremlin to invade Ukraine, underestimating the impact technological benefactors would have on Ukraine as a formidable competitor under Porter’s five forces model. This conflict exposes implications for industry integration to cyber defense exercises (CDX). This research is significant because it promotes a common language and framework to integrate private organizations in applying collaborative solutions and boundaries in a domain without borders and limited regulation.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_48755365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48755365</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48755365</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_487553653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0MjE30TUyNLZkgbONDDgYeIuLswwMDIyAyMTUgJPBwDk_tyC1JLMksyxVwTGlLDGvJDE9VSEzT6EkI1UhqLS4OF83NLsoMTMvMzFPITyxiIeBNS0xpziVF0pzM8i6uYY4e-hmFZfkF8UXFGXmJhZVxptYmJuaGpuZGhOSBwAVLzBw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Competitive Advantage in the Russo-Ukrainian War: Ukraine’s Technological Potential Against a Kremlin Goliath</title><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Vargas, Melissa</creator><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Melissa</creatorcontrib><description>This study explains the technological context and miscalculations that led to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and explores how public opinion shaped the technological factors that are helping Ukraine gain and maintain a competitive advantage. NATO overestimated Russia in information technology and did not account for collective hybrid efforts outside of Ukraine, emboldening Russia to push physical and ethical boundaries. However, Ukrainian forces and benefactors have been using information technology more efficiently than Russia, among other enablers, to gain a competitive advantage over its seemingly larger and more powerful adversary. Research must be conducted to understand the factors of Russia’s shortfalls, properly integrate corporations using a common language, and establish rules of engagement among civilian and military agencies in the cyber domain. History and case study methodologies were used for this research. Russia’s historical identity and impunity emboldened the Kremlin to invade Ukraine, underestimating the impact technological benefactors would have on Ukraine as a formidable competitor under Porter’s five forces model. This conflict exposes implications for industry integration to cyber defense exercises (CDX). This research is significant because it promotes a common language and framework to integrate private organizations in applying collaborative solutions and boundaries in a domain without borders and limited regulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2474-2120</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2474-2139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Army Cyber Institute</publisher><ispartof>The cyber defense review, 2023-10, Vol.8 (3), p.121-134</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48755365$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48755365$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25354,54524,54530</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Melissa</creatorcontrib><title>Competitive Advantage in the Russo-Ukrainian War: Ukraine’s Technological Potential Against a Kremlin Goliath</title><title>The cyber defense review</title><description>This study explains the technological context and miscalculations that led to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and explores how public opinion shaped the technological factors that are helping Ukraine gain and maintain a competitive advantage. NATO overestimated Russia in information technology and did not account for collective hybrid efforts outside of Ukraine, emboldening Russia to push physical and ethical boundaries. However, Ukrainian forces and benefactors have been using information technology more efficiently than Russia, among other enablers, to gain a competitive advantage over its seemingly larger and more powerful adversary. Research must be conducted to understand the factors of Russia’s shortfalls, properly integrate corporations using a common language, and establish rules of engagement among civilian and military agencies in the cyber domain. History and case study methodologies were used for this research. Russia’s historical identity and impunity emboldened the Kremlin to invade Ukraine, underestimating the impact technological benefactors would have on Ukraine as a formidable competitor under Porter’s five forces model. This conflict exposes implications for industry integration to cyber defense exercises (CDX). This research is significant because it promotes a common language and framework to integrate private organizations in applying collaborative solutions and boundaries in a domain without borders and limited regulation.</description><issn>2474-2120</issn><issn>2474-2139</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0MjE30TUyNLZkgbONDDgYeIuLswwMDIyAyMTUgJPBwDk_tyC1JLMksyxVwTGlLDGvJDE9VSEzT6EkI1UhqLS4OF83NLsoMTMvMzFPITyxiIeBNS0xpziVF0pzM8i6uYY4e-hmFZfkF8UXFGXmJhZVxptYmJuaGpuZGhOSBwAVLzBw</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Vargas, Melissa</creator><general>Army Cyber Institute</general><scope>JFNAL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Competitive Advantage in the Russo-Ukrainian War</title><author>Vargas, Melissa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_487553653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Melissa</creatorcontrib><collection>JSTOR Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>The cyber defense review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vargas, Melissa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Competitive Advantage in the Russo-Ukrainian War: Ukraine’s Technological Potential Against a Kremlin Goliath</atitle><jtitle>The cyber defense review</jtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>134</epage><pages>121-134</pages><issn>2474-2120</issn><eissn>2474-2139</eissn><abstract>This study explains the technological context and miscalculations that led to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and explores how public opinion shaped the technological factors that are helping Ukraine gain and maintain a competitive advantage. NATO overestimated Russia in information technology and did not account for collective hybrid efforts outside of Ukraine, emboldening Russia to push physical and ethical boundaries. However, Ukrainian forces and benefactors have been using information technology more efficiently than Russia, among other enablers, to gain a competitive advantage over its seemingly larger and more powerful adversary. Research must be conducted to understand the factors of Russia’s shortfalls, properly integrate corporations using a common language, and establish rules of engagement among civilian and military agencies in the cyber domain. History and case study methodologies were used for this research. Russia’s historical identity and impunity emboldened the Kremlin to invade Ukraine, underestimating the impact technological benefactors would have on Ukraine as a formidable competitor under Porter’s five forces model. This conflict exposes implications for industry integration to cyber defense exercises (CDX). This research is significant because it promotes a common language and framework to integrate private organizations in applying collaborative solutions and boundaries in a domain without borders and limited regulation.</abstract><pub>Army Cyber Institute</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2474-2120
ispartof The cyber defense review, 2023-10, Vol.8 (3), p.121-134
issn 2474-2120
2474-2139
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_48755365
source JSTOR Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
title Competitive Advantage in the Russo-Ukrainian War: Ukraine’s Technological Potential Against a Kremlin Goliath
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T04%3A52%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Competitive%20Advantage%20in%20the%20Russo-Ukrainian%20War:%20Ukraine%E2%80%99s%20Technological%20Potential%20Against%20a%20Kremlin%20Goliath&rft.jtitle=The%20cyber%20defense%20review&rft.au=Vargas,%20Melissa&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=134&rft.pages=121-134&rft.issn=2474-2120&rft.eissn=2474-2139&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E48755365%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48755365&rfr_iscdi=true