Archaeology and Social Memory
This review provides a road map through current trends and issues in archaeological studies of memory. Many scholars continue to draw on Halbwachs for collective memory studies, emphasizing how the past can legitimate political authority. Others are inspired by Bergson, focusing on the persistent ma...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annual review of anthropology 2019-10, Vol.48 (1), p.207-225 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 225 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 207 |
container_title | Annual review of anthropology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Van Dyke, Ruth M |
description | This review provides a road map through current trends and issues in archaeological studies of memory. Many scholars continue to draw on Halbwachs for collective memory studies, emphasizing how the past can legitimate political authority. Others are inspired by Bergson, focusing on the persistent material intrusion of the past into the present. "Past in the past" studies are particularly widespread in the Near East Classical world, Europe, the Maya region, and Native North America. Archaeologists have viewed materialized memory in various ways: as passively continuous, discursively referenced, intentionally invented, obliterated. Key domains of inquiry include monuments, places, and
lieux de mémoire
; treatment and disposal of the dead; habitual practices and senses; the recent and contemporary past; and forgetting and erasure. Important contemporary work deploys archaeology as a tool of counter-memory in the aftermath of recent violence and trauma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_annua</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_48550938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48550938</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48550938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-8353b01a17e11ff22ff6ff3566c8abcd19ff59b6d6911aac4f217c4c50a3cf6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1LAzEURYMoWKs_oVDQbfS9ZJKZATel-AUVF-o6vKaJbZlOajJV-u-dEnHv6i3evefCYewK4Rqx0DfUtrvovji13TIGjiAEVhwQQeERG6AqFC9EDcdsAFAVXKsSTtlZSmsAkFrqARtNol2SC0342I-pXYxfg11RM352mxD35-zEU5Pcxe8dsvf7u7fpI5-9PDxNJzNOPb7jlVRyDkhYOkTvhfBeey-V1raiuV1g7b2q53qha0QiW3iBpS2sApLWayuH7DJztzF87lzqzDrsYttPGiGhLnUpK9mnbnPKxpBSdN5s42pDcW8QzEGI-RVishCThZgspK-Pcn2duhD_ukWlFNQ9f8gm-X-gUNNzVu47_W_jByXud5s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309767383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Archaeology and Social Memory</title><source>Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Van Dyke, Ruth M</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Dyke, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><description>This review provides a road map through current trends and issues in archaeological studies of memory. Many scholars continue to draw on Halbwachs for collective memory studies, emphasizing how the past can legitimate political authority. Others are inspired by Bergson, focusing on the persistent material intrusion of the past into the present. "Past in the past" studies are particularly widespread in the Near East Classical world, Europe, the Maya region, and Native North America. Archaeologists have viewed materialized memory in various ways: as passively continuous, discursively referenced, intentionally invented, obliterated. Key domains of inquiry include monuments, places, and
lieux de mémoire
; treatment and disposal of the dead; habitual practices and senses; the recent and contemporary past; and forgetting and erasure. Important contemporary work deploys archaeology as a tool of counter-memory in the aftermath of recent violence and trauma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0084-6570</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-4290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Aftermath ; Archaeology ; Collective memory ; counter-memory ; forgetting ; Halbwachs, Maurice (1877-1945) ; Intrusion ; Memory ; Monuments ; Politics ; ruins ; Social memory ; time ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Annual review of anthropology, 2019-10, Vol.48 (1), p.207-225</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 by Annual Reviews</rights><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-8353b01a17e11ff22ff6ff3566c8abcd19ff59b6d6911aac4f217c4c50a3cf6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-8353b01a17e11ff22ff6ff3566c8abcd19ff59b6d6911aac4f217c4c50a3cf6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051$$EHTML$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>70,314,778,782,4170,27907,27908,33757,78005,78006</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Dyke, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><title>Archaeology and Social Memory</title><title>Annual review of anthropology</title><description>This review provides a road map through current trends and issues in archaeological studies of memory. Many scholars continue to draw on Halbwachs for collective memory studies, emphasizing how the past can legitimate political authority. Others are inspired by Bergson, focusing on the persistent material intrusion of the past into the present. "Past in the past" studies are particularly widespread in the Near East Classical world, Europe, the Maya region, and Native North America. Archaeologists have viewed materialized memory in various ways: as passively continuous, discursively referenced, intentionally invented, obliterated. Key domains of inquiry include monuments, places, and
lieux de mémoire
; treatment and disposal of the dead; habitual practices and senses; the recent and contemporary past; and forgetting and erasure. Important contemporary work deploys archaeology as a tool of counter-memory in the aftermath of recent violence and trauma.</description><subject>Aftermath</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Collective memory</subject><subject>counter-memory</subject><subject>forgetting</subject><subject>Halbwachs, Maurice (1877-1945)</subject><subject>Intrusion</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Monuments</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>ruins</subject><subject>Social memory</subject><subject>time</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>0084-6570</issn><issn>1545-4290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1LAzEURYMoWKs_oVDQbfS9ZJKZATel-AUVF-o6vKaJbZlOajJV-u-dEnHv6i3evefCYewK4Rqx0DfUtrvovji13TIGjiAEVhwQQeERG6AqFC9EDcdsAFAVXKsSTtlZSmsAkFrqARtNol2SC0342I-pXYxfg11RM352mxD35-zEU5Pcxe8dsvf7u7fpI5-9PDxNJzNOPb7jlVRyDkhYOkTvhfBeey-V1raiuV1g7b2q53qha0QiW3iBpS2sApLWayuH7DJztzF87lzqzDrsYttPGiGhLnUpK9mnbnPKxpBSdN5s42pDcW8QzEGI-RVishCThZgspK-Pcn2duhD_ukWlFNQ9f8gm-X-gUNNzVu47_W_jByXud5s</recordid><startdate>20191021</startdate><enddate>20191021</enddate><creator>Van Dyke, Ruth M</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191021</creationdate><title>Archaeology and Social Memory</title><author>Van Dyke, Ruth M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-8353b01a17e11ff22ff6ff3566c8abcd19ff59b6d6911aac4f217c4c50a3cf6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aftermath</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Collective memory</topic><topic>counter-memory</topic><topic>forgetting</topic><topic>Halbwachs, Maurice (1877-1945)</topic><topic>Intrusion</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Monuments</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>ruins</topic><topic>Social memory</topic><topic>time</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Dyke, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Dyke, Ruth M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Archaeology and Social Memory</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle><date>2019-10-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>207-225</pages><issn>0084-6570</issn><eissn>1545-4290</eissn><abstract>This review provides a road map through current trends and issues in archaeological studies of memory. Many scholars continue to draw on Halbwachs for collective memory studies, emphasizing how the past can legitimate political authority. Others are inspired by Bergson, focusing on the persistent material intrusion of the past into the present. "Past in the past" studies are particularly widespread in the Near East Classical world, Europe, the Maya region, and Native North America. Archaeologists have viewed materialized memory in various ways: as passively continuous, discursively referenced, intentionally invented, obliterated. Key domains of inquiry include monuments, places, and
lieux de mémoire
; treatment and disposal of the dead; habitual practices and senses; the recent and contemporary past; and forgetting and erasure. Important contemporary work deploys archaeology as a tool of counter-memory in the aftermath of recent violence and trauma.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0084-6570 |
ispartof | Annual review of anthropology, 2019-10, Vol.48 (1), p.207-225 |
issn | 0084-6570 1545-4290 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_48550938 |
source | Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Aftermath Archaeology Collective memory counter-memory forgetting Halbwachs, Maurice (1877-1945) Intrusion Memory Monuments Politics ruins Social memory time Trauma |
title | Archaeology and Social Memory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A53%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_annua&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Archaeology%20and%20Social%20Memory&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20anthropology&rft.au=Van%20Dyke,%20Ruth%20M&rft.date=2019-10-21&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=207-225&rft.issn=0084-6570&rft.eissn=1545-4290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_annua%3E48550938%3C/jstor_annua%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309767383&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48550938&rfr_iscdi=true |