Archaeology and Social Memory

This review provides a road map through current trends and issues in archaeological studies of memory. Many scholars continue to draw on Halbwachs for collective memory studies, emphasizing how the past can legitimate political authority. Others are inspired by Bergson, focusing on the persistent ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annual review of anthropology 2019-10, Vol.48 (1), p.207-225
1. Verfasser: Van Dyke, Ruth M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 225
container_issue 1
container_start_page 207
container_title Annual review of anthropology
container_volume 48
creator Van Dyke, Ruth M
description This review provides a road map through current trends and issues in archaeological studies of memory. Many scholars continue to draw on Halbwachs for collective memory studies, emphasizing how the past can legitimate political authority. Others are inspired by Bergson, focusing on the persistent material intrusion of the past into the present. "Past in the past" studies are particularly widespread in the Near East Classical world, Europe, the Maya region, and Native North America. Archaeologists have viewed materialized memory in various ways: as passively continuous, discursively referenced, intentionally invented, obliterated. Key domains of inquiry include monuments, places, and lieux de mémoire ; treatment and disposal of the dead; habitual practices and senses; the recent and contemporary past; and forgetting and erasure. Important contemporary work deploys archaeology as a tool of counter-memory in the aftermath of recent violence and trauma.
doi_str_mv 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_annua</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_48550938</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48550938</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48550938</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-8353b01a17e11ff22ff6ff3566c8abcd19ff59b6d6911aac4f217c4c50a3cf6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkE1LAzEURYMoWKs_oVDQbfS9ZJKZATel-AUVF-o6vKaJbZlOajJV-u-dEnHv6i3evefCYewK4Rqx0DfUtrvovji13TIGjiAEVhwQQeERG6AqFC9EDcdsAFAVXKsSTtlZSmsAkFrqARtNol2SC0342I-pXYxfg11RM352mxD35-zEU5Pcxe8dsvf7u7fpI5-9PDxNJzNOPb7jlVRyDkhYOkTvhfBeey-V1raiuV1g7b2q53qha0QiW3iBpS2sApLWayuH7DJztzF87lzqzDrsYttPGiGhLnUpK9mnbnPKxpBSdN5s42pDcW8QzEGI-RVishCThZgspK-Pcn2duhD_ukWlFNQ9f8gm-X-gUNNzVu47_W_jByXud5s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2309767383</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Archaeology and Social Memory</title><source>Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Van Dyke, Ruth M</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Dyke, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><description>This review provides a road map through current trends and issues in archaeological studies of memory. Many scholars continue to draw on Halbwachs for collective memory studies, emphasizing how the past can legitimate political authority. Others are inspired by Bergson, focusing on the persistent material intrusion of the past into the present. "Past in the past" studies are particularly widespread in the Near East Classical world, Europe, the Maya region, and Native North America. Archaeologists have viewed materialized memory in various ways: as passively continuous, discursively referenced, intentionally invented, obliterated. Key domains of inquiry include monuments, places, and lieux de mémoire ; treatment and disposal of the dead; habitual practices and senses; the recent and contemporary past; and forgetting and erasure. Important contemporary work deploys archaeology as a tool of counter-memory in the aftermath of recent violence and trauma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0084-6570</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-4290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Palo Alto: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Aftermath ; Archaeology ; Collective memory ; counter-memory ; forgetting ; Halbwachs, Maurice (1877-1945) ; Intrusion ; Memory ; Monuments ; Politics ; ruins ; Social memory ; time ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>Annual review of anthropology, 2019-10, Vol.48 (1), p.207-225</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 by Annual Reviews</rights><rights>Copyright Annual Reviews, Inc. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-8353b01a17e11ff22ff6ff3566c8abcd19ff59b6d6911aac4f217c4c50a3cf6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-8353b01a17e11ff22ff6ff3566c8abcd19ff59b6d6911aac4f217c4c50a3cf6c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051?crawler=true&amp;mimetype=application/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051$$EHTML$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>70,314,778,782,4170,27907,27908,33757,78005,78006</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Dyke, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><title>Archaeology and Social Memory</title><title>Annual review of anthropology</title><description>This review provides a road map through current trends and issues in archaeological studies of memory. Many scholars continue to draw on Halbwachs for collective memory studies, emphasizing how the past can legitimate political authority. Others are inspired by Bergson, focusing on the persistent material intrusion of the past into the present. "Past in the past" studies are particularly widespread in the Near East Classical world, Europe, the Maya region, and Native North America. Archaeologists have viewed materialized memory in various ways: as passively continuous, discursively referenced, intentionally invented, obliterated. Key domains of inquiry include monuments, places, and lieux de mémoire ; treatment and disposal of the dead; habitual practices and senses; the recent and contemporary past; and forgetting and erasure. Important contemporary work deploys archaeology as a tool of counter-memory in the aftermath of recent violence and trauma.</description><subject>Aftermath</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Collective memory</subject><subject>counter-memory</subject><subject>forgetting</subject><subject>Halbwachs, Maurice (1877-1945)</subject><subject>Intrusion</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Monuments</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>ruins</subject><subject>Social memory</subject><subject>time</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>0084-6570</issn><issn>1545-4290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkE1LAzEURYMoWKs_oVDQbfS9ZJKZATel-AUVF-o6vKaJbZlOajJV-u-dEnHv6i3evefCYewK4Rqx0DfUtrvovji13TIGjiAEVhwQQeERG6AqFC9EDcdsAFAVXKsSTtlZSmsAkFrqARtNol2SC0342I-pXYxfg11RM352mxD35-zEU5Pcxe8dsvf7u7fpI5-9PDxNJzNOPb7jlVRyDkhYOkTvhfBeey-V1raiuV1g7b2q53qha0QiW3iBpS2sApLWayuH7DJztzF87lzqzDrsYttPGiGhLnUpK9mnbnPKxpBSdN5s42pDcW8QzEGI-RVishCThZgspK-Pcn2duhD_ukWlFNQ9f8gm-X-gUNNzVu47_W_jByXud5s</recordid><startdate>20191021</startdate><enddate>20191021</enddate><creator>Van Dyke, Ruth M</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><general>Annual Reviews, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191021</creationdate><title>Archaeology and Social Memory</title><author>Van Dyke, Ruth M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a429t-8353b01a17e11ff22ff6ff3566c8abcd19ff59b6d6911aac4f217c4c50a3cf6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aftermath</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Collective memory</topic><topic>counter-memory</topic><topic>forgetting</topic><topic>Halbwachs, Maurice (1877-1945)</topic><topic>Intrusion</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Monuments</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>ruins</topic><topic>Social memory</topic><topic>time</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Dyke, Ruth M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Dyke, Ruth M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Archaeology and Social Memory</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of anthropology</jtitle><date>2019-10-21</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>207-225</pages><issn>0084-6570</issn><eissn>1545-4290</eissn><abstract>This review provides a road map through current trends and issues in archaeological studies of memory. Many scholars continue to draw on Halbwachs for collective memory studies, emphasizing how the past can legitimate political authority. Others are inspired by Bergson, focusing on the persistent material intrusion of the past into the present. "Past in the past" studies are particularly widespread in the Near East Classical world, Europe, the Maya region, and Native North America. Archaeologists have viewed materialized memory in various ways: as passively continuous, discursively referenced, intentionally invented, obliterated. Key domains of inquiry include monuments, places, and lieux de mémoire ; treatment and disposal of the dead; habitual practices and senses; the recent and contemporary past; and forgetting and erasure. Important contemporary work deploys archaeology as a tool of counter-memory in the aftermath of recent violence and trauma.</abstract><cop>Palo Alto</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><doi>10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0084-6570
ispartof Annual review of anthropology, 2019-10, Vol.48 (1), p.207-225
issn 0084-6570
1545-4290
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_48550938
source Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Aftermath
Archaeology
Collective memory
counter-memory
forgetting
Halbwachs, Maurice (1877-1945)
Intrusion
Memory
Monuments
Politics
ruins
Social memory
time
Trauma
title Archaeology and Social Memory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T00%3A53%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_annua&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Archaeology%20and%20Social%20Memory&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20anthropology&rft.au=Van%20Dyke,%20Ruth%20M&rft.date=2019-10-21&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=207-225&rft.issn=0084-6570&rft.eissn=1545-4290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011051&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_annua%3E48550938%3C/jstor_annua%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2309767383&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=48550938&rfr_iscdi=true