Management as ideology: the case of 'new managerialism' in higher education
The paper explores ideological conceptions of management, especially 'new managerialism', with particular reference to their role in the reform of higher education. It is suggested that attempts to reform public services in general are political as well as technical, though there is no sin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oxford review of education 2005-06, Vol.31 (2), p.217-235 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 235 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 217 |
container_title | Oxford review of education |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Deem, Rosemary Brehony, Kevin J |
description | The paper explores ideological conceptions of management, especially 'new managerialism', with particular reference to their role in the reform of higher education. It is suggested that attempts to reform public services in general are political as well as technical, though there is no single unitary ideology of 'new managerialism'. Whilst some argue that managers have become a class and have particular interests, this may not be so for all public services. The arguments presented are illustrated by data taken from a recent research project on the management of UK higher education. It is suggested that managers in public service organisations such as universities do not constitute a class. However, as in the case of manager-academics, managing a contemporary public service such as higher education may involve taking on the ideologies and values of 'new managerialism', and for some, embracing these. So management ideologies do seem to serve the interests of manager-academics and help cement relations of power and dominance, even in contexts like universities which were not traditionally associated with the dominance of management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03054980500117827 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_dipf_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_4618615</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ719262</ericid><jstor_id>4618615</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4618615</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-4d35037e2e6d258487c85c0210af874fe26545b62e960f81ddb15b63553c74b83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE9LHDEYh4NUcKv9AJYegod6Gpv_yYiXItraWnppzyGbyexmmUnWJIvdb9-sIwoK7SmE3_PkzfsD4BijM4wU-oQo4qxViCOEsVRE7oEZZoI3tMX8DZjt8qYC_AC8zXmFEBKS0Rn4_sMEs3CjCwWaDH3n4hAX23NYlg5akx2MPTwN7h6OD2DyZvB5PIU-wKVfLF2CrttYU3wMR2C_N0N27x7PQ_D7-urX5dfm9ueXm8vPt43lFJeGdZQjKh1xoiNcMSWt4hYRjEyvJOsdEZzxuSCuFahXuOvmuF4p59RKNlf0EHyc3l2neLdxuejRZ-uGwQQXN1lThXlbS6jgyQtwFTcp1L9pgrmiSlJeITxBNsWck-v1OvnRpK3GSO-61a-6rc6Hyal92Cf-6pvELRHkOV7lEtNTzgRWAu8mXkyxD31Mo7mPaeh0Mdshpj6ZYH3d4V_D5X_1V5Yuf0o1309m59fPa4qWKqHoX4Tfqdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215838735</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Management as ideology: the case of 'new managerialism' in higher education</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Deem, Rosemary ; Brehony, Kevin J</creator><creatorcontrib>Deem, Rosemary ; Brehony, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><description>The paper explores ideological conceptions of management, especially 'new managerialism', with particular reference to their role in the reform of higher education. It is suggested that attempts to reform public services in general are political as well as technical, though there is no single unitary ideology of 'new managerialism'. Whilst some argue that managers have become a class and have particular interests, this may not be so for all public services. The arguments presented are illustrated by data taken from a recent research project on the management of UK higher education. It is suggested that managers in public service organisations such as universities do not constitute a class. However, as in the case of manager-academics, managing a contemporary public service such as higher education may involve taking on the ideologies and values of 'new managerialism', and for some, embracing these. So management ideologies do seem to serve the interests of manager-academics and help cement relations of power and dominance, even in contexts like universities which were not traditionally associated with the dominance of management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-4985</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-3915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03054980500117827</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Taylor and Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Academic profession ; Administrator Role ; Administrators ; Business management ; Education ; Education reform ; Educational Administration ; Educational Change ; Educational research ; Einstellung (Psy) ; Empirische Untersuchung ; Foreign Countries ; Government services ; Großbritannien ; Higher Education ; Hochschule ; Hochschulleitung ; Hochschulreform ; Ideologie ; Ideology ; Knowledge management ; Management ; Managerialism ; Open universities ; Performance management ; Politics ; Power Structure ; Public Service ; Staff ; Universities ; Öffentlicher Dienst</subject><ispartof>Oxford review of education, 2005-06, Vol.31 (2), p.217-235</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2005</rights><rights>Copyright 2005 Taylor & Francis Group Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Carfax Publishing Company Jun 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-4d35037e2e6d258487c85c0210af874fe26545b62e960f81ddb15b63553c74b83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-4d35037e2e6d258487c85c0210af874fe26545b62e960f81ddb15b63553c74b83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4618615$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4618615$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27843,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=693868$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ719262$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Deem, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brehony, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><title>Management as ideology: the case of 'new managerialism' in higher education</title><title>Oxford review of education</title><description>The paper explores ideological conceptions of management, especially 'new managerialism', with particular reference to their role in the reform of higher education. It is suggested that attempts to reform public services in general are political as well as technical, though there is no single unitary ideology of 'new managerialism'. Whilst some argue that managers have become a class and have particular interests, this may not be so for all public services. The arguments presented are illustrated by data taken from a recent research project on the management of UK higher education. It is suggested that managers in public service organisations such as universities do not constitute a class. However, as in the case of manager-academics, managing a contemporary public service such as higher education may involve taking on the ideologies and values of 'new managerialism', and for some, embracing these. So management ideologies do seem to serve the interests of manager-academics and help cement relations of power and dominance, even in contexts like universities which were not traditionally associated with the dominance of management.</description><subject>Academic profession</subject><subject>Administrator Role</subject><subject>Administrators</subject><subject>Business management</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education reform</subject><subject>Educational Administration</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Einstellung (Psy)</subject><subject>Empirische Untersuchung</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Government services</subject><subject>Großbritannien</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Hochschule</subject><subject>Hochschulleitung</subject><subject>Hochschulreform</subject><subject>Ideologie</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Managerialism</subject><subject>Open universities</subject><subject>Performance management</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power Structure</subject><subject>Public Service</subject><subject>Staff</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Öffentlicher Dienst</subject><issn>0305-4985</issn><issn>1465-3915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE9LHDEYh4NUcKv9AJYegod6Gpv_yYiXItraWnppzyGbyexmmUnWJIvdb9-sIwoK7SmE3_PkzfsD4BijM4wU-oQo4qxViCOEsVRE7oEZZoI3tMX8DZjt8qYC_AC8zXmFEBKS0Rn4_sMEs3CjCwWaDH3n4hAX23NYlg5akx2MPTwN7h6OD2DyZvB5PIU-wKVfLF2CrttYU3wMR2C_N0N27x7PQ_D7-urX5dfm9ueXm8vPt43lFJeGdZQjKh1xoiNcMSWt4hYRjEyvJOsdEZzxuSCuFahXuOvmuF4p59RKNlf0EHyc3l2neLdxuejRZ-uGwQQXN1lThXlbS6jgyQtwFTcp1L9pgrmiSlJeITxBNsWck-v1OvnRpK3GSO-61a-6rc6Hyal92Cf-6pvELRHkOV7lEtNTzgRWAu8mXkyxD31Mo7mPaeh0Mdshpj6ZYH3d4V_D5X_1V5Yuf0o1309m59fPa4qWKqHoX4Tfqdw</recordid><startdate>20050601</startdate><enddate>20050601</enddate><creator>Deem, Rosemary</creator><creator>Brehony, Kevin J</creator><general>Taylor and Francis Ltd</general><general>Carfax Publishing</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group Journals</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050601</creationdate><title>Management as ideology: the case of 'new managerialism' in higher education</title><author>Deem, Rosemary ; Brehony, Kevin J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c531t-4d35037e2e6d258487c85c0210af874fe26545b62e960f81ddb15b63553c74b83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Academic profession</topic><topic>Administrator Role</topic><topic>Administrators</topic><topic>Business management</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education reform</topic><topic>Educational Administration</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Einstellung (Psy)</topic><topic>Empirische Untersuchung</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Government services</topic><topic>Großbritannien</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Hochschule</topic><topic>Hochschulleitung</topic><topic>Hochschulreform</topic><topic>Ideologie</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Managerialism</topic><topic>Open universities</topic><topic>Performance management</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power Structure</topic><topic>Public Service</topic><topic>Staff</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Öffentlicher Dienst</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Deem, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brehony, Kevin J</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Oxford review of education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Deem, Rosemary</au><au>Brehony, Kevin J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ719262</ericid><atitle>Management as ideology: the case of 'new managerialism' in higher education</atitle><jtitle>Oxford review of education</jtitle><date>2005-06-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>217-235</pages><issn>0305-4985</issn><eissn>1465-3915</eissn><abstract>The paper explores ideological conceptions of management, especially 'new managerialism', with particular reference to their role in the reform of higher education. It is suggested that attempts to reform public services in general are political as well as technical, though there is no single unitary ideology of 'new managerialism'. Whilst some argue that managers have become a class and have particular interests, this may not be so for all public services. The arguments presented are illustrated by data taken from a recent research project on the management of UK higher education. It is suggested that managers in public service organisations such as universities do not constitute a class. However, as in the case of manager-academics, managing a contemporary public service such as higher education may involve taking on the ideologies and values of 'new managerialism', and for some, embracing these. So management ideologies do seem to serve the interests of manager-academics and help cement relations of power and dominance, even in contexts like universities which were not traditionally associated with the dominance of management.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Taylor and Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/03054980500117827</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-4985 |
ispartof | Oxford review of education, 2005-06, Vol.31 (2), p.217-235 |
issn | 0305-4985 1465-3915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_4618615 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; PAIS Index |
subjects | Academic profession Administrator Role Administrators Business management Education Education reform Educational Administration Educational Change Educational research Einstellung (Psy) Empirische Untersuchung Foreign Countries Government services Großbritannien Higher Education Hochschule Hochschulleitung Hochschulreform Ideologie Ideology Knowledge management Management Managerialism Open universities Performance management Politics Power Structure Public Service Staff Universities Öffentlicher Dienst |
title | Management as ideology: the case of 'new managerialism' in higher education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T17%3A21%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_dipf_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Management%20as%20ideology:%20the%20case%20of%20'new%20managerialism'%20in%20higher%20education&rft.jtitle=Oxford%20review%20of%20education&rft.au=Deem,%20Rosemary&rft.date=2005-06-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=217-235&rft.issn=0305-4985&rft.eissn=1465-3915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03054980500117827&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_dipf_%3E4618615%3C/jstor_dipf_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215838735&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ719262&rft_jstor_id=4618615&rfr_iscdi=true |