Teachers' and Students' Belief Systems About the Self-Regulation of Learning
Contemporary theories of learning and instruction emphasise the importance of students knowing how to effectively regulate their learning. A large body of research indicates that effective regulation of learning is beneficial for achievement. Set against this research are findings showing that the p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational psychology review 2019-03, Vol.31 (1), p.223-251 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 251 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Educational psychology review |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Lawson, Michael J. Vosniadou, Stella Van Deur, Penny Wyra, Mirella Jeffries, David |
description | Contemporary theories of learning and instruction emphasise the importance of students knowing how to effectively regulate their learning. A large body of research indicates that effective regulation of learning is beneficial for achievement. Set against this research are findings showing that the promotion by teachers of strategies for the self-regulation of learning (SRL), and student use of these strategies, is less common than might be expected. We review this research on the promotion and use of SRL strategies and suggest that a range of beliefs about learning and SRL strategies limit the promotion of SRL learning strategies by teachers. This contributes in turn to the lack of knowledge and use of such strategies by students. These beliefs are represented as forming an interrelated system that needs to be made explicit and examined in order to increase the level of SRL strategy promotion and use. Each of the beliefs is described and the paper concludes with discussion of the implications of the review for teacher educators, teachers, students, school leaders, curriculum designers and researchers. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10648-018-9453-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_45133326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A713723208</galeid><ericid>EJ1206587</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.232542</informt_id><jstor_id>45133326</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A713723208</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-4f0df0c80d35797bab032081749afb5240e807d307f15722bdf01d2ef043a4783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1r3DAQNaGFpml-QA8BQw89KR192NJeCtuQfrFQ6CaQm5DtkVeL19pK8iH_vvJ6SW9FB0kz772Z94riPYVbCiA_RQq1UASoIitRcSIviktaSU44r59e5TcIIJLVT2-KtzHuAWAlBb8sNg9o2h2G-LE0Y1du09ThmPLvCw4Obbl9jgkPsVw3fkpl2mG5xcGS39hPg0nOj6W35QZNGN3YvyteWzNEvD7fV8Xj1_uHu-9k8-vbj7v1hrSiEokIC52FVkHHK7mSjWmAM1BUipWxTcUEoALZcZA2W2CsyWjaMbQguBFS8aviw6J7DP7PhDHpvZ_CmEdqRqmiXNWCZdTtgurNgNqN1qdg2nw6PLjWj2hdrq8l5ZLN8zOBLoQ2-BgDWn0M7mDCs6ag55T1krLOKes5ZS0z52bhYHDtC_7-J2VQV2rus6Ufc2_sMfxb9X-inxdSOLikDbpj0jFn3O5ONk5VH3rdeTercE7rMyobqU7Wz1vtY_LhZS1RUc45q_lfNjumOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2118138642</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teachers' and Students' Belief Systems About the Self-Regulation of Learning</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Lawson, Michael J. ; Vosniadou, Stella ; Van Deur, Penny ; Wyra, Mirella ; Jeffries, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Michael J. ; Vosniadou, Stella ; Van Deur, Penny ; Wyra, Mirella ; Jeffries, David</creatorcontrib><description>Contemporary theories of learning and instruction emphasise the importance of students knowing how to effectively regulate their learning. A large body of research indicates that effective regulation of learning is beneficial for achievement. Set against this research are findings showing that the promotion by teachers of strategies for the self-regulation of learning (SRL), and student use of these strategies, is less common than might be expected. We review this research on the promotion and use of SRL strategies and suggest that a range of beliefs about learning and SRL strategies limit the promotion of SRL learning strategies by teachers. This contributes in turn to the lack of knowledge and use of such strategies by students. These beliefs are represented as forming an interrelated system that needs to be made explicit and examined in order to increase the level of SRL strategy promotion and use. Each of the beliefs is described and the paper concludes with discussion of the implications of the review for teacher educators, teachers, students, school leaders, curriculum designers and researchers.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-726X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-336X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10648-018-9453-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer</publisher><subject>Child and School Psychology ; Education ; Educational Psychology ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Learner Engagement ; Learning ; Learning and Instruction ; Learning Strategies ; Learning Theories ; Literature reviews ; Pedagogy ; Primary secondary education ; REFLECTION ON THE FIELD ; Self Management ; Student Behavior ; Student beliefs ; Student Role ; Students ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher beliefs ; Teacher Educators ; Teachers ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>Educational psychology review, 2019-03, Vol.31 (1), p.223-251</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Springer</rights><rights>Educational Psychology Review is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-4f0df0c80d35797bab032081749afb5240e807d307f15722bdf01d2ef043a4783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-4f0df0c80d35797bab032081749afb5240e807d307f15722bdf01d2ef043a4783</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0175-3683</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45133326$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45133326$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1206587$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vosniadou, Stella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Deur, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyra, Mirella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffries, David</creatorcontrib><title>Teachers' and Students' Belief Systems About the Self-Regulation of Learning</title><title>Educational psychology review</title><addtitle>Educ Psychol Rev</addtitle><description>Contemporary theories of learning and instruction emphasise the importance of students knowing how to effectively regulate their learning. A large body of research indicates that effective regulation of learning is beneficial for achievement. Set against this research are findings showing that the promotion by teachers of strategies for the self-regulation of learning (SRL), and student use of these strategies, is less common than might be expected. We review this research on the promotion and use of SRL strategies and suggest that a range of beliefs about learning and SRL strategies limit the promotion of SRL learning strategies by teachers. This contributes in turn to the lack of knowledge and use of such strategies by students. These beliefs are represented as forming an interrelated system that needs to be made explicit and examined in order to increase the level of SRL strategy promotion and use. Each of the beliefs is described and the paper concludes with discussion of the implications of the review for teacher educators, teachers, students, school leaders, curriculum designers and researchers.</description><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Psychology</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning and Instruction</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Primary secondary education</subject><subject>REFLECTION ON THE FIELD</subject><subject>Self Management</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Student beliefs</subject><subject>Student Role</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher beliefs</subject><subject>Teacher Educators</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>1040-726X</issn><issn>1573-336X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UE1r3DAQNaGFpml-QA8BQw89KR192NJeCtuQfrFQ6CaQm5DtkVeL19pK8iH_vvJ6SW9FB0kz772Z94riPYVbCiA_RQq1UASoIitRcSIviktaSU44r59e5TcIIJLVT2-KtzHuAWAlBb8sNg9o2h2G-LE0Y1du09ThmPLvCw4Obbl9jgkPsVw3fkpl2mG5xcGS39hPg0nOj6W35QZNGN3YvyteWzNEvD7fV8Xj1_uHu-9k8-vbj7v1hrSiEokIC52FVkHHK7mSjWmAM1BUipWxTcUEoALZcZA2W2CsyWjaMbQguBFS8aviw6J7DP7PhDHpvZ_CmEdqRqmiXNWCZdTtgurNgNqN1qdg2nw6PLjWj2hdrq8l5ZLN8zOBLoQ2-BgDWn0M7mDCs6ag55T1krLOKes5ZS0z52bhYHDtC_7-J2VQV2rus6Ufc2_sMfxb9X-inxdSOLikDbpj0jFn3O5ONk5VH3rdeTercE7rMyobqU7Wz1vtY_LhZS1RUc45q_lfNjumOg</recordid><startdate>20190301</startdate><enddate>20190301</enddate><creator>Lawson, Michael J.</creator><creator>Vosniadou, Stella</creator><creator>Van Deur, Penny</creator><creator>Wyra, Mirella</creator><creator>Jeffries, David</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0175-3683</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190301</creationdate><title>Teachers' and Students' Belief Systems About the Self-Regulation of Learning</title><author>Lawson, Michael J. ; Vosniadou, Stella ; Van Deur, Penny ; Wyra, Mirella ; Jeffries, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-4f0df0c80d35797bab032081749afb5240e807d307f15722bdf01d2ef043a4783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Psychology</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning and Instruction</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Primary secondary education</topic><topic>REFLECTION ON THE FIELD</topic><topic>Self Management</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Student beliefs</topic><topic>Student Role</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher beliefs</topic><topic>Teacher Educators</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vosniadou, Stella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Deur, Penny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyra, Mirella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeffries, David</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lawson, Michael J.</au><au>Vosniadou, Stella</au><au>Van Deur, Penny</au><au>Wyra, Mirella</au><au>Jeffries, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1206587</ericid><atitle>Teachers' and Students' Belief Systems About the Self-Regulation of Learning</atitle><jtitle>Educational psychology review</jtitle><stitle>Educ Psychol Rev</stitle><date>2019-03-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>223-251</pages><issn>1040-726X</issn><eissn>1573-336X</eissn><abstract>Contemporary theories of learning and instruction emphasise the importance of students knowing how to effectively regulate their learning. A large body of research indicates that effective regulation of learning is beneficial for achievement. Set against this research are findings showing that the promotion by teachers of strategies for the self-regulation of learning (SRL), and student use of these strategies, is less common than might be expected. We review this research on the promotion and use of SRL strategies and suggest that a range of beliefs about learning and SRL strategies limit the promotion of SRL learning strategies by teachers. This contributes in turn to the lack of knowledge and use of such strategies by students. These beliefs are represented as forming an interrelated system that needs to be made explicit and examined in order to increase the level of SRL strategy promotion and use. Each of the beliefs is described and the paper concludes with discussion of the implications of the review for teacher educators, teachers, students, school leaders, curriculum designers and researchers.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10648-018-9453-7</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0175-3683</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1040-726X |
ispartof | Educational psychology review, 2019-03, Vol.31 (1), p.223-251 |
issn | 1040-726X 1573-336X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_jstor_primary_45133326 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Child and School Psychology Education Educational Psychology Laws, regulations and rules Learner Engagement Learning Learning and Instruction Learning Strategies Learning Theories Literature reviews Pedagogy Primary secondary education REFLECTION ON THE FIELD Self Management Student Behavior Student beliefs Student Role Students Teacher Attitudes Teacher beliefs Teacher Educators Teachers Teaching methods |
title | Teachers' and Students' Belief Systems About the Self-Regulation of Learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T10%3A18%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teachers'%20and%20Students'%20Belief%20Systems%20About%20the%20Self-Regulation%20of%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Educational%20psychology%20review&rft.au=Lawson,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2019-03-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=223-251&rft.issn=1040-726X&rft.eissn=1573-336X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10648-018-9453-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_jstor%3EA713723208%3C/gale_jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2118138642&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A713723208&rft_ericid=EJ1206587&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.232542&rft_jstor_id=45133326&rfr_iscdi=true |