Confirmation of the Syva Micro Trak Enzyme Immunoassay for Chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test

Background and Objectives: The Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is used widely for screening women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Confirmatory tests used in conjunction with EIA screening have shown that false-positive results are common. Goals: To evaluate the specificity of the Syva M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sexually transmitted diseases 1996-11, Vol.23 (6), p.465-470
Hauptverfasser: BEEBE, JAMES L., MASTERS, HELEN, JUNGKIND, DONALD, HELTZEL, DAVID M., WEINBERG, ADRIANA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 470
container_issue 6
container_start_page 465
container_title Sexually transmitted diseases
container_volume 23
creator BEEBE, JAMES L.
MASTERS, HELEN
JUNGKIND, DONALD
HELTZEL, DAVID M.
WEINBERG, ADRIANA
description Background and Objectives: The Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is used widely for screening women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Confirmatory tests used in conjunction with EIA screening have shown that false-positive results are common. Goals: To evaluate the specificity of the Syva MicroTrak EIA by confirmation of positive specimens with the Syva Direct Fluorescent Specimen Test. Study Design: Of 6,039 endocervical specimens collected from women attending Colorado family planning clinics, 328 positive EIA results (5.4%) were obtained by Syva MicroTrak EIA. A random subset of 136 positive specimens was tested by Syva Direct Specimen Test. Twenty of 136 specimens (14.7%) negative by Syva Direct Specimen testing were also tested by Syva blocking antibody tests (9 of 20 positive, 45%) and Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR; 6 of 20 positive, 30%). Of 20 specimens positive by Syva MicroTrak EIA and negative by Syva Direct Specimen Test, 11 (55%) were also negative by blocking antibody and PCR, including three specimens with initial EIA sample-to-cutoff ratios greater than 2. Conclusions: Confirmatory testing of Syva MicroTrak EIA positive specimens with Syva Direct Specimen Test showed that 14.7% were false positive. Coupling the Syva Direct Specimen test with either blocking antibody or PCR reduces the rate of false-positive results to 8%.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_jstor_primary_44964847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44964847</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44964847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-jstor_primary_449648473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjMFqwkAURQepYKp-gvB-IJCpE6NLSZV20VWzl2eckNHMPHlvLIxfL9Luu7ocDueOVKbLZZWb8k2_qKzQZp2Xla4m6lXkXDy50JlKNYXOscfoKAB1EHsL3-kH4cu1TNAwXmAX7slb-PT-FghFMEFHDHU_oE8nhxAZ256eJwLH9Nu_O7ZthP1wI7bS2hBhG6I70ilBYyXO1LjDQez8b6dqsd819Ud-lkh8uLLzyOlgzGZl1qZa_ucfOmlLPg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Confirmation of the Syva Micro Trak Enzyme Immunoassay for Chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>BEEBE, JAMES L. ; MASTERS, HELEN ; JUNGKIND, DONALD ; HELTZEL, DAVID M. ; WEINBERG, ADRIANA</creator><creatorcontrib>BEEBE, JAMES L. ; MASTERS, HELEN ; JUNGKIND, DONALD ; HELTZEL, DAVID M. ; WEINBERG, ADRIANA</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives: The Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is used widely for screening women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Confirmatory tests used in conjunction with EIA screening have shown that false-positive results are common. Goals: To evaluate the specificity of the Syva MicroTrak EIA by confirmation of positive specimens with the Syva Direct Fluorescent Specimen Test. Study Design: Of 6,039 endocervical specimens collected from women attending Colorado family planning clinics, 328 positive EIA results (5.4%) were obtained by Syva MicroTrak EIA. A random subset of 136 positive specimens was tested by Syva Direct Specimen Test. Twenty of 136 specimens (14.7%) negative by Syva Direct Specimen testing were also tested by Syva blocking antibody tests (9 of 20 positive, 45%) and Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR; 6 of 20 positive, 30%). Of 20 specimens positive by Syva MicroTrak EIA and negative by Syva Direct Specimen Test, 11 (55%) were also negative by blocking antibody and PCR, including three specimens with initial EIA sample-to-cutoff ratios greater than 2. Conclusions: Confirmatory testing of Syva MicroTrak EIA positive specimens with Syva Direct Specimen Test showed that 14.7% were false positive. Coupling the Syva Direct Specimen test with either blocking antibody or PCR reduces the rate of false-positive results to 8%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-5717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-4521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</publisher><subject>Original Articles</subject><ispartof>Sexually transmitted diseases, 1996-11, Vol.23 (6), p.465-470</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1996 American Venereal Disease Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44964847$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44964847$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BEEBE, JAMES L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MASTERS, HELEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUNGKIND, DONALD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELTZEL, DAVID M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEINBERG, ADRIANA</creatorcontrib><title>Confirmation of the Syva Micro Trak Enzyme Immunoassay for Chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test</title><title>Sexually transmitted diseases</title><description>Background and Objectives: The Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is used widely for screening women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Confirmatory tests used in conjunction with EIA screening have shown that false-positive results are common. Goals: To evaluate the specificity of the Syva MicroTrak EIA by confirmation of positive specimens with the Syva Direct Fluorescent Specimen Test. Study Design: Of 6,039 endocervical specimens collected from women attending Colorado family planning clinics, 328 positive EIA results (5.4%) were obtained by Syva MicroTrak EIA. A random subset of 136 positive specimens was tested by Syva Direct Specimen Test. Twenty of 136 specimens (14.7%) negative by Syva Direct Specimen testing were also tested by Syva blocking antibody tests (9 of 20 positive, 45%) and Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR; 6 of 20 positive, 30%). Of 20 specimens positive by Syva MicroTrak EIA and negative by Syva Direct Specimen Test, 11 (55%) were also negative by blocking antibody and PCR, including three specimens with initial EIA sample-to-cutoff ratios greater than 2. Conclusions: Confirmatory testing of Syva MicroTrak EIA positive specimens with Syva Direct Specimen Test showed that 14.7% were false positive. Coupling the Syva Direct Specimen test with either blocking antibody or PCR reduces the rate of false-positive results to 8%.</description><subject>Original Articles</subject><issn>0148-5717</issn><issn>1537-4521</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqFjMFqwkAURQepYKp-gvB-IJCpE6NLSZV20VWzl2eckNHMPHlvLIxfL9Luu7ocDueOVKbLZZWb8k2_qKzQZp2Xla4m6lXkXDy50JlKNYXOscfoKAB1EHsL3-kH4cu1TNAwXmAX7slb-PT-FghFMEFHDHU_oE8nhxAZ256eJwLH9Nu_O7ZthP1wI7bS2hBhG6I70ilBYyXO1LjDQez8b6dqsd819Ud-lkh8uLLzyOlgzGZl1qZa_ucfOmlLPg</recordid><startdate>19961101</startdate><startdate>19961201</startdate><enddate>19961101</enddate><enddate>19961201</enddate><creator>BEEBE, JAMES L.</creator><creator>MASTERS, HELEN</creator><creator>JUNGKIND, DONALD</creator><creator>HELTZEL, DAVID M.</creator><creator>WEINBERG, ADRIANA</creator><general>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19961101</creationdate><title>Confirmation of the Syva Micro Trak Enzyme Immunoassay for Chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test</title><author>BEEBE, JAMES L. ; MASTERS, HELEN ; JUNGKIND, DONALD ; HELTZEL, DAVID M. ; WEINBERG, ADRIANA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-jstor_primary_449648473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Original Articles</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BEEBE, JAMES L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MASTERS, HELEN</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JUNGKIND, DONALD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HELTZEL, DAVID M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEINBERG, ADRIANA</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Sexually transmitted diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BEEBE, JAMES L.</au><au>MASTERS, HELEN</au><au>JUNGKIND, DONALD</au><au>HELTZEL, DAVID M.</au><au>WEINBERG, ADRIANA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Confirmation of the Syva Micro Trak Enzyme Immunoassay for Chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test</atitle><jtitle>Sexually transmitted diseases</jtitle><date>1996-11-01</date><date>1996-12-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>465</spage><epage>470</epage><pages>465-470</pages><issn>0148-5717</issn><eissn>1537-4521</eissn><abstract>Background and Objectives: The Syva MicroTrak enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is used widely for screening women infected with Chlamydia trachomatis. Confirmatory tests used in conjunction with EIA screening have shown that false-positive results are common. Goals: To evaluate the specificity of the Syva MicroTrak EIA by confirmation of positive specimens with the Syva Direct Fluorescent Specimen Test. Study Design: Of 6,039 endocervical specimens collected from women attending Colorado family planning clinics, 328 positive EIA results (5.4%) were obtained by Syva MicroTrak EIA. A random subset of 136 positive specimens was tested by Syva Direct Specimen Test. Twenty of 136 specimens (14.7%) negative by Syva Direct Specimen testing were also tested by Syva blocking antibody tests (9 of 20 positive, 45%) and Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction (PCR; 6 of 20 positive, 30%). Of 20 specimens positive by Syva MicroTrak EIA and negative by Syva Direct Specimen Test, 11 (55%) were also negative by blocking antibody and PCR, including three specimens with initial EIA sample-to-cutoff ratios greater than 2. Conclusions: Confirmatory testing of Syva MicroTrak EIA positive specimens with Syva Direct Specimen Test showed that 14.7% were false positive. Coupling the Syva Direct Specimen test with either blocking antibody or PCR reduces the rate of false-positive results to 8%.</abstract><pub>Lippincott-Raven Publishers</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-5717
ispartof Sexually transmitted diseases, 1996-11, Vol.23 (6), p.465-470
issn 0148-5717
1537-4521
language eng
recordid cdi_jstor_primary_44964847
source Journals@Ovid Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Original Articles
title Confirmation of the Syva Micro Trak Enzyme Immunoassay for Chlamydia trachomatis by Syva Direct Fluorescent Antibody Test
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T12%3A41%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Confirmation%20of%20the%20Syva%20Micro%20Trak%20Enzyme%20Immunoassay%20for%20Chlamydia%20trachomatis%20by%20Syva%20Direct%20Fluorescent%20Antibody%20Test&rft.jtitle=Sexually%20transmitted%20diseases&rft.au=BEEBE,%20JAMES%20L.&rft.date=1996-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=465&rft.epage=470&rft.pages=465-470&rft.issn=0148-5717&rft.eissn=1537-4521&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor%3E44964847%3C/jstor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44964847&rfr_iscdi=true